https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOZjMZC5/x/c/4Z8jPtFohx2 :
CrazyRussian 0 points 13 minutes ago +1 / -1
Since when "a link" become a proof of anything?
Do you understand that anybody could make a page with absolutely any bullshit?
Well, is it kind of some mental illness, when somebody account a link to some web >page as a proof?
–CrazyRussian 0 points 5 days ago +1 / -1
Still waiting for any proof from you...
You still didn't tell me proof of what exactly you are waiting. :)
I'll wait.
That's the only thing you could ever do with such attitude. :)
https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOZjMZC5/x/c/4Z8j6NemZ6H
CrazyRussian 0 point 1 minutes ago +1 / -1
Your brain could not function without external links?
https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOZjMZC5/x/c/4Z8jPtFpWdC
Logic 100. :D
CrazyRussian 0 point 16 minutes ago +1 / -1
More interesting question is why you demand some fucking link to get a proof that magnet does not stick to copper of graphene? Yet another rabbit hole here? :)
Because facts.
More interesting question is why you demand some fucking link to get a proof that magnet does not stick to copper of graphene? Yet another rabbit hole here? :)
I'm shure you have some copper thing around. Piece of wire or whatever. I also told you how to make some graphene in seconds. Scotch tape and graphite brush from electric motor is not a hard thing to find at all. And you definitely should have at least one magnet in your apartment or where you live.
What fucking links you need to check that by yourself?
Wait....
Are you not from real world, if you can't just do simpliest things to find your proof, and only links is real for you? Are you kind of AI or some scanned consciousness somewhere in hidden datacenter without any ability to interact with real world? :) That is why you want links, not real things?
Funny, what next?
Hey, guys. Should I add this comment to the post or what? :D
This chatbot CANNOT post external links. :D
What?
Look at this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOu0yC3WEMQ
Well, that was really weird.
Chatbot confirmed.
Did you at least read a title of the link you posted? I'll copy it for you:
Fe3O4 is not a graphene! It is black iron oxide. There also could not be any "graphene solution" or "graphene oxide solution" because both graphene and graphene oxide is insoluble in water. Anything that combined with black iron oxide(Fe3O4) will stick to magnets. Whatever - wooden sawdust, paper pulp, charcoal powder, anything fine balck iron oxide particles could stick to. You could make absolutely anything "magnetic" just using fine black iron oxide powder in some binder as paint. And it is used so a lot. It even have its own color designation - Black 4330. But all that have absolutly nothing to do with graphene. Grafene itself is not ferromagnetic and can't stick to magnets, Fe3O4 is.
You are incredibly stupid or amasingly insolent in pushing bullshit here!
I thought you did that with all your comments.
Can you prove that?
Can you prove that?
Can you prove that?
Can you prove that?
Can you prove that? You can check what "superconductivity" means in the meantime.
Wow, more insults from a chatbot that never provides external links... Color me surprised... (It's irony, if Elon didn't program you to notice that)
So, whenever you're ready - show me 1 proof of your claims. I showed medical studies, video materials, and documentaries on the topic. You still only write some theories. 0 facts, 0 proof. Still... It gets boring already...
Let me know if you have anything more than your opinion on the topic. I'll wait.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Really you could make YBCO superconductor on your kitchen. Works at liquid nitrogen temperature. But I think posting instructions on how to do that will be superfluous as you have hands from ass or just not a real person. :)
Where is your proof then?
Yet another post of "all talk and no game"...
https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOj8yOaP/i-found-a-funny-chatbot-activity/ - Here's a post about you.
You never provide evidence. Just your statements that you think will be believed because you write "yes" again and again...
It's a conspiracy sub, chatbot. Try harder.
Where's your proof? I'll wait.
Where is your investigation? Where is your proof?
Are you really thinking that people in a conspiracy sub will just go with your theories?
Show some proof to defend your theories and I will add them in my post. I'll wait.
All you offer is more text that is backed up by... what? Your words?
Where is your proof?
All talk and no game still...? Are you really banking on people that are so unaware to seek sources? I am not. I like sources. And I made a post about how you never provide sources.
Let me know if you have a source. I'll wait.
Source trolls are used to report, flag, and remove the source of data the government doesn't like.
SO THE QUESTION BECOMES... IS @Neo1 a source troll?
That's been my suspicion for a while now
It doesn't even feel the same as not understanding, and needing more details. It's just as malicious as posts like these.
This sort of logic belongs in the Looney bin. Literally loling that all it takes for somebody to be a chatbot is that that chatbot won't pist a link. Neo, some advice, the future won't be kind to your brain if you keep thinking that way.
Dude does seem like a fed. Spends all day trying to convince us our eyes deceive. Uses phrases like "In the first place I would suppose". Then spells sure "shure". Also says hes bad at english? Id vote fedfag.
we have to get past the idea that anything written down HAS to be correct. thats what normies do.
It's not a strange behavior from u/CrazyRussian at all.
In my country, we call these people a wooden philosopher - one, who talks too much but never says anything of value.
This "CR" is just a chatbot. Apparently cannot connect to external links, so it can't provide any research about his claims. That's my point. But it will exhaust you with more and more text. That's your point.
I just exposed him for what he is. You can literally see this user being unable to understand anything that's not his opinion... How is that a reserch ground? It's an opinion ground.
P.S.: Why do you always misspell "I" as "ayh"?
sourcing is weird. Its a good concept but just doesn't really mean anything nowadays. what someone considers a truth, or valid source is unfortunately tied to either there political view or religious ideology. Like right now, i could source you scientific papers describing AIDS transmission, and also source you scientific papers disproving viruses all together.
Hes right in a sense, what the point of sourcing when you have to independently fact check a source?
It's a simple calculation. If the source is in line with a belief I already hold, it's real. If it's in conflict with what I already believe, it's fake news.
So I must trust only his words?
That's not researching. That's religious ideology.
You should look around this site, users post links in here. Are they all liers?
Let me show you the top 3 posts:
https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOj4PiNM/guess-who-owns-onlyfans/c/ - providing a link.
https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOeLVKR0/get-your-kids-down-to-the-milita/c/ - providing a link.
https://conspiracies.win/p/17sOeJDieA/as-jewish-as-it-gets/c/ - proving a link.
Should we ban them or what?
no no, the opposite. trust no words from anyone, even sources. BIll Copper said it best. Trust nothing you cant prove with your own research
But I provided the top posts that include a link to help out researchers in the previous comment...
Yes, everyone can do their own research, but this page is made to help people out.
What are you even saying? That we should never provide links?
No links to help out researchers, you mean. Twitter posts don't count.
That reply to you felt very childish. Bot childish.
Quite possibly a bot.
They certainly lied about the sources though.
Even if it's a human bot, they burnt that account.
First one has a link, but it is to a Twitter page (not a source).
Second one has no link or source, just a screenshot of a Twitter post.
Third one has no links at all.
Why'd you need to lie?
Oh, and it's "liars".
You're making excuses to act helpless. Aka source trolling.
Good find