I want to point out that I know multiple people who claim to be Jewish, but practice nothing. So it's a big show to say you're Jewish. I find that obnoxious. Bring Jewish has become thrown around like saying you're hungry.
One of our friends who is not technically Jewish (mom was adopted by Jewish family), still tries to claim most Jews are good...he obviously is not paying attention. So we started keeping our jew talk to ourselves.
a) if the term "jew" was suggested to you, and you consented to the suggested by using it, then you were bound anew by choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
b) SEC'ULAR, adjective - "living within the world without being relegated", hence without consenting to being bind anew by the suggestions of others.
Ask yourself this...are the so called "jews" bound to any term suggested by you or are you bound to the suggested term "jews"?
What if the few represent the secular (chosen ones) among the religious many (bound by consent to follow suggested choices)?
nazis wanted to get rid of jews, because they controll the banks and entertainment, which they put gay, pedo and troon shit in
holocaust didn't happen. jews have been attacking, raping and killing white people for over 6000 years. do you think it's strange white people want them to finally stop?
They deny the holocaust because it is indeed a lie. They wish for one because in reality they were the ones who were holocausted and revenge is only a naturally expected response.
Not sure how European-centric or Arab-centric those religions are considering that probably half of the Christian population is not European (African, Asian, Mixed South American) And more than half of Muslims are not Arabs (Pakistanis, Indonesians, Indians, Malaysians, Kazakh, Iranian, etc..)
Anyone can adopt those religions, but judaism is really different.
Atheist jew 1: "I do not believe in judaism, but I am jewish!!!"
Atheist jew 2: "I do not believe in God, but I believe israel has the right to exist because god said so in the bible"
Just a snippet of their contradictions, this will also make you understand why jews are the problem. The mixture between religion and ethnicity makes things very difficult for us non-jews to analyze.
For a start, Orthodox jews, do not reject materialism, their religion is 100% material, they believe in reincarnation and not an after life. But what you misinterpret for spirituality is in fact just rules, they have to follow an endless amount of rules, as others said, the Talmud is so vast that they depend on the Rabbi for answers and the Rabbis depend on an explanation book called the shulhan arukh.
These rules cause the separation between jews and non jews, they can only fit with jews. they can only jewish food and they only feel at home with other jews.
"Socialism" is part of their religion, the kibbutz is in a way a religious institution.
The main and most important difference between Muslims-Chrisitians vs jews, is that Muslims and Christians think anyone following another religion is human, only one who made a mistake and will go to hell for it, but if they convert they will go to heaven, they might even be flexible and think most will go to heaven.
jews on the other hand think all non-jews are inherently non-human, they are animals shaped as humans to serve the jews. The only exception are the few souls who are transitioning because they were jewish but in the past they killed another jew so they need to do the reincarnation cycle all over again passing through bacteria, insects, animals, non-jews, then finally a jew after he has redeemed himself!!!
a) RELIGION, noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...the inversion of perceivable (balance) to perceiving (choice) natural law.
b) the few suggest secularism to tempt the many to ignore perceivable SEC'ULAR, adjective - "living within the world without being relegated, hence without consenting to being bind anew by the suggestions of others.
It's ones consent to the suggested -ISM, which tempts one into consent to contract law (religio). Nature doesn't suggest...it communicates everything perceivable to every perceiving one aka enacting towards reaction.
Do you think it's all the same, or different factions?
a) everything (process of dying) represents sameness, everyone within represents differentiation (living).
b) nature sets itself apart, hence from wholeness (process of dying) into apartheid (living). Living represents ones struggle to sustain apartheid while being dissolved back into wholeness.
c) the few represents apartheid (israel), while suggesting the many togetherness aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); e pluribus unum (out of many; one); equality (sameness) through diversity (difference); united nations; united states; european union; usmca (formerly nafta); uniformity; university; unilateral etc.
ISRA'EL; from SARA (contention; resistance) EL (god) aka partial (living) resisting whole (process of dying) to sustain apartheid within wholeness.
d) FAC'TION, noun [Latin factio, from facio, to make or do.] - "acting in union"...the few suggest the many to shape factions, as to tempt each one of them to ignore being the partial reaction (living) within the enacting whole (process of dying).
One cannot "make"; only RE (respond to) MAKE (being made by). One cannot "do"; only RE (respond to) DO (being done by). Others can suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt one to ignore being reactor (life) within direction (inception towards death).
If one consents to suggested "actors", then the perceiving one (life) ignores to "react" to the perceivable direction (inception towards death) inspiring one to resist.
reject hedonism and materialism
Accepting (want) or rejecting (not want) any suggested -ISM, tempts one to ignore adaptation (need) to perceivable, while resisting suggested temptation (want).
Aren't the secular Jews the more Socialist ones?
