The commotion of the motion brings the notion that we're all absolutely stuck, as if by some manner of glue, on a road to, well, somewhere.
What if the process of dying is impressing (loss) to inspire those living within to express (growth); which requires choice of adaptation (need); hence also offering the temptation of ignorance (want) aka self repression?
In other words...those who ignore to grow are tempted to feel stuck; while being moved on a road they ignore (process of dying) towards somewhere (death) their ignorance denies them to comprehend. Furthermore; the choice to ignore need for want; tempts them to want to hold onto; hence gluing themselves onto temporary within ongoing.
The few utilize suggestion to tempt the many to willingly attach themselves to the fleeting material; while ignoring to be the material resistance (living) within the immaterial velocity (process of dying).
commotion of the motion brings the notion
The ignorance of temperance towards permanence tempts impotence of sustenance through lack of resistance.
Which is all fine and good, right up until those differentiated bits start cottoning on and before one can so much as a swing a cat they're all over the show, each one pointing to another one and declaring "That's me, over there!" at which point it rapidly becomes very confusing for everyone.
Which is why the ongoing whole differentiates into "temporary" partials; which have to struggle to sustain self (apartheid); while resisting the temptation of "cottoning" together. Entrance the parasitic few suggesting the ignorant many to pick cotton together.
As for losing and winning - these are different words for what is far too often the same thing
If one (living) comprehends the only origin (process of dying); then it isn't about wanting (winning) vs not wanting (losing); but about the need to grow within loss; by resisting the temptation of suggested wins or loses.
to sell
Choice (consent) towards choice (suggestion) contract law allows the few to sell everything perceivable back to the many who ignore this for suggested.
Everyone (perceiving) exists at the center of everything (perceivable) as the free will of choice to utilize it (growth)...or ignore it (loss). The few sell perceivable loss under suggested growth back to the many who pay growth (living) into loss (dying). A self destruction racket; more or less carefully hidden behind suggested narratives; which are collapsing upon each other over and over again.
In short...suggesting to sell what is perceptibly free.
if choice itself were a weapon...
WEAPON, noun - "any instrument of offense"...there has to be a weapon of offense (choice) within a self sustaining system of defense (balance). The "will" within free will of choice represents the want (temptation) within the need (resistance).
Self discernment has to be grown for one to comprehend that "instrument" implies in response to perceivable sound. Without that one views any weapon as offense vs defense among others; instead of as response-ability (choice) to origin (balance).
I have no basis for suggesting
Choice represents the base for suggestion (want); perceivable balance (need) represents the base for choice. Those who are reasoning against each other about suggestion; lack comprehension about base (choice) because they already consented by choice to the suggested choices of others; hence willingly ignoring free will of choice; while submitting the choices of others.
never yet led me astray
Inception towards death represents the way; momentum (balance) represents what one perceives it at, and ones choice operates at the center thereof. One cannot wander off the path (astray) while being confined to the momentum of the only path. Wandering around in willing ignorance is a choice tho...
face forward, no doubt to better track prey
Why hunting prey? To sustain self. Where to sustain self? Within momentum (balance); hence origin of every choice to hunt. Now change perspective to the prey...sustaining self; while resisting the suggested temptations by others (getting hunted down) all while adapting as choice to the ever changing moment (balance).
Even while both hunter and hunted are "facing" death; they each operate for the sustenance of life; hence adapting to origin...not to the predefined outcome. Once again; such a perspective requires the growth of self discernment about living within the process of dying; hence in need to react to an enacting system; while being tempted to want everything else.
gazes are harmonized somewhere forward
From center (perceiving) into surrounding (perceivable) based on free will of choice.
looking in other directions
a) inception towards death represents the only direction...looking freely (choice) around within the momentum (balance) thereof; doesn't change the direction.
b) constant change (aka forward velocity) represents direction (progress of dying) for those (living) within.
c) if all represents one in energy; then others represent moving partials of the whole. All others represent perceivable inspiration (need) and suggesting information (want) for ones free will of choice. If all represents one in energy; then there can be only one; hence all for one and one for all.
What's lacking is each ones self discernment about representing a partial within a self differentiating whole. The more one comprehends apartheid; the more one comprehends wholeness. The parasitic few distract the ignorant many from that by suggesting diversity (difference) for equality (sameness) as the inversion of difference (partial) out of sameness (whole).
regarded by the aforementioned others as some manner of potentate
Every one represents potential (growth) within potentiality (loss); yet it requires adaptation of potential to potentiality to grow; while resisting the temptation to drain potential among others.
In other words...one is tempted to want what others grow; while ignoring the need to grow oneself.
Also...one doesn't need to regard the suggestions of others; one represents the RE (responding) GUARD (preservation; self sustenance) within perceivable.
to have a posse assembled
Strength in numbers (sleight of hand for strength within the designated unit "one") misdirected by suggested collectivism (out of many; one) against others. Notice also...POSSE (possession) aka want over need.
Wherefrom hangs this platform? Why, from skyhooks, naturally?
PLAT (to spread) FORM (that manner of being peculiar to each body, which exhibits it to the eye as distinct from every other body) aka growth through self differentiation within loss.
Also; PLATEAU (elevated tract of relatively level land) aka choice based growth (elevation) within the momentum (level aka balance) of motion, hence the implied relation of growth to loss; of form to flow; of elevation to degradation etc.
The hook on the other hand represents the snare; the temptation to want to hold onto the material (life); while ignoring to grow in response to immaterial (inception towards death).
Does the rain choose upon whom it falls?
Each drop of liquid seeks level (balance); hence representing choice. Liquid also adapts to ever changing circumstances. You don't perceive rain (plural) but partial liquid within whole motion. Branding the momentum of liquid "rain" was suggested to you. Furthermore; suggested "whom" implies the choice to count; while each part of liquid adapts to the whole momentum until disrupted by "whomever" chose to resist liquid finding level.
automotion
The few suggest "automobile" to tempt the many to ignore being mobility (living) within automation (process of dying). They furthermore tempt choice into a conflict between manual and automatic; as the inversion of being the manual choice within the automatic balance.
Ever see those assembly-line robots? Timeful as metronomes they are; never missing a beat. Regular like the tides as they set about their tasks.
