Take hope in the fact mentioned in the video that they believe themselves to be invicible, i.e. “gods among men.”
Pride is the deadliest sin.
And their own weapons will be turned against them.
They invented the internet to surveil and control us…
But it’s a two-way mirror…
Their children are dopamine slaves, too, chasing social media clout. Only a matter of time before they spill the beans for likes and shares. Not all of them can be quietly swept away to that famous LA hospital where they come out blonde.
Leaders and heroes will again start to rise to the top, they already are, and will inspire us conspiritards to whittle away at the barnacles of apathy that formed while we were psy-opped floating aimlessly in the sea of information.
The red line will be crossed, and that’s what they want: total chaos (anarchy) and a demoralized society they can whip into shape with a new fascist movement. This is right out of the soviet playbook, as they saw this happen in Germany during/after the Weimar era and seek to emulate it. It’s written about in the two pandemic simulations…
The caveat is that we won’t want what they offer us after the next big shoe drops. In other words, the apathy will transmute into a rejection of cosmopolitanism. People are realizing they would rather work the land and have a family than be trapped in a Zoom prison and bang randos on the weekend.
Slowly, but it accelerates daily until the tipping point.
Aka your want for suggested outcome (hope) tempting the not wanted outcome (fear), hence putting yourself into the hope vs fear; right vs wrong; want vs not want conflict of reasoning over suggested information.
Choice doesn't exist within a versus (want vs not want imbalance), but at the center (need/want balance)...unless ignored.
a) hope and fear (outcome) tempt one to ignore origin.
b) want and not want tempt one to ignore need.
c) right and wrong (suggested information) tempt one to ignore predefined (perceivable inspiration).
Nature isn't right; nature isn't wrong...nature IS for one to BE within. One cannot define what reality IS; only BE within predefined reality, while redefining BEING, hence shaping self.
INVIN'CIBLE, adjective [Latin in and vinco, to conquer.]...the consent of the many to the suggestions of the few represents the willing submission of being conquered by GOVERN (to control) MENT (mind).
Furthermore; consent to suggested represents the "belief" of the many, while the few seldom are tempted to believe anything; since they wield the tool of suggested information over the many.
their deadliest sin
a) the few suggest moralism, which when consented to, domesticates the free will of choice by the many to rules of behavior suggested by the few.
b) SIN, noun - "voluntary departure of a moral agent from a known rule of rectitude or duty"...it's the process of dying which represents the "moral agent" (action defining manners) for the living reactions within, and the duty for reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) implies adaptation...more specifically the choice to resist (living) temptation (dying) or fall for it.
c) judging the reactions of others as suggested "sin" represents ones choice to ignore reacting (perceiving) to enacting (perceivable). The natural order (life being moved from inception towards death) represents that which "just is" aka phonetic "JUSTICE".
accelerates daily until the tipping point
a) only if velocity (process of dying) remains the same can resistance (living) within momentum (balance) have the choice to accelerate (loss) or decelerate (growth).
b) momentum (balance in motion) represents the ever changing moment for ones free will of choice at the center...balancing for self sustenance, hence existing on the tipping point of need/want at every moment of existence.
we won’t want what they offer
a) wanting vs not wanting suggested information represents consent to suggested information (want) over perceivable inspiration (need).
Choice within balance implies within need (perceivable) or want (suggested)
Choice within imbalance implies within want (suggested) vs not want (suggested).
b) nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving)...unless ignored for substitute offers (suggested).
What could another offer that nature doesn't already supplies?
Good post, Zap!
Take hope in the fact mentioned in the video that they believe themselves to be invicible, i.e. “gods among men.”
Pride is the deadliest sin. And their own weapons will be turned against them. They invented the internet to surveil and control us… But it’s a two-way mirror…
Their children are dopamine slaves, too, chasing social media clout. Only a matter of time before they spill the beans for likes and shares. Not all of them can be quietly swept away to that famous LA hospital where they come out blonde.
Leaders and heroes will again start to rise to the top, they already are, and will inspire us conspiritards to whittle away at the barnacles of apathy that formed while we were psy-opped floating aimlessly in the sea of information.
The red line will be crossed, and that’s what they want: total chaos (anarchy) and a demoralized society they can whip into shape with a new fascist movement. This is right out of the soviet playbook, as they saw this happen in Germany during/after the Weimar era and seek to emulate it. It’s written about in the two pandemic simulations…
The caveat is that we won’t want what they offer us after the next big shoe drops. In other words, the apathy will transmute into a rejection of cosmopolitanism. People are realizing they would rather work the land and have a family than be trapped in a Zoom prison and bang randos on the weekend.
Slowly, but it accelerates daily until the tipping point.
https://archive.org/download/carnivals-of-life-and-death-james-shelby-downard/Shelby%2C%20Downard%2C%20Hoffman%2C%20M.%2C%20King%20Kill%2033%2C%20Revelation%20of%20the%20Method.pdf
The original book.
Avoid using their spells....instead of xxvid and vxxxxne say fake flu and poison, for example.
Aka your want for suggested outcome (hope) tempting the not wanted outcome (fear), hence putting yourself into the hope vs fear; right vs wrong; want vs not want conflict of reasoning over suggested information.
Choice doesn't exist within a versus (want vs not want imbalance), but at the center (need/want balance)...unless ignored.
a) hope and fear (outcome) tempt one to ignore origin.
b) want and not want tempt one to ignore need.
c) right and wrong (suggested information) tempt one to ignore predefined (perceivable inspiration).
Nature isn't right; nature isn't wrong...nature IS for one to BE within. One cannot define what reality IS; only BE within predefined reality, while redefining BEING, hence shaping self.
INVIN'CIBLE, adjective [Latin in and vinco, to conquer.]...the consent of the many to the suggestions of the few represents the willing submission of being conquered by GOVERN (to control) MENT (mind).
Furthermore; consent to suggested represents the "belief" of the many, while the few seldom are tempted to believe anything; since they wield the tool of suggested information over the many.
a) the few suggest moralism, which when consented to, domesticates the free will of choice by the many to rules of behavior suggested by the few.
b) SIN, noun - "voluntary departure of a moral agent from a known rule of rectitude or duty"...it's the process of dying which represents the "moral agent" (action defining manners) for the living reactions within, and the duty for reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying) implies adaptation...more specifically the choice to resist (living) temptation (dying) or fall for it.
c) judging the reactions of others as suggested "sin" represents ones choice to ignore reacting (perceiving) to enacting (perceivable). The natural order (life being moved from inception towards death) represents that which "just is" aka phonetic "JUSTICE".
a) only if velocity (process of dying) remains the same can resistance (living) within momentum (balance) have the choice to accelerate (loss) or decelerate (growth).
b) momentum (balance in motion) represents the ever changing moment for ones free will of choice at the center...balancing for self sustenance, hence existing on the tipping point of need/want at every moment of existence.
a) wanting vs not wanting suggested information represents consent to suggested information (want) over perceivable inspiration (need).
Choice within balance implies within need (perceivable) or want (suggested)
Choice within imbalance implies within want (suggested) vs not want (suggested).
b) nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving)...unless ignored for substitute offers (suggested).
What could another offer that nature doesn't already supplies?