SO'CIAL, adjective [Latin socialis, from socius, companion.] - "the publice as an aggregate body"...the few suggest socialism (togetherness) to tempt the consenting many to ignore perceivable apartheid (aka being partial within whole).
If each "one" of the many ignores to represent free will of choice within perceivable; for consenting to the suggested choices of the few, then the few become the "chosen ones" aka the ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection; choice".
In short...being one (apart from others) contradicts being social (togetherness). Suggested society represents the domestication of each "ones" free will of choice to follow the suggested choices of the few, hence CHATTEL, noun - "movable goods" slavery by consent of the (freehold) cattle aka those with "free" will of choice.
talmud
TALMUD (instruction) for MiSHNAH (perceivable inspiration) + GEMARA (suggested information)...it represents ones free will of choice to resist want (suggested) for need (perceivable). That implies the want to be instructed by a book suggested by others, which tempts one to be bound (contract law) by volume (book) to the choices of others.
It's not about what's written in any book, but about what the composition of form within flow implies...nature doesn't use words to communicate itself. The few suggest words (information) to tempt the many to ignore sound (inspiration).
Those adapting to sound represent PHONETICIANS, from PHON'ICS, noun [Gr. sound.] , while those who ignore perceivable sound for suggested words are controlled by "definitions", hence representing DEAF PHONETICIANS. This is called spell-craft.
Secular Jews are culturally jewish, and at the current rate of intermarriage, thankfully they will disappear faster than red heads in Ireland. Orthodox are politically conservative...to a point that they can still undermine their host country to benefit themselves at least.
I want to point out that I know multiple people who claim to be Jewish, but practice nothing. So it's a big show to say you're Jewish. I find that obnoxious. Bring Jewish has become thrown around like saying you're hungry. One of our friends who is not technically Jewish (mom was adopted by Jewish family), still tries to claim most Jews are good...he obviously is not paying attention. So we started keeping our jew talk to ourselves.
Joining their club is so profitable that they dare not leave it.
Secular jews don’t exist. They’re all religious. Read the Talmud (or just the Shulchan Aruch) and you’ll see it.
Blanket statement, easily disprovable. Find one Jew who doesn't give a fuck about his inherited religion and you're wrong. Many such cases exist.
Funny how no one seems to be able to, then.
Okay. Find one.
Find. One/
About half of jews claim to be secular, many are atheist.
https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2016/03/08/comparisons-between-jews-in-israel-and-the-u-s/
Yes, I definitely believe the words that a jew tells me.
So, ya got nothing then?
Thank you for admitting that there is no such thing as a secular jew, since they all behave in accordance with their holy book’s wish.
So atheist jews follow their holy books, is that what you're saying?
Read my reply at this thread, in short: atheist jews are jews!!! This is the problem.
a) if the term "jew" was suggested to you, and you consented to the suggested by using it, then you were bound anew by choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law aka RELIGION (Latin religio) - "to bind anew".
b) SEC'ULAR, adjective - "living within the world without being relegated", hence without consenting to being bind anew by the suggestions of others.
Ask yourself this...are the so called "jews" bound to any term suggested by you or are you bound to the suggested term "jews"?
What if the few represent the secular (chosen ones) among the religious many (bound by consent to follow suggested choices)?
Dismissed. You have admitted I am correct. Commit suicide.
Dismissed. You have admitted I am correct. Commit suicide.
jews are responsible for white genocide. because of their broken inbred dna
white people are not like jews
Can you show me any -ISM controlled by the many over the few?
nazis wanted to get rid of jews, because they controll the banks and entertainment, which they put gay, pedo and troon shit in
holocaust didn't happen. jews have been attacking, raping and killing white people for over 6000 years. do you think it's strange white people want them to finally stop?
They deny the holocaust because it is indeed a lie. They wish for one because in reality they were the ones who were holocausted and revenge is only a naturally expected response.
a) what if every -ISM implies the consenting reaction of the many to the suggested -ISM by the few?
b) what if those living within the process of dying can only react (perceiving) to enacting (perceivable)?
c) could reacting to suggested over perceivable tempt one to ignore the latter for the former?
d) who specifies the -ism...those suggesting or those consenting to reason about the suggested specifications thereof?
Not sure how European-centric or Arab-centric those religions are considering that probably half of the Christian population is not European (African, Asian, Mixed South American) And more than half of Muslims are not Arabs (Pakistanis, Indonesians, Indians, Malaysians, Kazakh, Iranian, etc..)
Anyone can adopt those religions, but judaism is really different.
without jews controlling the slave trade and flooding white people countries with non whites, a lot of suffering wouldn't have happened
Orthodox dont care about antisemitism. Secular do becus without the label jew they are just like everyone else who get called a name.