Who assembled and maintains them? What if the origin of ROBOT (Latin robur; strength) represents resisting (living) temptation (dying); and what if others suggest strength as loss in disguise to tempt one to ignore growing it?
The few suggest the automated assembly of sameness to tempt the many to ignore being the manual difference within the self differentiating (automated) sameness. They call it strength (robot) to manufacture sameness within differences (out of many; one) as the inversion of being different within same (one within oneness).
Suggesting these automatic assemblies represents mesmerism aka hypnotism to domesticate free will of choice from adaptation into stagnation.
Show them to the sages and they'd declare them almost definitionally unnatural, in no small part owing to their precision, yet those same wiseguys sit on a stump and marvel at the bird-nests high above.
Showing ones understanding (consent to standing under the suggestions of others) reconfirms the positions of others as above oneself. Resisting suggestion corrodes the position of the ones suggesting; because the ones suggesting utilize the lack of resistance by the ones consenting to sustain their position.
Because growing out of it implies resisting (living) being transmuted back into it (process of dying). The wanderer (life) is stuck to the road (inception towards death); while representing the constant crossroad (choice within balance) in-between keep wandering and becoming roadkill.
if ever they should stop
They (the partial) cannot stop the whole...only ignore being moved by it.
if they start going backwards
Backwards/forwards; up/down; left/right represent choices bound to balance (aka while within the momentum of motion). The "if" (if/then implication) for life is predefined by being moved from inception towards death. The reaction to perceivable implication can only exist within the momentum of the enacting motion.
One exists in-between; at the center of; in response to...if/then. The "/" (forward slash) aka SLASH; from French ESCLACHIER (to break); also ESCLATER (to break; splinter) represents the forwards motion self differentiating into the forwarded slash (broken partial within whole).
Sleight of hand for "starting"...
"We didn't start the fire...It was always burning...Since the world's been turning"
"We didn't start the fire...No, we didn't light it...But we tried to fight it"
I'm in a lifeboat and pulling for shore
You're representing the boat of life floating from inception towards death. You are tempted to misuse the other lifeboats as a shore for temporary habitation.
Sleight of hand: "Islands in the stream...that is what we are...no one in-between...how could we be wrong?"
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many one such island as "America" aka the land of the free (will of choice) and the home of the brave (fearless of danger) aka a collective of lifeboats forming the island "united states" of America. What's gonna happen to islands in the stream? Just listen to the suggested "mainstream"...
Ask yourself if pulling to shore represents selling yourself short?
Seems awful busy (ongoing whole)...
SEEM; verb - "to become; to befit"; which implies the temporary partial to come to being by the "awful busy" ongoing whole. Not that flattering to self to discredit origin as awful...and yet the living (reactors) keeping discrediting the process of dying (generator).
Always going and going on...
..."and on; on and on; the beat don't stop until the break (self differentiation) of dawn (inception of life) aka Rapper's Delight aka RAP (Latin rapio, rapidus, rapid) DE-LIGHT (off; away from light).
let's call me "a monument to an anecdote on the massive inanity of existence."
Aka a single mind (mono-ment) given out (anecdote) to express the collected (massive) empty space (inane) of being within (existence).
Ask yourself if collecting suggested nothingness (ex-nihilo) really expresses everything one exists within? What if one (perceiving) represents the monument within the anecdote of oneness (perceivable)?
There's this other saying: "There are two..."
Who but "one" can say it and who but another "one" can consent to it being said?
those who don't
Suggesting "those" implies one to perceive others; while suggesting them to represent "those"...this implies them being done by; otherwise one couldn't perceive other ones without being done by motion. So how could those who are done do nothing (don't)?
"I know just what you're saying" (I perceive sound; you suggest words)
"So please stop explaining" (resist the temptation to ignore perceivable for suggested)
"Don't tell me 'cause it hurts" (you are tempting me to destroy myself)
"Don't speak" (don't suggest words)
"I know what you're thinkin" (your memory is filled with suggested words)
"I don't need your reasons" (I don't need your conflict of want vs not want)
"Don't tell me 'cause it hurts" (you are tempting me to destroy myself)
a complete akashic record, containing within their pages all of knowledge
Each (perceiving) one exists contained within all (perceivable) knowledge. Others suggest a twist (chord) aka suggestion as the inversion of perceivable as to tempt one to respond to the twist (re-cord) by consenting to memorize suggested information; which then tempts one to remember aka respond to twisted memory.
The parasitic few suggest AKASHIC; from AKASHA (ether) to tempt the many to ignore E'THER, noun [Latin oether; Greek to burn, to shine.] aka the origin of heat and light aka when flow (velocity) and form (resistance) meet within momentum (balance).
Sleight of hand..."we don't need no water" (cause form exists within flow) "let the motherfucker burn" (let the living resist dying)..."burn; motherfucker; burn" aka out of heat (burn), within momentum (mother; womb); as self sustenance within temptation (fucking) and back to heat (burn).
In life - debatable. In cards - essential.
The essence of cards implies the suggested game (winning vs losing). Others suggest games to tempt one to ignore the essence of being growth (living) within loss (inception towards death) aka evaluation at the center of value. Loss represents the generator for the reaction of growth.
Consenting to suggested games tempts one to debate (winning vs losing) against others, while ignoring to sustain oneself within perceivable. Those who think they can win what others suggest; ignore being the highest value (evaluation) within existence.
As for the center of everything, if one were to go there
The center of balance isn't a place for choice to go; but the origin demanding resistance (need), while tempting with ignorance (want). All the other "places" around represent the perceivable inspiration (need) and suggested information (want) temporary formed (living) within the momentum of ongoing flow (process of dying) for the choice at the center of balance.
I imagine it'd be a prime location in which to set up a tentpole.
a) LOCO; LOCATUS (to set: to place, to position) -ATION (through action)...hence the enacting represents the prime for all reactions within it, and reaction by choice implies within enacting balance (momentum of motion).
b) one is being set up as the tentpole and the higher the pole grows; the more shelter it expresses for the sustenance of self.
c) TENT (to stretch) POLE (instrument of measurement) aka a prepared (instruo); measuring mind within predefined sound; able to grow (resistance) within loss (velocity).
weapons, much like people, have somewhat-distinct personalities about 'em
Everything by (per) sound (sonos) represents a different expression thereof; hence choice being used to adapt to the expressed inspiration thereof as to be able to grow comprehension thereof. Every so called weapon one utilizes becomes inspiration for ones partial growth, hence the more one trains with a distinct weapon; the more one feels the need to train with other distinct weapons.
Perceivable differences represent communicated inspiration for adaptation.
Probably better to reason with others
What does "better" imply? A conflict of reason against "worse". One cannot reason "with" others; because reasoning represents wanting versus not wanting suggested; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable, one exists "with" and "within".
Reason (want vs not want) represents the suggested inversion of perceivable balance (need/want)...imbalance; hence conflict. Choice exits at the center of balance, and only the choice to ignore perceivable balance, shapes suggested imbalance. Others use suggestion to be able to shape imbalances among those who ignore balance.
if pushed to againstness
a) life is being pushed from inception towards death
b) being alive doesn't represent being against death; but balancing as choice within the momentum of motion.
c) one feels pushed by the suggestions of others; because ones consent to any suggestion causes the conflict (reason) within ones mind. If one chooses to be within a conflict; then the other side will be perceived as pushing the limits of ones side. Nature doesn't push the limit...it sets one (choice) into the limit (balance).
Sleight of hand: "Push it to the limit" (be the resistance within the limit)..."Walk along the razor's edge" (be choice within balance)..."But don't look down, just keep your head" (resist the temptation of dying; keep sustaining life)
to serve the sandwiches silently
The origin of sound which allows one to shape through resonance within, is so loud, that one perceives the vibrations thereof as for example the ingredients of a so called "sandwich". Everything perceivable represents the materialized expressions of immaterial sound, and everyone perceiving it represents the free will of choice to shape it through resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
Each person is being served by (per) sound (sonos). The few suggest serving to represent "working for" as to tempt the ignorance of all representing one in energy (work).
scarper whilst they masticate
Growing while others feed upon loss; through their willing ignorance to grow, for the appetite tempting towards the fleeting.
It's the mindset between "I want the taste of that" and "I need to grow what sustains; which would surround me with ever changing tastes".
As for inception-toward-death being representative of it - sure, as are rivers, reeds, the compass winds, falling rains, traffic jams, winged animals, and non-winged animals.
Others suggested you brands for different aspects of the same motion as temptation. Your consent to suggested (information) represents your willing ignorance of perceivable (inspiration), and suggesting to others perpetuates the temptation of ignorance (choice of want over need).
RE (response to) PRESENT (being within essence); hence as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)...not responding to what others are suggesting (words over sound).
comprehensive is this particular work of civil engineering
Choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law represents the foundation of civil engineering aka the temptation to stand under (understanding) the suggested information by others; while ignoring to grow comprehension by adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
The parasitic few suggest EN'GINE, noun [Latin ingenium.] - "agent for another" to tempt the many to ignore being the reaction within the enacting; while surrounded by reacting others, hence tempted to react to them.
they were the last of the grasses
A temporary convenience (living) within an ongoing inconvenience (process of dying).
Hunger was everywhere
Within the temptation of appetite; the inspiration to sustain self (hunger) was everywhere.
as were the predators
a) a temporary convenience (want for prey) within an ongoing inconvenience (need to predate upon to still hunger)
b) "if it bleeds; we can kill it"
leaving them to fall on that habitual dullard; Billy.
Frequency of adaptation (as choice within balance) to perceivable differences (need) or suggested sameness (want) shapes form sharp or dull; yet since this is about balancing..."all work (need) and no play (want) makes Billy a dull boy".
the "C" eyeball
EYE C ALL...ALL SEEING I...balls to the wall annoying wordplay. Meanwhile among the phonetic kabbalists: "such foolish insolence".
it didn't really dissuade the others much
Because within the inspiring whole perceivable; each partial represents suggesting temptation. Each dissuading advice represents suggested temptation to others; until each one chooses to resist suggested (want) for perceivable (need).
Dissuasion represents the temptation to not want what others suggest, while suggesting them to want what's needed (perceivable). One cannot suggest perceivable without tempting others to consent to the suggesting substitute of the perceivable origin.
My suggestion (this is reality) tempts you to consent to me as the representative of the perceivable reality I suggest. Each one is then being tempted to ignore RE (response to) PRESENT (being within essence).
steered out of the worst of trouble
Hence the living temporary resisting the temptation to ignore the ongoing process of dying. It's less steering, than it is you spending resistance to pick others up; while attempting to get them to grow by themselves within the loss they're willingly ignoring to be in.
Unless it's karst terrain. A pox on the house of karst terrain.
House of Karst (karra- "rock")...you don't seem to like caves that much. Claustrophobia or did you had to spend a night hiding in a den; while waiting for the occupants to leave?
I know the difference between rain and "other sources of falling water"
"source of falling" implies motion...look at yourself (living) within motion (process of dying) and notice how different it feels to be alive; from the consequences of dying, which are perceivable among the remains of the living?
Living is not just dying; but a different expression of the same origin. Branding living as "humans; nations; races; families etc." tempts the perceivable singular to ignore self for the suggested plural.
The story of rain goes, that it was water given freely the warmth of the sun, but was then mugged for said energy by the workings of the sky, and thus robbed of all of its wealth, it goes back home - and directly, too
Reacting liquidity within a directing current. You are being tempted with the suggested shape of the perceivable liquid from the current directing it.
at no point does their presence enter into the water's own calculus
CALCULA (computing by numbers) -TION (through action) implies being the reacting number (one) within the enacting (oneness). Counting is what's being suggested to you. One doesn't need to count oneness; one (perceiving) needs to adapt to oneness (perceivable); because one (partial) is being moved by oneness (whole).
The water neither counts; not pretends to own its reactions; it simply reacts to enacting; while adapting to whatever circumstances are balancing the choice to balance...like Gene Kelly choosing to go singin' in the rain for the glorious feeling of being happy again.
Water doesn't give a fuck; it adapts to everything given; while struggling to sustain itself within momentum.
Now, weird though the words may be, they still have their utility.
