Because growing out of it implies resisting (living) being transmuted back into it (process of dying). The wanderer (life) is stuck to the road (inception towards death); while representing the constant crossroad (choice within balance) in-between keep wandering and becoming roadkill.
if ever they should stop
They (the partial) cannot stop the whole...only ignore being moved by it.
if they start going backwards
Backwards/forwards; up/down; left/right represent choices bound to balance (aka while within the momentum of motion). The "if" (if/then implication) for life is predefined by being moved from inception towards death. The reaction to perceivable implication can only exist within the momentum of the enacting motion.
One exists in-between; at the center of; in response to...if/then. The "/" (forward slash) aka SLASH; from French ESCLACHIER (to break); also ESCLATER (to break; splinter) represents the forwards motion self differentiating into the forwarded slash (broken partial within whole).
Sleight of hand for "starting"...
"We didn't start the fire...It was always burning...Since the world's been turning"
"We didn't start the fire...No, we didn't light it...But we tried to fight it"
I'm in a lifeboat and pulling for shore
You're representing the boat of life floating from inception towards death. You are tempted to misuse the other lifeboats as a shore for temporary habitation.
Sleight of hand: "Islands in the stream...that is what we are...no one in-between...how could we be wrong?"
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many one such island as "America" aka the land of the free (will of choice) and the home of the brave (fearless of danger) aka a collective of lifeboats forming the island "united states" of America. What's gonna happen to islands in the stream? Just listen to the suggested "mainstream"...
Ask yourself if pulling to shore represents selling yourself short?
Seems awful busy (ongoing whole)...
SEEM; verb - "to become; to befit"; which implies the temporary partial to come to being by the "awful busy" ongoing whole. Not that flattering to self to discredit origin as awful...and yet the living (reactors) keeping discrediting the process of dying (generator).
Always going and going on...
..."and on; on and on; the beat don't stop until the break (self differentiation) of dawn (inception of life) aka Rapper's Delight aka RAP (Latin rapio, rapidus, rapid) DE-LIGHT (off; away from light).
let's call me "a monument to an anecdote on the massive inanity of existence."
Aka a single mind (mono-ment) given out (anecdote) to express the collected (massive) empty space (inane) of being within (existence).
Ask yourself if collecting suggested nothingness (ex-nihilo) really expresses everything one exists within? What if one (perceiving) represents the monument within the anecdote of oneness (perceivable)?
There's this other saying: "There are two..."
Who but "one" can say it and who but another "one" can consent to it being said?
those who don't
Suggesting "those" implies one to perceive others; while suggesting them to represent "those"...this implies them being done by; otherwise one couldn't perceive other ones without being done by motion. So how could those who are done do nothing (don't)?
"I know just what you're saying" (I perceive sound; you suggest words)
"So please stop explaining" (resist the temptation to ignore perceivable for suggested)
"Don't tell me 'cause it hurts" (you are tempting me to destroy myself)
"Don't speak" (don't suggest words)
"I know what you're thinkin" (your memory is filled with suggested words)
"I don't need your reasons" (I don't need your conflict of want vs not want)
"Don't tell me 'cause it hurts" (you are tempting me to destroy myself)
a complete akashic record, containing within their pages all of knowledge
Each (perceiving) one exists contained within all (perceivable) knowledge. Others suggest a twist (chord) aka suggestion as the inversion of perceivable as to tempt one to respond to the twist (re-cord) by consenting to memorize suggested information; which then tempts one to remember aka respond to twisted memory.
The parasitic few suggest AKASHIC; from AKASHA (ether) to tempt the many to ignore E'THER, noun [Latin oether; Greek to burn, to shine.] aka the origin of heat and light aka when flow (velocity) and form (resistance) meet within momentum (balance).
Sleight of hand..."we don't need no water" (cause form exists within flow) "let the motherfucker burn" (let the living resist dying)..."burn; motherfucker; burn" aka out of heat (burn), within momentum (mother; womb); as self sustenance within temptation (fucking) and back to heat (burn).
In life - debatable. In cards - essential.
The essence of cards implies the suggested game (winning vs losing). Others suggest games to tempt one to ignore the essence of being growth (living) within loss (inception towards death) aka evaluation at the center of value. Loss represents the generator for the reaction of growth.
Consenting to suggested games tempts one to debate (winning vs losing) against others, while ignoring to sustain oneself within perceivable. Those who think they can win what others suggest; ignore being the highest value (evaluation) within existence.
As for the center of everything, if one were to go there
The center of balance isn't a place for choice to go; but the origin demanding resistance (need), while tempting with ignorance (want). All the other "places" around represent the perceivable inspiration (need) and suggested information (want) temporary formed (living) within the momentum of ongoing flow (process of dying) for the choice at the center of balance.
I imagine it'd be a prime location in which to set up a tentpole.
a) LOCO; LOCATUS (to set: to place, to position) -ATION (through action)...hence the enacting represents the prime for all reactions within it, and reaction by choice implies within enacting balance (momentum of motion).
b) one is being set up as the tentpole and the higher the pole grows; the more shelter it expresses for the sustenance of self.
c) TENT (to stretch) POLE (instrument of measurement) aka a prepared (instruo); measuring mind within predefined sound; able to grow (resistance) within loss (velocity).
weapons, much like people, have somewhat-distinct personalities about 'em
Everything by (per) sound (sonos) represents a different expression thereof; hence choice being used to adapt to the expressed inspiration thereof as to be able to grow comprehension thereof. Every so called weapon one utilizes becomes inspiration for ones partial growth, hence the more one trains with a distinct weapon; the more one feels the need to train with other distinct weapons.
Perceivable differences represent communicated inspiration for adaptation.
Probably better to reason with others
What does "better" imply? A conflict of reason against "worse". One cannot reason "with" others; because reasoning represents wanting versus not wanting suggested; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable, one exists "with" and "within".
Reason (want vs not want) represents the suggested inversion of perceivable balance (need/want)...imbalance; hence conflict. Choice exits at the center of balance, and only the choice to ignore perceivable balance, shapes suggested imbalance. Others use suggestion to be able to shape imbalances among those who ignore balance.
if pushed to againstness
a) life is being pushed from inception towards death
b) being alive doesn't represent being against death; but balancing as choice within the momentum of motion.
c) one feels pushed by the suggestions of others; because ones consent to any suggestion causes the conflict (reason) within ones mind. If one chooses to be within a conflict; then the other side will be perceived as pushing the limits of ones side. Nature doesn't push the limit...it sets one (choice) into the limit (balance).
