Element aka EL (from; hence implying origin) MENT (mind; memory; hence implying in response to origin). The road represents the motion sustaining both; work represents the foundation (energy) of it all and the net represents the mind used as instrument of resonance or dissonance within.
being a clod
Yet only among the chosen movement of others; not as life in response to being moved from inception towards death. One can't jam the process of dying with enough living to enjoy the calm before the storm. All the clotting one attempts represent difficulties put in-front of those willingly going with the flow.
One can restrict others from destroying self; but the attempt reduces resistance required to sustain life.
stumbling around aimlessly
To stumble implies as choice; choice implies response-ability to perceivable origin (balance). It's the want to aim which tempts one to ignore the need to respond to being directed at predefined outcome.
"The Rubber Bands" is a collective term
Collectivism (togetherness) is being suggested to tempt one to ignore perceivable apartheid. The "family unit" represents agreed upon collectivism; while each one unit within represents a perceivable partial (living) of the whole (process of dying). Behaving alike implies resonating as individual choice to collective origin (balance) and for the sustenance of self. The real unit of a family represents the sustenance of oneself by adapting as one (perceiving) to oneness (perceivable). The few suggest family "unit" to tempt one to ignore perceivable unitas (state of being one; oneness).
Unity represents one of the most efficient brands to rip others apart; because those who consent to be together; each ignore to sustain self when consenting to any suggested collective.
All the same! (backwards/forwards; up/down; left/right)
Put yourself at the center of them and you're in a box with the free will of choice over different directions. Those who grew up within the box lack the self discernment about their position at the center and the existence of the box. A step to the left implies coming from a right and vice versa. Free will to choose yet only within these unseen walls.
The words, we have on good authority
The AUTHOR (origin) doesn't formulate words; it forms reaction within the momentum of enacting flow, which implies the choice to react in resonance (sound) or dissonance (word).
If one shapes a word in resonance to perceivable sound; then why does one want to suggest it to others as meaning for sound? It's the want to define for those who decline the predefined; which tempts the spoken word to be shaped.
Though certainly life should be a ship, and not a mere boat. (That said, it does not wear a ship rig, and would more properly be termed a jackass barque)
One can't even rebrand vessel without tempting naval warfare among others...
Hey me, aforementioned question...Dangit! Outfoxed again! He gets me with this every time, I tell you.
That's because every suggested quest tempts one to reason about problems in search of solutions; while ignoring to be within the solution
have you seen the cowrie shells?
Ever so often while mudflat hiking (wattwandern).
one of those parrots that speaks almost entirely in insults.
A sleight of hand for parroting others (consenting to suggested) insulting self (ignorance of perceivable). Alas...Polly still deserves a cracker.
A story's got to have a point to be an anecdote, and oneness is perfectly formed without edges or corners anywhere on its surface.
AN'ECDOTE, noun [Gr. to publish, part, given out.] aka to publish the partial (perceiving) into the whole (perceivable); to cause apartheid through self differentiation of wholeness; to give out the temporary opportunity to "be" within ongoing.
One limits self when suggesting "perfectly formed"; because form represents the imperfect within the perfect flow. It's the parasitic few who suggest progressivism; hence PER'FECT, adjective - "to carry to the end"; hence tempting the many to follow along; while burdening themselves with suggested information about the things to come.
Try making a point within motion...what do you get? A line. How to tempt one to ignore being within that line? By suggesting one to be "online"...
8 onions a day
I can eat onions like apples, but mysteriously whenever I go for onions, my wife hands me an apple...
I have somewhere quite clearly seen those two books, and that they were together a servicable example of two things.
a) "two together" implies one; "two things" implies each one of 'em...one can only discern among perceivable differences; others can suggest togetherness to tempt one to ignore differences; hence constantly using "we" when suggesting in the name of other "ones" as "oneself".
b) SERV'ICE, noun [Latin servitium.] - "attendance on a superior" aka attendance of choice within superior balance. Voluntary or involuntary servitude represent need/want aka resonance/dissonance aka resistance/temptation aka in response to/ in ignorance of.
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many to consent to service providers; while tricking them with choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law to become the servants of those providing them suggestions.
there was a band called "The The"
"Those are the rules of religion...Those are the laws of the land"
"That's how the forces of darkness have suppressed the spirit of man"
"That's why human beings still walk on all fours...Whilst in the presence of their so called superiors"
it's fine to talk all the words in the world so long as one goes on to walk
Suggested words tempt one to walk in circles; perceivable sound inspires one to balance (resonate) on the only way to walk.
never let it be understated what wonderfully restorative - and indeed righting - effect walking has on the humours of the body.
The choice to walk within momentum (balance) re-balances choice. RE (response to) STORE (abundance) -ATION (through action)...it's how the reaction grows its lacks through adaptation.
The sun's comin' up and the birds are out singing...
My morning routine brings me among them about half an hour earlier; so I get a nice stretch going while the world around slowly awakens.
Not me (highest value in existence). If anything I'd be found at the bottom...
Top/bottom (perceivable balance) implies perceiving choice at the center.
Winning, yes. But winning what
a) winning vs losing; yes vs no...consenting to put oneself into imbalance is what corrupts one to comprehend being choice within balance aka evaluation within value aka potential within potentiality...the opportunity to access everything.
b) growth (living) within loss (process of dying) represents wining within losing.
we'd probably find emplacements. Eh? Ehh?
PLACE (residence of) MENT (mind; memory).
What if the tentpole has to step out to go and make like bears do in the woods? The roof'd fall down, that's what'd happen.
Balance (top/bottom) represents the foundation for wherever choice (tentpole) wanders; so wherever choice exists; shelter can be found. Whenever you need to make like bears do; you represent the choice to do so, and if you choose to ignore this; then nature will enforce the outcome...pressure/release.
Also I'm kinda short, so I'd make a pretty rubbish tentpole.
That tentpole represents the ecosystem of each one; the radius of each ones growth potential.
Other balances are also available.
All suggested balances represent imbalance; hence ones ignorance of perceivable balance. To choose among others tempts one to ignore that momentum (balance) self differentiates the whole flow into those others partial forms.
"ignore balance"...I've heard it said that it's much akin to "chewing a brick"
The consequences of ignoring balance can represent chewing a brick; yet ignorance represents bliss aka the temptation to want to ignore response-ability.
ONLY IF YOU CALL THIS LIVIN'!
"People ask me why...I never find a place to stop...And settle down, down, down"
"But I never wanted all those things...People need to justify...Their lives, lives, lives"
"Yes we were born, born...Born to be alive"
Think you can do MATLAB?