Distracting from perceivable now (balance); with suggested new (imbalance); hence tempting choice to ignore resisting. Meanwhile...comprehending the whole process is very inspiring for growing more comprehension out of it; while also tempting with a little bit of schadenfreude.
Element aka EL (from; hence implying origin) MENT (mind; memory; hence implying in response to origin). The road represents the motion sustaining both; work represents the foundation (energy) of it all and the net represents the mind used as instrument of resonance or dissonance within.
being a clod
Yet only among the chosen movement of others; not as life in response to being moved from inception towards death. One can't jam the process of dying with enough living to enjoy the calm before the storm. All the clotting one attempts represent difficulties put in-front of those willingly going with the flow.
One can restrict others from destroying self; but the attempt reduces resistance required to sustain life.
stumbling around aimlessly
To stumble implies as choice; choice implies response-ability to perceivable origin (balance). It's the want to aim which tempts one to ignore the need to respond to being directed at predefined outcome.
"The Rubber Bands" is a collective term
Collectivism (togetherness) is being suggested to tempt one to ignore perceivable apartheid. The "family unit" represents agreed upon collectivism; while each one unit within represents a perceivable partial (living) of the whole (process of dying). Behaving alike implies resonating as individual choice to collective origin (balance) and for the sustenance of self. The real unit of a family represents the sustenance of oneself by adapting as one (perceiving) to oneness (perceivable). The few suggest family "unit" to tempt one to ignore perceivable unitas (state of being one; oneness).
Unity represents one of the most efficient brands to rip others apart; because those who consent to be together; each ignore to sustain self when consenting to any suggested collective.
All the same! (backwards/forwards; up/down; left/right)
Put yourself at the center of them and you're in a box with the free will of choice over different directions. Those who grew up within the box lack the self discernment about their position at the center and the existence of the box. A step to the left implies coming from a right and vice versa. Free will to choose yet only within these unseen walls.
The words, we have on good authority
The AUTHOR (origin) doesn't formulate words; it forms reaction within the momentum of enacting flow, which implies the choice to react in resonance (sound) or dissonance (word).
If one shapes a word in resonance to perceivable sound; then why does one want to suggest it to others as meaning for sound? It's the want to define for those who decline the predefined; which tempts the spoken word to be shaped.
Though certainly life should be a ship, and not a mere boat. (That said, it does not wear a ship rig, and would more properly be termed a jackass barque)
One can't even rebrand vessel without tempting naval warfare among others...
Hey me, aforementioned question...Dangit! Outfoxed again! He gets me with this every time, I tell you.
That's because every suggested quest tempts one to reason about problems in search of solutions; while ignoring to be within the solution
have you seen the cowrie shells?
Ever so often while mudflat hiking (wattwandern).
one of those parrots that speaks almost entirely in insults.
A sleight of hand for parroting others (consenting to suggested) insulting self (ignorance of perceivable). Alas...Polly still deserves a cracker.
A story's got to have a point to be an anecdote, and oneness is perfectly formed without edges or corners anywhere on its surface.
AN'ECDOTE, noun [Gr. to publish, part, given out.] aka to publish the partial (perceiving) into the whole (perceivable); to cause apartheid through self differentiation of wholeness; to give out the temporary opportunity to "be" within ongoing.
One limits self when suggesting "perfectly formed"; because form represents the imperfect within the perfect flow. It's the parasitic few who suggest progressivism; hence PER'FECT, adjective - "to carry to the end"; hence tempting the many to follow along; while burdening themselves with suggested information about the things to come.
Try making a point within motion...what do you get? A line. How to tempt one to ignore being within that line? By suggesting one to be "online"...
8 onions a day
I can eat onions like apples, but mysteriously whenever I go for onions, my wife hands me an apple...
I have somewhere quite clearly seen those two books, and that they were together a servicable example of two things.
a) "two together" implies one; "two things" implies each one of 'em...one can only discern among perceivable differences; others can suggest togetherness to tempt one to ignore differences; hence constantly using "we" when suggesting in the name of other "ones" as "oneself".
b) SERV'ICE, noun [Latin servitium.] - "attendance on a superior" aka attendance of choice within superior balance. Voluntary or involuntary servitude represent need/want aka resonance/dissonance aka resistance/temptation aka in response to/ in ignorance of.
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many to consent to service providers; while tricking them with choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law to become the servants of those providing them suggestions.
there was a band called "The The"
"Those are the rules of religion...Those are the laws of the land"
"That's how the forces of darkness have suppressed the spirit of man"
"That's why human beings still walk on all fours...Whilst in the presence of their so called superiors"
it's fine to talk all the words in the world so long as one goes on to walk
Suggested words tempt one to walk in circles; perceivable sound inspires one to balance (resonate) on the only way to walk.
never let it be understated what wonderfully restorative - and indeed righting - effect walking has on the humours of the body.
The choice to walk within momentum (balance) re-balances choice. RE (response to) STORE (abundance) -ATION (through action)...it's how the reaction grows its lacks through adaptation.
The sun's comin' up and the birds are out singing...
My morning routine brings me among them about half an hour earlier; so I get a nice stretch going while the world around slowly awakens.
Not me (highest value in existence). If anything I'd be found at the bottom...
Top/bottom (perceivable balance) implies perceiving choice at the center.
Winning, yes. But winning what
a) winning vs losing; yes vs no...consenting to put oneself into imbalance is what corrupts one to comprehend being choice within balance aka evaluation within value aka potential within potentiality...the opportunity to access everything.
b) growth (living) within loss (process of dying) represents wining within losing.
we'd probably find emplacements. Eh? Ehh?
PLACE (residence of) MENT (mind; memory).
What if the tentpole has to step out to go and make like bears do in the woods? The roof'd fall down, that's what'd happen.
Balance (top/bottom) represents the foundation for wherever choice (tentpole) wanders; so wherever choice exists; shelter can be found. Whenever you need to make like bears do; you represent the choice to do so, and if you choose to ignore this; then nature will enforce the outcome...pressure/release.
Also I'm kinda short, so I'd make a pretty rubbish tentpole.
That tentpole represents the ecosystem of each one; the radius of each ones growth potential.
Other balances are also available.
All suggested balances represent imbalance; hence ones ignorance of perceivable balance. To choose among others tempts one to ignore that momentum (balance) self differentiates the whole flow into those others partial forms.
