Where did the plane go?
(twitter.com)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
I'm surprised I've never seen this video before. But there is absolutely no wreckage. Rumsfeld was photographed I'm sure carrying some wreckage away. Perhaps it was planted or staged for the cameras.
Alot of the clips they played that day never got played again.
I remember seeing a video of the hole in PA? It was never shown again. No debris, just a big crater and blackened dirt. I think they explained it away as "vaporizing" on impact.
Lmao, anyone who believes a plane vaporizes on impact, boy I got a few bridges to sell you.
I find it curious how no one talks about george bush's brother (not jeb lmao) who was the head of the security company that was in charge of the twin towers. Nothing to see there right!
The earliest clips are often the most important because they tell the story before the narrative arrives.
They even have field trips there. When my oldest went the people that lived there told the students there was never a plane crash.
The site is covered in cranes and heavy equipment. Clearly this is days or even weeks after the impact. You couldn't figure out from the lack of smoke?
All I have to do is ask you what day this was filmed and you'll have to say "I don't know" because that info isn't provided.
given the planes trajectory, wouldn't the debris be mixed in with the building?
Yeah, that's what I was wondering. If I throw an apple through a window, the applesauce is inside the house, not on the yard.
The vast majority of debris that was outside was the skin, in large part because it's thin aluminum. But yes, the physical debris is inside.
This video is clearly filmed several days after impact. There's no smoke, people are walking around on top of the rubble and the roof, and there's lots of heavy equipment around. You also don't exactly get any wide shots of the scene. All the light debris outside was probably long since picked up or relocated to clear the area.
Because this is filmed in Shaky Horror Cam and the audio has been destroyed, people want to pretend that this was like minutes after the impact. But... lol... no smoke. They sprayed water on the site for two days but you can see there's no more water being sprayed.
They'll claim there's no debris, you show them a picture of the actual main landing gear, they'll claim it was planted there. There is literally no answer for them except what they made up in their minds, believing foolish videos made by anonymous weirdos.
I'm not even going to dignify this with links to pictures of the landing gear. It's been 20 years, everybody has seen that picture at one point or another, at this point it's just willfully erasing your own memory to pretend you didn't see it.
It's funny how the most sensible 'conspiracy' you can have here is that they flew a remote-controlled airliner into the building, which would account for everything, but the conspiracy theorists reject it because missile theories are 'cooler', even though there's no evidence at all of a missile.
Don’t let u/Praisebetoscience see this. He’ll claim photoshop.
This video is clearly filmed days or maybe even weeks after, if you couldn't tell from all the heavy equipment and total lack of smoke.
Wait a second did you actually think this was what, mere minutes after impact? Why, because it's weirdly loud and shot in shaky horror-cam?
Psychopath: detected!
It's amazing how angry this stuff makes you.
Every post you make only digs you in deeper.
Was the Reichstag Fire a false flag?
I'm sure there is an exceptionally rare and implausible explanation for this that isn't simply that no planes crashed into anything and they just showed cheap CGI on the TV.
If they wanted to fake an airliner hitting the Pentagon why didn't they hit it with an airliner? You realize you can have a conspiracy and have a plane hitting the building too, right?
It's strange how that's a reasonable position but you will reject it outright because missiles are cool.
There is literally no physical evidence of a missile. Even one piece of airliner is more physical evidence of a plane then you have for a missile. If a plane didn't hit the building "because there's no debris", then neither did a missile for the exact same reason. So what did hit it?