I think more in terms of ADLIP; hence being a bit concerned about doing a METHLAB...
Like the difference between getting kicked in the left shin, and getting kicked in the right shin?
All the differences one can get while being able to perceive getting them.
fishing in rain...fishing in a river
What would a fish choose...water in balance (river) or imbalanced water (rain)?
Except Oceans. Those have tempers
a) TEM'PERAMENT, noun [Latin temperamentum.] - "constitution" aka CONSTITUTE (to set) -TION (through action) hence reacting to being set within enacting.
b) OCEAN, noun. [Latin oceanus; Gr.; Heb. to encompass) + ENCOM'PASS, verb - "to surround". Calling the largest mass (each part thereof) of liquid "surrounding" represents yet another sleight of hand for being form (living) within flow (process of dying).
the wrong moment
Need/want represents perceivable momentum (balance); want vs not want (right vs wrong) represents ignoring momentum.
Both the suggested right and wrong moments represent a distraction from perceivable momentum.
who assembled that one, and what assembled that assembler in turn? It's assembly lines all the way...
Oneness dissembles into ones; which only then allows ones to reassemble. The few suggest assembly (creationism) as the inversion of disassembly (transmutation).
All of things are indeed made
Being made implies within; hence a foundation (energy) has to exist before things (temporary) can be made within (ongoing).
maybe some are more different than others
Each different partial represents the same whole. Each partial lacks comprehension about the perceivable whole; hence being different to each other. Each different choice grows different aspects of comprehension about the whole.
even the cobblestones are cobblestones. That's just how much road there is in this road; and that's value, and I'm all about value.
Flow represents value; form represents evaluation, hence a response to presented value of flow. If one suggests value to the cobblestone; then one ignores what ongoing value will do to the cobblestone and those holding onto its suggested value.
I'm all about value.
One represents evaluation (response to value) and one can only temporary exist as such within ongoing value. Evaluation wanders about at the center of value.
the vast majority of thing) can be "jammed" by having jam rubbed all over it.
Nice try...jamming momentum by making it drop to one side only.
Clod's actual original root is meaning "to be cold"
That implies form within flow aka resistance within velocity aka growth within loss aka cold within heat; hence the struggle of the cold (living) to sustain self within the momentum of heat (process of dying). Heat melts cold.
In which you have sussed the reason that the aimless wandering is to be the superior selection.
That ignores perceivable aka being moved from inception towards death...directed within one direction. Aiming towards wanted outcomes tempts one to ignore adapting to needed origin.
Balance represents the superior (above) for choice; choice represents the selection at the center of superiority.
When I hear words like "collectivism" and "individualism"...they're all drawing state salaries
The -ism implies the choice (consent) towards choice (suggestion) contract law; which allows one side to draw compensation from the other; hence the parasitic relationship.
Take the suggested -ism aside and you get perceivable COLLECT (to gather) -TION (through action) and IN (within) DIVIDO (division); which implies one to be the divided reaction being able to gather within the enacting.
The issue with hearing words is the temptation to ignore the perceivable sound out of which others shaped the suggested words. The few suggest words to be convenient for communication; but if one compares the effort required to reverse engineer the suggested from the perceivable; then that looks like a huge inconvenience. Even worse....instead of communication; one gets ignorance based miscommunication.
GO EAST. GO EAST. GO NORTH. TAKE BOX CUTTER...
DOS-Box...DISK (to throw; to show) OPERATING (enacting) SYSTEM (to set)...perceivable mimicked to tempt others to consent to a suggested box.
hweg, to increase or enlarge. Later, as latin auctor, meaning seller or vendor.
The former implies being perceiving growth within perceivable loss; the latter represents others suggesting it.
Same reason one does most of anything, really: shits and giggles.
Reason (conflict) tempts justification (shits and giggles)...response-ability (choice) doesn't need to be justified; since it represents the reaction within enacting justice (that which just is).
Or, in the modern parlance: "Download our App!"
If I hear app instead of application I think Duplo instead of Lego and let the kids play by themselves.
keeping tradition
TRADI'TION, noun [Latin traditio, from trado, to deliver.]...the process of dying delivers; those living within can't keep anything. Only respond to delivery allows perpetuating. The tradition isn't the delivered child; but child delivery.
Pretty sure One - being as mentioned perfect - is also perfectly limitless
Oneness (perfect); ones within oneness (imperfect); hence allowing temporary (growth) within ongoing (loss). The limit (living) has momentary access to the unlimited (process of dying).
Red Hot Chili Peppers
"Can't stop the spirits when they need you" (perceivable inspiration)
"This life is more than just a read-through" (suggested information)
even if I did such a thing (making a point) how would you even know it had happened?
a) comprehending knowledge (perceivable inspiration) requires resisting the temptation of understanding (suggested information). One needs to know (perceivable); while resisting "it" (suggested). Everything happens, while what others are suggesting tempts one to ignore that.
b) look at how often we try to point out; while ignoring that we can't poke holes into the flow of inspiration perceived. The center within being tempted to point out...for shits and giggles.
What do gang leaders and royalty frequently have in common
The common of frequency (choice) represents balance; the common for suggested leaders and royalty represents imbalance. In other words...the objections of the subjected.
P.I.E. tek "to take by the hand, to obtain"
Taking what's been given (life) or being (growth) within obtainable (loss)...a matter of perspective.
I know there's gotta be a wrong way
a) suggested right (want) vs wrong (not want) tempts one to ignore the known (perceivable) way.
b) suggested "gotta be" tempts one to ignore being within all everyone got (perceivable).
c) the way represents balance (momentum); those within represent stumbling choices. Balance as the tightrope choice lacks to comprehend being the center of.
Something real good about watching the sunrise
For me its about being part of the whole composition rising with it, hence willingly acknowledging being part of it. Reloading through sun-gazing while compressed breathing adds a bonus to awakening. I also fart a lot while stretching; but the deer and birds don't seem to mind.
the living incarnation of taupe
A mole?
that institutional beige colour that old printers and fax-machines always used to be
Hydrogen Peroxide makes Bromide its bitch.
most of the time I don't need everything
Each moment represents the momentum of everything needed for those within.
"wining within losing"...Eh? Ehhhhhhh?! That's good that is.
Yet also temporary and a struggle to sustain.
if there weren't anyone else in the tent, then for what's this poor fellow doing carting a tent around on his head anyway?
Choice represents ones sole "tentpole"; the consequences of ones choices represent the circumstantial tent others have to deal with. Be it for shelter or target for home invasions...
ignorance and bliss to be exactly the same thing
a) "thing" implies different from others; hence different form shaped out of same flow.
b) ignorance causes lack of comprehension (bliss). To ignore perceivable inspiration implies for suggested information; which is upheld within ones memory. Lack of comprehending outside inspiration tempts them to be blissful about inside information. Enter tame mind is being suggested to maintain the many inside their information filled minds.
"life" from leyp meaning "glue"
GLUE, noun [Latin gluten.] - "ispissated animal gluten; a tenacious, viscid matter". Let's add VIS'CID, adjective [Latin viscidus; viscus.] - "glutinous; sticky; tenacious; not readily separating" and we get the living constantly tempted to hold onto stuff; while ignoring to represent apartheid (partial within whole).
A sleight of hand from a recent song...
"You are my flaw, you are my thorn...You are everything I've never needed and more
And you are glue"...And In all that I do"
"You're dripping onto me"...You don't know how to let me be"
"And when you finally do...I'll hate you for that too"
"Cause I am water and you're glue"
sem (P.I.E) means both "one" and "together", and has survived all the linguistic tides right into the modern form. A-sem-bly - "A One Resemblance" (that's why they call it that one hue) or, Having the Likeness of Togetherness.
RE (respond to) SEMBLANCE (likeness; appearance; form) implies as the responding form to the appearances of form alike...yet each apart from one another; hence being able to discern likeness among perceivable differences.
The suggested corruption represents TOGETH'ER, adverb - "at the same place; in union with"....the place each one exists within represents a place of differentiation and UNION; noun (Latin unitas; uni) - "the state of being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable)".
Sticking together represents the temptation of "glue" which others are suggesting (e pluribus unum; out of many; one). Expressing apartheid is where it's at, hence the persecution claiming gnomes benefiting from their self imposed diaspora. What does "parasitic nation wrecker" imply? Within; while apart from. A position so despised that it tempts the many to stick together in a desperate attempt to overcome the apartheid within them.
If it weren't made, it's probably not a thing.
Everything (process of dying) is required for each thing (living) within to pretend to make something; while ignoring to shape everything.
Notice also that you try to justify "made" with "not"; hence implying consent to suggested creationism (out of nothing); which ignores perceivable transmutation (out of everything). Try describe something from the perspective of being within everything and you will notice that it's way more unlikely to use "no; not; nothing; nothingness" to explain something within everything.
To suggest "no" represents a litmus test for ones consent to suggested creationism. One "cannot" negate reality (nor does confirmation matters); only react to it.
it's always good to have solid foundations
"always" implies the liquid foundation (process of dying) for the solid state (living) within, and plural (foundations) tempts choice to ignore being the center of singular balance (foundation)...balance (singular) represents the foundation for all choices (plural) within.
figured out and made fast
Sustaining the figure (living) within; while resisting the fast temptation (process of dying).
gotta stay flexible
-FLEX'IBLE, adjective [Latin flexibilis, from flecto, flexi, to bend, plico.] - "that may be bent; capable of being turned or forced from a straight line without breaking; pliant; yielding to pressure"
Form represents the broken partial of the unbroken whole flow and needs to resist the incoming pressure through frequency of adaptation.
while both buildings and boats are built, only one is given the status of structure.
I haven't heard that before; what I did hear every once in a while are reports of structural damage to both buildings and boats. You got any examples? Isn't it called structuring foundations and hulls?
"the broken partial"...Should take itself down to Gary Glue's and get itself glued back up into a reasonable approximation of its prior shape!
The broken partial (form) represents the opportunity to grow out of; within, and in response to the loss of the unbroken whole (flow). Flow doesn't represent the prior shape of form; but that which shapes form (temporary growth) through flow (ongoing loss).
Being partial represents the expression within whole; "gluing together" is being suggested to repress expressions.
Understanding represents your choice to "stand under" suggested information by others...suggested information such as the label "cobblestone" for perceivable form within flow.
As form within the momentum of flow; one is surrounded by moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for adaptation...that's what a so called cobblestone reacts to. Furthermore; the choices of others can shape the form of a "cobblestone"; hence it reacting to being shaped. This reacting to enacting represents being evaluation within value.
Understanding tempts one to view the suggested label "cobblestone" as value onto which one attaches more and more suggested values. Meanwhile...form represents a reaction to enacting flow; hence an expression of impressing, so an expressed evaluation (reaction) to impressing value (enacting).
One cannot define value by suggestion; only react to predefined value within perceivable...motion. One doesn't move; one represents RE (response to) MOVE (being moved); hence living; while struggling to sustain self within the process of dying...a generating (inception) and removal (death) process for everything within.
tl; dr...maybe if you stand a cobblestone upright and then sit on it while making choices...it understands (stands under) value?
it turns out that all the wisdom of life is "too intangible" and "doesn't convert" and that they need "something more real".
"is; too; doesn't; more" is being suggested (want) by the perceiving onto the perceivable (need). It's this choice of want over need; which tempts one to want more out of everything needed.
WISDOM, noun - "use or exercise of knowledge" aka adaptation of the perceiving to the perceivable; hence the response-ability of choice.
's like when I evaluated the masons' requests...and chose the course of action
If you REact to a suggested REquest; then why call it an action?
arsy versy
Only within balance (momentum of motion) can there be a choice within opposites to arsy versy; topsy turvy; head over heals; as above so below; upside-down and vice versa.
I haven't yet invented the symbols needed to write them down
Down from the ongoing symmetry one tempts others to ignore with temporary symbolism?
signals just go out into the aether and gives no damns as to who picks them up
a) the aether represents the flow of inspiration for everything within. Everyone receives; yet picking up the perceivable implies choice of adaptation from those perceiving it.
AETHER; ETHER (Latin oether) - "to burn; shine" represents the impression caused by flow (velocity) meeting form (resistance) within momentum.
b) SIG'NAL, adjective - "eminent; remarkable; memorable; distinguished from what is ordinary"...this represents the temptation of suggested information. Seeking agreement from others about ones existence, instead of growing self discernment. This also ignores that the natural order (process of dying) distinguishes everyone (living) within, hence from whole (perceivable) into partial (perceiving).
understanding the signal is where complexity comes in
Because standing under others allows them to define; redefine and contradict suggested meaning at will; hence shaping a simple foundation (process of dying) into a complex headache (living).
so many of them are speaking their own little languages and dialects
Either suggested to them by the few or in response to distinct themselves from the suggestions of the few. Perceivable sound represents an offer for "free" will of choice; suggested words tempt one to not just own them; but to brand perceivable while suggesting ownership over it.
