Below is my conjecture. Bonus points (just like on Who's Line is it Anyway) if you can create a scenario where the the riots will APPEAR to get worse if Trump wins, and that act as a sort of threat to the normies who want a "return to normalcy" and can be turned off or shut down after an inauguration.
A racial incident? Nah, to obvious even to the normies at this point.
A mega-racial incident like a bunch of whites with swastikas curb stomping a cutish black woman? Maybe, but there would have to be arrests, it can't be a glowie op, so they would have to trick a bunch of MFs.
Threat of "civil war" if Trump wins? Nah, overplayed that hand or the J6 Reichstag fire event.
Russia/Chinese/Mohamaddian terrorist attack? It would have to be a big one.
Food shortages? Possibly...but there is a lot of bad junk food people will turn to in order to keep the hunger pangs at bay, even if there are shortages of bread/milk/eggs.
Power outages? Getting warmer. Hot summers and power outages did the trick in the 1970s...calls out our "aging infrastructure" and creates food shortages and stuff spoils in the local Walmart freezer. Add in that this primarily happens in black urban areas the negroes will throw the bricks, and will say they won't stop unless they get reparations, which won't happen if Trump wins.
Then why larger part of population fall to vaccinehoax?
If their attempt was succesfull, then there wouldn't have been any lockdowns, masks, vaccine and so on compliance and coronahoax psyop would heve been curtailed at the beginning.
Really, all they achieved is only additional proof of hoax for those who already understood that this is a hoax. It is a good and useful thing, but it is in no way success.
There is also interesting, but very sad thing happened. Those who got that censorship in social networks is real and have an enormous scale, did completely insane thing - they turn to exacly same centralized and controlled Telegram, instead of moving to really independent and uncontrolled things like i2p, tox or whatever. There was interesting method used to do that trick, but that's another story.
You're asking questions way, way afield that have nothing to do with the original question, which is asking you to theorize on what they will use to spark social unrest around the election.
If you want to debate that, start another post.
I'm just thinking about solving the problem you put on the table with your question.
What is our benefint of having the answer to your question? OK, say, we figure out that it will be a feminist who will ride over trans activists who will attack her car. So what is the use of that knowledge for us? Even knowledge that they will undoubtedly do something is much more useful than that. That is not a details that are useful. Useful details are - how they will do that, what exactly they use to do that, who exactly will pay for it and so on.
The main problem is not with what they could do, the problem is that they could do it in principle.
To solve the problem in your question we need a way to prevent or mitigate the method they will use, regardless of exact event they will use as a kickstart.
I don't need you to answer the question. I don't need anything from you at all. I think the topic, in a black humor sort of way, is fun to think about. You don't have to participate.
As you wish.