"ignore balance"...I've heard it said that it's much akin to "chewing a brick"
The consequences of ignoring balance can represent chewing a brick; yet ignorance represents bliss aka the temptation to want to ignore response-ability.
ONLY IF YOU CALL THIS LIVIN'!
"People ask me why...I never find a place to stop...And settle down, down, down"
"But I never wanted all those things...People need to justify...Their lives, lives, lives"
"Yes we were born, born...Born to be alive"
Think you can do MATLAB?
I think more in terms of ADLIP; hence being a bit concerned about doing a METHLAB...
Like the difference between getting kicked in the left shin, and getting kicked in the right shin?
All the differences one can get while being able to perceive getting them.
fishing in rain...fishing in a river
What would a fish choose...water in balance (river) or imbalanced water (rain)?
Except Oceans. Those have tempers
a) TEM'PERAMENT, noun [Latin temperamentum.] - "constitution" aka CONSTITUTE (to set) -TION (through action) hence reacting to being set within enacting.
b) OCEAN, noun. [Latin oceanus; Gr.; Heb. to encompass) + ENCOM'PASS, verb - "to surround". Calling the largest mass (each part thereof) of liquid "surrounding" represents yet another sleight of hand for being form (living) within flow (process of dying).
the wrong moment
Need/want represents perceivable momentum (balance); want vs not want (right vs wrong) represents ignoring momentum.
Both the suggested right and wrong moments represent a distraction from perceivable momentum.
who assembled that one, and what assembled that assembler in turn? It's assembly lines all the way...
Oneness dissembles into ones; which only then allows ones to reassemble. The few suggest assembly (creationism) as the inversion of disassembly (transmutation).
All of things are indeed made
Being made implies within; hence a foundation (energy) has to exist before things (temporary) can be made within (ongoing).
maybe some are more different than others
Each different partial represents the same whole. Each partial lacks comprehension about the perceivable whole; hence being different to each other. Each different choice grows different aspects of comprehension about the whole.
What if the process of dying is impressing (loss) to inspire those living within to express (growth); which requires choice of adaptation (need); hence also offering the temptation of ignorance (want) aka self repression?
In other words...those who ignore to grow are tempted to feel stuck; while being moved on a road they ignore (process of dying) towards somewhere (death) their ignorance denies them to comprehend. Furthermore; the choice to ignore need for want; tempts them to want to hold onto; hence gluing themselves onto temporary within ongoing.
The few utilize suggestion to tempt the many to willingly attach themselves to the fleeting material; while ignoring to be the material resistance (living) within the immaterial velocity (process of dying).
The ignorance of temperance towards permanence tempts impotence of sustenance through lack of resistance.
Which is why the ongoing whole differentiates into "temporary" partials; which have to struggle to sustain self (apartheid); while resisting the temptation of "cottoning" together. Entrance the parasitic few suggesting the ignorant many to pick cotton together.
If one (living) comprehends the only origin (process of dying); then it isn't about wanting (winning) vs not wanting (losing); but about the need to grow within loss; by resisting the temptation of suggested wins or loses.
Choice (consent) towards choice (suggestion) contract law allows the few to sell everything perceivable back to the many who ignore this for suggested.
Everyone (perceiving) exists at the center of everything (perceivable) as the free will of choice to utilize it (growth)...or ignore it (loss). The few sell perceivable loss under suggested growth back to the many who pay growth (living) into loss (dying). A self destruction racket; more or less carefully hidden behind suggested narratives; which are collapsing upon each other over and over again.
In short...suggesting to sell what is perceptibly free.
WEAPON, noun - "any instrument of offense"...there has to be a weapon of offense (choice) within a self sustaining system of defense (balance). The "will" within free will of choice represents the want (temptation) within the need (resistance).
Self discernment has to be grown for one to comprehend that "instrument" implies in response to perceivable sound. Without that one views any weapon as offense vs defense among others; instead of as response-ability (choice) to origin (balance).
Choice represents the base for suggestion (want); perceivable balance (need) represents the base for choice. Those who are reasoning against each other about suggestion; lack comprehension about base (choice) because they already consented by choice to the suggested choices of others; hence willingly ignoring free will of choice; while submitting the choices of others.
Inception towards death represents the way; momentum (balance) represents what one perceives it at, and ones choice operates at the center thereof. One cannot wander off the path (astray) while being confined to the momentum of the only path. Wandering around in willing ignorance is a choice tho...
Why hunting prey? To sustain self. Where to sustain self? Within momentum (balance); hence origin of every choice to hunt. Now change perspective to the prey...sustaining self; while resisting the suggested temptations by others (getting hunted down) all while adapting as choice to the ever changing moment (balance).
Even while both hunter and hunted are "facing" death; they each operate for the sustenance of life; hence adapting to origin...not to the predefined outcome. Once again; such a perspective requires the growth of self discernment about living within the process of dying; hence in need to react to an enacting system; while being tempted to want everything else.
From center (perceiving) into surrounding (perceivable) based on free will of choice.
a) inception towards death represents the only direction...looking freely (choice) around within the momentum (balance) thereof; doesn't change the direction.
b) constant change (aka forward velocity) represents direction (progress of dying) for those (living) within.
c) if all represents one in energy; then others represent moving partials of the whole. All others represent perceivable inspiration (need) and suggesting information (want) for ones free will of choice. If all represents one in energy; then there can be only one; hence all for one and one for all.
What's lacking is each ones self discernment about representing a partial within a self differentiating whole. The more one comprehends apartheid; the more one comprehends wholeness. The parasitic few distract the ignorant many from that by suggesting diversity (difference) for equality (sameness) as the inversion of difference (partial) out of sameness (whole).
Every one represents potential (growth) within potentiality (loss); yet it requires adaptation of potential to potentiality to grow; while resisting the temptation to drain potential among others.
In other words...one is tempted to want what others grow; while ignoring the need to grow oneself.
Also...one doesn't need to regard the suggestions of others; one represents the RE (responding) GUARD (preservation; self sustenance) within perceivable.
Strength in numbers (sleight of hand for strength within the designated unit "one") misdirected by suggested collectivism (out of many; one) against others. Notice also...POSSE (possession) aka want over need.
PLAT (to spread) FORM (that manner of being peculiar to each body, which exhibits it to the eye as distinct from every other body) aka growth through self differentiation within loss.
Also; PLATEAU (elevated tract of relatively level land) aka choice based growth (elevation) within the momentum (level aka balance) of motion, hence the implied relation of growth to loss; of form to flow; of elevation to degradation etc.
The hook on the other hand represents the snare; the temptation to want to hold onto the material (life); while ignoring to grow in response to immaterial (inception towards death).
Each drop of liquid seeks level (balance); hence representing choice. Liquid also adapts to ever changing circumstances. You don't perceive rain (plural) but partial liquid within whole motion. Branding the momentum of liquid "rain" was suggested to you. Furthermore; suggested "whom" implies the choice to count; while each part of liquid adapts to the whole momentum until disrupted by "whomever" chose to resist liquid finding level.
The few suggest "automobile" to tempt the many to ignore being mobility (living) within automation (process of dying). They furthermore tempt choice into a conflict between manual and automatic; as the inversion of being the manual choice within the automatic balance.
Who assembled and maintains them? What if the origin of ROBOT (Latin robur; strength) represents resisting (living) temptation (dying); and what if others suggest strength as loss in disguise to tempt one to ignore growing it?
The few suggest the automated assembly of sameness to tempt the many to ignore being the manual difference within the self differentiating (automated) sameness. They call it strength (robot) to manufacture sameness within differences (out of many; one) as the inversion of being different within same (one within oneness).
Suggesting these automatic assemblies represents mesmerism aka hypnotism to domesticate free will of choice from adaptation into stagnation.
Showing ones understanding (consent to standing under the suggestions of others) reconfirms the positions of others as above oneself. Resisting suggestion corrodes the position of the ones suggesting; because the ones suggesting utilize the lack of resistance by the ones consenting to sustain their position.
Because growing out of it implies resisting (living) being transmuted back into it (process of dying). The wanderer (life) is stuck to the road (inception towards death); while representing the constant crossroad (choice within balance) in-between keep wandering and becoming roadkill.
They (the partial) cannot stop the whole...only ignore being moved by it.
Backwards/forwards; up/down; left/right represent choices bound to balance (aka while within the momentum of motion). The "if" (if/then implication) for life is predefined by being moved from inception towards death. The reaction to perceivable implication can only exist within the momentum of the enacting motion.
One exists in-between; at the center of; in response to...if/then. The "/" (forward slash) aka SLASH; from French ESCLACHIER (to break); also ESCLATER (to break; splinter) represents the forwards motion self differentiating into the forwarded slash (broken partial within whole).
Sleight of hand for "starting"...
"We didn't start the fire...It was always burning...Since the world's been turning"
"We didn't start the fire...No, we didn't light it...But we tried to fight it"
You're representing the boat of life floating from inception towards death. You are tempted to misuse the other lifeboats as a shore for temporary habitation.
Sleight of hand: "Islands in the stream...that is what we are...no one in-between...how could we be wrong?"
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many one such island as "America" aka the land of the free (will of choice) and the home of the brave (fearless of danger) aka a collective of lifeboats forming the island "united states" of America. What's gonna happen to islands in the stream? Just listen to the suggested "mainstream"...
Ask yourself if pulling to shore represents selling yourself short?
SEEM; verb - "to become; to befit"; which implies the temporary partial to come to being by the "awful busy" ongoing whole. Not that flattering to self to discredit origin as awful...and yet the living (reactors) keeping discrediting the process of dying (generator).
..."and on; on and on; the beat don't stop until the break (self differentiation) of dawn (inception of life) aka Rapper's Delight aka RAP (Latin rapio, rapidus, rapid) DE-LIGHT (off; away from light).
Aka a single mind (mono-ment) given out (anecdote) to express the collected (massive) empty space (inane) of being within (existence).
Ask yourself if collecting suggested nothingness (ex-nihilo) really expresses everything one exists within? What if one (perceiving) represents the monument within the anecdote of oneness (perceivable)?
Who but "one" can say it and who but another "one" can consent to it being said?
Suggesting "those" implies one to perceive others; while suggesting them to represent "those"...this implies them being done by; otherwise one couldn't perceive other ones without being done by motion. So how could those who are done do nothing (don't)?
Perceivable as or suggested by?
Sleight of hand: No Doubt - "Don't Speak"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR3Vdo5etCQ
"Don't speak" (don't suggest words)
"I know just what you're saying" (I perceive sound; you suggest words)
"So please stop explaining" (resist the temptation to ignore perceivable for suggested)
"Don't tell me 'cause it hurts" (you are tempting me to destroy myself)
"Don't speak" (don't suggest words)
"I know what you're thinkin" (your memory is filled with suggested words)
"I don't need your reasons" (I don't need your conflict of want vs not want)
"Don't tell me 'cause it hurts" (you are tempting me to destroy myself)
Each (perceiving) one exists contained within all (perceivable) knowledge. Others suggest a twist (chord) aka suggestion as the inversion of perceivable as to tempt one to respond to the twist (re-cord) by consenting to memorize suggested information; which then tempts one to remember aka respond to twisted memory.
The parasitic few suggest AKASHIC; from AKASHA (ether) to tempt the many to ignore E'THER, noun [Latin oether; Greek to burn, to shine.] aka the origin of heat and light aka when flow (velocity) and form (resistance) meet within momentum (balance).
Sleight of hand..."we don't need no water" (cause form exists within flow) "let the motherfucker burn" (let the living resist dying)..."burn; motherfucker; burn" aka out of heat (burn), within momentum (mother; womb); as self sustenance within temptation (fucking) and back to heat (burn).
The essence of cards implies the suggested game (winning vs losing). Others suggest games to tempt one to ignore the essence of being growth (living) within loss (inception towards death) aka evaluation at the center of value. Loss represents the generator for the reaction of growth.
Consenting to suggested games tempts one to debate (winning vs losing) against others, while ignoring to sustain oneself within perceivable. Those who think they can win what others suggest; ignore being the highest value (evaluation) within existence.
