One of the tactics of communists is to destabilize a country by ripping out all the foundations of the society. History, morality, traditions all must be marginialized and eliminated as much as possible.
Here comes flat earth, to contribute to that. They love to come up with scientific-sounding explanations why the earth is a flat disk, and ignore basic physics. They toss around a lot of complex sounding explanations while ignoring observable facts and invent their own science. It's all done in an effort to destabilize the country, just like all the sexual madness that's being pushed.
Big lurker here....Why does everyone shit on this specific conspiracy theory on a conspiracy theory board? I see the normal posters come out and shit on it and random accounts shit on it.
It's fine to not agree with all conspiracy theories.
Flat earth is one that has too many logical holes in it to be true, which is why I don't put any faith in it. The few times I've gotten into a debate with actual flat earthers, and asked them for explanations on the holes in the theory, they resorted to name calling and just telling me that I'm stupid.
There are obviously people within the conspiracy theory sphere that intentionally poison the well, by putting forth theories that are so insane as to put off normies, to make conspiracy theorists appear nutty, and make it easier for the establishment to make blanket labels against us, that we're crazy. Flat earth is probably one of those theories. You can even see it in the controlled, curated, and censored forums (like Reddit), whenever someone brings up a legitimate conspiracy, they're drowned out by the hive mind who bring up those well poisoned theories, to denigrate the entire conspiracy theory sphere.
Genuine conspiracy theorists usually don't believe in every single conspiracy, as there's a few that are beyond the pale, even for them, even though most of us are a lot more open to possibility than normies. You can usually tell when someone isn't a genuine conspiracy theorist when they deny all conspiracies wholecloth (like u/vpnsurfer), or when they try to appear as crazy as possible. It's also obvious by how they talk (very vitriolic) and how they argue (constant logical fallacies and ad hominems).
I find it strange when vpnsurfer and TallestSkil agree on something...
There will be overlap on certain issues where the shills on a conspiracy board, the ones who deny everything (as a means of being an annoying discordant troll to push genuine users away), meet with genuine users who only disbelieve certain conspiracies. It actually makes sense.
In fairness, whether a theory is being used to denigrate conspiracy theorists is not a good way to evaluate its validity. 9/11 conspiracy theories were once used to denigrate theorists. Also (particularly pre-covid scam) a little phrase called "anti-vaxx".
Oh, I agree. There are legitimate, genuine conspiracy theorists who will believe just about any theory imaginable, and have their reasons for it. It's up in the air whether the more "out there" theories were thought up by genuine people, or by subversives. In any case, it's obvious that the more out there theories are absolutely used to poison the well. But, you're right, we shouldn't necessarily acquiesce to how others feel about us or our beliefs. I was only pointing out how subversives use those more fringe theories to denigrate the entire community, to deflect away from the things they'd rather not discuss, and many subversives will keep a fire lit under those fringe theories (and push it themselves) as a means to further their goal to paint this sphere as "crazy", or any number of other ad hominems.
Thank you.
Gee, I fucking wonder. I fucking wonder why we wouldn’t want delusional kike bullshit to be spammed alongside actual conspiracies to poison the well for people who come along to read. I wonder why jews have a vested interest in posting mental retardation alongside facts that expose their crimes.
It is a mystery.
And how nice is it that conspiracies.win doesn't ban these people, nor should they. Although ad hominem attacks show a lot about the level of discourse (both sides do it, but one more so than the other possibly due to strong indoctrination), it can help people to better handle these conversations in the future. Can't bash gaw and expect the same results.
Propaganda and indoctrination. Literally that’s it.
Edit: I’m actually a lurker too. I literally made this account today because of the ridiculous vitriol against the guy replying here with his honest opinion about the shape of the earth.
Proven falsehoods and paid shilling, you mean. Truth is not a matter of opinion.
It is when you are wrong and ill-formed. You are putting it in a showcase for everyone to see. You can’t support your points. Enough said.
YOU WON’T ANSWER.
You have included a bunch of 'statements' based on assumptions that also are based on the assumption that the earth is a globe.....
You do realise that.....
For example....you physics questions are irrelevant since you need to believe the globe for their theories to have the assumption basis they work from....
You have no 'facts' ..... You have axiomatic corollaries and assumptions.
