The problem with Bannon is, He's not bribing the right official to officially charge these 51 with treason.. HEY STEVE!! You gotta bribe them MAN!! Pay up an dthey'll do your bidding.. Start a GoFundMe 'Bribe Official X to charge 51 intel spooks with treason.. I'll donate meself!
FYI Bannon worked for Goldman Sachs.
G Sachs sent him to confiscate the data from Biosphere experiment, who was both an experiment on global warming and also an experiment on if we can create a closed system environment on the Moon or Mars.
It failed biggly. and Bannon was the one to hide and confiscate the data so it didnt become public.
Sheriffs are literally the only people left that could do anything it seems.
Living within the process of dying implies being the executive (expressing growth) within the legislative (impressing loss)....each ones reactions represent the expression of natural law, even when ignored.
Everything (whole) does everyone (partial), while everyone (temporary) reacts to being done by everything (ongoing).
Sleight of hand: "The Sheriff of Nottingham leads to Robin Hood" aka if one consents to another as the entrusted execution of law (sheriff) for ones home (ham), then ones hood is getting robbed (robin hood), because one ignored perceivable everything for suggested nothing (notting).
hmm... that's quite a coordinated effort.. even if they were right.
turns out they were all wrong.
so.. you can either believe it was a case of ignorance or not.
but by the time this letter was signed, even i knew the laptop was legit. 😃
and there is no way i am smarter / more informed than 51 former highest ranking of intelligence officers.
no.
way.
so... they all lied. is my conclusion.
correction: they mislead. their letter is very carefully worded...
"It is for all these reasons that we write to say that the arrival on the US poli<cal scene of emails purportedly belonging to Vice President Biden’s son Hunter, much of it related to his time serving on the Board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma, has all the classic earmarks of a Russian information opera<on."
"all the classic earmarks"
"If we are right"
yea? and if they are wrong? then all that is implied from the emails are accurate - fair to say?
ps. they were wrong. so... maybe all that Burisma stuff needs a second look?
I think that, ultimately, Bannon is controlled opposition. But given that, an asset is pushed to tossing around the "T"-word, which I don't think is done lightly. Theoretically you can get hanged by the neck until dead for that kind of activity.
Thus I conclude that TPTB are under extreme pressure to keep their controlled opposition out in front of the masses, because it is only from out in front that one may divert them.
TREASON, noun (Latin traho; traditio; tradere) - "delivery, surrender, a handing down, a giving up".
a) the process of dying as the generator for living reactions represents the delivery of everything (whole) to everyone (partial), hence setting free will of choice into the momentum (balance) of motion.
b) being alive while being moved from inception towards death implies the need to resist (living) temptation (dying).
c) those who ignore resisting perceivable, while falling for the temptation of suggested, are surrendering their response-ability (choice) onto others, hence submitting to a handing down, hence them standing under (understanding) suggested information, while giving up adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
tl; dr...ones choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable) represents treason within all. The opposite of treason aka LOY'AL, adjective [Latin lex, law.] implies the need to adapt to natural law.
Ummm No. Treasonous is the wrong word. Entirely the wrong concept. In any understanding of obstruction, perjury, or felony. Doesn't treason have to be crimes against the nation, and its rulers, and ruling bodies. These are often motivated by another country, or authority, as acts of espionage, terrorism, warfare, or slander, etc.
It could perhaps be ruled as treason if they obstructed the courts or congress willfully. Again they have certain powers outside of this. Depends on the agency.
They've committed a felony at best, committed obstruction if indeed Congress had asked for the contents. Treason I don't think so? Harder subject to debate, it could be with lawyers, but I don't think any judge would grant that charge.
As agents they often have a different judicial process. As agents what oathes did they break, which institutional integrity have they compromised, acting on what orders.
I'm in no way a big specialist in US agencies, but doesn't agents give an oath to protect US constitution? If so, breaking that oath (at least about 1st amendment) could be named "treason", at least logically.
What oathes did they break, like official secrets, what institutional integrity did they compromise, like espionage, acting under what authority, foreign etc. Of course it isn't always the case, sometimes felonies. They have their own tribunals and special oversight committees. Etc.
There are also Whistle-blowers. They might have been granted other status away from past treason.
I was debating the concept here. It is strong rhetoric. I am unclear if it's applicable, Bannon is rallying the pundits. In light of kind of tit for tat. Partisan. But unless the GOP call for special committees into this. It's dead in the water. It's not treason. There was also emergency powers. It's scandalous for sure. Unelectable quite possibly. Impeachable unlikely. No such thing, an exercise of nothing much. Any protection unless proven crimes greater than the hearsay, often extend further.
The problem with Bannon is, He's not bribing the right official to officially charge these 51 with treason.. HEY STEVE!! You gotta bribe them MAN!! Pay up an dthey'll do your bidding.. Start a GoFundMe 'Bribe Official X to charge 51 intel spooks with treason.. I'll donate meself!