Sleight of hand: "Push it to the limit" (be the resistance within the limit)..."Walk along the razor's edge" (be choice within balance)..."But don't look down, just keep your head" (resist the temptation of dying; keep sustaining life)
to serve the sandwiches silently
The origin of sound which allows one to shape through resonance within, is so loud, that one perceives the vibrations thereof as for example the ingredients of a so called "sandwich". Everything perceivable represents the materialized expressions of immaterial sound, and everyone perceiving it represents the free will of choice to shape it through resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
Each person is being served by (per) sound (sonos). The few suggest serving to represent "working for" as to tempt the ignorance of all representing one in energy (work).
scarper whilst they masticate
Growing while others feed upon loss; through their willing ignorance to grow, for the appetite tempting towards the fleeting.
It's the mindset between "I want the taste of that" and "I need to grow what sustains; which would surround me with ever changing tastes".
As for inception-toward-death being representative of it - sure, as are rivers, reeds, the compass winds, falling rains, traffic jams, winged animals, and non-winged animals.
Others suggested you brands for different aspects of the same motion as temptation. Your consent to suggested (information) represents your willing ignorance of perceivable (inspiration), and suggesting to others perpetuates the temptation of ignorance (choice of want over need).
RE (response to) PRESENT (being within essence); hence as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)...not responding to what others are suggesting (words over sound).
comprehensive is this particular work of civil engineering
Choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law represents the foundation of civil engineering aka the temptation to stand under (understanding) the suggested information by others; while ignoring to grow comprehension by adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
The parasitic few suggest EN'GINE, noun [Latin ingenium.] - "agent for another" to tempt the many to ignore being the reaction within the enacting; while surrounded by reacting others, hence tempted to react to them.
they were the last of the grasses
A temporary convenience (living) within an ongoing inconvenience (process of dying).
Hunger was everywhere
Within the temptation of appetite; the inspiration to sustain self (hunger) was everywhere.
as were the predators
a) a temporary convenience (want for prey) within an ongoing inconvenience (need to predate upon to still hunger)
b) "if it bleeds; we can kill it"
leaving them to fall on that habitual dullard; Billy.
Frequency of adaptation (as choice within balance) to perceivable differences (need) or suggested sameness (want) shapes form sharp or dull; yet since this is about balancing..."all work (need) and no play (want) makes Billy a dull boy".
the "C" eyeball
EYE C ALL...ALL SEEING I...balls to the wall annoying wordplay. Meanwhile among the phonetic kabbalists: "such foolish insolence".
it didn't really dissuade the others much
Because within the inspiring whole perceivable; each partial represents suggesting temptation. Each dissuading advice represents suggested temptation to others; until each one chooses to resist suggested (want) for perceivable (need).
Dissuasion represents the temptation to not want what others suggest, while suggesting them to want what's needed (perceivable). One cannot suggest perceivable without tempting others to consent to the suggesting substitute of the perceivable origin.
My suggestion (this is reality) tempts you to consent to me as the representative of the perceivable reality I suggest. Each one is then being tempted to ignore RE (response to) PRESENT (being within essence).
steered out of the worst of trouble
Hence the living temporary resisting the temptation to ignore the ongoing process of dying. It's less steering, than it is you spending resistance to pick others up; while attempting to get them to grow by themselves within the loss they're willingly ignoring to be in.
Unless it's karst terrain. A pox on the house of karst terrain.
House of Karst (karra- "rock")...you don't seem to like caves that much. Claustrophobia or did you had to spend a night hiding in a den; while waiting for the occupants to leave?
I know the difference between rain and "other sources of falling water"
"source of falling" implies motion...look at yourself (living) within motion (process of dying) and notice how different it feels to be alive; from the consequences of dying, which are perceivable among the remains of the living?
Living is not just dying; but a different expression of the same origin. Branding living as "humans; nations; races; families etc." tempts the perceivable singular to ignore self for the suggested plural.
The story of rain goes, that it was water given freely the warmth of the sun, but was then mugged for said energy by the workings of the sky, and thus robbed of all of its wealth, it goes back home - and directly, too
Reacting liquidity within a directing current. You are being tempted with the suggested shape of the perceivable liquid from the current directing it.
at no point does their presence enter into the water's own calculus
CALCULA (computing by numbers) -TION (through action) implies being the reacting number (one) within the enacting (oneness). Counting is what's being suggested to you. One doesn't need to count oneness; one (perceiving) needs to adapt to oneness (perceivable); because one (partial) is being moved by oneness (whole).
The water neither counts; not pretends to own its reactions; it simply reacts to enacting; while adapting to whatever circumstances are balancing the choice to balance...like Gene Kelly choosing to go singin' in the rain for the glorious feeling of being happy again.
Water doesn't give a fuck; it adapts to everything given; while struggling to sustain itself within momentum.
Now, weird though the words may be, they still have their utility.
Distracting from perceivable now (balance); with suggested new (imbalance); hence tempting choice to ignore resisting. Meanwhile...comprehending the whole process is very inspiring for growing more comprehension out of it; while also tempting with a little bit of schadenfreude.
Element aka EL (from; hence implying origin) MENT (mind; memory; hence implying in response to origin). The road represents the motion sustaining both; work represents the foundation (energy) of it all and the net represents the mind used as instrument of resonance or dissonance within.
being a clod
Yet only among the chosen movement of others; not as life in response to being moved from inception towards death. One can't jam the process of dying with enough living to enjoy the calm before the storm. All the clotting one attempts represent difficulties put in-front of those willingly going with the flow.
One can restrict others from destroying self; but the attempt reduces resistance required to sustain life.
stumbling around aimlessly
To stumble implies as choice; choice implies response-ability to perceivable origin (balance). It's the want to aim which tempts one to ignore the need to respond to being directed at predefined outcome.
"The Rubber Bands" is a collective term
Collectivism (togetherness) is being suggested to tempt one to ignore perceivable apartheid. The "family unit" represents agreed upon collectivism; while each one unit within represents a perceivable partial (living) of the whole (process of dying). Behaving alike implies resonating as individual choice to collective origin (balance) and for the sustenance of self. The real unit of a family represents the sustenance of oneself by adapting as one (perceiving) to oneness (perceivable). The few suggest family "unit" to tempt one to ignore perceivable unitas (state of being one; oneness).