You do realise that those 'scientific findings' that you base your opinions on are not probable without certain unprovable assumptions
Your sophistry is disgusting and humiliating. You’re physically incapable of answering any questions or proving your own claims. You’ve admitted Earth isn’t flat. Get out.
Because it's a retarded conspiracy for degenerates.
I don't think it is communists, instead I think it is dialectic thinking where people think that they can discover the truth through reasoning and arguments, not evidence. Most religion is dialectic thinking as is pre scientific thought.
Dialectic thinking permeates much of our culture, primarily in politics and education. It is a cancer that is hard to eradicate.
So… communists.
Yeah, you're right, obviously.
You’re dead on about everything else, of course.
COM (together; with) + DIA (two)...few suggest communism to tempt many together; ones consent to a suggestion by another one puts one and one together as two.
Whole (all perceivable) sets apart (each ones perception)...
That's dialectic thinking aka one vs one...want vs not want; true vs false; yes vs no; us vs them; me vs you; belief vs disbelief; on vs off; rich vs poor; love vs hate; good vs evil; left vs right; black vs white; vanilla vs chocolate; pepsi vs coke etc.
Reasoning implies two sides against one another.
DIA (two) LEG (to collect)...ones consent to another ones suggestion implies collecting two, hence holding onto suggested information within ones mind/memory, while thinking within a conflict of reason.
a) PER (forward) MEARE (to pass)...only nature permeates (inception towards death); each one passing (life) resists dying.
b) Temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death) needs to resist wanted temptation to cultivate self.
a) Cancer implies accumulation (life) during eradication (inception towards death)...life wants to hold onto (temptation); yet needs to let go (resistance).
b) Cancer/karkinos/kar - "hard"...being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death). Ignoring this by solidifying establishes constipation within procession. Life perceives this constipation as cancer.
He is right. The sun disappears due to the laws of perspective. The fact it disappears over the horizon proves neither that it is flat or round. Same goes for ships disappearing over the horizon on the sea. You need a different example to prove him wrong.
Per specio implies by partial; being implies within whole L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...others suggest pluralism (laws) to distract each singular partial from discerning oneself.
a) Flat implies line; round implies circle...only within line can a circle be shaped.
b) Cut a circle at any point and you'll have a bend line...being implies bending (life) within line (inception towards death).
c) Few utilize suggestion to tempt consenting many into circular reasoning aka "mind bending".
Parallel lines do meet!!!!
PAR'ALLEL, adjective (Gr. against or opposite, and one the other) aka ones (life) parallel to one another within line (inception towards death). It's few who tempt many to meet within conflicts of reason aka in opposition to one another, while ignoring that nature sets each one apart from one another.
Everything resolves on a higher plane.
a) Resolve aka ones response to being solved within all implies each thing (partial) within everything (whole).
b) SOLVE, verb - "separate the parts of any thing"...motion (inception towards death) dissolves into matter (life) internally, while matter (living) reacts to external solution (dying).
c) PLANE, noun - "even or level"...even (balance) generates odds (choice); odds struggles within even (low/high aka growth within loss).
Show your calculations.
I don’t have to do calculations in a piece of paper to prove an observable fact. Essentially, the further something is from you, the shorter it is from your perspective. This means that something that is actually much shorter than the object further off can and does block the object from the bottom up. The same goes for the sun. On a flat plane, like a long road for example, everything in the distance, both above the horizon and below collapses into a line to create the horizon. It’s a function of distance from the observable object, not the shape of the earth. I have actually done experiments to prove this with binoculars and a camera. What have you done besides sit there and think I am stupid?
No shit, fuckstick. Thanks for admitting Earth isn’t flat.
lol, you are ignorant and angry. Must be miserable.
Thanks for admitting the Earth isn’t flat.
Does that also happen when looking up?
Horizon rises to your eye level, key word being level. Looking up isn’t looking at something in a level manner, is it?
So when I look alog a plane, visibility is limited but when I don't look along a plane, it isn't.
What magical process causes this?
It’s called terrain. You know, the opaque ground?
Why does water have the same effect then?
How many suns would there have to be to have a flat earth model work? Sounds like the beginning of a joke. When I lived in Alaska you could stand in Homer in Winter at sunrise and watch the sun come up across Kachemak Bay (SE). In the evening you could watch the sun set out by Augustine Island (SW). If an amateur radio operator in Kansas has a directional antenna What direction would he have to point it to talk to someone in Brisbane, Australia? It is not the direction the flat earth map shows. Did you know that Tokyo is due West of Anchor Point, AK? Atlanta, GA is due East of Anchor Point AK. It works when you place a string on a globe.
