Many Bible/Jesus/God denying pagans follow these wicked 48 occult laws of lucifer.
This explains why all the seething Gnostics in here always attack posts about Christianity. They're indeed godless manipulative psychopaths who worship a fake creator.
a) one can only exist in-between (spectrum) black (absence of light) and white (pure light), hence being enabled to view the visible spectrum of light as a hue (color) man.
b) gnostic implies perceivable; lodge (deposit for keeping; to fix) implies ones ignorance of being (perception) within momentum (perceivable) of motion.
their owners programmed them to be
Consent by many to suggested "programs" by few implies each one of the many holding onto, hence claiming for self aka taking possession over aka owning.
In short...others utilize suggestions to tempt one to own self, while permitting others to hold the deed.
most men are satanists
-ist (satanist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (satanism) aka ones submission to another...not satan, but the chosen one suggesting the -ism aka the one oneself chose to consent to.
But only luciferian occultists practice magick, also white magick is just as evil as black magick, and ALL practice of magick is forbidden to Christians by God!
Mark Passio was an occultist devil worshiper and never converted to Christianity. Atheists/Pagans/Gnostics are all indirectly Satanists in my opinion.
they're not all satanists. White gnosticism takes the esseence from hinduism, budhism and christianity. The magic they do isn't raping kids or cutting the foreskin as the catholics do, but they practice sex without ejaculation which is white tantra.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxS4IuhI4WQ&t=134s - look at this video from them, they still pray to God with the same prayers. they say Our Father prayer for up to 1 hour.
What does it matter if one converts or not, he is more of a christian then 90% who converted. thoughts, emotions and actions matter, not the signature on a paper that one converted. take 2 mins to look at this prayer and maybe take 1-2 hours to listen to the lecture that I linked.
also they don't work in the hidden, everything is open, and given for free. and there is no organization or gov that sponsors them.
this is solely said about glorian.org , as for the rest I don't know, many indeed are black magicians.
Trust me, there is absolutely no good way to practice magick because all of it is evil, and they are heretics who practice sex rituals, which is a grave sin before God.
It doesn't matter if it's open, they still worship an false Catholic christ on the cross (idolatry), and openly practice sex magick. They are just openly luciferian occultist's blasphemers who are breaking God's divine laws.
you didn't study 1 book and didn't listen to 1 lecture so your opinion is absolute worthless and right into the trashbin it goes.
it's all just prejudging. try and see if it works for yourself, this is true gnosis. but you chrisian cucks are so retarded and have your head up your ass soooooo deep that you can't even take into consideration the idea of real gnosis.
get cucked.
Why would I study books of a luciferian masonic "white" magic cult that openly spits on Jesus and our creator God?
It's nothing more than true BS satanic brainwashing in a sex cult, but hey I'm surely the one that is retarded here and don't know the Biblical definition of sin.
That's the Jesus Freak, " Leave it alone it's evil" showing. There's no point in trying. I was once told not to do my homework because the professor assigned a Manly P. Hall book. The people never read the man, never saw a biblioghraphy of his research, didn't even read the book cover they were telling me not to read because it was evil. They just saw his name, and declared it evil.
There's a time and place for everything. But, it gets taken too far too often leading to the willful ignorance we just read.
SEX (Latin seco; to divide) RITUAL (rite of passage)...Rite (life) of passage (inception towards death) implies division of whole into partials.
Others suggest sex (coming together) as the inversion of being set apart from one another (divided), and rituals (sacrifice) as the inversion of opportunity for growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).
Those who consent to suggested "sex rituals", ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want), hence viewing sex rituals through the lens of wanted temptation (lust). To distract from perceivable; others set the stage for suggested, hence promoting lust.
"I, Samael, am not in need of henchmen or followers, but only imitators of my doctrine: Gnosis. I do not follow anyone, nor do I want anyone to follow me. What I want is for each one of you to follow his own Self. I am only a lighthouse in the sea of existence, and I do not need clientele in order to subsist. Since I am against the slavery of souls, I do not want to enslave any soul, nor do I agree with executioners of ideals. Masters exist in abundance, and I am only one of many; thus, those who want to find the Masters will find them inside, within the profundities of their own inner consciousness." this is how every spiritual teacher should be.
Aka marking passion...ones consent to a suggested label, name; brand; MARK ; tempts one into PASSION (passio, patior, to suffer), hence others utilizing suggestions as an external agent (temptation) upon ones internal consent (to ignore resisting).