Sleight of hand using Bon Jovi..."It's my life, it's now or never...I ain't gonna live forever...I just want to live while I'm alive" aka the want to claim the temporary while willingly ignoring the ongoing. Ever heard a dead guy suggest "I just want to live..."? Meanwhile; no issue perceiving those alive singing along with ignorance based contradictions about their very existence.
they do this to make sure that they're only communicating with the right - however they should define such a thing - receivers.
a) the right (want) implies vs the wrong (not want)...a conflict of reason shaped by consenting to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
b) REceiver aka reaction (living); which implies to enacting (process of dying). Before one can receive; one perceives; which implies one being by; within; out of perceivable.
motionless for a moment
Add the implied "-um" and the "less" becomes a contradiction of the momentum of motion for those within it.
decoded by whatever decoders they have on hand into who-knows-what
Aka decoding (comprehension) the encoded (perceivable) for expression (growth) or repression (loss). Those who choose to repress themselves are being tempted by suggested encodes (numerology underneath the spoken languages and symbolism) to decode (understanding aka standing under) suggested information.
How to establish numerology? Tempt the perceiving ONE within perceivable ONEness to count others as numbers; while ignoring NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit (unitas; one; oneness)". Next step; branding them by suggested inversion aka "I am a name not a number".
the pure and simple reason
a) balance (need/want) represents the pure; imbalance (want vs not want) represent impure...for the choice in-between.
b) SIM'PLE aka SINE (without) PLICA (folding) tempts one to ignore being within self differentiated; hence representing the unfolded ones (partial) within the folded oneness (whole).
c) implication (if/then) trumps reason (want vs not want) within motion.
Recent sleight of hand...suggesting trump vs someone unreasonable (biden) tempts others to choose trump as the side of reason, while ignoring the implications (imbalance) of consenting to conflict (reasoning).
Life does not support chroot jails on account of that there is no kernel-level...
Perceiving kernel (choice) within perceivable root (balance). Meanwhile suggested CROOT - "an operation that changes the apparent root directory for the current running process" tempts one to ignore the directing current required to sustain momentum (balance) for the kernels (choice) within.
Suggested "no kernel-level" or perceivable kernel (choice) within level (balance)?
As for jail...being "free" will of choice implies at the center of "dom"inating balance aka free-dom. The few suggest confinement to tempt the many to ignore that the mind is being confined within the flow of inspiration.
the containerization has to happen on a higher level of abstraction.
ABSTRACT' aka ABSTRAHO (to draw from; to separate) - TION (through action)...level (balance aka momentum) represents the separation of higher (flow) and lower (form) and it's the separated reaction (choice) which represents the opportunity to draw from by being within.
It's these formed choices which represent the vessels (container).
scattering car-keys across the floor, to be later trod on like post-urban caltrops
Modern urbanization slaves carry flimsy flip key remotes around...so stepping on them only disables the electronics within. A bunch of Lego makes way more efficient caltrops and your hatrack would also scatter them everywhere, hence adding minefield capability to it.
"justice"...Wouldn't that be just ice?
As in melting (process of dying) those (living) within or what about losing flavor (differentiation) during the process (sameness) unless refreshing (adaptation)?
How did Vanilla Ice put it..."If there was a problem (living), yo, I'll (process of dying) solve it"..."Check out (consent to) the hook (suggested information) while D-Shay revolves (transmutation of form back to flow aka revolution) it". Also; D-Shay aka DJ aka DISK (to throw; exterior/surface aka perceivable inspiration) JOCKEY (to cheat; to trick; to deceive in trade aka suggested information).
"Word (suggested information) to your mother (matrix; womb; source; origin aka perceivable inspiration".
I'm still calling them "programs".
PROGRAM'MA, noun - "a letter sealed with the king's seal" aka suggested information sealing ones comprehension away from perceivable inspiration by the choice (king) to consent to suggested.
cultural touchstone...pre-cast building bricks.
Cultivated dependency to shape with what others are suggesting instead of shaping as choice within perceivable.
"ones within oneness"...Ah, a Threeness.
Only if one within oneness chooses to count other ones and suggest the counted ones as "three" or a trinity.
"Everything happens"...Though never with uniform distribution. It's no doubt a function of currents; those clever motions.
Each one (uni) represents the distributed form within the momentum of the distributing flow (current). Equality (process of dying) distributes diversity (living). The suggested inversion thereof represents diversity for equality.
Try implication...if within current and motion; then recurrent and remotion (removal) aka recurrent (living) removal (dying).
Do we try to point anything out though?
All suggested information points out affixed meaning within moving inspiration, hence contradicting the line with a point.
I kinda read the posts, and as I go I jot down notes of whatever comes to mind, this being later parsed into vaguely-english and then posted.
Jotting down what comes to mind represents memorizing suggested information; then remembering (respond to memorized); while shaping within the confines of suggested among mostly ignored inspiration perceivable.
I read until something inspires; then I adapt on the fly to it; while resisting the temptation to memorize anything. It's my less restricted consciousness which more and more efficiently draws from inspiration whatever necessary for adaptation.
Consenting to suggested information and then withdrawing into memory, while working with it, represents atrophy of conscious adaptation to perceivable. It's the mass accumulation of suggested information which tempts one to pretend that working within your ego server farm represents adaptation of perceiving (reaction) to perceivable (enacting).
Example...imagine you accumulated all the good shit from the web on hard-drives so that you can privately dive into it. Do this for a while and go back on the web..."boy; does the public web sucks". Online offer (perceivable inspiration) tempts offline accumulation (suggested information) and since the world wide web represents suggested information; the few have to mimic the perceivable inspiration with "always online" for the many aka "the internet of things".
Words in, Words out
Suggested words (want) tempt one to ignore perceivable sound (need), and choosing want (temptation) while ignoring need (resistance) tempts one to want more. Consented words come in easy; while requiring more and more effort to let go of. It's what "catchphrases" are exploiting. Also; HOOK (suggested) LINE (perceivable) SINKER (consenting choice)...fishing for consent.
the issue there is bolting words to words and ducttaping definitions
Your consent to the word (want) over the behavior of motion (need) bolts them; hence shapes idols of meaning out of suggested information; which then tempts you to duct tape them as partial information within your memory; while ignoring the "whole" flow of inspiration (the predefined meaning for those reacting to it).