All you have recognized is a cycle..... Btw....North, South, East, West.....
Those are relative to the sun.....
For those of a mind to, one should analyze this "FE" phenomenon from a "meta-perspective", outside of the issue of the shape of the Earth itself.
That is, consider those advocating the "wrong side". Certainly some are paid shills, so we can discount some portion, but there is a remainder. The rest are honest people, who we must conclude genuinely believe what they're saying.
One thing about them is that they cannot settle the issue for themselves. In fact, they don't even try. I've never heard any of them say, "Here's what I thought up as a test anyone can do. I did it and these are the results. I invite others to replicate the experiment and report those results, as is the practice in science." This reasoning process is totally alien to them.
I believe that the Dark Occultists, probably via their minions in Intelligence, studied the way the human mind works... and They found a flaw. Of course, this is precisely the way computers and other technical systems are hacked. A few years ago, They launched an exploit based on that flaw and here we are.
Again, science demands an accounting of all the evidence. As regards FE, that evidence includes the fact that numerous people sincerely believe something preposterous.
Your mind is gonna be blown when you figure out it's flat. WILL BE WILD
Couple handshake accounts are the main FE defenders. lol.
So just how thick is Flat Earth anyway?
Is it like a thin crust pizza or like a 4 layer cake?
How many miles deep would you have to dig a hole before you fell out the bottom?
Is it a circular disc, or square and stationary with 4 corners?
And if it is square wouldn't it be covered by a box instead of a dome?
🤔🤨
The sun sets.
I've personally spoken on the phone to family in America while I was in Australia, years ago. It was a sunny day for me, and it was dark night for them.
Additionally, I went stargazing in the wilderness while there. The North Star wasn't visible. The night's sky was entirely different.
Neither of those realities are possible with a disk model.
So is it really a circular disc?
Or is it square and stationary with 4 corners?
And if it is a square instead of a circle, wouldn't it be covered by a box instead of a dome?
🤔🤨
Sun goes in a cycle (discus)
Earth is not a perfect shape.....
yes, toward Thorntonbank Wind Farm (near the Belgian coast)
here's a photo
I didn't need to show any math. Underwater wind turbines don't work.
Your next line is “I saw the water tower,” isn’t it.
The jew cries out in pain as it strikes you. Reported for spam.
Shoot yourself. You’re not a serious account.
So nothing, then. You’re physically incapable of explaining how an object—which cannot ever have its angular diameter become negative—is somehow invisible. Got it. Fuck off.
Thanks for admitting the earth isn’t flat. Shoot yourself. You’re unable to do elementary school mathematics.
My communist textbooks, communist media, and nazi NASA taught me it was a sphere. That's at least strike 1, I think. Until they let us explore Antarctica...
Thanks for admitting Earth is not flat.
All you lames need to remember theyre both theories and since the adversary doesnt edit flat earth, both are definitely untrue. The adversary can only twist truth, thats all it has to work with. So the truth will lie in-between. Actually the truth is already out there in two places as proven fact.
Go away.
Stfu you absolute retard. You know nothing.
Thanks for admitting the Earth isn’t flat.
You're welcome. Will you admit the earth isnt a sphere?
I don’t admit lies, no.
Flat Earth isn't a theory in the scientific sense.
Globe earth has been around (and accepted as the current science) for a relatively short period of recorded history. It is plausible that this is part of the communist tactic to destabilize a country (and the entire earth population). Gallup poll conducted in 2019 found 40 percent of US adults believe the earth is less than 10,000 years old and humans were created in their present form. Just some food for thought. Oh and our government space agency was founded by a secret society and the masons just happened to be the ones landing on the moon. Indoctrination starts when one exits the womb.
Go to the ocean, stand on the shoreline with an island several miles away in the distance. Set up light pointed at the island, take a boat 10+ miles to island, observe light from the shoreline while standing on the beach. Globe earth, or at a minimum globe earth at the size that is claimed, debunked. That's using the equations that are presented as fact for how far you should be able to see. It's been done 100s of times on YouTube.
You need to be forcibly remanded to a mental institution.