Question.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (15)
sorted by:
Question.
So when this nation was developed and approved, practically overnight, you don't think it possible that any other nation could have tied itself to the nation of Israel?
I'll agree that it did not organically evolve.
Seems more like an eminent domain.
The suggested brand "israel" got its eminence (distinguished above others) by all those who consent to suggested nationalism aka from the many willingly submitting to the suggestions by a chosen few.
In other words...if a few suggest "this is israel" and many consent to believe or disbelieve it, then those many permit a few to define perceivable (reality) with suggested (fiction).
Suggestion tempts one to ignore perceivable...it has no power of itself; it's fueled by power of consent.
But who would want that?
Who would want to take part of the Holy Land? Is this rhetorical? If not, I'd wager everyone searching for God and all of the evil out there, to be sure. The problem is all these people got together to demand the jewish people should have that land but they left out that it is God's land, the reason that land is different than all other land is that God said His eyes and His heart would always be there. 1 Kings 9 So I think everyone should read what He expected and acknowledge the failure and repent.
Using the brand "israel" implies ones consent to suggested nationalism, hence binding self by consent to suggestion of another.
Meanwhile...perceivable nation implies each one of a people aka one apart from one another...not bound together.