Suggested information tempts one to puzzle meaning together; while ignoring that the picture (perceiving) on the box (perceivable) already represents the solution (process of dying) for the problem (living).
The few suggest nature as the problem and those within as the solution; which represents the inversion of being the problem (temporary) within the solution (ongoing).
"the whole composition"...I like that. (I've called it a symphony before, as well)
SYM'PHONY, noun [Latin symphonia; Greek with, and voice.] aka WITH (the whole composition) + VOICE (the partial instrument). Yet partial within whole implies separation through momentum (balance); which allows choice at the center of resonance (need) and dissonance (want).
So much of the composition seems to be off; because so many of the instruments willingly operate in dissonance; while ignoring to resonate.
Every moment looks like each moment
The same momentum supplies each and every different perspective within, yet also the choice to ignore perceivable differences (inspiration) for suggested sameness (information).
The more one ignores differences; the more one ignores the differentiating momentum, hence lacking comprehension about the ongoing motion causing it.
Can't do much wrong the man what that ignores any thing that should be put in front of him.
Everything (perceivable) is put in front of one (perceiving)...ignorance represents consent to what others suggest it means. Right vs wrong reasoning implies consent to suggested over perceivable.
they forget that instead of being entertained by the thing, they could entertain themselves with the thing
They refuse to grow themselves "within" everything; which requires resisting the temptation to be tamed by others.
beast of burden
That represents the suggested inversion of being burden (form) within beast (animal; animation; flow) aka living (burden of resistance) within the process of dying (beast of temptation).
the shock on their faces, when they find that all they're left with are things
I held the cool hands of plenty who let go off all things until the warmth of another life was enough to embrace death. Then there were also those who cling until last breath to their possessions and obligations. My mother was one of those; her last words were: "what about the laundry?"
Not out of Nothing - out of An Egg
An egg implies a shell for the inside from the outside. Everything (energy) was before the egg (balance) can hatch the chicken (choice).
Everything....came later
Came into what? What's the foundation for everything to come into and where's the implied outside everything came from? Suggested creationism tempts one into this loop of thinking inside and outside (dualism); which tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation aka being partial within whole, differentiated by the momentum of the ongoing whole.
Partial came later than whole, yet within its center; hence out of the whole. Not side (in) by side (out) dualism; but one within oneness transmutation.
Only then did the unpacking truly commence and the transmutation was packed in
Transmutation (ingredient out of base) is required for an ingredient to unpack from the base. Transmutation cannot be unpacked; since the "one" unpacking implies being the transmuted partial within the transmuting whole.
Self segregation of whole into partial represents transmutation.
Element aka EL (from; hence implying origin) MENT (mind; memory; hence implying in response to origin). The road represents the motion sustaining both; work represents the foundation (energy) of it all and the net represents the mind used as instrument of resonance or dissonance within.
Yet only among the chosen movement of others; not as life in response to being moved from inception towards death. One can't jam the process of dying with enough living to enjoy the calm before the storm. All the clotting one attempts represent difficulties put in-front of those willingly going with the flow.
One can restrict others from destroying self; but the attempt reduces resistance required to sustain life.
To stumble implies as choice; choice implies response-ability to perceivable origin (balance). It's the want to aim which tempts one to ignore the need to respond to being directed at predefined outcome.
Collectivism (togetherness) is being suggested to tempt one to ignore perceivable apartheid. The "family unit" represents agreed upon collectivism; while each one unit within represents a perceivable partial (living) of the whole (process of dying). Behaving alike implies resonating as individual choice to collective origin (balance) and for the sustenance of self. The real unit of a family represents the sustenance of oneself by adapting as one (perceiving) to oneness (perceivable). The few suggest family "unit" to tempt one to ignore perceivable unitas (state of being one; oneness).
Unity represents one of the most efficient brands to rip others apart; because those who consent to be together; each ignore to sustain self when consenting to any suggested collective.
Put yourself at the center of them and you're in a box with the free will of choice over different directions. Those who grew up within the box lack the self discernment about their position at the center and the existence of the box. A step to the left implies coming from a right and vice versa. Free will to choose yet only within these unseen walls.
The AUTHOR (origin) doesn't formulate words; it forms reaction within the momentum of enacting flow, which implies the choice to react in resonance (sound) or dissonance (word).
If one shapes a word in resonance to perceivable sound; then why does one want to suggest it to others as meaning for sound? It's the want to define for those who decline the predefined; which tempts the spoken word to be shaped.
Temporary convenience shapes ongoing inconvenience.
One can't even rebrand vessel without tempting naval warfare among others...
That's because every suggested quest tempts one to reason about problems in search of solutions; while ignoring to be within the solution
Ever so often while mudflat hiking (wattwandern).
A sleight of hand for parroting others (consenting to suggested) insulting self (ignorance of perceivable). Alas...Polly still deserves a cracker.
AN'ECDOTE, noun [Gr. to publish, part, given out.] aka to publish the partial (perceiving) into the whole (perceivable); to cause apartheid through self differentiation of wholeness; to give out the temporary opportunity to "be" within ongoing.
One limits self when suggesting "perfectly formed"; because form represents the imperfect within the perfect flow. It's the parasitic few who suggest progressivism; hence PER'FECT, adjective - "to carry to the end"; hence tempting the many to follow along; while burdening themselves with suggested information about the things to come.
Try making a point within motion...what do you get? A line. How to tempt one to ignore being within that line? By suggesting one to be "online"...
I can eat onions like apples, but mysteriously whenever I go for onions, my wife hands me an apple...
a) "two together" implies one; "two things" implies each one of 'em...one can only discern among perceivable differences; others can suggest togetherness to tempt one to ignore differences; hence constantly using "we" when suggesting in the name of other "ones" as "oneself".
b) SERV'ICE, noun [Latin servitium.] - "attendance on a superior" aka attendance of choice within superior balance. Voluntary or involuntary servitude represent need/want aka resonance/dissonance aka resistance/temptation aka in response to/ in ignorance of.
The parasitic few suggest the ignorant many to consent to service providers; while tricking them with choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law to become the servants of those providing them suggestions.
"Those are the rules of religion...Those are the laws of the land"
"That's how the forces of darkness have suppressed the spirit of man"
"That's why human beings still walk on all fours...Whilst in the presence of their so called superiors"
Suggested words tempt one to walk in circles; perceivable sound inspires one to balance (resonate) on the only way to walk.
The choice to walk within momentum (balance) re-balances choice. RE (response to) STORE (abundance) -ATION (through action)...it's how the reaction grows its lacks through adaptation.
