PROVE, verb - "to deduce conclusion" + TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.]
What if artificial deduction of conclusions tempts one to ignore the ongoing natural cause?
As suggested words deduce conclusions...does perceivable sound continue?
satoshi
NAKAMOTO (originated from center) SATOSHI (intelligence) aka central intelligence.
Besides the obvious sleight of hand...INTEL'LIGENCE, noun [Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) represents standing under suggested information; while ignoring to grow comprehension out of perceivable inspiration. Being perceiving (partial) within perceivable (whole) implies being reaction (choice) originating from center (balance) aka from enacting momentum.
What do you do with those who ignore being the center (choice) of momentum (balance)? You tempt them to consent to a chain on a block within a crypt.
what is she like 20?
what are her qualifications exactly?
her website just says 'researcher'.
I've been a researcher at the quantum telecommunications and quantum optics lab at Georgia Tech, the University of Maryland Joint Quantum Institute, and currently working on superconducting qubits.
Won't happen for a while, she says, but it must eventually.
QC is the same shit as thermonuclear power. Decades of billions grants with no any useful result. Take a look at her twitter, it is all about receiving grants.
The problem with QC is that you need a lot of qubits to do something really useful. But as you increase number of qubits, the uncertainity of result grow too. So, in reality you could have either completely useless but working few qbits quantum computer that gives results with 80% of certainity, or completely useless many qbits computer that gives garbage with 0.01% of certainity instead of results.
And most interesting thing about that quantum uncertainity problem - if you discover a way to overcome it, that also opens doors to many so-called closing technologies, from unlimited, untraceable and secure p2p communications (may be even FTL ones) to all that zero-point energy stuff. It's like a Pandora box of things where each and every one is a direct threat for elites. You will not need conventional cryptography and money, including crypto, if that box will be open. Funny, but breakthrough, necessary for achieving all that overhyped QC goals you heard about, will instantly make that goals obsolete. :)
Obviously, elites don't need that breakthrough, like they don't need a breakthrough in thermonuclear power. So, we are observing decades long money laundering with high expectations and tons of hype without any practical result in QC and will observe it until elites will be destroyed.
And it will be a very good thing for us, if that somehow happen "evetually".
Its because QC is based on the pseudo science of special relatively.
It does not. QC is based on quantum mechanics that is incompatible with Einstein special and common relativity. All attempts to somehow combine them into Unified Field Theory or Theory of Everything failed, even mathematically. Phylosophically it means that at least one of theories is wrong. Einstein relativity crap is definitely wrong. So, quantum mechanics could be more or less valid thing. At least, it does not lead to numerous weakly based paradoxes and does not insist on dogmatic shit like impossibility of FTL.
The main thing in quantum mechanics is that it operates with probabilities, not some exact values. Qubits could have a different probabilities being in 1 or 0,, not different levels or whatever.
For non-binary computers check Soviet tertiary computes of Setun family. They operated with trits, each could have -1, 0 or +1 state, or, in other terms true, unknown, false, or whatever. They was more effective than binary computers of the time, but development was shut down in 70s when binary computers was forced by unknown reason.
Ah yeah...the POWER (potential) of a THERMO (warm) NUCLEUS (nut) for the sustenance of self...a seedy business. But watch out...reactor overload; radio- (Latin radius; rod) activity; the rods are melting, nuclear explosion.
thermonuclear reactors does not have rods, only extremely hot plasma
a) -PLASM (a growth, a development; something molded" + ROD (Latin radius, ray, radix]...both denote growth within the mold of loss.
b) the EX of extreme implies "out of"; hence expression out of impressing aka reaction (living) out of enacting (process of dying).
c) what's the origin of heat? Friction between enacting velocity (flow) and reacting resistance (form) causing vibration and heat.
fusion reactors, not fission
Reaction implies within enacting; hence partial living (fission) within the whole process of dying (fusion). Each one represents fission (perceiving) reacting to fusion (perceivable).
The parasitic few suggest dualism (two states; on or off) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable coexistence (if/then implication)...if fusion; then fission and vice versa.
All represents one in energy; hence being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) aka partial transmuted out of whole; ingredient out of base; form out of flow; choice out of balance; potential out of potentiality; magnetic out of electric; female out of male; living out of the process of dying; resistance out of velocity; growth out of loss and so on.
Question the perceivable origin of ION (to go; to move; to proceed); then put yourself into it as the perceiving center; hence going from inception towards death; being moved by; being processed. Finally utilize implication (if/then) upon it...if going from inception towards death; then being alive, if being moved by; then being reaction within enacting; if being processed; then existing as resistance within velocity etc.
Notice also that the entire infrastructure of suggested nuclear energy is based upon a core (a center structure) aka the inner partial of the outer whole. If you consent to believe in power hidden inside a core; while surrounded by an outer shell; then how could you ever grow your comprehension of being the inner core (choice) within the outer shell (balance) aka the partial (perceiving) temporary wielding the power of the ongoing whole (perceivable) aka the choice to express everything balance (momentum of motion) impresses?
Who can count (compute) amounts (quantum)? The perceiving ONE.
Where can one count amounts? Within the ONEness of all perceivable.
