My Guess. Old World Concrete
(media.conspiracies.win)
Comments (58)
sorted by:
The land once belonged to the Canaanites who had Nephilim giants living amongst them. The site was reportedly a Canaanite tomb/temple.
SS: The tour guide in this video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R140jDNA2Q4) says it's 2k years old and they don't know how it was placed. I'd say it's much older.
A lot of the times when they say someone built something like this. They really mean that person did heavy renovations and claimed it was theirs
Care to explain why?
Care to explain why?
It's not just that the stone was placed there? It's also been machined almost perfectly flat. I think the obvious answer is, they had technology back then which we assumed didn't exist.
We still don't have vertical vibra-screeds today. ;(
That's the remains of the Roman fort Antonia, the only building they didn't thoroughly destroy after sacking Jerusalem, and they built with concrete.
O.K. Next time. Just say that.
I was backing up your guess, dude.
Sorry, I thought your reply was from King_of_Crazy. Who has been giving me the run around all day long. My mistake.
No worries, fren.
Just a reminder for anyone who got confused by ancient aliens lying about weight all the time.
This foundation block for the wailing wall is estimated at 570 tons.
The largest stone moved by man was the thunder stone in Russia and it was 1250-1500 tons. This was done in the 1700s before any haters say it was machine moved. They didn’t even use animals for it, it was moved by human strength and ingenuity alone. We know what rollers, hoists, muscle, and mind can do.
How did they move 1500 ton stone without machinery...please.
We really do not know what this was for, jewish and Torah lies have ruined much of history in that region, if it wasn't for Europe adopting Christianity, most of jewish history would have been in the dumpster, they were nothing but an insignificant savage tribe who probably resided in Yemen: https://uprootedpalestinians.wordpress.com/2021/05/01/fadel-al-rubai-challenging-the-myths-of-orientalism/
Could be stone. All those notches may have been for the rigging to hoist it into place.
That is a lot of effort for no gain.
The Romans knew how to built structures with concrete, forgotten in the fall of the Empire for a time. This isn't much of a reveal.
The Wailing Wall is a retaining wall, all that's left of the Jewish temple, after the Romans got done with it as per Christ's prophecy.
Most ancient sites do, balbek is another example where the heaviest stones where built first. The next generations built upon the original sites having to use lighter stones.
Edit: the giants of old'
Tell me how you can identify ancient concrete from a grainy picture please.
This monolith is called the Western Stone and has been extensively researched by people who do a bit more than just look at pictures they found on the internet.
It looks like concrete. I guessed.
1 Kings 7:9-11; All these were of costly stones cut to size, TRIMMED WITH SAWS, inside and out...
Stone cutting saws used in the construction of the temple in Jerusalem.
Have used concrete saws before. The blade is tipped with blue industrial diamonds. Water is used to ease friction and keep the blade cool.
That type of saw is the only way to cut stone or concrete.
That would be advanced technology used to build the temple back then.
I didn't say cut. You form the concrete where you wish it to be.
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.”
― George Orwell, 1984
You obviously have never cut concrete. Given.
Yet the biblical statement stands. They used saws to cut the stone, inside and out.
Get a Bible and read it for yourself. I provided the source text. That is evidence for your eyes to read.
Not only can you cast concrete to form, one can also cut it. I speak from direct experience.
You are really focused on this cutting of concrete as appose to laying concrete. Why?
Industrial saws are used to cut stone and concrete.
Granite and marble slabs are cut with industrial saws.
No different to the biblical reference.
They cut stone with saws. Full stop.
This is a joke. you Sir are a joke.
Someone just lost standing.
I write from experience and provided textual evidence.
Now all you can do is make accusations.
That in of itself is a joke, sir.
I am asking a really simple Question. Let me know if it is confusing you.
Again, I shall ask the Question:
You Sir seem really focused on this cutting of concrete as appose to laying concrete. Why?
Again, I shall ask the Question:
You Sir seem really focused on this cutting of concrete as appose to laying concrete. Why?
Again, I shall ask the Question:
You Sir seem really focused on this cutting of concrete as appose to laying concrete. Why?
Again, I shall ask the Question. You Sir seem really focused on this cutting of concrete as appose to laying concrete. Why?
This is a joke. you Sir are a joke.
Again, I shall ask the Question:
You Sir seem really focused on this cutting of concrete as appose to laying concrete. Why?
This is a joke. you Sir are a joke.
Again, I shall ask the Question:
You Sir seem really focused on this cutting of concrete as appose to laying concrete. Why?
Because one CAN cut concrete. Just. Like. Stone.
What don't you understand about that?
You lay concrete, you only cut it if you have made a mistake, or wish to make alterations in the future. If that is concrete it would have been formed where it is placed. You don't even cut it if you are making bricks out of it.
What a retarded reply.
Because one CAN cut concrete. Just. Like. Stone.
What don't you understand about that?
I get that you can cut concrete but like the other guy is saying why would you cut it if you have already layed a perfect foundation? You wouldnt.
That's great buddy. So keep talking about cutting concrete "Because one CAN cut concrete".
Yes. You want me to believe words over what I see with my eyes. You have perverted meaning.