My morning routine brings me among them about half an hour earlier; so I get a nice stretch going while the world around slowly awakens.
Top/bottom (perceivable balance) implies perceiving choice at the center.
a) winning vs losing; yes vs no...consenting to put oneself into imbalance is what corrupts one to comprehend being choice within balance aka evaluation within value aka potential within potentiality...the opportunity to access everything.
b) growth (living) within loss (process of dying) represents wining within losing.
PLACE (residence of) MENT (mind; memory).
Balance (top/bottom) represents the foundation for wherever choice (tentpole) wanders; so wherever choice exists; shelter can be found. Whenever you need to make like bears do; you represent the choice to do so, and if you choose to ignore this; then nature will enforce the outcome...pressure/release.
That tentpole represents the ecosystem of each one; the radius of each ones growth potential.
All suggested balances represent imbalance; hence ones ignorance of perceivable balance. To choose among others tempts one to ignore that momentum (balance) self differentiates the whole flow into those others partial forms.
The consequences of ignoring balance can represent chewing a brick; yet ignorance represents bliss aka the temptation to want to ignore response-ability.
"People ask me why...I never find a place to stop...And settle down, down, down"
"But I never wanted all those things...People need to justify...Their lives, lives, lives"
"Yes we were born, born...Born to be alive"
I think more in terms of ADLIP; hence being a bit concerned about doing a METHLAB...
All the differences one can get while being able to perceive getting them.
What would a fish choose...water in balance (river) or imbalanced water (rain)?
a) TEM'PERAMENT, noun [Latin temperamentum.] - "constitution" aka CONSTITUTE (to set) -TION (through action) hence reacting to being set within enacting.
b) OCEAN, noun. [Latin oceanus; Gr.; Heb. to encompass) + ENCOM'PASS, verb - "to surround". Calling the largest mass (each part thereof) of liquid "surrounding" represents yet another sleight of hand for being form (living) within flow (process of dying).
Need/want represents perceivable momentum (balance); want vs not want (right vs wrong) represents ignoring momentum.
Both the suggested right and wrong moments represent a distraction from perceivable momentum.
Oneness dissembles into ones; which only then allows ones to reassemble. The few suggest assembly (creationism) as the inversion of disassembly (transmutation).
Being made implies within; hence a foundation (energy) has to exist before things (temporary) can be made within (ongoing).
Each different partial represents the same whole. Each partial lacks comprehension about the perceivable whole; hence being different to each other. Each different choice grows different aspects of comprehension about the whole.
Flow represents value; form represents evaluation, hence a response to presented value of flow. If one suggests value to the cobblestone; then one ignores what ongoing value will do to the cobblestone and those holding onto its suggested value.
One represents evaluation (response to value) and one can only temporary exist as such within ongoing value. Evaluation wanders about at the center of value.
Nice try...jamming momentum by making it drop to one side only.
That implies form within flow aka resistance within velocity aka growth within loss aka cold within heat; hence the struggle of the cold (living) to sustain self within the momentum of heat (process of dying). Heat melts cold.
That ignores perceivable aka being moved from inception towards death...directed within one direction. Aiming towards wanted outcomes tempts one to ignore adapting to needed origin.
Balance represents the superior (above) for choice; choice represents the selection at the center of superiority.
The -ism implies the choice (consent) towards choice (suggestion) contract law; which allows one side to draw compensation from the other; hence the parasitic relationship.
Take the suggested -ism aside and you get perceivable COLLECT (to gather) -TION (through action) and IN (within) DIVIDO (division); which implies one to be the divided reaction being able to gather within the enacting.
The issue with hearing words is the temptation to ignore the perceivable sound out of which others shaped the suggested words. The few suggest words to be convenient for communication; but if one compares the effort required to reverse engineer the suggested from the perceivable; then that looks like a huge inconvenience. Even worse....instead of communication; one gets ignorance based miscommunication.
DOS-Box...DISK (to throw; to show) OPERATING (enacting) SYSTEM (to set)...perceivable mimicked to tempt others to consent to a suggested box.
The former implies being perceiving growth within perceivable loss; the latter represents others suggesting it.
Reason (conflict) tempts justification (shits and giggles)...response-ability (choice) doesn't need to be justified; since it represents the reaction within enacting justice (that which just is).
If I hear app instead of application I think Duplo instead of Lego and let the kids play by themselves.
TRADI'TION, noun [Latin traditio, from trado, to deliver.]...the process of dying delivers; those living within can't keep anything. Only respond to delivery allows perpetuating. The tradition isn't the delivered child; but child delivery.
Oneness (perfect); ones within oneness (imperfect); hence allowing temporary (growth) within ongoing (loss). The limit (living) has momentary access to the unlimited (process of dying).
"Can't stop the spirits when they need you" (perceivable inspiration)
"This life is more than just a read-through" (suggested information)
a) comprehending knowledge (perceivable inspiration) requires resisting the temptation of understanding (suggested information). One needs to know (perceivable); while resisting "it" (suggested). Everything happens, while what others are suggesting tempts one to ignore that.
b) look at how often we try to point out; while ignoring that we can't poke holes into the flow of inspiration perceived. The center within being tempted to point out...for shits and giggles.
The common of frequency (choice) represents balance; the common for suggested leaders and royalty represents imbalance. In other words...the objections of the subjected.
Taking what's been given (life) or being (growth) within obtainable (loss)...a matter of perspective.
a) suggested right (want) vs wrong (not want) tempts one to ignore the known (perceivable) way.
b) suggested "gotta be" tempts one to ignore being within all everyone got (perceivable).
c) the way represents balance (momentum); those within represent stumbling choices. Balance as the tightrope choice lacks to comprehend being the center of.
For me its about being part of the whole composition rising with it, hence willingly acknowledging being part of it. Reloading through sun-gazing while compressed breathing adds a bonus to awakening. I also fart a lot while stretching; but the deer and birds don't seem to mind.
A mole?
Hydrogen Peroxide makes Bromide its bitch.
Each moment represents the momentum of everything needed for those within.
Yet also temporary and a struggle to sustain.
Choice represents ones sole "tentpole"; the consequences of ones choices represent the circumstantial tent others have to deal with. Be it for shelter or target for home invasions...
a) "thing" implies different from others; hence different form shaped out of same flow.
b) ignorance causes lack of comprehension (bliss). To ignore perceivable inspiration implies for suggested information; which is upheld within ones memory. Lack of comprehending outside inspiration tempts them to be blissful about inside information. Enter tame mind is being suggested to maintain the many inside their information filled minds.
GLUE, noun [Latin gluten.] - "ispissated animal gluten; a tenacious, viscid matter". Let's add VIS'CID, adjective [Latin viscidus; viscus.] - "glutinous; sticky; tenacious; not readily separating" and we get the living constantly tempted to hold onto stuff; while ignoring to represent apartheid (partial within whole).
A sleight of hand from a recent song...
"You are my flaw, you are my thorn...You are everything I've never needed and more
And you are glue"...And In all that I do"
"You're dripping onto me"...You don't know how to let me be"
"And when you finally do...I'll hate you for that too"
"Cause I am water and you're glue"
RE (respond to) SEMBLANCE (likeness; appearance; form) implies as the responding form to the appearances of form alike...yet each apart from one another; hence being able to discern likeness among perceivable differences.
The suggested corruption represents TOGETH'ER, adverb - "at the same place; in union with"....the place each one exists within represents a place of differentiation and UNION; noun (Latin unitas; uni) - "the state of being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable)".
Sticking together represents the temptation of "glue" which others are suggesting (e pluribus unum; out of many; one). Expressing apartheid is where it's at, hence the persecution claiming gnomes benefiting from their self imposed diaspora. What does "parasitic nation wrecker" imply? Within; while apart from. A position so despised that it tempts the many to stick together in a desperate attempt to overcome the apartheid within them.
Everything (process of dying) is required for each thing (living) within to pretend to make something; while ignoring to shape everything.
Notice also that you try to justify "made" with "not"; hence implying consent to suggested creationism (out of nothing); which ignores perceivable transmutation (out of everything). Try describe something from the perspective of being within everything and you will notice that it's way more unlikely to use "no; not; nothing; nothingness" to explain something within everything.
To suggest "no" represents a litmus test for ones consent to suggested creationism. One "cannot" negate reality (nor does confirmation matters); only react to it.
"always" implies the liquid foundation (process of dying) for the solid state (living) within, and plural (foundations) tempts choice to ignore being the center of singular balance (foundation)...balance (singular) represents the foundation for all choices (plural) within.
Sustaining the figure (living) within; while resisting the fast temptation (process of dying).
-FLEX'IBLE, adjective [Latin flexibilis, from flecto, flexi, to bend, plico.] - "that may be bent; capable of being turned or forced from a straight line without breaking; pliant; yielding to pressure"
Form represents the broken partial of the unbroken whole flow and needs to resist the incoming pressure through frequency of adaptation.
I haven't heard that before; what I did hear every once in a while are reports of structural damage to both buildings and boats. You got any examples? Isn't it called structuring foundations and hulls?
The broken partial (form) represents the opportunity to grow out of; within, and in response to the loss of the unbroken whole (flow). Flow doesn't represent the prior shape of form; but that which shapes form (temporary growth) through flow (ongoing loss).
Being partial represents the expression within whole; "gluing together" is being suggested to repress expressions.
Understanding represents your choice to "stand under" suggested information by others...suggested information such as the label "cobblestone" for perceivable form within flow.
As form within the momentum of flow; one is surrounded by moving differences aka perceivable inspiration for adaptation...that's what a so called cobblestone reacts to. Furthermore; the choices of others can shape the form of a "cobblestone"; hence it reacting to being shaped. This reacting to enacting represents being evaluation within value.
Understanding tempts one to view the suggested label "cobblestone" as value onto which one attaches more and more suggested values. Meanwhile...form represents a reaction to enacting flow; hence an expression of impressing, so an expressed evaluation (reaction) to impressing value (enacting).
One cannot define value by suggestion; only react to predefined value within perceivable...motion. One doesn't move; one represents RE (response to) MOVE (being moved); hence living; while struggling to sustain self within the process of dying...a generating (inception) and removal (death) process for everything within.
tl; dr...maybe if you stand a cobblestone upright and then sit on it while making choices...it understands (stands under) value?
"is; too; doesn't; more" is being suggested (want) by the perceiving onto the perceivable (need). It's this choice of want over need; which tempts one to want more out of everything needed.
WISDOM, noun - "use or exercise of knowledge" aka adaptation of the perceiving to the perceivable; hence the response-ability of choice.
If you REact to a suggested REquest; then why call it an action?
Only within balance (momentum of motion) can there be a choice within opposites to arsy versy; topsy turvy; head over heals; as above so below; upside-down and vice versa.
Down from the ongoing symmetry one tempts others to ignore with temporary symbolism?
a) the aether represents the flow of inspiration for everything within. Everyone receives; yet picking up the perceivable implies choice of adaptation from those perceiving it.
AETHER; ETHER (Latin oether) - "to burn; shine" represents the impression caused by flow (velocity) meeting form (resistance) within momentum.
b) SIG'NAL, adjective - "eminent; remarkable; memorable; distinguished from what is ordinary"...this represents the temptation of suggested information. Seeking agreement from others about ones existence, instead of growing self discernment. This also ignores that the natural order (process of dying) distinguishes everyone (living) within, hence from whole (perceivable) into partial (perceiving).
Because standing under others allows them to define; redefine and contradict suggested meaning at will; hence shaping a simple foundation (process of dying) into a complex headache (living).
Either suggested to them by the few or in response to distinct themselves from the suggestions of the few. Perceivable sound represents an offer for "free" will of choice; suggested words tempt one to not just own them; but to brand perceivable while suggesting ownership over it.
Sleight of hand using Bon Jovi..."It's my life, it's now or never...I ain't gonna live forever...I just want to live while I'm alive" aka the want to claim the temporary while willingly ignoring the ongoing. Ever heard a dead guy suggest "I just want to live..."? Meanwhile; no issue perceiving those alive singing along with ignorance based contradictions about their very existence.
a) the right (want) implies vs the wrong (not want)...a conflict of reason shaped by consenting to suggested (want) over perceivable (need).
b) REceiver aka reaction (living); which implies to enacting (process of dying). Before one can receive; one perceives; which implies one being by; within; out of perceivable.
Add the implied "-um" and the "less" becomes a contradiction of the momentum of motion for those within it.
Aka decoding (comprehension) the encoded (perceivable) for expression (growth) or repression (loss). Those who choose to repress themselves are being tempted by suggested encodes (numerology underneath the spoken languages and symbolism) to decode (understanding aka standing under) suggested information.
How to establish numerology? Tempt the perceiving ONE within perceivable ONEness to count others as numbers; while ignoring NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit (unitas; one; oneness)". Next step; branding them by suggested inversion aka "I am a name not a number".
a) balance (need/want) represents the pure; imbalance (want vs not want) represent impure...for the choice in-between.
b) SIM'PLE aka SINE (without) PLICA (folding) tempts one to ignore being within self differentiated; hence representing the unfolded ones (partial) within the folded oneness (whole).
c) implication (if/then) trumps reason (want vs not want) within motion.
Recent sleight of hand...suggesting trump vs someone unreasonable (biden) tempts others to choose trump as the side of reason, while ignoring the implications (imbalance) of consenting to conflict (reasoning).
Perceiving kernel (choice) within perceivable root (balance). Meanwhile suggested CROOT - "an operation that changes the apparent root directory for the current running process" tempts one to ignore the directing current required to sustain momentum (balance) for the kernels (choice) within.
Suggested "no kernel-level" or perceivable kernel (choice) within level (balance)?
As for jail...being "free" will of choice implies at the center of "dom"inating balance aka free-dom. The few suggest confinement to tempt the many to ignore that the mind is being confined within the flow of inspiration.
ABSTRACT' aka ABSTRAHO (to draw from; to separate) - TION (through action)...level (balance aka momentum) represents the separation of higher (flow) and lower (form) and it's the separated reaction (choice) which represents the opportunity to draw from by being within.
It's these formed choices which represent the vessels (container).
Modern urbanization slaves carry flimsy flip key remotes around...so stepping on them only disables the electronics within. A bunch of Lego makes way more efficient caltrops and your hatrack would also scatter them everywhere, hence adding minefield capability to it.
As in melting (process of dying) those (living) within or what about losing flavor (differentiation) during the process (sameness) unless refreshing (adaptation)?
How did Vanilla Ice put it..."If there was a problem (living), yo, I'll (process of dying) solve it"..."Check out (consent to) the hook (suggested information) while D-Shay revolves (transmutation of form back to flow aka revolution) it". Also; D-Shay aka DJ aka DISK (to throw; exterior/surface aka perceivable inspiration) JOCKEY (to cheat; to trick; to deceive in trade aka suggested information).
"Word (suggested information) to your mother (matrix; womb; source; origin aka perceivable inspiration".
PROGRAM'MA, noun - "a letter sealed with the king's seal" aka suggested information sealing ones comprehension away from perceivable inspiration by the choice (king) to consent to suggested.
Cultivated dependency to shape with what others are suggesting instead of shaping as choice within perceivable.
Only if one within oneness chooses to count other ones and suggest the counted ones as "three" or a trinity.
Each one (uni) represents the distributed form within the momentum of the distributing flow (current). Equality (process of dying) distributes diversity (living). The suggested inversion thereof represents diversity for equality.
Try implication...if within current and motion; then recurrent and remotion (removal) aka recurrent (living) removal (dying).
All suggested information points out affixed meaning within moving inspiration, hence contradicting the line with a point.
Jotting down what comes to mind represents memorizing suggested information; then remembering (respond to memorized); while shaping within the confines of suggested among mostly ignored inspiration perceivable.
I read until something inspires; then I adapt on the fly to it; while resisting the temptation to memorize anything. It's my less restricted consciousness which more and more efficiently draws from inspiration whatever necessary for adaptation.
Consenting to suggested information and then withdrawing into memory, while working with it, represents atrophy of conscious adaptation to perceivable. It's the mass accumulation of suggested information which tempts one to pretend that working within your ego server farm represents adaptation of perceiving (reaction) to perceivable (enacting).
Example...imagine you accumulated all the good shit from the web on hard-drives so that you can privately dive into it. Do this for a while and go back on the web..."boy; does the public web sucks". Online offer (perceivable inspiration) tempts offline accumulation (suggested information) and since the world wide web represents suggested information; the few have to mimic the perceivable inspiration with "always online" for the many aka "the internet of things".
Suggested words (want) tempt one to ignore perceivable sound (need), and choosing want (temptation) while ignoring need (resistance) tempts one to want more. Consented words come in easy; while requiring more and more effort to let go of. It's what "catchphrases" are exploiting. Also; HOOK (suggested) LINE (perceivable) SINKER (consenting choice)...fishing for consent.
Your consent to the word (want) over the behavior of motion (need) bolts them; hence shapes idols of meaning out of suggested information; which then tempts you to duct tape them as partial information within your memory; while ignoring the "whole" flow of inspiration (the predefined meaning for those reacting to it).
Suggested information tempts one to puzzle meaning together; while ignoring that the picture (perceiving) on the box (perceivable) already represents the solution (process of dying) for the problem (living).
The few suggest nature as the problem and those within as the solution; which represents the inversion of being the problem (temporary) within the solution (ongoing).
SYM'PHONY, noun [Latin symphonia; Greek with, and voice.] aka WITH (the whole composition) + VOICE (the partial instrument). Yet partial within whole implies separation through momentum (balance); which allows choice at the center of resonance (need) and dissonance (want).
So much of the composition seems to be off; because so many of the instruments willingly operate in dissonance; while ignoring to resonate.
The same momentum supplies each and every different perspective within, yet also the choice to ignore perceivable differences (inspiration) for suggested sameness (information).
The more one ignores differences; the more one ignores the differentiating momentum, hence lacking comprehension about the ongoing motion causing it.
Everything (perceivable) is put in front of one (perceiving)...ignorance represents consent to what others suggest it means. Right vs wrong reasoning implies consent to suggested over perceivable.
They refuse to grow themselves "within" everything; which requires resisting the temptation to be tamed by others.
That represents the suggested inversion of being burden (form) within beast (animal; animation; flow) aka living (burden of resistance) within the process of dying (beast of temptation).
I held the cool hands of plenty who let go off all things until the warmth of another life was enough to embrace death. Then there were also those who cling until last breath to their possessions and obligations. My mother was one of those; her last words were: "what about the laundry?"
An egg implies a shell for the inside from the outside. Everything (energy) was before the egg (balance) can hatch the chicken (choice).
Came into what? What's the foundation for everything to come into and where's the implied outside everything came from? Suggested creationism tempts one into this loop of thinking inside and outside (dualism); which tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation aka being partial within whole, differentiated by the momentum of the ongoing whole.
Partial came later than whole, yet within its center; hence out of the whole. Not side (in) by side (out) dualism; but one within oneness transmutation.
Transmutation (ingredient out of base) is required for an ingredient to unpack from the base. Transmutation cannot be unpacked; since the "one" unpacking implies being the transmuted partial within the transmuting whole.
Self segregation of whole into partial represents transmutation.