Unity represents one of the most efficient brands to rip others apart; because those who consent to be together; each ignore to sustain self when consenting to any suggested collective.
All the same! (backwards/forwards; up/down; left/right)
Put yourself at the center of them and you're in a box with the free will of choice over different directions. Those who grew up within the box lack the self discernment about their position at the center and the existence of the box. A step to the left implies coming from a right and vice versa. Free will to choose yet only within these unseen walls.
The words, we have on good authority
The AUTHOR (origin) doesn't formulate words; it forms reaction within the momentum of enacting flow, which implies the choice to react in resonance (sound) or dissonance (word).
If one shapes a word in resonance to perceivable sound; then why does one want to suggest it to others as meaning for sound? It's the want to define for those who decline the predefined; which tempts the spoken word to be shaped.
Though certainly life should be a ship, and not a mere boat. (That said, it does not wear a ship rig, and would more properly be termed a jackass barque)
One can't even rebrand vessel without tempting naval warfare among others...
Hey me, aforementioned question...Dangit! Outfoxed again! He gets me with this every time, I tell you.
That's because every suggested quest tempts one to reason about problems in search of solutions; while ignoring to be within the solution
have you seen the cowrie shells?
Ever so often while mudflat hiking (wattwandern).
one of those parrots that speaks almost entirely in insults.
A sleight of hand for parroting others (consenting to suggested) insulting self (ignorance of perceivable). Alas...Polly still deserves a cracker.
A story's got to have a point to be an anecdote, and oneness is perfectly formed without edges or corners anywhere on its surface.
AN'ECDOTE, noun [Gr. to publish, part, given out.] aka to publish the partial (perceiving) into the whole (perceivable); to cause apartheid through self differentiation of wholeness; to give out the temporary opportunity to "be" within ongoing.
One limits self when suggesting "perfectly formed"; because form represents the imperfect within the perfect flow. It's the parasitic few who suggest progressivism; hence PER'FECT, adjective - "to carry to the end"; hence tempting the many to follow along; while burdening themselves with suggested information about the things to come.
Try making a point within motion...what do you get? A line. How to tempt one to ignore being within that line? By suggesting one to be "online"...
8 onions a day
I can eat onions like apples, but mysteriously whenever I go for onions, my wife hands me an apple...
I have somewhere quite clearly seen those two books, and that they were together a servicable example of two things.
a) "two together" implies one; "two things" implies each one of 'em...one can only discern among perceivable differences; others can suggest togetherness to tempt one to ignore differences; hence constantly using "we" when suggesting in the name of other "ones" as "oneself".
b) SERV'ICE, noun [Latin servitium.] - "attendance on a superior" aka attendance of choice within superior balance. Voluntary or involuntary servitude represent need/want aka resonance/dissonance aka resistance/temptation aka in response to/ in ignorance of.
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many to consent to service providers; while tricking them with choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law to become the servants of those providing them suggestions.
there was a band called "The The"
"Those are the rules of religion...Those are the laws of the land"
"That's how the forces of darkness have suppressed the spirit of man"
"That's why human beings still walk on all fours...Whilst in the presence of their so called superiors"
it's fine to talk all the words in the world so long as one goes on to walk
Suggested words tempt one to walk in circles; perceivable sound inspires one to balance (resonate) on the only way to walk.
never let it be understated what wonderfully restorative - and indeed righting - effect walking has on the humours of the body.
The choice to walk within momentum (balance) re-balances choice. RE (response to) STORE (abundance) -ATION (through action)...it's how the reaction grows its lacks through adaptation.
The sun's comin' up and the birds are out singing...
My morning routine brings me among them about half an hour earlier; so I get a nice stretch going while the world around slowly awakens.
Not me (highest value in existence). If anything I'd be found at the bottom...
Top/bottom (perceivable balance) implies perceiving choice at the center.
Winning, yes. But winning what
a) winning vs losing; yes vs no...consenting to put oneself into imbalance is what corrupts one to comprehend being choice within balance aka evaluation within value aka potential within potentiality...the opportunity to access everything.
b) growth (living) within loss (process of dying) represents wining within losing.
we'd probably find emplacements. Eh? Ehh?
PLACE (residence of) MENT (mind; memory).
What if the tentpole has to step out to go and make like bears do in the woods? The roof'd fall down, that's what'd happen.
Balance (top/bottom) represents the foundation for wherever choice (tentpole) wanders; so wherever choice exists; shelter can be found. Whenever you need to make like bears do; you represent the choice to do so, and if you choose to ignore this; then nature will enforce the outcome...pressure/release.
Also I'm kinda short, so I'd make a pretty rubbish tentpole.
That tentpole represents the ecosystem of each one; the radius of each ones growth potential.
Other balances are also available.
All suggested balances represent imbalance; hence ones ignorance of perceivable balance. To choose among others tempts one to ignore that momentum (balance) self differentiates the whole flow into those others partial forms.
"ignore balance"...I've heard it said that it's much akin to "chewing a brick"
The consequences of ignoring balance can represent chewing a brick; yet ignorance represents bliss aka the temptation to want to ignore response-ability.
ONLY IF YOU CALL THIS LIVIN'!
"People ask me why...I never find a place to stop...And settle down, down, down"
"But I never wanted all those things...People need to justify...Their lives, lives, lives"
"Yes we were born, born...Born to be alive"
Think you can do MATLAB?
I think more in terms of ADLIP; hence being a bit concerned about doing a METHLAB...
Like the difference between getting kicked in the left shin, and getting kicked in the right shin?
All the differences one can get while being able to perceive getting them.
fishing in rain...fishing in a river
What would a fish choose...water in balance (river) or imbalanced water (rain)?
Except Oceans. Those have tempers
a) TEM'PERAMENT, noun [Latin temperamentum.] - "constitution" aka CONSTITUTE (to set) -TION (through action) hence reacting to being set within enacting.
b) OCEAN, noun. [Latin oceanus; Gr.; Heb. to encompass) + ENCOM'PASS, verb - "to surround". Calling the largest mass (each part thereof) of liquid "surrounding" represents yet another sleight of hand for being form (living) within flow (process of dying).
the wrong moment
Need/want represents perceivable momentum (balance); want vs not want (right vs wrong) represents ignoring momentum.
Both the suggested right and wrong moments represent a distraction from perceivable momentum.
who assembled that one, and what assembled that assembler in turn? It's assembly lines all the way...
