Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

5
posted 1 year ago by monkey_ona_ball 1 year ago by monkey_ona_ball +7 / -3
26 comments share
26 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (26)
sorted by:
▲ 4 ▼
– UpwardBound 4 points 1 year ago +5 / -1

More flat-earth psy-op foolishness.

Yes, a lot of history has been falsified. Flat earth is idiotic defiance of well established physics. If the earth was a flat disk, it would crumble back into a sphere under the forces of gravity.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Afks 0 points 1 year ago +1 / -1

Prove gravity

We demonstrate that the surface does not curve at the rate it must, given the dimensions we are given

How do you reconcile that

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– UpwardBound 2 points 1 year ago +3 / -1

Prove gravity? Wow. Grab your camera, hop off a tall building then show us that you have disproved gravity. You own the burden of proof.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Afks 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

All that proves is that I’m denser than air

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– UpwardBound 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

You said it, not me.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Afks 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Mmmhmmm

Bumblebeetuna, fren

Be well

❤️

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SaltyJollyRoger 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

It's an oblate spheroid with irregularities in height, not a perfect sphere. What rate of curvature should be able take into account all differences in height between mountain and canyon? Ok, that's unfair. But seriously, is there a rate of constant curvature that would account for even slight changes like rolling hills?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Afks 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

You have the power of the interwebz in your hands

Plenty of info on our dot win communities if you actually care to look into it

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– SaltyJollyRoger 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

That's what I thought

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Afks 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

I just don’t care anymore to take the time for people who don’t take the time themselves

I’ve had many a discussion on the various dot win communities about it, and elsewhere

Your question was boring and uninformed

Eric Dubay has more than enough material on the subject if you care to earnestly explore someday

@Witsitgetsit is doing a flat earth debate on infowars in two days, maybe check that out or see his “Maskeraid tour” video which is a quick crash course and warm up to the subject

To answer your question about rate of curvature, it’s 8 inches per mile, squared

Square the mile not the 8, so it’s 8 inches of drop for the first mile then 32, 72, 128, 200, 288, 392, 512, 648, then 800 inches of drop at ten miles

We can do long distance observations across a span of water that far exceed ten miles they show zero drop

Distant buildings that should be fully obscured by the earth itself due to supposed curvature, in view, whether it be a hot summer day or a frozen winter day

If you live near a large body of water, I always recommend that one go see this for themselves

I can send you videos of others doing the same but it really hammers it home if you go see and test for yourself

Be well

❤️

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– SaltyJollyRoger 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Why does the sun sink below the horizon at sea? On a flat plane where the sun orbits a central point, it would never set like that - only shrink to a distant point in the sky.

Yes, you can use a digital camera to see boats out at see that have disappeared to the human eye. What you leave out is that if you keep watching through the camera, the ship continues to disappear from the bottom up. What would cause that?

Edit: And as already discussed, 8 meters per square mile is a calculation for a smooth ball and not an oblate spheroid with many variations in elevation.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Afks 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

The earth is smoother than a cue ball, relatively speaking

We’re observing across a span of water so your mountains and valleys doesn’t factor anyways

perspective and ocular resolution to answer your comment above about the sun disappearing

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 2 ▼
– Jalapeno_gringo 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Here's a crazy idea, how about you start a go fund me to build a weather balloon with a live feed camera and see for yourself

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Afks 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Already been done

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Jalapeno_gringo 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Do you have a link to the video?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– shillshot 1 point 1 year ago +1 / -0

Lets pray that God strikes the red heifers before they can be sacrificed tomorrow.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

If the system says...

a) Greek systēma "organized whole, a whole compounded of parts"...that's the suggested fiction tempting one to ignore that perceivable whole sets itself apart into each ones partial perception.

b) Perceivable whole doesn't say (utter words)...it moves sound.

media trickery

Latin medius - "middle"...being implies middle (perception) of everything (perceivable)...ones consent to suggested "media" tempts one to ignore that.

Suggestion tricks consent to ignore perception....IF one chooses to consent to it.

2+2 does not equal 5, but 4...