The center of balance isn't a place for choice to go; but the origin demanding resistance (need), while tempting with ignorance (want). All the other "places" around represent the perceivable inspiration (need) and suggested information (want) temporary formed (living) within the momentum of ongoing flow (process of dying) for the choice at the center of balance.
a) LOCO; LOCATUS (to set: to place, to position) -ATION (through action)...hence the enacting represents the prime for all reactions within it, and reaction by choice implies within enacting balance (momentum of motion).
b) one is being set up as the tentpole and the higher the pole grows; the more shelter it expresses for the sustenance of self.
c) TENT (to stretch) POLE (instrument of measurement) aka a prepared (instruo); measuring mind within predefined sound; able to grow (resistance) within loss (velocity).
Everything by (per) sound (sonos) represents a different expression thereof; hence choice being used to adapt to the expressed inspiration thereof as to be able to grow comprehension thereof. Every so called weapon one utilizes becomes inspiration for ones partial growth, hence the more one trains with a distinct weapon; the more one feels the need to train with other distinct weapons.
Perceivable differences represent communicated inspiration for adaptation.
What does "better" imply? A conflict of reason against "worse". One cannot reason "with" others; because reasoning represents wanting versus not wanting suggested; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable, one exists "with" and "within".
Reason (want vs not want) represents the suggested inversion of perceivable balance (need/want)...imbalance; hence conflict. Choice exits at the center of balance, and only the choice to ignore perceivable balance, shapes suggested imbalance. Others use suggestion to be able to shape imbalances among those who ignore balance.
a) life is being pushed from inception towards death
b) being alive doesn't represent being against death; but balancing as choice within the momentum of motion.
c) one feels pushed by the suggestions of others; because ones consent to any suggestion causes the conflict (reason) within ones mind. If one chooses to be within a conflict; then the other side will be perceived as pushing the limits of ones side. Nature doesn't push the limit...it sets one (choice) into the limit (balance).
Sleight of hand: "Push it to the limit" (be the resistance within the limit)..."Walk along the razor's edge" (be choice within balance)..."But don't look down, just keep your head" (resist the temptation of dying; keep sustaining life)
The origin of sound which allows one to shape through resonance within, is so loud, that one perceives the vibrations thereof as for example the ingredients of a so called "sandwich". Everything perceivable represents the materialized expressions of immaterial sound, and everyone perceiving it represents the free will of choice to shape it through resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
Each person is being served by (per) sound (sonos). The few suggest serving to represent "working for" as to tempt the ignorance of all representing one in energy (work).
Growing while others feed upon loss; through their willing ignorance to grow, for the appetite tempting towards the fleeting.
It's the mindset between "I want the taste of that" and "I need to grow what sustains; which would surround me with ever changing tastes".
Others suggested you brands for different aspects of the same motion as temptation. Your consent to suggested (information) represents your willing ignorance of perceivable (inspiration), and suggesting to others perpetuates the temptation of ignorance (choice of want over need).
RE (response to) PRESENT (being within essence); hence as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)...not responding to what others are suggesting (words over sound).
Choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law represents the foundation of civil engineering aka the temptation to stand under (understanding) the suggested information by others; while ignoring to grow comprehension by adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
The parasitic few suggest EN'GINE, noun [Latin ingenium.] - "agent for another" to tempt the many to ignore being the reaction within the enacting; while surrounded by reacting others, hence tempted to react to them.
A temporary convenience (living) within an ongoing inconvenience (process of dying).
Within the temptation of appetite; the inspiration to sustain self (hunger) was everywhere.
a) a temporary convenience (want for prey) within an ongoing inconvenience (need to predate upon to still hunger)
b) "if it bleeds; we can kill it"
Frequency of adaptation (as choice within balance) to perceivable differences (need) or suggested sameness (want) shapes form sharp or dull; yet since this is about balancing..."all work (need) and no play (want) makes Billy a dull boy".
EYE C ALL...ALL SEEING I...balls to the wall annoying wordplay. Meanwhile among the phonetic kabbalists: "such foolish insolence".
Because within the inspiring whole perceivable; each partial represents suggesting temptation. Each dissuading advice represents suggested temptation to others; until each one chooses to resist suggested (want) for perceivable (need).
Dissuasion represents the temptation to not want what others suggest, while suggesting them to want what's needed (perceivable). One cannot suggest perceivable without tempting others to consent to the suggesting substitute of the perceivable origin.
My suggestion (this is reality) tempts you to consent to me as the representative of the perceivable reality I suggest. Each one is then being tempted to ignore RE (response to) PRESENT (being within essence).
Hence the living temporary resisting the temptation to ignore the ongoing process of dying. It's less steering, than it is you spending resistance to pick others up; while attempting to get them to grow by themselves within the loss they're willingly ignoring to be in.
House of Karst (karra- "rock")...you don't seem to like caves that much. Claustrophobia or did you had to spend a night hiding in a den; while waiting for the occupants to leave?
"source of falling" implies motion...look at yourself (living) within motion (process of dying) and notice how different it feels to be alive; from the consequences of dying, which are perceivable among the remains of the living?
Living is not just dying; but a different expression of the same origin. Branding living as "humans; nations; races; families etc." tempts the perceivable singular to ignore self for the suggested plural.
Reacting liquidity within a directing current. You are being tempted with the suggested shape of the perceivable liquid from the current directing it.
CALCULA (computing by numbers) -TION (through action) implies being the reacting number (one) within the enacting (oneness). Counting is what's being suggested to you. One doesn't need to count oneness; one (perceiving) needs to adapt to oneness (perceivable); because one (partial) is being moved by oneness (whole).
The water neither counts; not pretends to own its reactions; it simply reacts to enacting; while adapting to whatever circumstances are balancing the choice to balance...like Gene Kelly choosing to go singin' in the rain for the glorious feeling of being happy again.
Water doesn't give a fuck; it adapts to everything given; while struggling to sustain itself within momentum.
Distracting from perceivable now (balance); with suggested new (imbalance); hence tempting choice to ignore resisting. Meanwhile...comprehending the whole process is very inspiring for growing more comprehension out of it; while also tempting with a little bit of schadenfreude.
Element aka EL (from; hence implying origin) MENT (mind; memory; hence implying in response to origin). The road represents the motion sustaining both; work represents the foundation (energy) of it all and the net represents the mind used as instrument of resonance or dissonance within.