Atheist jew 1: "I do not believe in judaism, but I am jewish!!!" Atheist jew 2: "I do not believe in God, but I believe israel has the right to exist because god said so in the bible"
Just a snippet of their contradictions, this will also make you understand why jews are the problem. The mixture between religion and ethnicity makes things very difficult for us non-jews to analyze.
For a start, Orthodox jews, do not reject materialism, their religion is 100% material, they believe in reincarnation and not an after life. But what you misinterpret for spirituality is in fact just rules, they have to follow an endless amount of rules, as others said, the Talmud is so vast that they depend on the Rabbi for answers and the Rabbis depend on an explanation book called the shulhan arukh.
These rules cause the separation between jews and non jews, they can only fit with jews. they can only jewish food and they only feel at home with other jews.
"Socialism" is part of their religion, the kibbutz is in a way a religious institution.
The main and most important difference between Muslims-Chrisitians vs jews, is that Muslims and Christians think anyone following another religion is human, only one who made a mistake and will go to hell for it, but if they convert they will go to heaven, they might even be flexible and think most will go to heaven.
jews on the other hand think all non-jews are inherently non-human, they are animals shaped as humans to serve the jews. The only exception are the few souls who are transitioning because they were jewish but in the past they killed another jew so they need to do the reincarnation cycle all over again passing through bacteria, insects, animals, non-jews, then finally a jew after he has redeemed himself!!!
a) RELIGION, noun (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law...the inversion of perceivable (balance) to perceiving (choice) natural law.
b) the few suggest secularism to tempt the many to ignore perceivable SEC'ULAR, adjective - "living within the world without being relegated, hence without consenting to being bind anew by the suggestions of others.
It's ones consent to the suggested -ISM, which tempts one into consent to contract law (religio). Nature doesn't suggest...it communicates everything perceivable to every perceiving one aka enacting towards reaction.
a) everything (process of dying) represents sameness, everyone within represents differentiation (living).
b) nature sets itself apart, hence from wholeness (process of dying) into apartheid (living). Living represents ones struggle to sustain apartheid while being dissolved back into wholeness.
c) the few represents apartheid (israel), while suggesting the many togetherness aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together); e pluribus unum (out of many; one); equality (sameness) through diversity (difference); united nations; united states; european union; usmca (formerly nafta); uniformity; university; unilateral etc.
ISRA'EL; from SARA (contention; resistance) EL (god) aka partial (living) resisting whole (process of dying) to sustain apartheid within wholeness.
d) FAC'TION, noun [Latin factio, from facio, to make or do.] - "acting in union"...the few suggest the many to shape factions, as to tempt each one of them to ignore being the partial reaction (living) within the enacting whole (process of dying).
One cannot "make"; only RE (respond to) MAKE (being made by). One cannot "do"; only RE (respond to) DO (being done by). Others can suggest "actors" under "directors" to tempt one to ignore being reactor (life) within direction (inception towards death).
If one consents to suggested "actors", then the perceiving one (life) ignores to "react" to the perceivable direction (inception towards death) inspiring one to resist.
Accepting (want) or rejecting (not want) any suggested -ISM, tempts one to ignore adaptation (need) to perceivable, while resisting suggested temptation (want).
SO'CIAL, adjective [Latin socialis, from socius, companion.] - "the publice as an aggregate body"...the few suggest socialism (togetherness) to tempt the consenting many to ignore perceivable apartheid (aka being partial within whole).
If each "one" of the many ignores to represent free will of choice within perceivable; for consenting to the suggested choices of the few, then the few become the "chosen ones" aka the ELITE; noun (French élite) - "selection; choice".
In short...being one (apart from others) contradicts being social (togetherness). Suggested society represents the domestication of each "ones" free will of choice to follow the suggested choices of the few, hence CHATTEL, noun - "movable goods" slavery by consent of the (freehold) cattle aka those with "free" will of choice.
TALMUD (instruction) for MiSHNAH (perceivable inspiration) + GEMARA (suggested information)...it represents ones free will of choice to resist want (suggested) for need (perceivable). That implies the want to be instructed by a book suggested by others, which tempts one to be bound (contract law) by volume (book) to the choices of others.
It's not about what's written in any book, but about what the composition of form within flow implies...nature doesn't use words to communicate itself. The few suggest words (information) to tempt the many to ignore sound (inspiration).
Those adapting to sound represent PHONETICIANS, from PHON'ICS, noun [Gr. sound.] , while those who ignore perceivable sound for suggested words are controlled by "definitions", hence representing DEAF PHONETICIANS. This is called spell-craft.
Secular Jews are culturally jewish, and at the current rate of intermarriage, thankfully they will disappear faster than red heads in Ireland. Orthodox are politically conservative...to a point that they can still undermine their host country to benefit themselves at least.