Does that represent spending resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying)? What if resistance has to be grown as to be able to spend it? What if spending it represents the temptation to ignore growing it?
bang on a drum
Does an instrument exist within sound? IN (within) STRUO (to prepare) MENT (mind; memory)...what if growing resistance represents preparation? What if resisting sound represents resonance; while ignoring to resist represents dissonance?
EVERYTHING IN LIFE IS A...
If one exists in it; can one define what it "is" or is one tempted to suggest others what "is"; while tempting them to ignore what "was" perceivable before?
TERM, noun [Latin terminus, a limit or boundary.] + FLEX'IBLE, adjective [Latin flexibilis, from flecto, flexi, to bend] - "capable of being turned or forced from a straight line or form without breaking; pliant; yielding to pressure"
Perceivable balance represents the boundary (term) for the perceiving choice (flexible) within. Holding onto represents the temptation to ignore resisting being moved by. How could choice hold onto balance if balance (momentum) is within motion?
"flexitive" action
Flexible choice implies reaction to inflexible balance. Momentum has to stay the same (balanced) for the different form within to have the choice to exist.
Phalanges
Joint digits represent a partial of a whole. No matter how outermost (extreme) one points the digits; one still exists as choice within the innermost part of balance.
hold fast
This is great...fast implicating the temporary choice to hold onto while moving; hence being resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying). Holding onto wants represents the temptation; adaptation to need represents the response-ability (choice) to sustain self.
The plurality of idioms
It's ones consent to another ones suggested idiom which tempts the singular one to claim ownership of plural suggestions. Why? Because if one consents to the suggestions of others; then one ignores the single source of all perceivable. This in return makes the one suggesting the singular source of everything suggestible.
Those who ignore reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggestion) can be sold reality as peace-meal fiction; hence the use of suggested information (words) upon the flow of perceivable inspiration (sound). Each part of a moving system expresses the whole of it; which one ignores when consenting to endless words describing different aspects of the same source.
habit of, upon encountering an unfamiliar thing, to attempt at once to take it
Tempted by want to ignore response-ability (choice) within need. One cannot claim what reality already offered towards free will of choice; only adapt to perceivable to grow comprehension of it. Choosing to ignore this; while falling for temptation; represses that growth of comprehension; hence being further tempted to suggested explanations about the perceivable, yet as of now incomprehensible.
Another issue here is the lack of self discernment about being different (partial) within same (whole); hence being tempted to familiarize everything aka domestication of choice within perceivable differences.
The parasitic few exploit this through the suggestion of e pluribus unum (out of many; one), hence tempting the many "unite" together; while ignoring UNITY; UNUS (one) aka being apart (partial within whole).
if that fails... paint it
Suggestion as means of distraction from perceivable. Humanity in a nutshell.
one drum...rhythm by drummer
Aka the whole (drum) and the partial (drummer) expressing the whole. It's on the partial to grow potential for expression within the potentiality of the whole. The few suggest instruments (Rockefeller literally supplied the education system with instruments just to gain control over the tuning frequency) to tempt each one of the many to ignore being the INSTRUO (to prepare) MENT (mind; memory) within the source of sound.
the drummer is a legal fiction
Branding the temporary drummer by suggestion represents the legal fiction; for which one ignores legal reality of sound causing resonance and dissonance within itself. For one to drum implies the choice between resonance (need) and dissonance (want); while the designation "drummer" implies a suggestion by or towards others.
Choice is located at the center of balance.
Balance represents the momentum of constant change.
Those who ignore perceivable change for suggested brands (names; idols; affixed meaning) can be rebranded at will by those making the suggestions.
Nature represents a moving system...it doesn't suggest names for anything; it moves everything.
Late Edit: Rinse (process of dying); Repeat (living)...
Does that represent spending resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying)? What if resistance has to be grown as to be able to spend it? What if spending it represents the temptation to ignore growing it?
Does an instrument exist within sound? IN (within) STRUO (to prepare) MENT (mind; memory)...what if growing resistance represents preparation? What if resisting sound represents resonance; while ignoring to resist represents dissonance?
If one exists in it; can one define what it "is" or is one tempted to suggest others what "is"; while tempting them to ignore what "was" perceivable before?
Perceivable balance represents the boundary (term) for the perceiving choice (flexible) within. Holding onto represents the temptation to ignore resisting being moved by. How could choice hold onto balance if balance (momentum) is within motion?
Flexible choice implies reaction to inflexible balance. Momentum has to stay the same (balanced) for the different form within to have the choice to exist.
Joint digits represent a partial of a whole. No matter how outermost (extreme) one points the digits; one still exists as choice within the innermost part of balance.
This is great...fast implicating the temporary choice to hold onto while moving; hence being resistance (living) within velocity (process of dying). Holding onto wants represents the temptation; adaptation to need represents the response-ability (choice) to sustain self.
It's ones consent to another ones suggested idiom which tempts the singular one to claim ownership of plural suggestions. Why? Because if one consents to the suggestions of others; then one ignores the single source of all perceivable. This in return makes the one suggesting the singular source of everything suggestible.
Those who ignore reality (perceivable) for fiction (suggestion) can be sold reality as peace-meal fiction; hence the use of suggested information (words) upon the flow of perceivable inspiration (sound). Each part of a moving system expresses the whole of it; which one ignores when consenting to endless words describing different aspects of the same source.
Tempted by want to ignore response-ability (choice) within need. One cannot claim what reality already offered towards free will of choice; only adapt to perceivable to grow comprehension of it. Choosing to ignore this; while falling for temptation; represses that growth of comprehension; hence being further tempted to suggested explanations about the perceivable, yet as of now incomprehensible.
Another issue here is the lack of self discernment about being different (partial) within same (whole); hence being tempted to familiarize everything aka domestication of choice within perceivable differences.
The parasitic few exploit this through the suggestion of e pluribus unum (out of many; one), hence tempting the many "unite" together; while ignoring UNITY; UNUS (one) aka being apart (partial within whole).
Suggestion as means of distraction from perceivable. Humanity in a nutshell.
Aka the whole (drum) and the partial (drummer) expressing the whole. It's on the partial to grow potential for expression within the potentiality of the whole. The few suggest instruments (Rockefeller literally supplied the education system with instruments just to gain control over the tuning frequency) to tempt each one of the many to ignore being the INSTRUO (to prepare) MENT (mind; memory) within the source of sound.
Branding the temporary drummer by suggestion represents the legal fiction; for which one ignores legal reality of sound causing resonance and dissonance within itself. For one to drum implies the choice between resonance (need) and dissonance (want); while the designation "drummer" implies a suggestion by or towards others.
All the neighbors in unison: "YES; DO THAT!"