Oneness dissembles into ones; which only then allows ones to reassemble. The few suggest assembly (creationism) as the inversion of disassembly (transmutation).
All of things are indeed made
Being made implies within; hence a foundation (energy) has to exist before things (temporary) can be made within (ongoing).
maybe some are more different than others
Each different partial represents the same whole. Each partial lacks comprehension about the perceivable whole; hence being different to each other. Each different choice grows different aspects of comprehension about the whole.
even the cobblestones are cobblestones. That's just how much road there is in this road; and that's value, and I'm all about value.
Flow represents value; form represents evaluation, hence a response to presented value of flow. If one suggests value to the cobblestone; then one ignores what ongoing value will do to the cobblestone and those holding onto its suggested value.
I'm all about value.
One represents evaluation (response to value) and one can only temporary exist as such within ongoing value. Evaluation wanders about at the center of value.
the vast majority of thing) can be "jammed" by having jam rubbed all over it.
Nice try...jamming momentum by making it drop to one side only.
Clod's actual original root is meaning "to be cold"
That implies form within flow aka resistance within velocity aka growth within loss aka cold within heat; hence the struggle of the cold (living) to sustain self within the momentum of heat (process of dying). Heat melts cold.
In which you have sussed the reason that the aimless wandering is to be the superior selection.
That ignores perceivable aka being moved from inception towards death...directed within one direction. Aiming towards wanted outcomes tempts one to ignore adapting to needed origin.
Balance represents the superior (above) for choice; choice represents the selection at the center of superiority.
When I hear words like "collectivism" and "individualism"...they're all drawing state salaries
The -ism implies the choice (consent) towards choice (suggestion) contract law; which allows one side to draw compensation from the other; hence the parasitic relationship.
Take the suggested -ism aside and you get perceivable COLLECT (to gather) -TION (through action) and IN (within) DIVIDO (division); which implies one to be the divided reaction being able to gather within the enacting.
The issue with hearing words is the temptation to ignore the perceivable sound out of which others shaped the suggested words. The few suggest words to be convenient for communication; but if one compares the effort required to reverse engineer the suggested from the perceivable; then that looks like a huge inconvenience. Even worse....instead of communication; one gets ignorance based miscommunication.
GO EAST. GO EAST. GO NORTH. TAKE BOX CUTTER...
DOS-Box...DISK (to throw; to show) OPERATING (enacting) SYSTEM (to set)...perceivable mimicked to tempt others to consent to a suggested box.
hweg, to increase or enlarge. Later, as latin auctor, meaning seller or vendor.
The former implies being perceiving growth within perceivable loss; the latter represents others suggesting it.
Same reason one does most of anything, really: shits and giggles.
Reason (conflict) tempts justification (shits and giggles)...response-ability (choice) doesn't need to be justified; since it represents the reaction within enacting justice (that which just is).
Or, in the modern parlance: "Download our App!"
If I hear app instead of application I think Duplo instead of Lego and let the kids play by themselves.
keeping tradition
TRADI'TION, noun [Latin traditio, from trado, to deliver.]...the process of dying delivers; those living within can't keep anything. Only respond to delivery allows perpetuating. The tradition isn't the delivered child; but child delivery.
Pretty sure One - being as mentioned perfect - is also perfectly limitless
Oneness (perfect); ones within oneness (imperfect); hence allowing temporary (growth) within ongoing (loss). The limit (living) has momentary access to the unlimited (process of dying).
Red Hot Chili Peppers
"Can't stop the spirits when they need you" (perceivable inspiration)
"This life is more than just a read-through" (suggested information)
even if I did such a thing (making a point) how would you even know it had happened?
a) comprehending knowledge (perceivable inspiration) requires resisting the temptation of understanding (suggested information). One needs to know (perceivable); while resisting "it" (suggested). Everything happens, while what others are suggesting tempts one to ignore that.
b) look at how often we try to point out; while ignoring that we can't poke holes into the flow of inspiration perceived. The center within being tempted to point out...for shits and giggles.
What do gang leaders and royalty frequently have in common
The common of frequency (choice) represents balance; the common for suggested leaders and royalty represents imbalance. In other words...the objections of the subjected.
P.I.E. tek "to take by the hand, to obtain"
Taking what's been given (life) or being (growth) within obtainable (loss)...a matter of perspective.
I know there's gotta be a wrong way
a) suggested right (want) vs wrong (not want) tempts one to ignore the known (perceivable) way.
b) suggested "gotta be" tempts one to ignore being within all everyone got (perceivable).
c) the way represents balance (momentum); those within represent stumbling choices. Balance as the tightrope choice lacks to comprehend being the center of.
Something real good about watching the sunrise
For me its about being part of the whole composition rising with it, hence willingly acknowledging being part of it. Reloading through sun-gazing while compressed breathing adds a bonus to awakening. I also fart a lot while stretching; but the deer and birds don't seem to mind.
the living incarnation of taupe
A mole?
that institutional beige colour that old printers and fax-machines always used to be
Hydrogen Peroxide makes Bromide its bitch.
most of the time I don't need everything
Each moment represents the momentum of everything needed for those within.
"wining within losing"...Eh? Ehhhhhhh?! That's good that is.
Yet also temporary and a struggle to sustain.
if there weren't anyone else in the tent, then for what's this poor fellow doing carting a tent around on his head anyway?
Choice represents ones sole "tentpole"; the consequences of ones choices represent the circumstantial tent others have to deal with. Be it for shelter or target for home invasions...
ignorance and bliss to be exactly the same thing
a) "thing" implies different from others; hence different form shaped out of same flow.
b) ignorance causes lack of comprehension (bliss). To ignore perceivable inspiration implies for suggested information; which is upheld within ones memory. Lack of comprehending outside inspiration tempts them to be blissful about inside information. Enter tame mind is being suggested to maintain the many inside their information filled minds.
"life" from leyp meaning "glue"
GLUE, noun [Latin gluten.] - "ispissated animal gluten; a tenacious, viscid matter". Let's add VIS'CID, adjective [Latin viscidus; viscus.] - "glutinous; sticky; tenacious; not readily separating" and we get the living constantly tempted to hold onto stuff; while ignoring to represent apartheid (partial within whole).
A sleight of hand from a recent song...
