Below is my conjecture. Bonus points (just like on Who's Line is it Anyway) if you can create a scenario where the the riots will APPEAR to get worse if Trump wins, and that act as a sort of threat to the normies who want a "return to normalcy" and can be turned off or shut down after an inauguration.
A racial incident? Nah, to obvious even to the normies at this point.
A mega-racial incident like a bunch of whites with swastikas curb stomping a cutish black woman? Maybe, but there would have to be arrests, it can't be a glowie op, so they would have to trick a bunch of MFs.
Threat of "civil war" if Trump wins? Nah, overplayed that hand or the J6 Reichstag fire event.
Russia/Chinese/Mohamaddian terrorist attack? It would have to be a big one.
Food shortages? Possibly...but there is a lot of bad junk food people will turn to in order to keep the hunger pangs at bay, even if there are shortages of bread/milk/eggs.
Power outages? Getting warmer. Hot summers and power outages did the trick in the 1970s...calls out our "aging infrastructure" and creates food shortages and stuff spoils in the local Walmart freezer. Add in that this primarily happens in black urban areas the negroes will throw the bricks, and will say they won't stop unless they get reparations, which won't happen if Trump wins.
Any kind of citizen discontent could be turned by MSM into a picture of severe threat to the "freedom" and "democracy" that needs tough measures to save "freedom" and "democracy" and guarantee "safety".
Unfortunately they have some success in so-called "creating reality". In the absence of any serious means to couteract MSM creating needed "reality", average citizen have no real means and, unfortunately any desire to find out how things going in reality. Independent journalism and personal information exchange is a very small part of moder information flow.
In the case of such campaign, only small number of locals and tiny amount of those who will bother to find out what really happened will know the truth. Vast majority of population will accept the narrative without questions.
I think MSM and social media could easily create "reality" even out of absoultely nothing. I see no any problems for them in creating a story about something that happened in a non-existing town and most will just swallow that. Things will become worse when politicians will pass something legislative about that non-existing event in non-existing town, and that will be used to prosecute those who will question town existence, since if it is in official papers it is definitely "exist" and event definitely "happen".
So you think it will be a "wag the dog" event? Interesting. But in this day and age of everyone with a video camera in their pocket, I don't think that will fly.
Do you remember what happened with #EmptyHospitals? Thousands of that "people with video cameras in pockets" was just completely ignored and banned and major population was convinced that there was a medical disaster, overcrowded hospitals and huge number of "infected".
Fled pergfectly.
That's a fair point, but the crowded hospitals propaganda was to get people to stay at home, not riot. Incentives are different.
I'm talking about technology, not goals of its use.
"People with cameras in pocket" are easily mitigated and their information succesfully suppressed by means of MSM silence and social networks censorship and bots activity.
There is many ways how that technology could be overcame, but people who trying to resist don't even want to hear anything on that matter, continuing to hopelessly lose time in enemy controlled centralized social shit.