Even if you have a negative reaction to these, one might wonder, "Well, technically, what makes them evil?"
As noted at the top, almost all of these devolve into manipulation of others. I have come to think that this is in fact the very definition of evil: treating others as means, rather than as ends in themselves.
Also funny is that if you read this list and recall any Satanists you may have encountered, you think, "Yep, that's what they do alright." Which in my book makes them slaves all over again, and they don't have the level of consciousness to realize it.
Some simple examples: a baby crying is a manipulation. A shopkeeper setting a price of 0.99 instead of 1 is a manipulation. A smile and funny joke to a girl you like is a manipulation.
None of these things are inherently bad.
Manipulation with intent to hurt is another story, but that's just one side of the coin.
Reread my original comment. The point is subtle, and I find that subtlety gets by almost everyone (by definition, perhaps) even when they bother putting forth the effort to understand. Most people love too much thinking they already have the answer. That's because it makes them comfortable.
And that subtle point has greatly informed my view of the evolution to the current situation.
To put it simply, in the foreword he goes into the issue of how morality intersects with these concepts. He explains that the fact remains that they exist and can be effective, so it behoves one to be aware of such techniques, if only to spot them being used against you and your loved ones - so you can apply proper advice and save yourself trouble.
Many of the explanations of the concepts that you provided are also so misrepresentative as to be laughable. I would personally be embarrassed to try to explain a text that I had never even glanced at. To each their own, I guess.
On that note: Did you cry as a baby in order to get attention and food? Such dark wizardry from such an early age! You evil manipulator, you.
Many Bible/Jesus/God denying pagans follow these wicked 48 occult laws of lucifer.
This explains why all the seething Gnostics in here always attack posts about Christianity. They're indeed godless manipulative psychopaths who worship a fake creator.
they're black gnostics. Samael Aun Weor taught white magic. and the white lodge.
listen to this lecture - https://glorian.org/learn/courses-and-lectures/defense-for-spiritual-warfare/defense-for-spiritual-warfare-part-1
and yeah as Mark Passio put it, most men are satanists because they owners programmed them to be.
a) one can only exist in-between (spectrum) black (absence of light) and white (pure light), hence being enabled to view the visible spectrum of light as a hue (color) man.
b) gnostic implies perceivable; lodge (deposit for keeping; to fix) implies ones ignorance of being (perception) within momentum (perceivable) of motion.
Consent by many to suggested "programs" by few implies each one of the many holding onto, hence claiming for self aka taking possession over aka owning.
In short...others utilize suggestions to tempt one to own self, while permitting others to hold the deed.
-ist (satanist) implies ones consent to suggested -ism (satanism) aka ones submission to another...not satan, but the chosen one suggesting the -ism aka the one oneself chose to consent to.
But only luciferian occultists practice magick, also white magick is just as evil as black magick, and ALL practice of magick is forbidden to Christians by God!
Mark Passio was an occultist devil worshiper and never converted to Christianity. Atheists/Pagans/Gnostics are all indirectly Satanists in my opinion.
they're not all satanists. White gnosticism takes the esseence from hinduism, budhism and christianity. The magic they do isn't raping kids or cutting the foreskin as the catholics do, but they practice sex without ejaculation which is white tantra. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxS4IuhI4WQ&t=134s - look at this video from them, they still pray to God with the same prayers. they say Our Father prayer for up to 1 hour.
What does it matter if one converts or not, he is more of a christian then 90% who converted. thoughts, emotions and actions matter, not the signature on a paper that one converted. take 2 mins to look at this prayer and maybe take 1-2 hours to listen to the lecture that I linked.
also they don't work in the hidden, everything is open, and given for free. and there is no organization or gov that sponsors them.
this is solely said about glorian.org , as for the rest I don't know, many indeed are black magicians.
Trust me, there is absolutely no good way to practice magick because all of it is evil, and they are heretics who practice sex rituals, which is a grave sin before God.
It doesn't matter if it's open, they still worship an false Catholic christ on the cross (idolatry), and openly practice sex magick. They are just openly luciferian occultist's blasphemers who are breaking God's divine laws.
you didn't study 1 book and didn't listen to 1 lecture so your opinion is absolute worthless and right into the trashbin it goes. it's all just prejudging. try and see if it works for yourself, this is true gnosis. but you chrisian cucks are so retarded and have your head up your ass soooooo deep that you can't even take into consideration the idea of real gnosis. get cucked.
