I am a Marine Corps infantry veteran who is now working for the United States Government in electronic espionage, and have been for the last five years.
From fucking 4chan.
Have we learned nothing after all those years of TOTALLY LEGIT GOVERNMENT INSIDERS trolling about popular topics?
I was just reading the same post and a similar one over on Reddit, and there was an incredible number of people posting how this guy was full of it and it was all bullshit and upvoting each other and slamming anyone who said anything to the contrary. That in itself should tell everyone something about the information's legitimacy (but I won't give away what I think it means!)
That being said, is there going to be some nuclear Armageddon? No.
Russia is already aware of a potential imminent false flag of exactly this nature and has an impressive capability to defeat such attack if launched.
Past that--and it's a much longer and deeper story--it seems the maniacs running the US do not have access to nuclear weapons. Their lackeys that do apparently will not provide access either, because they have no willingness to get annihilated in service to the Empire.
Nukes have already been used by Russia a number of times in the current conflict in Ukraine, so if the West wanted to point to a Russian "nuclear provocation", they could have simply done that. So whatever loony idea this guy may have come across, it's not going to start a nuclear war.
Finally, that bit about the "anti-LGBT pro-white Christian" program is totally bizarre and there's no evidence anywhere to connect it to. My thought is that some CIA maniac decided to circulate this bit of disinfo just in case They need to smoke a bunch of gays and trannies and blame it on white conservatives.
Looks like this guy just innocently accepted it, and one is reminded of Bill Cooper, who came to suspect phony UFO-related documents were being planted in front of him as disinfo.
Tactical nukes where. Come on. Like the lowest yields on the biggest munitions storages. That way nobody cares. No. Why aren't they using them everywhere else? Literally. Look it's a cluster of Ukrainians in tanks and stuff. Tactical strike. No other risk as you put it. A number of times now. No fallout either.
Where have the nukes been used? Why was there no other fallout reported? Why aren't they being used everywhere? Only used according to yourself selectively on the munition storages?
It was the said event you're quoting, the big factory that plumed last month with the depleted shells, a month or two before the fuel depot and the anti aircraft? Those weren't nukes. Neither was the mall in Kiev or the bunker in Lviv.
Indeed it is. But I have come to understand that few have the ability to keep up. It's still a bit counterintuitive to me, but there are some that wish to proclaim this fact, as they believe it somehow demonstrates their superiority. A strange thing to witness, but there we have it.
Keep researching. Or don't, but there's no need to bother me about it with lame-ass rhetoric.
No you. Nukes have a very distinctive signature and leave behind radiation.
I provided the examples of your assumption. You turn around and produce ignorance. Read it. It doesn't make you clever blaming me or turning this debate into how I need to research your claim. I cited 5 examples of detonations you're possibly presuming.
There is a supposed debate on the depleted shells, except a radiation reading was there prior to any detonation, despite of it being there afterwards, and it wasn't a tactical signature. There was two missile hits. If a nuke why double tap. Neither were the distinct blast
The signature of a distinctive flash, the flash being incredibly bright, and then the blast wave, shock wave, travelling outwards. Like at the mall. However there are other munitions that also cause a shock wave. Like vacuum and thermobaric. It was incendiary. Because it hit flammable materials and munitions. Like it did at the railway factory fuel depot.
So where asshole, read that bullshit, so matter of fact. When. Where. How. You claimed. I asked. I didn't ask for nonsense.
If they're using nukes so brazenly why has it been localised to explosions with ignitable compounds. Munition storage, and fuel depots? They leave plumes, and clouds. Incendiary materials do. Check out American disasters this year, railway crash, the milking factory, fertiliser storage. All had mushroom clouds, and plumes.
If you're quoting the hypersonic hits like Lviv, or the recent one somewhere in Donetsk, something something cannot pronounce it, near Bakhmut somewhere. Neither had radiation readings. The mall didn't either. They would be screaming, until he was blue in the face calling for nuclear missiles to reign down on Russia, begging for the nukes.
Again the probability is almost zero, because it would get a huge response. We'd hear no end of it. Our ears would fall off. The press would incite WW3, because Zelenskyy would be screaming for a nuclear football.
Really expending a tremendous amount of effort on this specific issue, aren't you? A few will be astute enough to note this, and draw the proper conclusions.
BTW, you got so overexcited you replied to your own post.
That isn't an answer. It's bullshit. See when I make a debate I insert more than erratic claims.
You've just matter of fact expected people to believe your bullshit with no context to back it up. Somebody said something you're claiming, believe. Dumb, stupid, ignorant, fantasy, whimsical, baloney, trite.
Where. When. How. First rules of thought. Not somebody said something on the Internet you've claimed.
Look at Ukraine all they air is. At what point on the probability have nukes hit when all they air is?
Our ears would fall off. Dumbass.
Baseless conjecture. There would be no end of it. It would be everywhere. There is 0 chance to date they have been used. It is not say they won't. Currently none.
