a state is a government appartus. a nation is a people of a common language and culture living together. a territory is a boundary on a map. all three things are distinct. u can have two without the other. a state with a territory and no nation = yugoslavia. a state and nation without teritory = isis. a territory and nation without state = afghanistan.
So when this nation was developed and approved, practically overnight, you don't think it possible that any other nation could have tied itself to the nation of Israel?
The suggested brand "israel" got its eminence (distinguished above others) by all those who consent to suggested nationalism aka from the many willingly submitting to the suggestions by a chosen few.
In other words...if a few suggest "this is israel" and many consent to believe or disbelieve it, then those many permit a few to define perceivable (reality) with suggested (fiction).
Suggestion tempts one to ignore perceivable...it has no power of itself; it's fueled by power of consent.
Who would want to take part of the Holy Land? Is this rhetorical? If not, I'd wager everyone searching for God and all of the evil out there, to be sure. The problem is all these people got together to demand the jewish people should have that land but they left out that it is God's land, the reason that land is different than all other land is that God said His eyes and His heart would always be there. 1 Kings 9
So I think everyone should read what He expected and acknowledge the failure and repent.
It was a joke. I have no idea what the State of Israel is. Except I do. It was a historic reference to the two-state solution with Palestine.
Except that's changed. Or seems to be.
Gaza will be evacuated bar its terrorists. Jerusalem is also going to be the capital of Israel.
Wasn't the two-state solution a part of the normalisation process?
Today there is only Israel. The current events are. Yes it homes a diverse population. But I think any notion of Palestine will cease. Although who knows?
A state is a nation or territory.
a state is a government appartus. a nation is a people of a common language and culture living together. a territory is a boundary on a map. all three things are distinct. u can have two without the other. a state with a territory and no nation = yugoslavia. a state and nation without teritory = isis. a territory and nation without state = afghanistan.
So when this nation was developed and approved, practically overnight, you don't think it possible that any other nation could have tied itself to the nation of Israel?
I'll agree that it did not organically evolve.
Seems more like an eminent domain.
The suggested brand "israel" got its eminence (distinguished above others) by all those who consent to suggested nationalism aka from the many willingly submitting to the suggestions by a chosen few.
In other words...if a few suggest "this is israel" and many consent to believe or disbelieve it, then those many permit a few to define perceivable (reality) with suggested (fiction).
Suggestion tempts one to ignore perceivable...it has no power of itself; it's fueled by power of consent.
But who would want that?
Who would want to take part of the Holy Land? Is this rhetorical? If not, I'd wager everyone searching for God and all of the evil out there, to be sure. The problem is all these people got together to demand the jewish people should have that land but they left out that it is God's land, the reason that land is different than all other land is that God said His eyes and His heart would always be there. 1 Kings 9 So I think everyone should read what He expected and acknowledge the failure and repent.
Using the brand "israel" implies ones consent to suggested nationalism, hence binding self by consent to suggestion of another.
Meanwhile...perceivable nation implies each one of a people aka one apart from one another...not bound together.
a) nation implies each one of a people; territory implies terra (earth).
b) state implies being send (life) within order (inception towards death) aka condition of being.
America?
Maybe
It was a joke. I have no idea what the State of Israel is. Except I do. It was a historic reference to the two-state solution with Palestine.
Except that's changed. Or seems to be.
Gaza will be evacuated bar its terrorists. Jerusalem is also going to be the capital of Israel.
Wasn't the two-state solution a part of the normalisation process?
Today there is only Israel. The current events are. Yes it homes a diverse population. But I think any notion of Palestine will cease. Although who knows?
Except it's clear there is only Israel emerging.
Here is a list of countries with "state" in their name:
United Mexican States (official name of Mexico)
United States of America (official name of the United States)
State of Eritrea (official name of Eritrea)
State of Qatar (official name of Qatar)
State of Kuwait (official name of Kuwait)
State of Israel (official name of Israel)
State of Libya (official name of Libya)
State of Bahrain (official name of Bahrain)
State of Palestine (official name of Palestine)
State of Vatican City (official name of Vatican City)
State of Brunei, Abode of Peace (official name of Brunei)
State of Eswatini (official name of Eswatini, also known as Swaziland)
Country of Satan-stan
ISRAEL (Hebrew yisra'el) - "he that striveth (life) within god (inception towards death)"...State of israel implies being alive.