I don't know what the supposed "elites" are trying to build their bunkers for
Hide. Destroy the surface. Emerge. Enslave the survivors using preserved tech. Back in the 90's the rumor was the white people hide in bunkers and the black people become the slaves.
And they never left the Stone Age, never developed the wheel, never had writing, couldn’t even create charcoal, and were wiped the fuck out by the white man for being subhuman savages.
I suspect that's what the bunkers are really for: a fall back in case they break everything.
The idea that they're in total control is nonsense. They depend entirely on "plebs" for day to day essentials (ever see one of them fix a leaky faucet?) and us plebs need them less and less. Yeah, they may have food and supplies for 50 years, but then what? They can't replenish it without help, at which point they'll emerge and try to take control again.
What they're doing is playing a game of chicken. They're trying to cause a break down in our systems that they can appear to save us from, and thus maintain control (see Covid, Ukraine, climate change, supply chain failure, etc, etc). The message isn't "look at how we're above consequence", it's "you will die if you don't listen to us".
But it's a fine line between everything working without them (and us not needing them) to everything breaking so bad that they can't fix it (in which case, we eat them). Hence, they build bunkers to weather the collapse that they are courting through their actions.
a) SOCI'ETY, noun [Latin socius, a companion.] - "a number of persons united"...doesn't breaking away contradict uniting together?
b) if the few are breaking away from togetherness (society), then why are the many desperately trying to come together as to overcome the few?
c) what if suggested "breakaway" tempts one to ignore being the perceiving break (life) within the perceivable way (inception towards death), hence the division (break) of whole into partial through direction of motion (way)?
ruling class
CLASS, noun - "a number of persons in society, supposed to have some resemblance or equality" + RULE, noun -"authority for direction"
What if direction (inception towards death) sets itself apart (life), hence from whole sameness (process of dying) into partial differences (living)? What if others suggest the inversion thereof as equality (sameness) through diversity (differences)?
What if ones consent to suggested "representative government" by another one, shapes the suggesting one into the ruler and the consenting one into a class under the ruler?
If others suggest one to go this way or that way...does that change the only perceivable way (inception towards death) for everyone (life) within?
Fake and gay.
Even though the Architect spilled the beans in The Matrix, I still perceived him as the evil mastermind.
Hide. Destroy the surface. Emerge. Enslave the survivors using preserved tech. Back in the 90's the rumor was the white people hide in bunkers and the black people become the slaves.
And they never left the Stone Age, never developed the wheel, never had writing, couldn’t even create charcoal, and were wiped the fuck out by the white man for being subhuman savages.
Maybe take a little sun.
In the movie Demolition Man, it was actually the rebels, like us, who had to live underground. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yLmjCyqdA8
Denis Leary has some of the best rants. He was in this movie and Judgment Night. Both came out in 1993.
I suspect that's what the bunkers are really for: a fall back in case they break everything.
The idea that they're in total control is nonsense. They depend entirely on "plebs" for day to day essentials (ever see one of them fix a leaky faucet?) and us plebs need them less and less. Yeah, they may have food and supplies for 50 years, but then what? They can't replenish it without help, at which point they'll emerge and try to take control again.
What they're doing is playing a game of chicken. They're trying to cause a break down in our systems that they can appear to save us from, and thus maintain control (see Covid, Ukraine, climate change, supply chain failure, etc, etc). The message isn't "look at how we're above consequence", it's "you will die if you don't listen to us".
But it's a fine line between everything working without them (and us not needing them) to everything breaking so bad that they can't fix it (in which case, we eat them). Hence, they build bunkers to weather the collapse that they are courting through their actions.
a) SOCI'ETY, noun [Latin socius, a companion.] - "a number of persons united"...doesn't breaking away contradict uniting together?
b) if the few are breaking away from togetherness (society), then why are the many desperately trying to come together as to overcome the few?
c) what if suggested "breakaway" tempts one to ignore being the perceiving break (life) within the perceivable way (inception towards death), hence the division (break) of whole into partial through direction of motion (way)?
What if direction (inception towards death) sets itself apart (life), hence from whole sameness (process of dying) into partial differences (living)? What if others suggest the inversion thereof as equality (sameness) through diversity (differences)?
What if ones consent to suggested "representative government" by another one, shapes the suggesting one into the ruler and the consenting one into a class under the ruler?
If others suggest one to go this way or that way...does that change the only perceivable way (inception towards death) for everyone (life) within?