Take hope in the fact mentioned in the video that they believe themselves to be invicible, i.e. “gods among men.”
Pride is the deadliest sin.
And their own weapons will be turned against them.
They invented the internet to surveil and control us…
But it’s a two-way mirror…
Their children are dopamine slaves, too, chasing social media clout. Only a matter of time before they spill the beans for likes and shares. Not all of them can be quietly swept away to that famous LA hospital where they come out blonde.
Leaders and heroes will again start to rise to the top, they already are, and will inspire us conspiritards to whittle away at the barnacles of apathy that formed while we were psy-opped floating aimlessly in the sea of information.
The red line will be crossed, and that’s what they want: total chaos (anarchy) and a demoralized society they can whip into shape with a new fascist movement. This is right out of the soviet playbook, as they saw this happen in Germany during/after the Weimar era and seek to emulate it. It’s written about in the two pandemic simulations…
The caveat is that we won’t want what they offer us after the next big shoe drops. In other words, the apathy will transmute into a rejection of cosmopolitanism. People are realizing they would rather work the land and have a family than be trapped in a Zoom prison and bang randos on the weekend.
Slowly, but it accelerates daily until the tipping point.
Aka your want for suggested outcome (hope) tempting the not wanted outcome (fear), hence putting yourself into the hope vs fear; right vs wrong; want vs not want conflict of reasoning over suggested information.
Choice doesn't exist within a versus (want vs not want imbalance), but at the center (need/want balance)...unless ignored.
a) hope and fear (outcome) tempt one to ignore origin.
b) want and not want tempt one to ignore need.
c) right and wrong (suggested information) tempt one to ignore predefined (perceivable inspiration).
Nature isn't right; nature isn't wrong...nature IS for one to BE within. One cannot define what reality IS; only BE within predefined reality, while redefining BEING, hence shaping self.
INVIN'CIBLE, adjective [Latin in and vinco, to conquer.]...the consent of the many to the suggestions of the few represents the willing submission of being conquered by GOVERN (to control) MENT (mind).
Furthermore; consent to suggested represents the "belief" of the many, while the few seldom are tempted to believe anything; since they wield the tool of suggested information over the many.
their deadliest sin
a) the few suggest moralism, which when consented to, domesticates the free will of choice by the many to rules of behavior suggested by the few.
b) SIN, noun - "voluntary departure of a moral agent from a known rule of rectitude or duty"...it's the process of dying which represents the "moral agent" (action defining manners) for the living reactions within, and the duty for reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) implies adaptation...more specifically the choice to resist (living) temptation (dying) or fall for it.
c) judging the reactions of others as suggested "sin" represents ones choice to ignore reacting (perceiving) to enacting (perceivable). The natural order (life being moved from inception towards death) represents that which "just is" aka phonetic "JUSTICE".
accelerates daily until the tipping point
a) only if velocity (process of dying) remains the same can resistance (living) within momentum (balance) have the choice to accelerate (loss) or decelerate (growth).
b) momentum (balance in motion) represents the ever changing moment for ones free will of choice at the center...balancing for self sustenance, hence existing on the tipping point of need/want at every moment of existence.
we won’t want what they offer
a) wanting vs not wanting suggested information represents consent to suggested information (want) over perceivable inspiration (need).
Choice within balance implies within need (perceivable) or want (suggested)
Choice within imbalance implies within want (suggested) vs not want (suggested).
b) nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving)...unless ignored for substitute offers (suggested).
What could another offer that nature doesn't already supplies?
Put a black box around what caused you to feel the way you do and how exactly that was accomplished. It seems to me that that is precisely how the Dark Occultists would prefer everyone who might offer them resistance would feel.
You're free to hand them a victory over yourself, but you may want to reconsider spreading such an idea to others. Well, unless that was your point.
Too true, too true. The problems we're facing appear enormous and insurmountable, so we're all waiting around for a savior to come by and put the world to right. But at the same time, virtually all of us fail to do that which is well within out power to do.
There are innumerable examples, but the one that always gets me--and it comes up often--is when people sue to get rehired by an organization that fired them because they refused the clot shot. Well, that sounds like a good thing, right?
No, it's incredibly wrong. Why would anyone wish to give (actually, compel the organization to allow them to give) their efforts towards advancing the interests of an entity that--wittingly or unwittingly--participated in a global genocidal program? Does that make any sense? Should that in any way be applauded as progress?
Is it within the power of most people just to get another job? Given the wave of "died suddenly" and the help wanted signs everywhere, I think it's easier than it''s been in a while. But described in the terms I just used--and I believe used fairly--to continue on the path the vast majority choose to take seems clearly to be suicidal insanity.
Why would anyone wish to give (actually, compel the organization to allow them to give) their efforts towards advancing the interests of an entity that--wittingly or unwittingly--participated in a global genocidal program?
We are given to believe that we go to work to put money in our pockets, but really, the purpose of our work should be to help and serve one another, and to advance what we call civilization. In all respects this is admirable and enables humanity to develop to it's true potential and find it's ultimate destiny.
But you see how truly perverse and diabolical our situation is when we have to avoid that just so we can slow down the construction of our prison a bit, and throw a little sand in the gears of the machine enslaving us.
In my personal point of view, you can compare it to telling a young teenager their patents have given them a drug that damages their heart with a 90% mortality rate in 10 years. Yes, they are going to be upset and demoralized. But it is a truth, and you dud not commit the action. Maybe most teens would be self destructive, but some would do great things, like Terry Fox. Or have a spiritual journey.
Some people would argue to just let the kid be a kid, and stay in ignorance. Maybe there is nothing good that would come out of it, but maybe just maybe with the warning, they can find a way to be healthy.
If people are demoralized by the truth, it is a separate issue that needs improvement. Conspiracies are about learning the truth... in the past, people were raised with better coping skills. If the current year is about learning the truth, maybe in the coming years, society will learn to increase moral... maybe that is the job of spiritualists, not conspiracy theoriests.
I would strongly disagree with anyone who claims that revelation is unavoidable. But to amplify, the Elite cannot control Reality, so the foundation of their entire program is to control our perception of Reality, which is the same on a functional basis. Indeed, they wish even to control the nature of our consciousnesses with which we perceive reality.
As an example, much of history has been rewritten. That is, what was once common, everyday knowledge has been destroyed. Once revealed, knowledge may certainly be concealed again.
I wouldn't get wrapped up by anything occultists have to say. I have found it to be virtually all BS and nonsense. Many of their claims are simply incorrect. And with those erroneous claims, I get the sense they aren't liars--as one might expect--but rather that they have been misled with false knowledge and their arrogance gives them to pass it on as fact.
As I see it at the current time, there are two counterbalancing forces. On one side is the absolute truth. "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." I wish to advance the cause of freedom, therefore I wish to find and share the truth to those who wish to hear it.
Which brings us to the other side: the vast majority do not wish to hear it, and will react negatively to those around them who speak it. "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine." Really, there's the initiation that is needed: that which prepares people to hear the truth.
In the end, we may make this moral analysis: If you seek to act morally, you must always try to discover the truth. The same goes for everyone. If you expect others to act morally, it is your duty to aid them. Thus, it is your duty to do what is within your power to help them discover the truth for themselves.
I think you understand as well as anyone how very dark the situation is right now, but what keeps me moving forward is how very bright the future could possibly be.
None of my research has indicated there is a literal Hell or Heaven as they are commonly understood (although there most certainly is an afterlife, or as some understand it a "real life" after this one). But what I have come to piece together is that we have a choice between a descent into what amounts to Hell on Earth, or the manifestation of all we need of Heaven in the physical plane.
I mean this not just in the poetic sense, but in actual, practical terms (which, funnily enough, really does wrap back around to Heaven and Hell as they are understood mythologically but it's a very long story).
I think a real deal was struck, with real terms, and we were given the tools to be able to prevail. We are now in the midst of that contest. In my carefully considered estimation, we are prevailing and gain strength every day.
But if it is, in the fullness of time, our fate to lose it all, well, fuck it, I'll still go down swinging. Even if to no other entity in the Universe, I am still answerable to my own conscience.
they will release information that will mimic our initiatory procedure
Choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law...that's the initial procedure for all suggested information and therefore also the the mimicry within the perpetuation of suggested information.
The trick...natural law communicates perceivable inspiration to each ones perceiving mind aka an enacting system (process of dying) generating reactions (living). The many are being tempted to react to the reactions of the few instead of the enacting nature. This represents why the many want to follow the suggested leads of the few; while ignoring the need to resist being moved within perceivable nature.
we are helping the occult achieve their goals
a) suggested goals (outcomes) are for the many who ignore the need to resist perceivable origin. The suggested "one world government" represents a feared goal of the many, yet simply the perceivable origin for the few with eyes to see.
b) nature generates expression (living) through impression (process of dying)...no concealment, but enlightenment...unless ignored.
c) consenting to suggested information "achieves" within ones memory, adaptation to perceivable inspiration frees ones memory from achieved garbage. One who chooses to let go (suggested information) gains access (perceivable inspiration).
d) consent to suggested "we" (plural) conceals the perceiving one (singular). How could one grow if one consents to stand under (understand) others?
Good post, Zap!
Take hope in the fact mentioned in the video that they believe themselves to be invicible, i.e. “gods among men.”
Pride is the deadliest sin. And their own weapons will be turned against them. They invented the internet to surveil and control us… But it’s a two-way mirror…
Their children are dopamine slaves, too, chasing social media clout. Only a matter of time before they spill the beans for likes and shares. Not all of them can be quietly swept away to that famous LA hospital where they come out blonde.
