We are all gonna die
(files.catbox.moe)
Comments (20)
sorted by:
I notice a (((common thread))) with the authors of this bullshit.
a) Author implies singular (chosen one); readers imply common (each ones choice to ignore self for another).
b) Ones consent to the suggestion of another establishes the bond, that permits others to twist (thread) many ones together.
Biggest example...few weaving a world wide web to entangle many into endless threads of contention; argumentation aka conflicts of reason.
https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/thread
The only reason why we're all gonna die is because some genocidal one world government decide to sent just about everyone they come across to the concentration camp.
a) CON (together) CENTRA (center within circumference; hence apart) TION (ation).
b) Being implies center (life) of action (inception towards death), hence living apart from one another...few CON (connect) many together.
c) Everyone implies suggested pluralism; each one implies perceivable singular.
Using the word "everyone" implies ignoring singular for a plural aggregation, hence establishing a connection; like RELIGION (Latin religio, to bind anew) between ones consent and another ones suggestion.
we used to execute prophets who got it wrong.
Heretics have been tolerated for far too long.
SPIEL MAN
A kike who SPIELS nonsense
What is sad is that this kike nonsense influenced and tricked entire generations. Boomers ate this shit up. Fucking gullible man.
thats not even a full 3 months from my birth I was literally born into that bullshit and theyre still trying to sell it to us lol
reading comprehension isn't your strength, is it?
So the trend reversed? I thought we've arrived in the era of global boiling according to UN's last estimates. Try harder, fedboy.
was any action taken?
Era implies a fixed point in time...ones arrival (inception) as matter (life) implies into momentum (inception towards death) of motion.
As I said, failed reading comprehension.
Here's a hint: it does not say that entire nations will be wiped off the earth by 2000.
What do you think it says?
Oh wow, it says could. How convenient is that. Let's make wild predictions and insert the word could there so we have a way out when they fail time and time again. Never mind we will use those predictions to inform policy as if they have certainty. You know what? The sun could fail to rise up tomorrow, but in case it does, it could fail to rise 10 years from now or make that a 100. That's my prediction and it would be catastrophic for us all. Now to mitigate that everyone should start mandatory sun worship with blood sacrifices at high-noon.
It says there will be massive environmental disasters up to and possibly including entire nations being wiped from the earth. That is the entire subject of the paragraph. You have to take the whole paragraph in context. One word does not change that, it clarifies it.
Yes and for when does it predict it?
lol cry harder
If you have been raped in a dressing room by Donald Trump, call us for a free consultation. We also handle whiplash cases, dog bite suits, and defamation in New York, Georgia, and Beaver Falls North Dakota. This offer not valid if you're a fed or in a Tel Aviv gay bar or in a tunnel under a synagogue.
For what?