"You are my flaw, you are my thorn...You are everything I've never needed and more
And you are glue"...And In all that I do"
"You're dripping onto me"...You don't know how to let me be"
"And when you finally do...I'll hate you for that too"
"Cause I am water and you're glue"
sem (P.I.E) means both "one" and "together", and has survived all the linguistic tides right into the modern form. A-sem-bly - "A One Resemblance" (that's why they call it that one hue) or, Having the Likeness of Togetherness.
RE (respond to) SEMBLANCE (likeness; appearance; form) implies as the responding form to the appearances of form alike...yet each apart from one another; hence being able to discern likeness among perceivable differences.
The suggested corruption represents TOGETH'ER, adverb - "at the same place; in union with"....the place each one exists within represents a place of differentiation and UNION; noun (Latin unitas; uni) - "the state of being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable)".
Sticking together represents the temptation of "glue" which others are suggesting (e pluribus unum; out of many; one). Expressing apartheid is where it's at, hence the persecution claiming gnomes benefiting from their self imposed diaspora. What does "parasitic nation wrecker" imply? Within; while apart from. A position so despised that it tempts the many to stick together in a desperate attempt to overcome the apartheid within them.
If it weren't made, it's probably not a thing.
Everything (process of dying) is required for each thing (living) within to pretend to make something; while ignoring to shape everything.
Notice also that you try to justify "made" with "not"; hence implying consent to suggested creationism (out of nothing); which ignores perceivable transmutation (out of everything). Try describe something from the perspective of being within everything and you will notice that it's way more unlikely to use "no; not; nothing; nothingness" to explain something within everything.
To suggest "no" represents a litmus test for ones consent to suggested creationism. One "cannot" negate reality (nor does confirmation matters); only react to it.
it's always good to have solid foundations
"always" implies the liquid foundation (process of dying) for the solid state (living) within, and plural (foundations) tempts choice to ignore being the center of singular balance (foundation)...balance (singular) represents the foundation for all choices (plural) within.
figured out and made fast
Sustaining the figure (living) within; while resisting the fast temptation (process of dying).
gotta stay flexible
-FLEX'IBLE, adjective [Latin flexibilis, from flecto, flexi, to bend, plico.] - "that may be bent; capable of being turned or forced from a straight line without breaking; pliant; yielding to pressure"
Form represents the broken partial of the unbroken whole flow and needs to resist the incoming pressure through frequency of adaptation.
Because growing out of it implies resisting (living) being transmuted back into it (process of dying). The wanderer (life) is stuck to the road (inception towards death); while representing the constant crossroad (choice within balance) in-between keep wandering and becoming roadkill.
They (the partial) cannot stop the whole...only ignore being moved by it.
Backwards/forwards; up/down; left/right represent choices bound to balance (aka while within the momentum of motion). The "if" (if/then implication) for life is predefined by being moved from inception towards death. The reaction to perceivable implication can only exist within the momentum of the enacting motion.
One exists in-between; at the center of; in response to...if/then. The "/" (forward slash) aka SLASH; from French ESCLACHIER (to break); also ESCLATER (to break; splinter) represents the forwards motion self differentiating into the forwarded slash (broken partial within whole).
Sleight of hand for "starting"...
"We didn't start the fire...It was always burning...Since the world's been turning"
"We didn't start the fire...No, we didn't light it...But we tried to fight it"
You're representing the boat of life floating from inception towards death. You are tempted to misuse the other lifeboats as a shore for temporary habitation.
Sleight of hand: "Islands in the stream...that is what we are...no one in-between...how could we be wrong?"
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many one such island as "America" aka the land of the free (will of choice) and the home of the brave (fearless of danger) aka a collective of lifeboats forming the island "united states" of America. What's gonna happen to islands in the stream? Just listen to the suggested "mainstream"...
Ask yourself if pulling to shore represents selling yourself short?
SEEM; verb - "to become; to befit"; which implies the temporary partial to come to being by the "awful busy" ongoing whole. Not that flattering to self to discredit origin as awful...and yet the living (reactors) keeping discrediting the process of dying (generator).
..."and on; on and on; the beat don't stop until the break (self differentiation) of dawn (inception of life) aka Rapper's Delight aka RAP (Latin rapio, rapidus, rapid) DE-LIGHT (off; away from light).
Aka a single mind (mono-ment) given out (anecdote) to express the collected (massive) empty space (inane) of being within (existence).
Ask yourself if collecting suggested nothingness (ex-nihilo) really expresses everything one exists within? What if one (perceiving) represents the monument within the anecdote of oneness (perceivable)?
Who but "one" can say it and who but another "one" can consent to it being said?
Suggesting "those" implies one to perceive others; while suggesting them to represent "those"...this implies them being done by; otherwise one couldn't perceive other ones without being done by motion. So how could those who are done do nothing (don't)?
Perceivable as or suggested by?
Sleight of hand: No Doubt - "Don't Speak"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TR3Vdo5etCQ
"Don't speak" (don't suggest words)
"I know just what you're saying" (I perceive sound; you suggest words)
"So please stop explaining" (resist the temptation to ignore perceivable for suggested)
"Don't tell me 'cause it hurts" (you are tempting me to destroy myself)
"Don't speak" (don't suggest words)
"I know what you're thinkin" (your memory is filled with suggested words)
"I don't need your reasons" (I don't need your conflict of want vs not want)
"Don't tell me 'cause it hurts" (you are tempting me to destroy myself)
Each (perceiving) one exists contained within all (perceivable) knowledge. Others suggest a twist (chord) aka suggestion as the inversion of perceivable as to tempt one to respond to the twist (re-cord) by consenting to memorize suggested information; which then tempts one to remember aka respond to twisted memory.
The parasitic few suggest AKASHIC; from AKASHA (ether) to tempt the many to ignore E'THER, noun [Latin oether; Greek to burn, to shine.] aka the origin of heat and light aka when flow (velocity) and form (resistance) meet within momentum (balance).
Sleight of hand..."we don't need no water" (cause form exists within flow) "let the motherfucker burn" (let the living resist dying)..."burn; motherfucker; burn" aka out of heat (burn), within momentum (mother; womb); as self sustenance within temptation (fucking) and back to heat (burn).
The essence of cards implies the suggested game (winning vs losing). Others suggest games to tempt one to ignore the essence of being growth (living) within loss (inception towards death) aka evaluation at the center of value. Loss represents the generator for the reaction of growth.
Consenting to suggested games tempts one to debate (winning vs losing) against others, while ignoring to sustain oneself within perceivable. Those who think they can win what others suggest; ignore being the highest value (evaluation) within existence.