Leaders and heroes will again start to rise to the top, they already are, and will inspire us conspiritards to whittle away at the barnacles of apathy that formed while we were psy-opped floating aimlessly in the sea of information.
The red line will be crossed, and that’s what they want: total chaos (anarchy) and a demoralized society they can whip into shape with a new fascist movement. This is right out of the soviet playbook, as they saw this happen in Germany during/after the Weimar era and seek to emulate it. It’s written about in the two pandemic simulations…
The caveat is that we won’t want what they offer us after the next big shoe drops. In other words, the apathy will transmute into a rejection of cosmopolitanism. People are realizing they would rather work the land and have a family than be trapped in a Zoom prison and bang randos on the weekend.
Slowly, but it accelerates daily until the tipping point.
https://archive.org/download/carnivals-of-life-and-death-james-shelby-downard/Shelby%2C%20Downard%2C%20Hoffman%2C%20M.%2C%20King%20Kill%2033%2C%20Revelation%20of%20the%20Method.pdf
The original book.
Avoid using their spells....instead of xxvid and vxxxxne say fake flu and poison, for example.
Aka your want for suggested outcome (hope) tempting the not wanted outcome (fear), hence putting yourself into the hope vs fear; right vs wrong; want vs not want conflict of reasoning over suggested information.
Choice doesn't exist within a versus (want vs not want imbalance), but at the center (need/want balance)...unless ignored.
a) hope and fear (outcome) tempt one to ignore origin.
b) want and not want tempt one to ignore need.
c) right and wrong (suggested information) tempt one to ignore predefined (perceivable inspiration).
Nature isn't right; nature isn't wrong...nature IS for one to BE within. One cannot define what reality IS; only BE within predefined reality, while redefining BEING, hence shaping self.
INVIN'CIBLE, adjective [Latin in and vinco, to conquer.]...the consent of the many to the suggestions of the few represents the willing submission of being conquered by GOVERN (to control) MENT (mind).
Furthermore; consent to suggested represents the "belief" of the many, while the few seldom are tempted to believe anything; since they wield the tool of suggested information over the many.
a) the few suggest moralism, which when consented to, domesticates the free will of choice by the many to rules of behavior suggested by the few.
b) SIN, noun - "voluntary departure of a moral agent from a known rule of rectitude or duty"...it's the process of dying which represents the "moral agent" (action defining manners) for the living reactions within, and the duty for reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) implies adaptation...more specifically the choice to resist (living) temptation (dying) or fall for it.
c) judging the reactions of others as suggested "sin" represents ones choice to ignore reacting (perceiving) to enacting (perceivable). The natural order (life being moved from inception towards death) represents that which "just is" aka phonetic "JUSTICE".
a) only if velocity (process of dying) remains the same can resistance (living) within momentum (balance) have the choice to accelerate (loss) or decelerate (growth).
b) momentum (balance in motion) represents the ever changing moment for ones free will of choice at the center...balancing for self sustenance, hence existing on the tipping point of need/want at every moment of existence.
a) wanting vs not wanting suggested information represents consent to suggested information (want) over perceivable inspiration (need).
Choice within balance implies within need (perceivable) or want (suggested)
Choice within imbalance implies within want (suggested) vs not want (suggested).
b) nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving)...unless ignored for substitute offers (suggested).
What could another offer that nature doesn't already supplies?
Put a black box around what caused you to feel the way you do and how exactly that was accomplished. It seems to me that that is precisely how the Dark Occultists would prefer everyone who might offer them resistance would feel.
You're free to hand them a victory over yourself, but you may want to reconsider spreading such an idea to others. Well, unless that was your point.
But on the flipside... there is something to be said about how little has been done to stop any of the evil that so many more know is taking place.
Too true, too true. The problems we're facing appear enormous and insurmountable, so we're all waiting around for a savior to come by and put the world to right. But at the same time, virtually all of us fail to do that which is well within out power to do.
There are innumerable examples, but the one that always gets me--and it comes up often--is when people sue to get rehired by an organization that fired them because they refused the clot shot. Well, that sounds like a good thing, right?
No, it's incredibly wrong. Why would anyone wish to give (actually, compel the organization to allow them to give) their efforts towards advancing the interests of an entity that--wittingly or unwittingly--participated in a global genocidal program? Does that make any sense? Should that in any way be applauded as progress?
Is it within the power of most people just to get another job? Given the wave of "died suddenly" and the help wanted signs everywhere, I think it's easier than it''s been in a while. But described in the terms I just used--and I believe used fairly--to continue on the path the vast majority choose to take seems clearly to be suicidal insanity.
💫🙏
I took a year off work so I don't have to pay income taxes.
I don't disagree, and every little bit helps.
