If they wanted to fake an airliner hitting the Pentagon why didn't they hit it with an airliner? You realize you can have a conspiracy and have a plane hitting the building too, right?
It's strange how that's a reasonable position but you will reject it outright because missiles are cool.
There is literally no physical evidence of a missile. Even one piece of airliner is more physical evidence of a plane then you have for a missile. If a plane didn't hit the building "because there's no debris", then neither did a missile for the exact same reason. So what did hit it?
If they wanted to fake an airliner hitting the Pentagon why didn't they hit it with an airliner? You realize you can have a conspiracy and have a plane hitting the building too, right?
It's strange how that's a reasonable position but you will reject it outright because missiles are cool.
There is literally no physical evidence of a missile. Even one piece of airliner is more physical evidence of a plane then you have for a missile. If a plane didn't hit the building "because there's no debris", then neither did a missile for the exact same reason. So what did hit it?