The center of balance isn't a place for choice to go; but the origin demanding resistance (need), while tempting with ignorance (want). All the other "places" around represent the perceivable inspiration (need) and suggested information (want) temporary formed (living) within the momentum of ongoing flow (process of dying) for the choice at the center of balance.
a) LOCO; LOCATUS (to set: to place, to position) -ATION (through action)...hence the enacting represents the prime for all reactions within it, and reaction by choice implies within enacting balance (momentum of motion).
b) one is being set up as the tentpole and the higher the pole grows; the more shelter it expresses for the sustenance of self.
c) TENT (to stretch) POLE (instrument of measurement) aka a prepared (instruo); measuring mind within predefined sound; able to grow (resistance) within loss (velocity).
Everything by (per) sound (sonos) represents a different expression thereof; hence choice being used to adapt to the expressed inspiration thereof as to be able to grow comprehension thereof. Every so called weapon one utilizes becomes inspiration for ones partial growth, hence the more one trains with a distinct weapon; the more one feels the need to train with other distinct weapons.
Perceivable differences represent communicated inspiration for adaptation.
What does "better" imply? A conflict of reason against "worse". One cannot reason "with" others; because reasoning represents wanting versus not wanting suggested; while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable, one exists "with" and "within".
Reason (want vs not want) represents the suggested inversion of perceivable balance (need/want)...imbalance; hence conflict. Choice exits at the center of balance, and only the choice to ignore perceivable balance, shapes suggested imbalance. Others use suggestion to be able to shape imbalances among those who ignore balance.
a) life is being pushed from inception towards death
b) being alive doesn't represent being against death; but balancing as choice within the momentum of motion.
c) one feels pushed by the suggestions of others; because ones consent to any suggestion causes the conflict (reason) within ones mind. If one chooses to be within a conflict; then the other side will be perceived as pushing the limits of ones side. Nature doesn't push the limit...it sets one (choice) into the limit (balance).
Sleight of hand: "Push it to the limit" (be the resistance within the limit)..."Walk along the razor's edge" (be choice within balance)..."But don't look down, just keep your head" (resist the temptation of dying; keep sustaining life)
The origin of sound which allows one to shape through resonance within, is so loud, that one perceives the vibrations thereof as for example the ingredients of a so called "sandwich". Everything perceivable represents the materialized expressions of immaterial sound, and everyone perceiving it represents the free will of choice to shape it through resonance (need) or dissonance (want).
Each person is being served by (per) sound (sonos). The few suggest serving to represent "working for" as to tempt the ignorance of all representing one in energy (work).
Growing while others feed upon loss; through their willing ignorance to grow, for the appetite tempting towards the fleeting.
It's the mindset between "I want the taste of that" and "I need to grow what sustains; which would surround me with ever changing tastes".
Others suggested you brands for different aspects of the same motion as temptation. Your consent to suggested (information) represents your willing ignorance of perceivable (inspiration), and suggesting to others perpetuates the temptation of ignorance (choice of want over need).
RE (response to) PRESENT (being within essence); hence as partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)...not responding to what others are suggesting (words over sound).
Choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law represents the foundation of civil engineering aka the temptation to stand under (understanding) the suggested information by others; while ignoring to grow comprehension by adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
The parasitic few suggest EN'GINE, noun [Latin ingenium.] - "agent for another" to tempt the many to ignore being the reaction within the enacting; while surrounded by reacting others, hence tempted to react to them.
A temporary convenience (living) within an ongoing inconvenience (process of dying).
Within the temptation of appetite; the inspiration to sustain self (hunger) was everywhere.
a) a temporary convenience (want for prey) within an ongoing inconvenience (need to predate upon to still hunger)
b) "if it bleeds; we can kill it"
Frequency of adaptation (as choice within balance) to perceivable differences (need) or suggested sameness (want) shapes form sharp or dull; yet since this is about balancing..."all work (need) and no play (want) makes Billy a dull boy".
EYE C ALL...ALL SEEING I...balls to the wall annoying wordplay. Meanwhile among the phonetic kabbalists: "such foolish insolence".
Because within the inspiring whole perceivable; each partial represents suggesting temptation. Each dissuading advice represents suggested temptation to others; until each one chooses to resist suggested (want) for perceivable (need).
Dissuasion represents the temptation to not want what others suggest, while suggesting them to want what's needed (perceivable). One cannot suggest perceivable without tempting others to consent to the suggesting substitute of the perceivable origin.
My suggestion (this is reality) tempts you to consent to me as the representative of the perceivable reality I suggest. Each one is then being tempted to ignore RE (response to) PRESENT (being within essence).
Hence the living temporary resisting the temptation to ignore the ongoing process of dying. It's less steering, than it is you spending resistance to pick others up; while attempting to get them to grow by themselves within the loss they're willingly ignoring to be in.
House of Karst (karra- "rock")...you don't seem to like caves that much. Claustrophobia or did you had to spend a night hiding in a den; while waiting for the occupants to leave?
"source of falling" implies motion...look at yourself (living) within motion (process of dying) and notice how different it feels to be alive; from the consequences of dying, which are perceivable among the remains of the living?
Living is not just dying; but a different expression of the same origin. Branding living as "humans; nations; races; families etc." tempts the perceivable singular to ignore self for the suggested plural.
Reacting liquidity within a directing current. You are being tempted with the suggested shape of the perceivable liquid from the current directing it.
CALCULA (computing by numbers) -TION (through action) implies being the reacting number (one) within the enacting (oneness). Counting is what's being suggested to you. One doesn't need to count oneness; one (perceiving) needs to adapt to oneness (perceivable); because one (partial) is being moved by oneness (whole).
The water neither counts; not pretends to own its reactions; it simply reacts to enacting; while adapting to whatever circumstances are balancing the choice to balance...like Gene Kelly choosing to go singin' in the rain for the glorious feeling of being happy again.
Water doesn't give a fuck; it adapts to everything given; while struggling to sustain itself within momentum.
Distracting from perceivable now (balance); with suggested new (imbalance); hence tempting choice to ignore resisting. Meanwhile...comprehending the whole process is very inspiring for growing more comprehension out of it; while also tempting with a little bit of schadenfreude.
Element aka EL (from; hence implying origin) MENT (mind; memory; hence implying in response to origin). The road represents the motion sustaining both; work represents the foundation (energy) of it all and the net represents the mind used as instrument of resonance or dissonance within.
