No you. Nukes have a very distinctive signature and leave behind radiation.
I provided the examples of your assumption. You turn around and produce ignorance. Read it. It doesn't make you clever blaming me or turning this debate into how I need to research your claim. I cited 5 examples of detonations you're possibly presuming.
There is a supposed debate on the depleted shells, except a radiation reading was there prior to any detonation, despite of it being there afterwards, and it wasn't a tactical signature. There was two missile hits. If a nuke why double tap. Neither were the distinct blast
The signature of a distinctive flash, the flash being incredibly bright, and then the blast wave, shock wave, travelling outwards. Like at the mall. However there are other munitions that also cause a shock wave. Like vacuum and thermobaric. It was incendiary. Because it hit flammable materials and munitions. Like it did at the railway factory fuel depot.
So where asshole, read that bullshit, so matter of fact. When. Where. How. You claimed. I asked. I didn't ask for nonsense.
If they're using nukes so brazenly why has it been localised to explosions with ignitable compounds. Munition storage, and fuel depots? They leave plumes, and clouds. Incendiary materials do. Check out American disasters this year, railway crash, the milking factory, fertiliser storage. All had mushroom clouds, and plumes.
If you're quoting the hypersonic hits like Lviv, or the recent one somewhere in Donetsk, something something cannot pronounce it, near Bakhmut somewhere. Neither had radiation readings. The mall didn't either. They would be screaming, until he was blue in the face calling for nuclear missiles to reign down on Russia, begging for the nukes.
Again the probability is almost zero, because it would get a huge response. We'd hear no end of it. Our ears would fall off. The press would incite WW3, because Zelenskyy would be screaming for a nuclear football.
Really expending a tremendous amount of effort on this specific issue, aren't you? A few will be astute enough to note this, and draw the proper conclusions.
BTW, you got so overexcited you replied to your own post.
That isn't an answer. It's bullshit. See when I make a debate I insert more than erratic claims.
You've just matter of fact expected people to believe your bullshit with no context to back it up. Somebody said something you're claiming, believe. Dumb, stupid, ignorant, fantasy, whimsical, baloney, trite.
Where. When. How. First rules of thought. Not somebody said something on the Internet you've claimed.
Look at Ukraine all they air is. At what point on the probability have nukes hit when all they air is?
Our ears would fall off. Dumbass.
Baseless conjecture. There would be no end of it. It would be everywhere. There is 0 chance to date they have been used. It is not say they won't. Currently none.
Ukraine would scream scream and scream. It's all they do.
Ergo this fucking topic being written into doctrine. Congress and Nato have approved action if the reactor goes meltdown.
No you. Nukes have a very distinctive signature and leave behind radiation.
I provided the examples of your assumption. You turn around and produce ignorance. Read it. It doesn't make you clever blaming me or turning this debate into how I need to research your claim. I cited 5 examples of detonations you're possibly presuming.
There is a supposed debate on the depleted shells, except a radiation reading was there prior to any detonation, despite of it being there afterwards, and it wasn't a tactical signature. There was two missile hits. If a nuke why double tap. Neither were the distinct blast
The signature of a distinctive flash, the flash being incredibly bright, and then the blast wave, shock wave, travelling outwards. Like at the mall. However there are other munitions that also cause a shock wave. Like vacuum and thermobaric. It was incendiary. Because it hit flammable materials and munitions. Like it did at the railway factory fuel depot.
So where asshole, read that bullshit, so matter of fact. When. Where. How. You claimed. I asked. I didn't ask for nonsense.
If they're using nukes so brazenly why has it been localised to explosions with ignitable compounds. Munition storage, and fuel depots? They leave plumes, and clouds. Incendiary materials do. Check out American disasters this year, railway crash, the milking factory, fertiliser storage. All had mushroom clouds, and plumes.
If you're quoting the hypersonic hits like Lviv, or the recent one somewhere in Donetsk, something something cannot pronounce it, near Bakhmut somewhere. Neither had radiation readings. The mall didn't either. They would be screaming, until he was blue in the face calling for nuclear missiles to reign down on Russia, begging for the nukes.
Again the probability is almost zero, because it would get a huge response. We'd hear no end of it. Our ears would fall off. The press would incite WW3, because Zelenskyy would be screaming for a nuclear football.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/07/03/europe/zelensky-ukraine-putin-erin-burnett-interview-intl-cmd/index.html
Here example of blue in the face. You know counter offensive is badly. Because he's screaming. https://liveuamap.com/en
But if nukes our ears would fall off.
Somehow I doubt defenses last forever. They haven't in any other war. How indeed does it conclude. Because there's always nukes.
Really expending a tremendous amount of effort on this specific issue, aren't you? A few will be astute enough to note this, and draw the proper conclusions.
BTW, you got so overexcited you replied to your own post.
That isn't an answer. It's bullshit. See when I make a debate I insert more than erratic claims.
You've just matter of fact expected people to believe your bullshit with no context to back it up. Somebody said something you're claiming, believe. Dumb, stupid, ignorant, fantasy, whimsical, baloney, trite.
Where. When. How. First rules of thought. Not somebody said something on the Internet you've claimed.
Getting paid per post, I see. We all see.
No dumbass. I question bullshit.
Look at Ukraine all they air is. At what point on the probability have nukes hit when all they air is?
Our ears would fall off. Dumbass.
Baseless conjecture. There would be no end of it. It would be everywhere. There is 0 chance to date they have been used. It is not say they won't. Currently none.
Ukraine would scream scream and scream. It's all they do.
Ergo this fucking topic being written into doctrine. Congress and Nato have approved action if the reactor goes meltdown.