I appreciate your attempt to discredit the judicial system, but it was already thoroughly discredited before your experiment.

I have also noticed the same applies to job application. If applying for a position with a Republican ownership, register Republican. When applying for a position with a Democrat ownership, register Democrat. I couldn't get noticed until I registered with the correct party, then some how I became the one person they were looking for. Highly illegal, but try proving it

Do you mean being summoned for jury duty, or actually being selected for jury duty? I just got summoned last month, but did not get picked probably based on what I said about this big real estate builder company. The lawyers got to questions us all in the courtroom before we were selected. We answered a questionnaire, and then they asked for elaboration on your answers. They picked half black people for the jury panel...which technically doesn't accurately reflect our community.

Before that, I got jury duty probably over 5 years ago. I don't even know what political party I'm registered in. I don't even remember when I registered to vote what I put. I know I wasn't democrat, but I don't remember that question. I did have to change my registration when I got married, but I don't remember that being a question.

Your vote holds no power, because people who are actually totally corrupted by power are now cooking the books, left and right.

I cannot accept your canon that we are to judge Pope and King unlike other men, with a favourable presumption that they did no wrong. If there is any presumption it is the other way against holders of power, increasing as the power increases. Historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility. Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority: still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it. That is the point at which the negation of Catholicism and the negation of Liberalism meet and keep high festival, and the end learns to justify the means. You would hang a man of no position, like Ravaillac; but if what one hears is true, then Elizabeth asked the gaoler to murder Mary, and William III ordered his Scots minister to extirpate a clan. Here are the greater names coupled with the greater crimes. You would spare these criminals, for some mysterious reason. I would hang them, higher than Haman, for reasons of quite obvious justice; still more, still higher, for the sake of historical science. - Lord Acton (1887)

Good going. There is no reason not to test this more even with what we already know.

Not sure if this applies—

in my district, who ever is in charge of jury duty summons makes the rules, and the rules change with them. I forget the office… “circuit court jagoff” or something…

But this was explained to me, because depending on who’s in charge, they will use voter registration or that+the drivers license database to pull people in as proof of residency and to expand the candidacy pool…. SINCE SO MANY PEOPLE ARENT REGISTERED TO VOTE…

Why would you want to be a jurior? Why would anybody on the Planet want to be a jurior? As far as jobs, and political party, abstain from the selection. Why would it matter unless it has political affiliations. If doesn't, it shouldn't matter. Politics is one of those things not said in the workplace. Unless it's fuck it.

Courts are real cunts on that duty. Even worse you're a puppet anyway. Influenced into a decision and it might not be your choice. But being dragged there. Literally have too or you're in contempt and can still perjury yourself. It's an exercise in madness.

Judges are different everybody can be a judge. But a jurior fuck you. Witnesses are obviously far worse unless they're the victim. Fuck that.