Did I miss something? Wasn't there a medieval-ish warm period where Vikings farmed greenland and grapes grew in England? Wouldn't that have been a hotter global temperature?
Comments (23)
sorted by:
We have to take away Steven Spielberg's new 4,444 ton diesel powered yacht to save the planet.
Wouldn't help much. Carbon dioxide is 0.04% of the atmosphere. Human beings create only 3% of that 0.04%.
Just for comparison. One volcano going off undoes all of the carbon 'savings', by stopping all the yachts in existence from operating for many years, in the first hour of eruption. And there are about 50 volcanoes which erupt every year.
It was never about science or logic.
It's about using climate change as an excuse for restricting freedom. So let's oppress the rich elite, politicians' large motorcades, politicians' mansions, politicians' private planes and yachts. No no no elitist. Muh climate change. In fact, just having billions of dollars naturally leads to more consumption which is more climate change. Therefore strip Bill Gates, Fauci, Biden, Soros, all the rich jews of all their wealth. It's safer for the climate for these kid fuckers to be broke or even better yet, dead. Because you can't expel carbon dioxide out of your lungs if you are deceased. They should elect for suicide, which may be legally assisted in several states already.
I hear you. Of course it has nothing to do with climate, which changes all the time. Today Earth is 2-4°C colder than all of the last 8000 years. Around 1875 it was the lowest point in the last 10,000 years. And that matches exactly the time when meteorological observations started.
This is the first thing normies have to understand, not what they're being told on the JCM (Jew Controlled Media). There are only 6 main Media companies left today and the Rothschilds own them all controlling over 90% of all Media. All lies, absolutely designed to serve their purpose, Agenda 2030 and JWO (Jew World Order).
Always my favorite climate hoax clip.
He got $50m for "writing" one book.
$12m for a seafront home is a few weeks work. How upset would he be if it got washed away?
You think he's going to sit there and watch the sea rise? (even if seas rising wasn't fake & gay)
Jews laundering money through phony book deals.
They should be arrested and charged with money laundering. Our government is a crime organization.
Hey now that's qtalk and we don't take kindly to that around here, or so I've been told...many many times.
A couple years ago, we had a heat wave of ~40°C for a solid month. Thisbyear we've had nearly 3 days, and there was also a week of near freezing weather in May. I'm not seeing the hottest on record; maybe it's everywhere but here?
The plants are doing great, though.
yeah the whole North was open from 900ad to mid 1400s till the little ice age, which lasted to the 1800s.
Yes! This is what I had heard. I will have to look into it more thanks for the info.
According to Jørgen Peder Steffensen, of Denmark’s Niels Bohr Institute, warming of the planet Earth is a good thing. Experiments with ice from the Viking age around the year one thousand, also called the medieval warm period shows in Greenland the Medieval Warm Period was about one and a half degrees warmer on average than today: https://rclutz.com/2023/05/05/1875-was-coldest-in-10000-years-warming-a-good-thing/
1875 was coldest in 10,000 years. And that matches exactly the time when meteorological observations started. Undisputed temperature reconstructions from around the world show the planet was much warmer over most of the Holocene (past 10,000 years) than it is today: https://archive.ph/gKfao
Thanks! Perfect info. Will share :)
normies last week; the weather has been mild all of may and june this is crazy what is happening.
normies this week: it has been hot for 3 days this is crazy what is happening.
Lol, well. It has been in the MSM lately.
I dont know, but I suspect this happens and when it does it creates a situation where everything goes into fucking hostile mode to compete for resources.
I know, I sound stupid.
Wasps are a good example though. Even though it seems the top results are debunking it ^^.
https://www.rescue.com/latest-buzz/seasonal-bug-bulletin/how-insects-handle-heat/
Seems like insects start to produce like crazy the hotter it gets, proably a survival strategy.
I also suspect the aggression is the same for mammals, which is why people get so fucking insane during the summer, even before covid.
https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/temperature-violence-heat-aggression-psychology-fight-b1904811.html
Just because its natural, doesnt mean its good. I just worry that its a sign of something yet to come.
Nova scotia feeling like fucking appalachia ohio in the middle of a hot humid july.
a) oneself represents center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable)...others suggest norms to tempt one to hold onto; which establishes a perpendicular intersection.
b) being center (life) of surrounding (inception towards death) implies a balance/level/horizontal foundation (loss) for choice/changing/vertical (growth) existence.
c) suggested norms rule those who consent to them.
d) choice requires balance...others suggest SQUARE, adjective - "parallel; even; leaving no balance" as the inversion thereof.
e) being alive; while being moved from inception towards death; represents parallel to those who ignore resisting.
f) the few suggest parallelism aka PAR'ALLEL, adjective (Gr. against or opposite) to tempt the many to ignore being curvature (temporary growth) within linear (ongoing loss).
Consenting to anything suggested tempts one to miss (ignore) everything perceivable...
Look into "hello" aka HEL (helsinki) O (odenma) aka the former north-pole...
People are incapable of taking in all stimulus of their environment. Not everything someone misses was something they necessarily perceived or were tempted by.
a) ENVIRON (to sourround) + MENT (mind/memory)...mind/memory can only exist at the center of surrounding input.
b) action (inception towards death) animates aka excites aka stimulates reactions (life). Only within action can one react.
c) being implies everything perceivable (whole) offered to everyone's perception (partial)...others suggest one to take wanted; while ignoring the needed offer.
d) being able to breathe implies being within breathable fluid...breathing isn't about taking this fluid; but about adapting to it flowing through one.
e) suggested "in-capable" tempts one to ignore being with-IN CAPABLE (able to hold or contain). Life (form) is being contained within inception towards death motion (flow).
That which is capable (whole) enables incapability (partials).
f) others suggest wanted stimuli like hamburger or fries to tempt one to ignore needed stimuli...hunger. It doesn't matter what one wants or not wants to eat; because one needs to adapt to hunger. One exists within the force of hunger (ongoing loss) as the resisting force (temporary growth).
Taking in food doesn't stop hunger forcing one to adapt by eating.
In short...suggested information overstimulates those who ignore perceivable inspiration for it. That's why choosing to take and hold onto tempts one to feel overburdened by all the incoming stimuli.
a) motion (inception towards death) represents ongoing temptation for temporary resistance (life) within. The "path of least resistance" represents a suggested temptation for one to ignore resisting.
b) to miss (failing to aim) is based on ones consent to aim at suggested outcomes; while ignoring that perceivable origin aims life from inception towards death, hence towards a predefined outcome...a discernible outcome for those who aren't willingly ignoring it.
c) consider if surrounding (inception towards death) projectiles center (life); hence it not being about aiming; but about what the momentum of the ongoing projectile (motion) generates...temporary resistance.
d) before one can direct aim at anything suggested; one is being directed by everything perceivable.
e) taking any "weapon" for aiming and realize that one utilizes ones "weapon of choice" before choosing to aim. Discerning this allows one to further comprehend that choice (reaction) can only exist within balance (action)...ones free will of choice represents the impact of projected (motion) balance (momentum).
f) allow yourself to discern the contradiction within writing "not everything" aka nothing/everything...where did you learn the behavior to describe everything by using nothing as the foundation?
g) can life (partial) miss being moved from inception towards death (whole)? If not; then partial cannot miss whole....why is that so hard to comprehend? Because suggested "if not" tempts one to reason (nothing vs everything) instead of adapting to implication (if/then).
tl; dr...all of the above one can choose to ignore, hence "dismiss".