And, if not, how will they justify it? WWIII? Or go ahead with an election under a "new virus" to allow for cheating?
Or something else entirely?
Comments (29)
sorted by:
I completely agree, but they don't have absolute control - they're not gods. I really do believe that they wanted Hillary to win in 2016, for instance. And they woke a lot of people up with the blatant cheating in 2020. I'm torn on Trump, but it's clear that the establishment don't want him.
Nah. You saw how fast Hillary conceded. It's just good cop bad cop.
If trump was an actual threat, he would have committed suicide long ago.
She conceded because if they fought to count votes, their scam would have been uncovered. They went extra hard in 2020 by muddying the courts and cranking up the propaganda, ensuring they could steal it.
They did enough to make you believe it.
a) entrance (inception) towards outcome (death) implies life wielding free will of choice (elect; eligio; to choose) as resistance.
b) selecting others by consenting to suggested elections gives them the power of ones consent to restrict (control) ones free will of choice...voting represents a self imposed restriction.
In other words...the few suggest different outcomes to tempt the many to ignore predefined outcome for everyone. Aiming at something different; while ignoring the same natural order gives others control over ones "destiny". Those who follow orders willingly ignore natural order, hence lacking comprehension about what goes on.
No, also we will not jump into WW3 yet.
The way they will do it is to unleash an Antifa revolution that will burn down the White House and lead to civil war between the far left and the far right.
Hmm, bold move to allow the far left to be painted as the villains in the normies eyes - seeing as quasi-communism seems to be one of their goals. Possible, though.
Not sure what angle they'd take to accomplish that, either. They prepped hatred of Trump for years to get them riled up a few years back. While I know that Antifa aren't keen on Democrats either, I don't see the backdrop there. Maybe they would if Trump won in 2024, before he took office.
The elite is neither left or right, the far left and the far right are manipulated to do their bidding. What I believe is happening is the same case as they did using Hitler.
To rationalize more insane ideologies. And the cycle continues.
I agree that they're neither left nor right. The way I see it, their goals are to expand their control whilst keeping pitchforks from their doors. The global financial system has been on life support since 2008, so they seem to be keeping it afloat artificially (by stuffing countries with migrants) while removing any power to resist from the masses - as it is sure to fall apart before too long, and people will be angry, to say the least. Sure, directing the anger elsewhere is a time-tested ploy, but it's so much easier to maintain control over a communist style system - so that's what they're gunning for, as fast as they reasonably can.
It will not and never be the current batch of elites doing it though. At least the pawns.
You don't see the Tsar taking control of everything for the Illuminati in the NWO's Russia -- you see Stalin doing it.
Agree vs disagree; us vs them; either vs neither and left vs right represent different sides within the same conflict of reason...a conflict shaped by ones consent to anything suggested by others.
French élite - "selection, choice". Choice can only exist at the center of surrounding balance (left/right)...never on any side. Others suggest sides to tempt choice to ignore center, hence tempting one to imbalance self.
Suggested IDEO (form) LOGY (logos; word) tempts one to ignore being IN (within) perceivable SANUS (sound).
Words are formed within flowing sound...consenting to suggested form tempts one to ignore perceivable flow.
Continuity implies ongoing forward motion...only those within can experience cyclical repetition temporarily.
The handy property of an illness is that it serves as an excuse to keep observers away.
There will be a fake election because it helps maintain the "everything is normal, folks" parade, Trump will run because preventing him from running will fire up the right, so he will run but his supporters will be able to tell that something is off, they'll be expecting it to feel like last time and it won't, it'll feel weird and unsettling and awkwardly forced, the left will prop up someone at the last minute to replace Biden, the MSM will very awkwardly mostly ignore this person and just take the usual anti-Trump approach, the last minute prop from the left will win by a small margin, they will literally repeat everything from last time, people will feel awkward for being shocked at the audacity even though they know they shouldn't actually be surprised, then the crazy wild card event will happen almost immediately after the election
There will be. Because there are only so many scenarios there won't. It seems those odds have increased. But regardless, any larger probability still favours an election.
When an election isn't upheld, it's because of disaster or crisis or war, directly affecting it.
A nation in war at home cannot vote, depending on how it's fighting. But if it's fighting abroad, it often makes no difference to an elective process, but many nation's often don't tend to change admins during warfare of any kind. It changes politicians, envoys, intelligence appointed for security, diplomacy, and war. It could potentially mean retreat.
Crisis potentially delays an elective process. Extreme disaster, significantly affecting the population preventing votes, or a disease, pandemic. Until votes can be held.
Bets, aren't worth betting at this point. But any risks increase.
Voting is a consent form for these witches to rule us.
What a condescending tone to take ha, as if I don't already know...
Democracy is certainly rigged. I don't think anybody here denies that.
But the establishment really didn't want the brexit vote to turn out the way it did - it set them back in their plans. They remained dominant ofc, but with the way they tried to get around the peoples vote, they hated that they actually lost progress because of a vote. Anything that makes them even temporarily seethe makes me happy. They need to keep the deception going, which means they need to either control both "sides" of a vote, or cheat the vote. Thus, they are, short of revolution, the only chinks in the armour that it's possible to get at them through, as the general public still believes that democracy works. The elite want them to keep believing that.
Need to have election theater for the illusion of democracy for the avg midwit normie narrative
My $2 says there will be a 2024 selection, and then there will be dictatorship/martial law for 8 years, and then the people finally revolt, and then USA collapses.
If trump win the left will probably want to start a civil war.
a) ELECT', verb (Latin eligo; Greek; to choose)...being implies ones free will of choice.; others suggest elections to tempt one to select (French; elite) them as the "chosen ones".
b) suggested US (united states) tempts one to ignore being apart from other ones, not together (we the people), hence UNITED; UNIT; UNUS - "one".