Ukraine would scream scream and scream. It's all they do.
Ergo this fucking topic being written into doctrine. Congress and Nato have approved action if the reactor goes meltdown.
The whole Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Station false flag attack has been so over-advertised for months now that it's more likely to NOT happen than to actually happen.
Remember, these bastards are opportunists.
If they miss their window of opportunity, they just pivot.
More likely is that they are using the Zapo thing as a diversion at this point and will do something completely different.
NATO Summit is in Vilnius, Lithuania on July 11th to 12th.
Pedo-Biden is visiting the Baltics on July 9th to 13th.
Highly likely that something will happen during that timeframe, but not necessarily on 4th/5th.
Yawn. It causes nuclear war. It has already been inserted into Nato doctrine as a means of Nato entering. If it gets hit. It has already been approved by Dems and the Gop, senate, as entry. Nato has also suggest likewise. It ain't a dam. It's meltdown. It faster causes direct involvement.
There are grounds around it. Not many. To what extent depends on the disaster. But it will cause a reaction Nato commit.
It would be easier to turn it off. Eject the cores and shut it down. Removing it from the battlefield. Oh they'll moan it's supplying both sides. After this long it's a risk that should have seen it shutdown. Rather then a propaganda tool where both sides assume it will. Not that easy injecting the cores, it needs a whole team of monkeys, and measures. But it might've been smarter then it being blamed.
In either event there's a risk it remains contentious. A means of escalation.
The problem was also shutting it down, it was called a warcrime, I believ3 certain subststions were artempted, it brought inspectors. It's supplying both. America also accused Russia of tampering with any upgrades they added on it. Hasn't it got like 6 cores?
But somehow it seemibgly would've been smarter to turn it off. At what point is it still in operation in a warzone? Tempting something.
Most American federal agencies have strict anti-LGBT and pro white christian values.
The push for LGBT rights, and laws catering to trannies have been a psychological operation to get data on where most of these people live, and use targeted advertising, as well as other techniques to get them to all move towards largely populated
This is just nonsensical psychobabble. How can most federal agencies have pro Christian values when 98% of DC votes and financially donates to the democratic party? DC (and by extension all federal agencies within DC) are overwhelming liberal (pro gay anti christian)
From fucking 4chan.
Have we learned nothing after all those years of TOTALLY LEGIT GOVERNMENT INSIDERS trolling about popular topics?
I was just reading the same post and a similar one over on Reddit, and there was an incredible number of people posting how this guy was full of it and it was all bullshit and upvoting each other and slamming anyone who said anything to the contrary. That in itself should tell everyone something about the information's legitimacy (but I won't give away what I think it means!)
That being said, is there going to be some nuclear Armageddon? No.
Russia is already aware of a potential imminent false flag of exactly this nature and has an impressive capability to defeat such attack if launched.
Past that--and it's a much longer and deeper story--it seems the maniacs running the US do not have access to nuclear weapons. Their lackeys that do apparently will not provide access either, because they have no willingness to get annihilated in service to the Empire.
Nukes have already been used by Russia a number of times in the current conflict in Ukraine, so if the West wanted to point to a Russian "nuclear provocation", they could have simply done that. So whatever loony idea this guy may have come across, it's not going to start a nuclear war.
Finally, that bit about the "anti-LGBT pro-white Christian" program is totally bizarre and there's no evidence anywhere to connect it to. My thought is that some CIA maniac decided to circulate this bit of disinfo just in case They need to smoke a bunch of gays and trannies and blame it on white conservatives.
Looks like this guy just innocently accepted it, and one is reminded of Bill Cooper, who came to suspect phony UFO-related documents were being planted in front of him as disinfo.
We live in a wilderness of mirrors.
Nukes, hahaha. No. What. Where. When?
Nukes? You cite that, so matter of fact.
Tactical nukes where. Come on. Like the lowest yields on the biggest munitions storages. That way nobody cares. No. Why aren't they using them everywhere else? Literally. Look it's a cluster of Ukrainians in tanks and stuff. Tactical strike. No other risk as you put it. A number of times now. No fallout either.
Where have the nukes been used? Why was there no other fallout reported? Why aren't they being used everywhere? Only used according to yourself selectively on the munition storages?
It was the said event you're quoting, the big factory that plumed last month with the depleted shells, a month or two before the fuel depot and the anti aircraft? Those weren't nukes. Neither was the mall in Kiev or the bunker in Lviv.
Indeed it is. But I have come to understand that few have the ability to keep up. It's still a bit counterintuitive to me, but there are some that wish to proclaim this fact, as they believe it somehow demonstrates their superiority. A strange thing to witness, but there we have it.
Keep researching. Or don't, but there's no need to bother me about it with lame-ass rhetoric.
No you. Nukes have a very distinctive signature and leave behind radiation.
I provided the examples of your assumption. You turn around and produce ignorance. Read it. It doesn't make you clever blaming me or turning this debate into how I need to research your claim. I cited 5 examples of detonations you're possibly presuming.
There is a supposed debate on the depleted shells, except a radiation reading was there prior to any detonation, despite of it being there afterwards, and it wasn't a tactical signature. There was two missile hits. If a nuke why double tap. Neither were the distinct blast
The signature of a distinctive flash, the flash being incredibly bright, and then the blast wave, shock wave, travelling outwards. Like at the mall. However there are other munitions that also cause a shock wave. Like vacuum and thermobaric. It was incendiary. Because it hit flammable materials and munitions. Like it did at the railway factory fuel depot.
So where asshole, read that bullshit, so matter of fact. When. Where. How. You claimed. I asked. I didn't ask for nonsense.
If they're using nukes so brazenly why has it been localised to explosions with ignitable compounds. Munition storage, and fuel depots? They leave plumes, and clouds. Incendiary materials do. Check out American disasters this year, railway crash, the milking factory, fertiliser storage. All had mushroom clouds, and plumes.
If you're quoting the hypersonic hits like Lviv, or the recent one somewhere in Donetsk, something something cannot pronounce it, near Bakhmut somewhere. Neither had radiation readings. The mall didn't either. They would be screaming, until he was blue in the face calling for nuclear missiles to reign down on Russia, begging for the nukes.
Again the probability is almost zero, because it would get a huge response. We'd hear no end of it. Our ears would fall off. The press would incite WW3, because Zelenskyy would be screaming for a nuclear football.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/03/europe/zelensky-ukraine-putin-erin-burnett-interview-intl-cmd/index.html
Here example of blue in the face. You know counter offensive is badly. Because he's screaming. https://liveuamap.com/en
But if nukes our ears would fall off.
Somehow I doubt defenses last forever. They haven't in any other war. How indeed does it conclude. Because there's always nukes.
Really expending a tremendous amount of effort on this specific issue, aren't you? A few will be astute enough to note this, and draw the proper conclusions.
BTW, you got so overexcited you replied to your own post.
That isn't an answer. It's bullshit. See when I make a debate I insert more than erratic claims.
You've just matter of fact expected people to believe your bullshit with no context to back it up. Somebody said something you're claiming, believe. Dumb, stupid, ignorant, fantasy, whimsical, baloney, trite.
Where. When. How. First rules of thought. Not somebody said something on the Internet you've claimed.
Getting paid per post, I see. We all see.
No dumbass. I question bullshit.
Look at Ukraine all they air is. At what point on the probability have nukes hit when all they air is?
Our ears would fall off. Dumbass.
Baseless conjecture. There would be no end of it. It would be everywhere. There is 0 chance to date they have been used. It is not say they won't. Currently none.
Ukraine would scream scream and scream. It's all they do.
Ergo this fucking topic being written into doctrine. Congress and Nato have approved action if the reactor goes meltdown.
The whole Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Station false flag attack has been so over-advertised for months now that it's more likely to NOT happen than to actually happen.
Remember, these bastards are opportunists.
If they miss their window of opportunity, they just pivot.
More likely is that they are using the Zapo thing as a diversion at this point and will do something completely different.
NATO Summit is in Vilnius, Lithuania on July 11th to 12th.
Pedo-Biden is visiting the Baltics on July 9th to 13th.
Highly likely that something will happen during that timeframe, but not necessarily on 4th/5th.
Yawn. It causes nuclear war. It has already been inserted into Nato doctrine as a means of Nato entering. If it gets hit. It has already been approved by Dems and the Gop, senate, as entry. Nato has also suggest likewise. It ain't a dam. It's meltdown. It faster causes direct involvement.
There are grounds around it. Not many. To what extent depends on the disaster. But it will cause a reaction Nato commit.
It would be easier to turn it off. Eject the cores and shut it down. Removing it from the battlefield. Oh they'll moan it's supplying both sides. After this long it's a risk that should have seen it shutdown. Rather then a propaganda tool where both sides assume it will. Not that easy injecting the cores, it needs a whole team of monkeys, and measures. But it might've been smarter then it being blamed.
In either event there's a risk it remains contentious. A means of escalation.
The problem was also shutting it down, it was called a warcrime, I believ3 certain subststions were artempted, it brought inspectors. It's supplying both. America also accused Russia of tampering with any upgrades they added on it. Hasn't it got like 6 cores?
But somehow it seemibgly would've been smarter to turn it off. At what point is it still in operation in a warzone? Tempting something.
The push for LGBT rights, and laws catering to trannies have been a psychological operation to get data on where most of these people live, and use targeted advertising, as well as other techniques to get them to all move towards largely populated
This is just nonsensical psychobabble. How can most federal agencies have pro Christian values when 98% of DC votes and financially donates to the democratic party? DC (and by extension all federal agencies within DC) are overwhelming liberal (pro gay anti christian)
The power plant is turned off.
It won't cause a meltdown at all even if they bomb it.
Larptard at it's best.