And, if not, how will they justify it? WWIII? Or go ahead with an election under a "new virus" to allow for cheating?
Or something else entirely?
And, if not, how will they justify it? WWIII? Or go ahead with an election under a "new virus" to allow for cheating?
Or something else entirely?
a) entrance (inception) towards outcome (death) implies life wielding free will of choice (elect; eligio; to choose) as resistance.
b) selecting others by consenting to suggested elections gives them the power of ones consent to restrict (control) ones free will of choice...voting represents a self imposed restriction.
In other words...the few suggest different outcomes to tempt the many to ignore predefined outcome for everyone. Aiming at something different; while ignoring the same natural order gives others control over ones "destiny". Those who follow orders willingly ignore natural order, hence lacking comprehension about what goes on.