Why would I study books of a luciferian masonic "white" magic cult that openly spits on Jesus and our creator God?
It's nothing more than true BS satanic brainwashing in a sex cult, but hey I'm surely the one that is retarded here and don't know the Biblical definition of sin.
more like, JesusTaughtUsToRepent!
Based on the dumb shit you post. You study garbage opinions rather than cited facts.
That's the Jesus Freak, " Leave it alone it's evil" showing. There's no point in trying. I was once told not to do my homework because the professor assigned a Manly P. Hall book. The people never read the man, never saw a biblioghraphy of his research, didn't even read the book cover they were telling me not to read because it was evil. They just saw his name, and declared it evil.
There's a time and place for everything. But, it gets taken too far too often leading to the willful ignorance we just read.
SEX (Latin seco; to divide) RITUAL (rite of passage)...Rite (life) of passage (inception towards death) implies division of whole into partials.
Others suggest sex (coming together) as the inversion of being set apart from one another (divided), and rituals (sacrifice) as the inversion of opportunity for growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).
Those who consent to suggested "sex rituals", ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want), hence viewing sex rituals through the lens of wanted temptation (lust). To distract from perceivable; others set the stage for suggested, hence promoting lust.
"I, Samael, am not in need of henchmen or followers, but only imitators of my doctrine: Gnosis. I do not follow anyone, nor do I want anyone to follow me. What I want is for each one of you to follow his own Self. I am only a lighthouse in the sea of existence, and I do not need clientele in order to subsist. Since I am against the slavery of souls, I do not want to enslave any soul, nor do I agree with executioners of ideals. Masters exist in abundance, and I am only one of many; thus, those who want to find the Masters will find them inside, within the profundities of their own inner consciousness." this is how every spiritual teacher should be.
Aka marking passion...ones consent to a suggested label, name; brand; MARK ; tempts one into PASSION (passio, patior, to suffer), hence others utilizing suggestions as an external agent (temptation) upon ones internal consent (to ignore resisting).
Even if you have a negative reaction to these, one might wonder, "Well, technically, what makes them evil?"
As noted at the top, almost all of these devolve into manipulation of others. I have come to think that this is in fact the very definition of evil: treating others as means, rather than as ends in themselves.
Also funny is that if you read this list and recall any Satanists you may have encountered, you think, "Yep, that's what they do alright." Which in my book makes them slaves all over again, and they don't have the level of consciousness to realize it.
Manipulation of others is neither good nor evil inherently. It's part of the human experience, we are all both manipulators and manipulated.
I maintain my conclusion, but those who are interested in using other people for their own ends seek to justify themselves by inventing excuses.
Satanists teach their followers to stop lying, especially to themselves, but in my experience few posses the discipline to follow this directive.
Some simple examples: a baby crying is a manipulation. A shopkeeper setting a price of 0.99 instead of 1 is a manipulation. A smile and funny joke to a girl you like is a manipulation. None of these things are inherently bad.
Manipulation with intent to hurt is another story, but that's just one side of the coin.
Reread my original comment. The point is subtle, and I find that subtlety gets by almost everyone (by definition, perhaps) even when they bother putting forth the effort to understand. Most people love too much thinking they already have the answer. That's because it makes them comfortable.
And that subtle point has greatly informed my view of the evolution to the current situation.
That is fucked up.
Have you ever read the book, or even the foreword? This isn't an accurate portrayal of the content.
No I didn't. But these laws are manipulation and therefore black magic. maybe let us know how the author isn't in fact a manipulator?
To put it simply, in the foreword he goes into the issue of how morality intersects with these concepts. He explains that the fact remains that they exist and can be effective, so it behoves one to be aware of such techniques, if only to spot them being used against you and your loved ones - so you can apply proper advice and save yourself trouble. Many of the explanations of the concepts that you provided are also so misrepresentative as to be laughable. I would personally be embarrassed to try to explain a text that I had never even glanced at. To each their own, I guess.
On that note: Did you cry as a baby in order to get attention and food? Such dark wizardry from such an early age! You evil manipulator, you.
Several of these are contradictory so it comes across like a hybrid between a lazy 4chan larp and a satirical criticism of middle management