Ever see those assembly-line robots? Timeful as metronomes they are; never missing a beat. Regular like the tides as they set about their tasks.

Who assembled and maintains them? What if the origin of ROBOT (Latin robur; strength) represents resisting (living) temptation (dying); and what if others suggest strength as loss in disguise to tempt one to ignore growing it?

The few suggest the automated assembly of sameness to tempt the many to ignore being the manual difference within the self differentiating (automated) sameness. They call it strength (robot) to manufacture sameness within differences (out of many; one) as the inversion of being different within same (one within oneness).

Suggesting these automatic assemblies represents mesmerism aka hypnotism to domesticate free will of choice from adaptation into stagnation.

Show them to the sages and they'd declare them almost definitionally unnatural, in no small part owing to their precision, yet those same wiseguys sit on a stump and marvel at the bird-nests high above.

Showing ones understanding (consent to standing under the suggestions of others) reconfirms the positions of others as above oneself. Resisting suggestion corrodes the position of the ones suggesting; because the ones suggesting utilize the lack of resistance by the ones consenting to sustain their position.