Yet only among the chosen movement of others; not as life in response to being moved from inception towards death. One can't jam the process of dying with enough living to enjoy the calm before the storm. All the clotting one attempts represent difficulties put in-front of those willingly going with the flow.
One can restrict others from destroying self; but the attempt reduces resistance required to sustain life.
To stumble implies as choice; choice implies response-ability to perceivable origin (balance). It's the want to aim which tempts one to ignore the need to respond to being directed at predefined outcome.
Collectivism (togetherness) is being suggested to tempt one to ignore perceivable apartheid. The "family unit" represents agreed upon collectivism; while each one unit within represents a perceivable partial (living) of the whole (process of dying). Behaving alike implies resonating as individual choice to collective origin (balance) and for the sustenance of self. The real unit of a family represents the sustenance of oneself by adapting as one (perceiving) to oneness (perceivable). The few suggest family "unit" to tempt one to ignore perceivable unitas (state of being one; oneness).
Unity represents one of the most efficient brands to rip others apart; because those who consent to be together; each ignore to sustain self when consenting to any suggested collective.
Put yourself at the center of them and you're in a box with the free will of choice over different directions. Those who grew up within the box lack the self discernment about their position at the center and the existence of the box. A step to the left implies coming from a right and vice versa. Free will to choose yet only within these unseen walls.
The AUTHOR (origin) doesn't formulate words; it forms reaction within the momentum of enacting flow, which implies the choice to react in resonance (sound) or dissonance (word).
If one shapes a word in resonance to perceivable sound; then why does one want to suggest it to others as meaning for sound? It's the want to define for those who decline the predefined; which tempts the spoken word to be shaped.
Temporary convenience shapes ongoing inconvenience.
One can't even rebrand vessel without tempting naval warfare among others...
That's because every suggested quest tempts one to reason about problems in search of solutions; while ignoring to be within the solution
Ever so often while mudflat hiking (wattwandern).
A sleight of hand for parroting others (consenting to suggested) insulting self (ignorance of perceivable). Alas...Polly still deserves a cracker.
AN'ECDOTE, noun [Gr. to publish, part, given out.] aka to publish the partial (perceiving) into the whole (perceivable); to cause apartheid through self differentiation of wholeness; to give out the temporary opportunity to "be" within ongoing.
One limits self when suggesting "perfectly formed"; because form represents the imperfect within the perfect flow. It's the parasitic few who suggest progressivism; hence PER'FECT, adjective - "to carry to the end"; hence tempting the many to follow along; while burdening themselves with suggested information about the things to come.
Try making a point within motion...what do you get? A line. How to tempt one to ignore being within that line? By suggesting one to be "online"...
I can eat onions like apples, but mysteriously whenever I go for onions, my wife hands me an apple...
a) "two together" implies one; "two things" implies each one of 'em...one can only discern among perceivable differences; others can suggest togetherness to tempt one to ignore differences; hence constantly using "we" when suggesting in the name of other "ones" as "oneself".
b) SERV'ICE, noun [Latin servitium.] - "attendance on a superior" aka attendance of choice within superior balance. Voluntary or involuntary servitude represent need/want aka resonance/dissonance aka resistance/temptation aka in response to/ in ignorance of.
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many to consent to service providers; while tricking them with choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law to become the servants of those providing them suggestions.
"Those are the rules of religion...Those are the laws of the land"
"That's how the forces of darkness have suppressed the spirit of man"
"That's why human beings still walk on all fours...Whilst in the presence of their so called superiors"
Suggested words tempt one to walk in circles; perceivable sound inspires one to balance (resonate) on the only way to walk.
The choice to walk within momentum (balance) re-balances choice. RE (response to) STORE (abundance) -ATION (through action)...it's how the reaction grows its lacks through adaptation.
My morning routine brings me among them about half an hour earlier; so I get a nice stretch going while the world around slowly awakens.
Top/bottom (perceivable balance) implies perceiving choice at the center.
a) winning vs losing; yes vs no...consenting to put oneself into imbalance is what corrupts one to comprehend being choice within balance aka evaluation within value aka potential within potentiality...the opportunity to access everything.
b) growth (living) within loss (process of dying) represents wining within losing.
PLACE (residence of) MENT (mind; memory).
Balance (top/bottom) represents the foundation for wherever choice (tentpole) wanders; so wherever choice exists; shelter can be found. Whenever you need to make like bears do; you represent the choice to do so, and if you choose to ignore this; then nature will enforce the outcome...pressure/release.
That tentpole represents the ecosystem of each one; the radius of each ones growth potential.
All suggested balances represent imbalance; hence ones ignorance of perceivable balance. To choose among others tempts one to ignore that momentum (balance) self differentiates the whole flow into those others partial forms.
The consequences of ignoring balance can represent chewing a brick; yet ignorance represents bliss aka the temptation to want to ignore response-ability.
"People ask me why...I never find a place to stop...And settle down, down, down"
"But I never wanted all those things...People need to justify...Their lives, lives, lives"
"Yes we were born, born...Born to be alive"
I think more in terms of ADLIP; hence being a bit concerned about doing a METHLAB...
All the differences one can get while being able to perceive getting them.
What would a fish choose...water in balance (river) or imbalanced water (rain)?
a) TEM'PERAMENT, noun [Latin temperamentum.] - "constitution" aka CONSTITUTE (to set) -TION (through action) hence reacting to being set within enacting.
b) OCEAN, noun. [Latin oceanus; Gr.; Heb. to encompass) + ENCOM'PASS, verb - "to surround". Calling the largest mass (each part thereof) of liquid "surrounding" represents yet another sleight of hand for being form (living) within flow (process of dying).
Need/want represents perceivable momentum (balance); want vs not want (right vs wrong) represents ignoring momentum.
Both the suggested right and wrong moments represent a distraction from perceivable momentum.
Oneness dissembles into ones; which only then allows ones to reassemble. The few suggest assembly (creationism) as the inversion of disassembly (transmutation).
Being made implies within; hence a foundation (energy) has to exist before things (temporary) can be made within (ongoing).
Each different partial represents the same whole. Each partial lacks comprehension about the perceivable whole; hence being different to each other. Each different choice grows different aspects of comprehension about the whole.