FYI Bannon worked for Goldman Sachs. G Sachs sent him to confiscate the data from Biosphere experiment, who was both an experiment on global warming and also an experiment on if we can create a closed system environment on the Moon or Mars.
It failed biggly. and Bannon was the one to hide and confiscate the data so it didnt become public.
WOWIE ZOWIE MAN SAY THING! THEREFORE BOOM HERE COMES THE PAIN TAKE THAT DEMOCRAPZ!
TICK - TOCK
Dats right Raggyu!! Emmmmmmmriii..
> Sheriffs are literally the only people left that could do anything
any American Citizen could do anything. ...depending on what they were willing to lose.
that Tree of Liberty ain't gonna water itself.
Living within the process of dying implies being the executive (expressing growth) within the legislative (impressing loss)....each ones reactions represent the expression of natural law, even when ignored.
Everything (whole) does everyone (partial), while everyone (temporary) reacts to being done by everything (ongoing).
Sleight of hand: "The Sheriff of Nottingham leads to Robin Hood" aka if one consents to another as the entrusted execution of law (sheriff) for ones home (ham), then ones hood is getting robbed (robin hood), because one ignored perceivable everything for suggested nothing (notting).
source article:
https://www.politico.com/news/2020/10/19/hunter-biden-story-russian-disinfo-430276
"If we are right..." 😃
Jim Clapper
Mike Hayden
Leon PaneSa
John Brennan
...and 47 others.
...all signed this letter.
hmm... that's quite a coordinated effort.. even if they were right.
turns out they were all wrong.
so.. you can either believe it was a case of ignorance or not.
but by the time this letter was signed, even i knew the laptop was legit. 😃
and there is no way i am smarter / more informed than 51 former highest ranking of intelligence officers.
no.
way.
so... they all lied. is my conclusion.
correction: they mislead. their letter is very carefully worded...
"all the classic earmarks"
"If we are right"
yea? and if they are wrong? then all that is implied from the emails are accurate - fair to say?
ps. they were wrong. so... maybe all that Burisma stuff needs a second look?
Just add it to the 200,000 "sealed indictments" Steve Bannon once harped about.
I think that, ultimately, Bannon is controlled opposition. But given that, an asset is pushed to tossing around the "T"-word, which I don't think is done lightly. Theoretically you can get hanged by the neck until dead for that kind of activity.
Thus I conclude that TPTB are under extreme pressure to keep their controlled opposition out in front of the masses, because it is only from out in front that one may divert them.
a) the process of dying as the generator for living reactions represents the delivery of everything (whole) to everyone (partial), hence setting free will of choice into the momentum (balance) of motion.
b) being alive while being moved from inception towards death implies the need to resist (living) temptation (dying).
c) those who ignore resisting perceivable, while falling for the temptation of suggested, are surrendering their response-ability (choice) onto others, hence submitting to a handing down, hence them standing under (understanding) suggested information, while giving up adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
tl; dr...ones choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable) represents treason within all. The opposite of treason aka LOY'AL, adjective [Latin lex, law.] implies the need to adapt to natural law.
Steven Bannon also swears loyalty to ZOA and zionism.
PROOF https://conspiracies.win/p/15JUHGyLBq/steven-bannon-is-just-a-zionist-/c/
Ummm No. Treasonous is the wrong word. Entirely the wrong concept. In any understanding of obstruction, perjury, or felony. Doesn't treason have to be crimes against the nation, and its rulers, and ruling bodies. These are often motivated by another country, or authority, as acts of espionage, terrorism, warfare, or slander, etc.
It could perhaps be ruled as treason if they obstructed the courts or congress willfully. Again they have certain powers outside of this. Depends on the agency.
They've committed a felony at best, committed obstruction if indeed Congress had asked for the contents. Treason I don't think so? Harder subject to debate, it could be with lawyers, but I don't think any judge would grant that charge.
As agents they often have a different judicial process. As agents what oathes did they break, which institutional integrity have they compromised, acting on what orders.
I'm in no way a big specialist in US agencies, but doesn't agents give an oath to protect US constitution? If so, breaking that oath (at least about 1st amendment) could be named "treason", at least logically.
Yes that was for treason my friend.
What oathes did they break, like official secrets, what institutional integrity did they compromise, like espionage, acting under what authority, foreign etc. Of course it isn't always the case, sometimes felonies. They have their own tribunals and special oversight committees. Etc.
There are also Whistle-blowers. They might have been granted other status away from past treason.
I was debating the concept here. It is strong rhetoric. I am unclear if it's applicable, Bannon is rallying the pundits. In light of kind of tit for tat. Partisan. But unless the GOP call for special committees into this. It's dead in the water. It's not treason. There was also emergency powers. It's scandalous for sure. Unelectable quite possibly. Impeachable unlikely. No such thing, an exercise of nothing much. Any protection unless proven crimes greater than the hearsay, often extend further.
Too many people crucifying hunter biden, he's a good man that has successfully conquered his addiction issues. Leave Hunter Alone!