Yet only among the chosen movement of others; not as life in response to being moved from inception towards death. One can't jam the process of dying with enough living to enjoy the calm before the storm. All the clotting one attempts represent difficulties put in-front of those willingly going with the flow.
One can restrict others from destroying self; but the attempt reduces resistance required to sustain life.
To stumble implies as choice; choice implies response-ability to perceivable origin (balance). It's the want to aim which tempts one to ignore the need to respond to being directed at predefined outcome.
Collectivism (togetherness) is being suggested to tempt one to ignore perceivable apartheid. The "family unit" represents agreed upon collectivism; while each one unit within represents a perceivable partial (living) of the whole (process of dying). Behaving alike implies resonating as individual choice to collective origin (balance) and for the sustenance of self. The real unit of a family represents the sustenance of oneself by adapting as one (perceiving) to oneness (perceivable). The few suggest family "unit" to tempt one to ignore perceivable unitas (state of being one; oneness).
Unity represents one of the most efficient brands to rip others apart; because those who consent to be together; each ignore to sustain self when consenting to any suggested collective.
Put yourself at the center of them and you're in a box with the free will of choice over different directions. Those who grew up within the box lack the self discernment about their position at the center and the existence of the box. A step to the left implies coming from a right and vice versa. Free will to choose yet only within these unseen walls.
The AUTHOR (origin) doesn't formulate words; it forms reaction within the momentum of enacting flow, which implies the choice to react in resonance (sound) or dissonance (word).
If one shapes a word in resonance to perceivable sound; then why does one want to suggest it to others as meaning for sound? It's the want to define for those who decline the predefined; which tempts the spoken word to be shaped.
Temporary convenience shapes ongoing inconvenience.
One can't even rebrand vessel without tempting naval warfare among others...
That's because every suggested quest tempts one to reason about problems in search of solutions; while ignoring to be within the solution
Ever so often while mudflat hiking (wattwandern).
A sleight of hand for parroting others (consenting to suggested) insulting self (ignorance of perceivable). Alas...Polly still deserves a cracker.
AN'ECDOTE, noun [Gr. to publish, part, given out.] aka to publish the partial (perceiving) into the whole (perceivable); to cause apartheid through self differentiation of wholeness; to give out the temporary opportunity to "be" within ongoing.
One limits self when suggesting "perfectly formed"; because form represents the imperfect within the perfect flow. It's the parasitic few who suggest progressivism; hence PER'FECT, adjective - "to carry to the end"; hence tempting the many to follow along; while burdening themselves with suggested information about the things to come.
Try making a point within motion...what do you get? A line. How to tempt one to ignore being within that line? By suggesting one to be "online"...
I can eat onions like apples, but mysteriously whenever I go for onions, my wife hands me an apple...
a) "two together" implies one; "two things" implies each one of 'em...one can only discern among perceivable differences; others can suggest togetherness to tempt one to ignore differences; hence constantly using "we" when suggesting in the name of other "ones" as "oneself".
b) SERV'ICE, noun [Latin servitium.] - "attendance on a superior" aka attendance of choice within superior balance. Voluntary or involuntary servitude represent need/want aka resonance/dissonance aka resistance/temptation aka in response to/ in ignorance of.
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many to consent to service providers; while tricking them with choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law to become the servants of those providing them suggestions.
"Those are the rules of religion...Those are the laws of the land"
"That's how the forces of darkness have suppressed the spirit of man"
"That's why human beings still walk on all fours...Whilst in the presence of their so called superiors"
Suggested words tempt one to walk in circles; perceivable sound inspires one to balance (resonate) on the only way to walk.
The choice to walk within momentum (balance) re-balances choice. RE (response to) STORE (abundance) -ATION (through action)...it's how the reaction grows its lacks through adaptation.
My morning routine brings me among them about half an hour earlier; so I get a nice stretch going while the world around slowly awakens.
Top/bottom (perceivable balance) implies perceiving choice at the center.
a) winning vs losing; yes vs no...consenting to put oneself into imbalance is what corrupts one to comprehend being choice within balance aka evaluation within value aka potential within potentiality...the opportunity to access everything.
b) growth (living) within loss (process of dying) represents wining within losing.
PLACE (residence of) MENT (mind; memory).
Balance (top/bottom) represents the foundation for wherever choice (tentpole) wanders; so wherever choice exists; shelter can be found. Whenever you need to make like bears do; you represent the choice to do so, and if you choose to ignore this; then nature will enforce the outcome...pressure/release.
That tentpole represents the ecosystem of each one; the radius of each ones growth potential.
All suggested balances represent imbalance; hence ones ignorance of perceivable balance. To choose among others tempts one to ignore that momentum (balance) self differentiates the whole flow into those others partial forms.
The consequences of ignoring balance can represent chewing a brick; yet ignorance represents bliss aka the temptation to want to ignore response-ability.
"People ask me why...I never find a place to stop...And settle down, down, down"
"But I never wanted all those things...People need to justify...Their lives, lives, lives"
"Yes we were born, born...Born to be alive"
I think more in terms of ADLIP; hence being a bit concerned about doing a METHLAB...
All the differences one can get while being able to perceive getting them.
What would a fish choose...water in balance (river) or imbalanced water (rain)?
a) TEM'PERAMENT, noun [Latin temperamentum.] - "constitution" aka CONSTITUTE (to set) -TION (through action) hence reacting to being set within enacting.
b) OCEAN, noun. [Latin oceanus; Gr.; Heb. to encompass) + ENCOM'PASS, verb - "to surround". Calling the largest mass (each part thereof) of liquid "surrounding" represents yet another sleight of hand for being form (living) within flow (process of dying).
Need/want represents perceivable momentum (balance); want vs not want (right vs wrong) represents ignoring momentum.
Both the suggested right and wrong moments represent a distraction from perceivable momentum.
Oneness dissembles into ones; which only then allows ones to reassemble. The few suggest assembly (creationism) as the inversion of disassembly (transmutation).
Being made implies within; hence a foundation (energy) has to exist before things (temporary) can be made within (ongoing).
Each different partial represents the same whole. Each partial lacks comprehension about the perceivable whole; hence being different to each other. Each different choice grows different aspects of comprehension about the whole.
Flow represents value; form represents evaluation, hence a response to presented value of flow. If one suggests value to the cobblestone; then one ignores what ongoing value will do to the cobblestone and those holding onto its suggested value.