We are given to believe that we go to work to put money in our pockets, but really, the purpose of our work should be to help and serve one another, and to advance what we call civilization. In all respects this is admirable and enables humanity to develop to it's true potential and find it's ultimate destiny.
But you see how truly perverse and diabolical our situation is when we have to avoid that just so we can slow down the construction of our prison a bit, and throw a little sand in the gears of the machine enslaving us.
Yeah man, you're right (re: suing to work for the devil who wants you dead, etc.); that kind of stuff bugs me deeply also.
In my personal point of view, you can compare it to telling a young teenager their patents have given them a drug that damages their heart with a 90% mortality rate in 10 years. Yes, they are going to be upset and demoralized. But it is a truth, and you dud not commit the action. Maybe most teens would be self destructive, but some would do great things, like Terry Fox. Or have a spiritual journey.
Some people would argue to just let the kid be a kid, and stay in ignorance. Maybe there is nothing good that would come out of it, but maybe just maybe with the warning, they can find a way to be healthy.
If people are demoralized by the truth, it is a separate issue that needs improvement. Conspiracies are about learning the truth... in the past, people were raised with better coping skills. If the current year is about learning the truth, maybe in the coming years, society will learn to increase moral... maybe that is the job of spiritualists, not conspiracy theoriests.
I would strongly disagree with anyone who claims that revelation is unavoidable. But to amplify, the Elite cannot control Reality, so the foundation of their entire program is to control our perception of Reality, which is the same on a functional basis. Indeed, they wish even to control the nature of our consciousnesses with which we perceive reality.
As an example, much of history has been rewritten. That is, what was once common, everyday knowledge has been destroyed. Once revealed, knowledge may certainly be concealed again.
I wouldn't get wrapped up by anything occultists have to say. I have found it to be virtually all BS and nonsense. Many of their claims are simply incorrect. And with those erroneous claims, I get the sense they aren't liars--as one might expect--but rather that they have been misled with false knowledge and their arrogance gives them to pass it on as fact.
As I see it at the current time, there are two counterbalancing forces. On one side is the absolute truth. "And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." I wish to advance the cause of freedom, therefore I wish to find and share the truth to those who wish to hear it.
Which brings us to the other side: the vast majority do not wish to hear it, and will react negatively to those around them who speak it. "For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine." Really, there's the initiation that is needed: that which prepares people to hear the truth.
In the end, we may make this moral analysis: If you seek to act morally, you must always try to discover the truth. The same goes for everyone. If you expect others to act morally, it is your duty to aid them. Thus, it is your duty to do what is within your power to help them discover the truth for themselves.
You're very welcome! Glad to be of service.
I think you understand as well as anyone how very dark the situation is right now, but what keeps me moving forward is how very bright the future could possibly be.
None of my research has indicated there is a literal Hell or Heaven as they are commonly understood (although there most certainly is an afterlife, or as some understand it a "real life" after this one). But what I have come to piece together is that we have a choice between a descent into what amounts to Hell on Earth, or the manifestation of all we need of Heaven in the physical plane.
I mean this not just in the poetic sense, but in actual, practical terms (which, funnily enough, really does wrap back around to Heaven and Hell as they are understood mythologically but it's a very long story).
I think a real deal was struck, with real terms, and we were given the tools to be able to prevail. We are now in the midst of that contest. In my carefully considered estimation, we are prevailing and gain strength every day.
But if it is, in the fullness of time, our fate to lose it all, well, fuck it, I'll still go down swinging. Even if to no other entity in the Universe, I am still answerable to my own conscience.
Guns and butter digs into the real deep state operations, just as Trine Day Publishing does.
Follow those and you have much better understanding of how the world works, and not the usual run-of-the-mill conspiracy crap.
https://www.gunsandbutter.org/
https://www.trineday.com/blogs/trineday-podcast
Choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law...that's the initial procedure for all suggested information and therefore also the the mimicry within the perpetuation of suggested information.
The trick...natural law communicates perceivable inspiration to each ones perceiving mind aka an enacting system (process of dying) generating reactions (living). The many are being tempted to react to the reactions of the few instead of the enacting nature. This represents why the many want to follow the suggested leads of the few; while ignoring the need to resist being moved within perceivable nature.
a) suggested goals (outcomes) are for the many who ignore the need to resist perceivable origin. The suggested "one world government" represents a feared goal of the many, yet simply the perceivable origin for the few with eyes to see.
b) nature generates expression (living) through impression (process of dying)...no concealment, but enlightenment...unless ignored.
c) consenting to suggested information "achieves" within ones memory, adaptation to perceivable inspiration frees ones memory from achieved garbage. One who chooses to let go (suggested information) gains access (perceivable inspiration).
d) consent to suggested "we" (plural) conceals the perceiving one (singular). How could one grow if one consents to stand under (understand) others?