How come that most of the countries that consider themselves Arab are outside of Arabia?
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (55)
sorted by:
The few Egyptians that I know are fiercely Egyptian. They never call themselves "Arabs". Same with Lebanese people.
Calling these group of people "Arabs" is a Jewish construct. Jewish rabbis usually call these group of people "Ishmael".
How come they speak Arabic then?
Remember: colonisation is only bad when Europeans do it.
That's funny. Did the Arabians kill Gaddafi?
Or was that the Zionists?
I think I am starting to get how those kikes work, instead of us building actual networks fighting them or thinking clearly on our own of the situation, they want us engaging in frivolous discussions and debates all day long, always throwing the burden of proof on us while making one outlandish claim after the other.
Meanwhile, they advance their goals, and build their networks.
I think most of the people online aren't going to be "fighting" them in the physical sense.
Jesus said carry a sword, but did not himself.
You know who DOES carry swords though? The Sikh. The Zionists will be on the wrong end of things in the end, we know this. I know one that runs a liquor store and has the "sword of God" tattooed on his arm.
There was a recent post on Reddit about Israel paying people to attend their rally in DC tomorrow, and it said in the post that the rally was sponsored by the Jewish Federations of North America and the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations.
I'm Polish/German, and there's roughly the same number of Poles in the U.S. as "Jews". While there are Polish organization like PAC (which even publicly has chided the Zionists), the level of organization is far greater with the "Jews". Because they are liars and evil and MUST stick together for support.
Most Americans are mixed heritage and thus don't organize strictly from a racial standpoint. Plus, we see ourselves as Americans. The Zionists don't. And they really aren't. That's why they will all flee for Israel eventually. Our "network" is the general public.
I've come to the conclusion that Jewish organization is well over a thousand years old. Probably started around 2.000 years ago with a basic secret government council. It never been as tight and effective as it is now of course. But if they will flee from the US, it is possible that it was planned that way and I am not sure it will be all pretty in the states by that time.
Their plan could indeed be to assemble all Jews in the greater Israel project while leaving the rest of the world in ruins.
I actually meant to link this, and I have mentioned it before a time or two...
Now they could leave the world in ruins, but they won't, because they really don't have the capability. Even if they hit every major city in the world with nukes, how do you think the leftovers would react?
Besides, the US is their Zionist/Masonic accomplishment...I believe they are too egotistical to destroy their own handiwork. They also have their maps for the future, with the Mississippi corridor basically free of people.
It's gonna sound silly, but the mitigating factor to me is the things that the elite cannot control, or don't even understand to be able to control.
Why do you think it says in the Bible that God placed the sun, the moon, and the stars in the "vault in the sky"? Why do the elite take trips into "space" that really aren't? Why do the Chris Hadfield BS? Musk and his Tesla? Need I say more?
It's gonna be wild.
Those flyers were intentionally marketed towards parents to tell their kids how to make money. Such a setup. I hope no one fell for it.
I know. But a shekel is a shekel...
Not when it can get 1/6 treatment.
I would imagine worse than that; they are going to make a splash one way or another.
Das bezweifle ich doch sehr.
Yeah, you are pretty gay.
Reasoning over suggested.
US reasons (want vs not want) among themselves over what THEY suggest...pluralism (us; they) is also suggested.
Burdening oneself with suggested tempts one to seek confirmation (proof) from others...theism (the) is also suggested.
A suggestion isn't a claim, but a temptation for others to claim (consent) it. Such claim (consent) is payed in credit (creed; belief; faith), which establishes the one suggesting as the consenting ones debtor.
Consider this...how does something OUTlandish get INTO one?
Nature advances (inception towards death) growth (life)...if one chooses to resist temptations such as suggested progressivism (goals); then one grows.
a) Ones consent puts one into the suggested web of others; like for example the suggested world wide web.
b) only within work (energy) can one build (solid within fluid).
You do, obviously. That's why you are in thread!
Why are you in the thread if you don't care?
Sure. That's what you are doing.
Arabs. They even filmed it.
Paid for by Clinton et al.
"We came, we saw, he died."
'Member that?
Thanks for agreeing that Arabs killed Gadaffi.
I denounce it as much as I denkunce the Egyptian Book of the Dead or The Book of Mormon.
They all have exactly no meaning for me.
Zionist Arabs working for the U.S.
Now what is the evil Israel has done?
Of all the dumb bullshit you have made up, this is the dumbest.
You still haven't answered the question who ruled Palestine in 1946.
Your handlers aren't allowed it, are they?
Oh, no...money can't buy people to kill people.
Handlers?
You retarded?
Reported...I will not reply to any further comment.
Centuries of white genocide. How’s that even a question?
Imaginary lines that meant nothing thousands of years ago.
ARAB; noun (Hebrew arabha) - "desert" + DESERT; verb - "to leave, abandon"...that's why.
That's not what that word means, and you know it.
You are a liar.
Suggested word implies ones ignorance of perceivable sound...if consented to.
Three years of lying, and now you wish for us to trust you because you are now suddenly using etymonline.com?
Are you fucking kidding me?
You Clown:₪
Correct. Arab does not mean Desert.
And even if you are trying to be honest? Who would trust a liar?
What’s the etymology of the word then?
I'm having a conversation with the spammer. The one who pollutes every thread he enters. And now I need to defend this stance from you as well?
I'm not doing that. You're Question holds no validity here.
The etymology is in fact exactly what he said, which is why you’re afraid to answer and expose yourself not as a righteous crusader against “spammers” but merely someone not adding to the conversation at all
This isn't a conversation. He only knows about that website as I have used it against him in the past. He floods the boards with spam. It is claimed by others that he is allowed to do this, as it is his 'word magic'.