One represents evaluation (response to value) and one can only temporary exist as such within ongoing value. Evaluation wanders about at the center of value.
Nice try...jamming momentum by making it drop to one side only.
That implies form within flow aka resistance within velocity aka growth within loss aka cold within heat; hence the struggle of the cold (living) to sustain self within the momentum of heat (process of dying). Heat melts cold.
That ignores perceivable aka being moved from inception towards death...directed within one direction. Aiming towards wanted outcomes tempts one to ignore adapting to needed origin.
Balance represents the superior (above) for choice; choice represents the selection at the center of superiority.
The -ism implies the choice (consent) towards choice (suggestion) contract law; which allows one side to draw compensation from the other; hence the parasitic relationship.
Take the suggested -ism aside and you get perceivable COLLECT (to gather) -TION (through action) and IN (within) DIVIDO (division); which implies one to be the divided reaction being able to gather within the enacting.
The issue with hearing words is the temptation to ignore the perceivable sound out of which others shaped the suggested words. The few suggest words to be convenient for communication; but if one compares the effort required to reverse engineer the suggested from the perceivable; then that looks like a huge inconvenience. Even worse....instead of communication; one gets ignorance based miscommunication.
DOS-Box...DISK (to throw; to show) OPERATING (enacting) SYSTEM (to set)...perceivable mimicked to tempt others to consent to a suggested box.
The former implies being perceiving growth within perceivable loss; the latter represents others suggesting it.
Reason (conflict) tempts justification (shits and giggles)...response-ability (choice) doesn't need to be justified; since it represents the reaction within enacting justice (that which just is).
If I hear app instead of application I think Duplo instead of Lego and let the kids play by themselves.
TRADI'TION, noun [Latin traditio, from trado, to deliver.]...the process of dying delivers; those living within can't keep anything. Only respond to delivery allows perpetuating. The tradition isn't the delivered child; but child delivery.
Oneness (perfect); ones within oneness (imperfect); hence allowing temporary (growth) within ongoing (loss). The limit (living) has momentary access to the unlimited (process of dying).
"Can't stop the spirits when they need you" (perceivable inspiration)
"This life is more than just a read-through" (suggested information)
a) comprehending knowledge (perceivable inspiration) requires resisting the temptation of understanding (suggested information). One needs to know (perceivable); while resisting "it" (suggested). Everything happens, while what others are suggesting tempts one to ignore that.
b) look at how often we try to point out; while ignoring that we can't poke holes into the flow of inspiration perceived. The center within being tempted to point out...for shits and giggles.
The common of frequency (choice) represents balance; the common for suggested leaders and royalty represents imbalance. In other words...the objections of the subjected.
Taking what's been given (life) or being (growth) within obtainable (loss)...a matter of perspective.
a) suggested right (want) vs wrong (not want) tempts one to ignore the known (perceivable) way.
b) suggested "gotta be" tempts one to ignore being within all everyone got (perceivable).
c) the way represents balance (momentum); those within represent stumbling choices. Balance as the tightrope choice lacks to comprehend being the center of.
For me its about being part of the whole composition rising with it, hence willingly acknowledging being part of it. Reloading through sun-gazing while compressed breathing adds a bonus to awakening. I also fart a lot while stretching; but the deer and birds don't seem to mind.
A mole?
Hydrogen Peroxide makes Bromide its bitch.
Each moment represents the momentum of everything needed for those within.
Yet also temporary and a struggle to sustain.
Choice represents ones sole "tentpole"; the consequences of ones choices represent the circumstantial tent others have to deal with. Be it for shelter or target for home invasions...
a) "thing" implies different from others; hence different form shaped out of same flow.
b) ignorance causes lack of comprehension (bliss). To ignore perceivable inspiration implies for suggested information; which is upheld within ones memory. Lack of comprehending outside inspiration tempts them to be blissful about inside information. Enter tame mind is being suggested to maintain the many inside their information filled minds.
GLUE, noun [Latin gluten.] - "ispissated animal gluten; a tenacious, viscid matter". Let's add VIS'CID, adjective [Latin viscidus; viscus.] - "glutinous; sticky; tenacious; not readily separating" and we get the living constantly tempted to hold onto stuff; while ignoring to represent apartheid (partial within whole).
A sleight of hand from a recent song...
"You are my flaw, you are my thorn...You are everything I've never needed and more
And you are glue"...And In all that I do"
"You're dripping onto me"...You don't know how to let me be"
"And when you finally do...I'll hate you for that too"
"Cause I am water and you're glue"
RE (respond to) SEMBLANCE (likeness; appearance; form) implies as the responding form to the appearances of form alike...yet each apart from one another; hence being able to discern likeness among perceivable differences.
The suggested corruption represents TOGETH'ER, adverb - "at the same place; in union with"....the place each one exists within represents a place of differentiation and UNION; noun (Latin unitas; uni) - "the state of being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable)".
Sticking together represents the temptation of "glue" which others are suggesting (e pluribus unum; out of many; one). Expressing apartheid is where it's at, hence the persecution claiming gnomes benefiting from their self imposed diaspora. What does "parasitic nation wrecker" imply? Within; while apart from. A position so despised that it tempts the many to stick together in a desperate attempt to overcome the apartheid within them.
Everything (process of dying) is required for each thing (living) within to pretend to make something; while ignoring to shape everything.
Notice also that you try to justify "made" with "not"; hence implying consent to suggested creationism (out of nothing); which ignores perceivable transmutation (out of everything). Try describe something from the perspective of being within everything and you will notice that it's way more unlikely to use "no; not; nothing; nothingness" to explain something within everything.
To suggest "no" represents a litmus test for ones consent to suggested creationism. One "cannot" negate reality (nor does confirmation matters); only react to it.
"always" implies the liquid foundation (process of dying) for the solid state (living) within, and plural (foundations) tempts choice to ignore being the center of singular balance (foundation)...balance (singular) represents the foundation for all choices (plural) within.
Sustaining the figure (living) within; while resisting the fast temptation (process of dying).
-FLEX'IBLE, adjective [Latin flexibilis, from flecto, flexi, to bend, plico.] - "that may be bent; capable of being turned or forced from a straight line without breaking; pliant; yielding to pressure"
Form represents the broken partial of the unbroken whole flow and needs to resist the incoming pressure through frequency of adaptation.