After reading old books from lots of cultures and exploring the others through video docs, there are definitely patterns that repeat and overlap.
In the mahabharata, the oldest hindu epic, are present both sons of gods, heavy 'magic' weapons, and an impressive amount of man power. The kuruksetra war was fought by 11 + 7 (sides) akshauinis, each amounting to about 220k soldiers. In total, about 4 millions are said to have perished in the conflict. India still have tourist spots dedicated to the woods the Pandavas were said to have spent years of exile.
In the sumerian tales, the king dinasties were said to come from the gods, and each king reigned for unhumanly long times. The gods were also considered physical, capable of reproduction with humans. The 'poetry' layer that came with homeric and ellenic culture was not present, and descriptions are very much literal of those episodes.
In Greece, we also have the example of gods joining fights and perishing. A common theme of old god lore. Many, different and better than humans, but real people who can die also.
Finally, in the old testament if taken literally we have lots of the same. Yahweh being a regional leader, in charge of a people, which are the sons of Abraham.
Noticeably, these sons become thousands and thousands. Unless the guy was a real Gengis Abraham, the most obvious solution is that 'the sons of' refer to a lineage and blood rather than a direct parental relationship. This also checks out because most of the old testament is spergy if you don't resolve this kind of sayings, as the same jargon is used when referring to Esau, Edom, Jacob and Ishmael among others.
In the old testament we also read descriptions of gods infighting for land, using similar tools to those described in the Mahabharata.
For example 'the glory of god', which isn't always with god, but he has to bring it with him (in a passage one of Yahweh commanders asks him to use its glory and he says come back tomorrow i have to go fetch it lol), he advises his commander to seek refuge behind a rock when he passes with his glory, as everyone in front of it will be killed (but being behind rocks on the side is safe as the glory of god has its limits, like rocks, yeah).
It doesn't take much to see the old testament as it is portrayed is absolute trash with no connection to the original intent of the writings. But read literally, it checks out everything other cultures were also talking about around the same time.
A very different picture of history then arises. I'm leaving spirituality out of this, in the end spirituality should be history-agnostic or transcendent at its core imo.
In the book of enoch this other 'god race' is also described as coming from 'god', the Elyon, the Anu of sumerians most likely, the Chronos of greeks. Indeed this god in many tales is considered gone (either exiled or went back home), while his sons remain to rule earth. In the sumerians that is Enki and Enlil, and later Marduk, for the greeks it was Zeus (Enlil), Poseidon (Enki) and Hades (a self insert? lol. But most likely Nergal receiving a status upgrade).
There is a lot of variation and speculation on the topic, i'm trying to stick to what is most relevant and shared across cultures. All cultures have this 'god race' archetype, of a race better than humans, that created humans as they are, and lived among humans for a long time.
All this has interesting consequences in our times:
The jews still worship Yahweh. The jews know of the literal interpretation of the old testament and of the dual DNA legacy. This likely mean the blood of Yahweh is still going strong today, and atop jewry, which indeed treat blood as of the utmost importance.
'The future', in some sense, depends on knowledge of this past. If existed, items like 'the glory of god' or the 'Brahmastra' (which is described very similarly to a current atomic bomb) could easily be on par with the most deadly modern weapons.
The power of the 'dark side' nowadays mostly reside on acknowledging the real past and enforcing a false narrative to keep the power differential from the resulting knowledge differential.
We are an actual genetic experiment which would explain the mysterious jump from monkey to human which left no half species behind like all the rest of evolution seems to be obligated to. We also have some blood of the gods, we are not a natural species. Nor free. The free range human farming is perhaps a recent idea, but the farming part has been going on since the dawn of mankind. It was literally designed to be so.
i think your ready for this my friend. https://archive.org/details/AnatolyFomenkoBooks/History-FictionOrScienceByAnatolyFomenkoVol.1/
Nice drop friend, thanks!
np, wish you luck in your research
This mirrors my take on lore as wdll. Too many cultures depicting advanced tech.
I think other species on earth are the result of former genetic manipulation as well. Take butterflies with eyes on the wings. Sure, they could have been the product of evolution if you really stretch your credulity, but I think they were the result of these former civilizations playing around with genetics to create specific designs on animals.
Religion is what you get when primitive people try to understand a technocivilization when the records remain but the technology is long gone.
www.rael.org
While I generally agree with their explanations of biblical events, their organization's views on morality are way out of line with mine, and they seem to fall in line with other religions with their tithing requirements. What do aliens need money for?
They are way to abortion happy. Their views on having the state raise children is totally fucked up. They seem to have come up with these guidelines without understanding how corrupt human organizations become (ostensibly).
For the most part, they seem like another group that took a piece of truth as a main support column and then wove lies all around it to come up with another money-making religion.
We believe that humans must evolve out of any need for money – and also any will to power. The tithing/gift-giving goes towards building an embassy for the Elohim, and towards the expenses of the organization (Rael's expenses, support staff, website, etc.). We have to acknowledge that we live within a monetary system while trying to spread the messages. The money also allows people to attend the seminars for free.
Ideally, there wouldn't be any need for abortion, but our birth control tech is still primitive and largely harmful (I think intentionally), and I'm not sure where you're seeing that "the state" should raise the children. We feel that childcare and education should be a communal experience (which, it is now, but not with the benefit of the child in mind), but parents are definitely the stewards of their offspring. You have to remember that any discussion of "the state" in terms of the Elohim is a governing structure that is focused on the good of all, without money and power, valuing intelligence, love, freedom, the individual and peace.
That's some lame association
His book Intelligent Design ties in the "genetic experiment" part of your observations with the only explanation of the Old Testament that makes any sense.
Consenting to a suggested side tempts one to ignore being choice in-between sides, hence keeping self in the dark (within ignorance), while permitting chosen ones to shine the light at whatever they choose one to focus on.
The power of a chosen one implies ones consenting choice, choosing another over self.
FORCE, noun (Latin fortis; strength) - "momentum; the quantity of power produced by motion". The center (life) of momentum (inception towards death) is forced (loss) to resist (growth), which is how motion generates strength through force internally.
Sleight of hand: "may the force (inception towards death) be with you (life)".
The few suggest narratives; sermons; orations; stories etc. to tempt one to keep holding onto them, while ignoring the ongoing force aka the perceivable inspiration for each expression within.
I would suggest that to the Romans, Enlil was Saturn and Marduk was Jupiter. I have found it key to get these identifications absolutely correct.