Equal (inception towards death) generates diverse (life) by setting itself apart from one another...others suggest name/number/noun/designation of units (Latin unitas; unus; one) to distract one from discerning self by counting others.

the answer is

Suggested questions tempt one onto a quest towards outcomes; while answers tempt one to wait for the suggestions by others...both tempt problem (life) to ignore solution (inception towards death) aka tempting one with suggested outcomes to ignore perceivable origin.

burning books

Amazon "kindle fire"...

an unwilling slave...

...cannot exist. Why? Because ones free "will" of choice (slave) selects chosen ones (master) suggestion. Consenting to suggested implies buying into the temptation of selling self out to another.

Free will of choice cannot be enslaved by another...only shirked by oneself onto another.

all of history is...

He-brew His-story to trick you/jew to fall for it...aka spell-craft. Nature reveals everything (perceivable) to each one (perception)...others tempt one to store suggested within ones consenting mind/memory.

actors posing as something else

If an actor has a director; then that implies "reactor"...that's the suggested inversion of perceivable...being reaction (life) within direction (inception towards death) aka reactor (temporary growth) within generator (ongoing loss).

dark ages

Age (period of life) implies ones life...ignoring that for the suggested ages of others keeps ones discernment within darkness. Being alive implies a ray of light aka that which the light brings by setting itself apart into a visible light spectrum for each hue-man within anima-tion.

Sleight of hand: "exit light" (discernment) "enter night" (ignorance) "take my hand" (consent to my suggestion) "and we're off to never-neverland" (ones ignored potential among others).

do not fight one another

Reason implies the foundation of all conflicts, and ones consent to anything suggested by another tempts one into a conflict of reason aka want vs not want; true vs false; belief vs disbelief; yes vs no; on vs off; right vs wrong; good vs evil; big mac vs whopper; pepsi vs coke; us vs them; left vs right; up vs down; white vs black; red vs blue etc.

Reasoning over suggested tempts one to ignore implication (if/then) of perceivable.

Implication (mishnah) over reason (gemara) aka talmudic reasoning.

work together

Sleight of hand: "Work will set you free" (Arbeit macht frei) aka EN'ERGY, noun (Greek work) - "internal or inherent power" setting each one within as free will of choice.

Nature sets itself apart...those within tempt each other together.

coming together

Aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka abrahamism (father of multitude) aka miscegenation; multiculturalism; mass migration; mongrelization; melting pot aka equality (same) through diversity (difference) aka united states; united nations; european union; united kingdom; soviet union; uniformity; university; unicode; universal basic income; universal pictures; unicef; unisex aka "there comes a time when we need to heed a certain call; when the world must come together as one"

Meanwhile in reality...being ONE implies apart from ONE another aka "all for one and one for all" aka "there can be only one" aka "alone...all(in)one" aka whole (oneness) generating partials (ones).

to seek out such knowledge

To see (perceive) implies knowledge; to seek (suggested) implies understanding aka standing-under another. One needs to see; one wants to seek...seeking distorts ones sight with what others suggest one to watch.

Watching what another suggests reduces ones sight within all perceivable by focusing aka a point where rays of light meet. A point implies end of sentence, while being a ray of light implies ones life-sentence before point of death.

who we are, where we are, and what we're doing there

Suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self discernment. Only oneself can discern who; where; what and why of being...consenting to the suggestion thereof contradicts self discernment.

entertainment

Aka enter tame mind....ones consent permits suggested information by another to enter and tame ones mind. Perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto; hence choosing to hold onto suggested information tempting one to tame ones own free spirited mind/memory.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– TallestSkil 0 points 1 year ago +3 / -3

Get fucked, you flat piece of shit.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Jalapeno_gringo 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

That's a very terse way of saying.... One who lacks a comprehensive education might be led into foolish beliefs such as FE. Perhaps it would be a better use of your time to educate yourself thoroughly in this discipline before returning to post regurgitated nonsense. Or you can take the direct approach as you have done. :)

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– DragonsDontEatSoy 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I don't think Tallest has time to deal with flerfer bullshit.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Jalapeno_gringo 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I don't either. I think they're just here to discredit legitimate conspiracies or sadly uneducated

permalink parent save report block reply

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - 9slbq (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy