Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

13
Someone explain (www.youtube.com)
posted 2 years ago by dukey 2 years ago by dukey +13 / -0
19 comments share
19 comments share save hide report block hide replies
Comments (19)
sorted by:
▲ 5 ▼
– Primate98 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

There seems to have been some technology available until pretty recently at whose nature I could not even guess. Further, it seems to be beyond even the two most commonly advanced "fringe" proposals: advanced cutting tools and the liquefaction of stone.

The Veiled Virgin

18th-Century Sculpture Has a Delicate Net Carved Out of a Single Block of Marble

With those examples, suppose we gave a sculptor a scalpel like a light saber. Could such sculptures be created without a flaw showing a slip of the light scalpel? Hard to believe they could.

Even stranger is a marble sculpture of a little girl wearing a linen shift. (I don't have a link but it was shown in one of Sylvie Ivanowa's videos.) When you look very closely, the weave of the linen has been replicated. There's also a small flaw on her arm, and close inspection reveals it's not a defect in the marble, but replicates a tiny scar in her skin. Why would any sculptor do such a thing?

And I mean, fucking-A, it's not just that no one can create sculptures like these any more, and it's not just that no one tries, but no one even wants to fucking talk about it.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– Lippy68 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Almost like they scanned a girl and then used a laser based 3D printer?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Primate98 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Bizarrely, there is actually evidence of 3D scanning, or at least evidence very suggestive of such a thing. I found the original video and Sylvie talks about the statue starting at 8:55:

"Impossible" statues, "Impossible" ancient jewellery, Moscow nuked, (old version)

I highly recommend watching the entire video, and also any other of her work you can get your hands on. One of the very best researchers out there. You'll be left shaking your head at what has been lost (that is to say, stolen from us).

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– clemaneuverers 1 point 2 years ago +2 / -1

One of the "woo" theories is that they had a way of "liquifying" rock and casting it - hence the similarity in detail to modern metal-cast sculptures.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– dukey [S] 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

The working theory is they just had copper tools to cut and shape the stone. But copper isn't exactly a hard metal. My theory is they must have had diamond cutting bits. After all diamond, like gold exists in it's natural form, it doesn't need to be smelted or combined with other chemicals to extract it.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1
▲ -1 ▼
– Eisenhorn -1 points 2 years ago +1 / -2

because it wasn't necessary.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -2 ▼
– Eisenhorn -2 points 2 years ago +4 / -6

Considering that many people have replicated shaping these types of rocks with copper and stone tools, why exactly do you think they would have needed diamond cutting bits?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– dukey [S] 2 points 2 years ago +3 / -1

I'd love to see someone replicate this with stone or copper tools.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– Eisenhorn 0 points 2 years ago +4 / -4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xv70B0T3cUM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQkQwsBhj8I

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdUSZwAHZXU

There are many more of these experiments.

So, back to my question. Why exactly do you think they would have needed diamond cutting bits?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– GoldenRatioed 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

Thanks for these links. I learned something this morning.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Needmorepopcorn 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

So I'm deep in it but maybe this will give you a path to follow.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gcdrk5dTZ8A

U.S. cities seen on maps from 1500. Top Kek

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Ninpomike 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

I watched the video and have heard of this mud flood theory. So people went to seattle to dig it up and when they realized the buildings go deeper they just destroyed them and the built on top of them for the new wave of people coming? Also did they find dead bodies throughout these mud flooded cities since this happened all over the world?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– Needmorepopcorn 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Not much talk of bodies maybe most were disposed of before hand or time got to them.

I think civilization has gone underground many times before.

Streets of Tartaria also goes to Utah and finds a lot.

Most of these grad oldworld buildings had no connected sidewalks and the pioneers just set up wooden boardwalks in the mud. There was an old world bath house on top of salt lake check it out lots of spires and they must have chose that lake for conductive purposes? They tore it down. Most govt bld's, old uni's, library's, or some have been transformed into museums and such, are old world.

Something I just started thinking about is that child labor. What were the adults doing? Why were there so many children working?

I think its the Mercator maps that show Chicago,Seattle,SanFran,Los Angles.

If I run across it ill upload it for you I have it.

I think these are reused city's of the old world.

I think most history pre 1800's is retellings of story's from a long forgotten past.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1
▲ -3 ▼
– Eisenhorn -3 points 2 years ago +3 / -6

"ultrasonic cutting tool"

kek

There are plenty of videos available showing how people replicate cutting and shaping extremely hard stones with very simple tools that would have been available to the ancient Egyptians.

These videos are just rubbish clickbait made by ignorant people.

Someone explain

Stone, copper, bronze tools for shaping and sandstone, quartz sand, and emery for polishing.

There is absolutely nothing mysterious about this.

permalink save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– freedomlogic 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

Thats the mainstream explanation. And we see what the greeks were able to do with regular marble. But that is a 3 on the mohs scale.

Even then, all it takes is one chip and bloop the whole thing can crack. Doesnt really matter what your working with.

Im not saying its impossible, but if it was done by human hands it was by people who had amazing talent and skills. The part that gets me is there are so many of them.

The mainstream explanation is they used sand with silica quartz in it as a cutting/sanding lubricant basically. I could see them sticking it to bitumen and papyrus like sandpaper haha. But I just find it hard to believe they built the pyramid in 20 years using this technology. I dont care if they had 5 million people ^^ and it was supposedly done with 20,000-100,000 men. All master masonry workers? lol

Something doesnt add up about egypt, but we likely will never know the truth in our lifetimes. The government there and governments all over the world do a good job of cockblocking us from what really happened.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ -3 ▼
– Eisenhorn -3 points 2 years ago +1 / -4

But I just find it hard to believe they built the pyramid in 20 years using this technology.

The pyramids weren't built from granite.

I really don't see what your point is. You say that you find it hard to believe and that "something doesn't add up but you cannot point out anything specific that you struggle with and why exactly.

There have been plenty of experiments showing that it's possible to shape granite with copper, abrasives, and stone in a relatively short amount of time so why is it that you cannot believe that people did the same thing thousand of years ago?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 0 ▼
– deleted 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - j6rsh (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy