Below is my conjecture. Bonus points (just like on Who's Line is it Anyway) if you can create a scenario where the the riots will APPEAR to get worse if Trump wins, and that act as a sort of threat to the normies who want a "return to normalcy" and can be turned off or shut down after an inauguration.
A racial incident? Nah, to obvious even to the normies at this point.
A mega-racial incident like a bunch of whites with swastikas curb stomping a cutish black woman? Maybe, but there would have to be arrests, it can't be a glowie op, so they would have to trick a bunch of MFs.
Threat of "civil war" if Trump wins? Nah, overplayed that hand or the J6 Reichstag fire event.
Russia/Chinese/Mohamaddian terrorist attack? It would have to be a big one.
Food shortages? Possibly...but there is a lot of bad junk food people will turn to in order to keep the hunger pangs at bay, even if there are shortages of bread/milk/eggs.
Power outages? Getting warmer. Hot summers and power outages did the trick in the 1970s...calls out our "aging infrastructure" and creates food shortages and stuff spoils in the local Walmart freezer. Add in that this primarily happens in black urban areas the negroes will throw the bricks, and will say they won't stop unless they get reparations, which won't happen if Trump wins.
Yep. Have power outages and have trump leave it up to governors again to round their people up into concentration camps where they they will be chipped, vaxxed, or killed.
the supreme court abortion thing seemed to be polling well with certain groups. rally blue team and rile them up with perceived red team retard trump. use that rage again to fuel the illusion of democracy and keep the monoparty blue team in power.
Any kind of citizen discontent could be turned by MSM into a picture of severe threat to the "freedom" and "democracy" that needs tough measures to save "freedom" and "democracy" and guarantee "safety".
Unfortunately they have some success in so-called "creating reality". In the absence of any serious means to couteract MSM creating needed "reality", average citizen have no real means and, unfortunately any desire to find out how things going in reality. Independent journalism and personal information exchange is a very small part of moder information flow.
In the case of such campaign, only small number of locals and tiny amount of those who will bother to find out what really happened will know the truth. Vast majority of population will accept the narrative without questions.
I think MSM and social media could easily create "reality" even out of absoultely nothing. I see no any problems for them in creating a story about something that happened in a non-existing town and most will just swallow that. Things will become worse when politicians will pass something legislative about that non-existing event in non-existing town, and that will be used to prosecute those who will question town existence, since if it is in official papers it is definitely "exist" and event definitely "happen".
So you think it will be a "wag the dog" event? Interesting. But in this day and age of everyone with a video camera in their pocket, I don't think that will fly.
Do you remember what happened with #EmptyHospitals? Thousands of that "people with video cameras in pockets" was just completely ignored and banned and major population was convinced that there was a medical disaster, overcrowded hospitals and huge number of "infected".
Fled pergfectly.
That's a fair point, but the crowded hospitals propaganda was to get people to stay at home, not riot. Incentives are different.
I'm talking about technology, not goals of its use.
"People with cameras in pocket" are easily mitigated and their information succesfully suppressed by means of MSM silence and social networks censorship and bots activity.
There is many ways how that technology could be overcame, but people who trying to resist don't even want to hear anything on that matter, continuing to hopelessly lose time in enemy controlled centralized social shit.
People with cameras going around to unbusy hospitals is also what broke the spell of the panic. Those videos went viral. Technology cuts both ways.
But I'm not going to disagree that people are getting manipulated though.
Then why larger part of population fall to vaccinehoax?
If their attempt was succesfull, then there wouldn't have been any lockdowns, masks, vaccine and so on compliance and coronahoax psyop would heve been curtailed at the beginning.
Really, all they achieved is only additional proof of hoax for those who already understood that this is a hoax. It is a good and useful thing, but it is in no way success.
There is also interesting, but very sad thing happened. Those who got that censorship in social networks is real and have an enormous scale, did completely insane thing - they turn to exacly same centralized and controlled Telegram, instead of moving to really independent and uncontrolled things like i2p, tox or whatever. There was interesting method used to do that trick, but that's another story.
You're asking questions way, way afield that have nothing to do with the original question, which is asking you to theorize on what they will use to spark social unrest around the election.
If you want to debate that, start another post.
False flag blamed on Russia & the angle is Trump was besties with Putin during his presidency & can't be trusted as the leader after the thing Russia has done & the "Russian collusion" trigger term comes back from the dead in msm, triggering some mkultra tier response in the general public
Oh, good one.
Probably more race stuff. They're not that creative.
Can't involve Asians, gotta be blacks, if this were the case.
Why would they? They don’t need it. They have hard proof that no one will ever threaten their power in any capacity. We’ve literally let them get away with publicly admitting to stealing elections now. There’s no reason for them to expend any time, effort, or cash on distractions beyond their normal script and the “sides” that read from it.
Why not? No one would know.
They can say and do whatever they want and it won’t matter to public response.
While I appreciate the response, the response, given the topic, is like hitting the tennis ball as far and hard as you can like you're playing baseball
My point is that pontificating is meaningless because
Oh, I get it. You are telling everyone in this forum, that they should give up.
Where do your allegiances lie? Because, it seems, your allegiances lie.
Prove your own claims if they’re true, subhuman coward.
Did you mean to call me a goyim?
Reported for spam.
Reported for spam.
I got your point and I ignored it. You think everything is meaningless unless it matches your subjective standards.
Enjoy white genocide, then.
Do you buy strawmen at a discount for your comments here?
Prove wrong what I said, then. Enough of this piddly bullshit and petty bickering. If I’m wrong, prove it. When will whites fight back. What’s the red line. Where. How. Details.
Add to the strawmen you purchase in bulk, you're also an expert at shifting the burden of proof.
Okay keyboard warrior, since you're glowing like you just stole my bike with questions like that, why don't you give me some of your red lines and details.