Who's This Stooge Working For?
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (95)
sorted by:
He is working for Ari Emanuel.
Black budget military contractors and Space Force chipped his brain before Tesla, gave him hair plugs said you're gonna play the part of the technology pusher, so we can finally come out of the shadows
Those damn evil hair plugs!
They're not really hair plugs. As A.E.van Vogt noted in his novel Slan, they're tendrils used for telepathy by mutants.
Well if I ever meet him I'll give him a transcendental noogie
Alas, poor Al died long ago. I don't want you to meet him soon.
The vrill society called them "hairs."
You gotta admit, its hard to trust a bald person lol
I never thought of that 😂 Is it because they are dick shaped people now? 😂🤣
Rothschilds, et. al.
You think the Rothschild's want Donald Trump as president?
"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws" ~Mayer Amschel Rothschild
They want the figurehead that causes the most internal division, so yes
You think you know the motives of the Rothschilds?
I'm not defending anyone I'm asking for proof of your assumptions which you clearly cannot provide
We don't need to assume anything about the goals of the Rothschilds, they've been stated plainly and in public.
DJT is "the anti-Rothschild," not that he can fix everything.
Families or syndicates like the Rothschilds don't maintain their position by letting everyone know what they are aiming at.
If they have 1/10th of the power you believe they do wouldn't they have control over what is said about them especially on an ever-changing medium such as the Internet? I don't doubt their power, infact I'd say they've quite effectively convinced sheeple of their false motives.
i don't, i'm merely speculating on past events and past actions.
how was it like when trump became president the first time, or obama, or george w bush? i remember there being so much division on racism, rich vs poor, right vs left, terrorism vs west, etc. when i was a kid
what was it like when clinton, george hw bush, and the like before him became president? that was before my time but i imagine it was not too different based on past records. how was it after biden became president?
same elsewhere. how did things change when trudeau became prime minister? or recently when putin just got re-elected? immediately a "terror" attack happened, and now there's talk of more active russian military push westward in europe, with leaders claiming this is "concerning".
why do you keep asking loaded questions? is there a purpose to showing bias and then devaluing your original post when you question the people who disagree with you and the people who agree with you?
if you want to keep doubted people, even yourself, then please state what you think the answers to all your questions are. if not, then this is not being helpful at all
do you think things will improve if the correct leader, or a good leader is "elected" into that kind of position?
There absolutely was not this degree of polarization. By the mid-90's, pretty much nobody cared if you were white or black, for example. D&C, divide and conquer strategy, absolutely is a primary tool of the WEF et al. We the People can defeat that, need to, and won't be able to accomplish anything until we do.
Obama pushed the pendulum in one direction, Trump shoved it in the other. And here we are.
I'll have to take your word in it since I'm not in the usa and mid-90s was before my time
When you say people didn't care about race, or were not so divided, was that the sentiment in person? Or was that also how it was presented by media & the government?
That was the reality on the ground, in most places. I'm sure you could still find racists, especially in the south. They didn't try pumping up the racist rhetoric so much before Obama, although a couple black leaders still did it.
I think they know it doesn't matter who's POTUS.
If it didn't matter why would one side be attempting to imprison the other side?
Don't fall for the theatrics. Read this: https://coronacircus.com/2020/11/07/dusty-finish/ He was right about this one except the timing.
"Of course we could be wrong, and Biden could be the new president.
That could mean two things:
Trump is actually an underdog, it is not kayfabe, and we are completely wrong on the whole thing."
I think people on this forum have convinced themselves they know what's going on to their own detriment.
I of course know that he said that. But as I said I think he was just wrong about the timing. The dusty finish aspect of it is what matters.
So if Trump was such a threat, couldn't they just assassinate him one way or another? He is swimming with Jews. Have you forgotten about his daughter and Kushner?
That'd make a martyr out of him and they know it
theatrics to create maximum division and instability. instability is highly profitable. it’s not that fucking complicated. this shit goes on all the time in other countries, often times due to the interference of american intelligence agencies. they’re just running their game IN AMERICA now.
Idk they've been encouraging racial division for a long time and partisan divide just as long I think they don't know what they're doing anymore and it's driving people together instead of dividing them. The "US" and the "Them" has never been so clearly defined
trump is provably a cia asset. anyone that knows his history understands this, it’s not a secret by any means.
Lol username checks out
You used the term "provably" which implies you can prove it, can you? By down voting my comment you've proven my point Internet stranger
E pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka united states.
Few collectivize many, while nature (whole) sets itself apart (partials). Many ignoring perceivable nature for suggestions by few are trying to hold together what nature sets apart from one another.
tl;dr...nature drives (inception towards death) apart (life)...artifice (suggestions by few) tempt together (consent by many).
Shut the fuck up, schitzobot
Because one side has infiltrated all branches, and they have the bankers behind them – with the goal of creating a uni-party as in most of the communist countries.
They used DJT to lump all the nationalists into one party and demonize them.
I think we probably agree right in the middle of the issue, because the game has changed pretty radically now and since 2020. Part of my point is that the fact the Joe Biden is president proves that it doesn't matter who's in that position. He can't smell his own farts, let alone make executive decisions without being told what to do.
Bidens approval rating is at 38% per gallup So you think "they" are lumping 62% roughly 208 million people together intentionally? Nah that dog don't hunt
You trust that poll? That shitbag was running 3rd & 4th in the primaries against other dems, and even more people hate him now. If they're also polling undocumented migrants who are paid to approve of him (and are on Gallup's phone list), then maybe that percentage is accurate.
In your percentage breakdown, you're leaving out a very solid, large and growing subgroup of people who know this is all bullshit, don't vote and/or don't have a party preference.
That poll shows me that's the highest number they could lie about and get away with. I seriously doubt even 3% of the US approves of Biden at the moment
"Lock her up" vs "Lock him up"...both sides where suggested to tempt ones consenting choice into a conflict of reason (versus)..which implies mind (ment) within (in) confine (prison) aka im-prison-ment.
If you laid off the LSD for a while, reality might come into focus.
Psychedelic aka PSYKHE (animating power) DELOUN (make visible; reveal) implies being revealed (life) through animation (inception towards death)...consenting to suggested PHARMAKON - "a drug, a poison, philter, charm, spell, enchantment" tempts one to ignore that.
Being implies as living sentence within moving reality...ones choice to focus establishes a point of convergence, which diminishes ones life sentence. It's resistance spend by bending light.
Each suggestion by another tempts ones consent to focus on and hold onto it; while all perceivable inspires one to adapt and let go off. Choosing the latter increases ones resistance to the temptation of former.
He did so much that they despised, like build the wall, drain the swamp, and locked her up.
Oh wait, he did none of that. In fact, he did the complete opposite.
He didn't start any wars and to me that's a big deal
Kind of lit the match for a second civil war, which IMO is far worse than shelling the shit out of sand land.
Uh no not at all. Donny got elected because things were so cattywampus in DC you speak of war flippantly because you know nothing of it.
Donny was installed. Sorry to burst your bubble buddy.
Yep by the 'merican people
He did build the wall. You're such a dumbass that you missed it.
I don't blame you but what I don't understand is whatever corruption in elections could be subverted by American citizens being public about who they voted for and comparing it to whatever the election tally says, honesty could salvage democracy but it seems to be impossible in this hedonistic hell scape
Most certainly, but we didn't have a say then and now we do. We can make it right together.
I look at it as a tactician, they are large and we are small, they move slow and we move fast. Life is war and the greatest enemy you will ever face is yourself.
I think we've been told freedom is this or that but true freedom comes from within, having the ability to transcend the chains and coffins that most people find themselves in. Wave your freak flag high and make your voice heard. Reject what they tell you to be and be what you tell you to be.
"Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75." Benjamin Franklin
"The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion." Albert Camus
There's a difference between having a say, which you are doing now, and having control. But you still have a vast advantage over a child born in a slum in Bangladesh and that advantage is a voice to express your discontent. The world will never stay the way it is, change is an inevitability. If we want to control the things clearly outside of our control we must first have control over ourselves.
"If you want to change the world, first change yourself, then tell others how you did it. Never demand that people change. Inspire them to change using your own change as an example instead." Dan Pearce
Sounds like pessimism has poisoned your logic. You can own guns that alone means you are more free than the majority of the world.
I'm convinced Musk is just a character at this point. He nominally runs SpaceX, Tesla, Twitter, Starlink, and numerous other companies while also tweeting all day and claiming to have a max level Diablo 4 character for some bizarre reason. Oh and he was "vaccine injured" but still managed to do all these things, so what was the vaccine injury? Did he get the sniffles and change his entire worldview?
And every venture he's involved in just so happens to promote transhumanism or other technocratic control agendas. He's constantly hyping up AI not so much to say we need to be careful about development but more to say we need brain chips to stay relevant in the world of AI.
He's getting conservatards and others who are just waking up to the corruption under his umbrella because most people are desperate for a powerful figure to follow and who better than the man the media has painted as a super genius Iron Man for over a decade?
Max level doesn't mean shit unless he talks about playing on permadeath. That shit will make you kill yourself.
It was like right after the game came out. The point is he just has infinite time
I think he is a clone or test tube baby of the MIC or someone like DARPA. We know abot Darpas life log becoming Facebook. Now they need a Tony Stark like figure to convince the people, especially on the right to follow them. To believe these massive companies are legit provate enterprises and not MIC assets designed to control everyone. Governement cant run businesses like that, so they fake them being private entities. Elons Grandpa was a huge technocrat player in Canada. He’s a butt baby of the MIC.
Himself, followed by the military-industrial complex.
He is just a midwit who is creating useful stuff for implement cbdc and one world government unintentionally because he thinks it’s cool sci-fi shit. When he has outlived his usefulness they will take everything he has built.
Depends on the amount of wealth they have, there's only 2,640 billionaires in the world as of 2023 and as George Carlin presciently stated It's A BIG club and you ain't in it
You think it's a joke, that says more than you can imagine
Funny enough there's a carlin clip for that too.
Wealth inequality in the world is extreme, with the poorest half of the population owning just 2% of the global total, while the richest 10% own 76% of all wealth. It's literally a club and to become a billionaire unless you are born into it you are vetted imho
this
How could one leverage one of the wealthiest, autistic men in the world?