What if others suggest "one" to count amounts, as to tempt "one" to ignore perceivable oneness? NUMBER (designation of a unit) implies UNIT (Latin unus; one).
extinction-level
EXTINCT (being at the end) + LEVEL (being at the center of balance).
What if temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) can only exist as choice at the center of balance (momentum)? What if living within the process of dying implies in (inception) and out (death) of origin?
What if others suggest extinction (focusing on end) to distract one from being at the center; hence imbalancing one with suggested distractions? How easy is it to tempt choice to ignore its origin aka the center of balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs evil; rich vs poor; basketball vs football; Russia vs Ukraine; us vs them; black vs white; left vs right; 2 dollars vs $1,99 ?
Anyway...does being require self discernment within perceivable or consent to what others suggest one to be? Is it really "to be or not to be" or could it be "being within; out of and in response to origin"?
Does one have response-ability (choice) to discern the who; where; what and why of ones existence and should one respond to others for suggested answers?
I'd like to decrypt her, if ya know what I mean.
DE (away from) CRYPT (underground burial vault)
Grave-robbery.
But my master's degree is in simping! With a minor in soy beverages technology.
i came here to say that ...
get it... "came"
<high tech nanofacepalm>
Here ya go... https://nypost.com/2021/11/09/brothel-offers-vaccinations-and-free-sexual-session-in-bold-incentive-program/
looooooooooolllllllll
not quite the same, but also this one:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/ajherrington/2021/05/07/free-marijuana-for-covid-19-vaccines-proves-to-be-a-popular-perk/
"quantum computers will break current encryption methods" is not a revelation, it is their entire raison d'être
Well tbf quantum decryption was a proven technology even before "satoshi" created the technology. So... makes you wonder
I could see this
What if artificial deduction of conclusions tempts one to ignore the ongoing natural cause?
As suggested words deduce conclusions...does perceivable sound continue?
Besides the obvious sleight of hand...INTEL'LIGENCE, noun [Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand) represents standing under suggested information; while ignoring to grow comprehension out of perceivable inspiration. Being perceiving (partial) within perceivable (whole) implies being reaction (choice) originating from center (balance) aka from enacting momentum.
What do you do with those who ignore being the center (choice) of momentum (balance)? You tempt them to consent to a chain on a block within a crypt.
what is she like 20? what are her qualifications exactly? her website just says 'researcher'.
It's simping for physics....
--
Her kind of content pisses me off. She can make low quality content and put click aot titles and losers will gladly eat it up because she is hot.
QC is the same shit as thermonuclear power. Decades of billions grants with no any useful result. Take a look at her twitter, it is all about receiving grants.
The problem with QC is that you need a lot of qubits to do something really useful. But as you increase number of qubits, the uncertainity of result grow too. So, in reality you could have either completely useless but working few qbits quantum computer that gives results with 80% of certainity, or completely useless many qbits computer that gives garbage with 0.01% of certainity instead of results.
And most interesting thing about that quantum uncertainity problem - if you discover a way to overcome it, that also opens doors to many so-called closing technologies, from unlimited, untraceable and secure p2p communications (may be even FTL ones) to all that zero-point energy stuff. It's like a Pandora box of things where each and every one is a direct threat for elites. You will not need conventional cryptography and money, including crypto, if that box will be open. Funny, but breakthrough, necessary for achieving all that overhyped QC goals you heard about, will instantly make that goals obsolete. :)
Obviously, elites don't need that breakthrough, like they don't need a breakthrough in thermonuclear power. So, we are observing decades long money laundering with high expectations and tons of hype without any practical result in QC and will observe it until elites will be destroyed.
And it will be a very good thing for us, if that somehow happen "evetually".
It does not. QC is based on quantum mechanics that is incompatible with Einstein special and common relativity. All attempts to somehow combine them into Unified Field Theory or Theory of Everything failed, even mathematically. Phylosophically it means that at least one of theories is wrong. Einstein relativity crap is definitely wrong. So, quantum mechanics could be more or less valid thing. At least, it does not lead to numerous weakly based paradoxes and does not insist on dogmatic shit like impossibility of FTL.
The main thing in quantum mechanics is that it operates with probabilities, not some exact values. Qubits could have a different probabilities being in 1 or 0,, not different levels or whatever.
For non-binary computers check Soviet tertiary computes of Setun family. They operated with trits, each could have -1, 0 or +1 state, or, in other terms true, unknown, false, or whatever. They was more effective than binary computers of the time, but development was shut down in 70s when binary computers was forced by unknown reason.
Ah yeah...the POWER (potential) of a THERMO (warm) NUCLEUS (nut) for the sustenance of self...a seedy business. But watch out...reactor overload; radio- (Latin radius; rod) activity; the rods are melting, nuclear explosion.
thermonuclear reactors does not have rods, only extremely hot plasma, they are fusion reactors, not fission like NPP.
a) -PLASM (a growth, a development; something molded" + ROD (Latin radius, ray, radix]...both denote growth within the mold of loss.
b) the EX of extreme implies "out of"; hence expression out of impressing aka reaction (living) out of enacting (process of dying).
c) what's the origin of heat? Friction between enacting velocity (flow) and reacting resistance (form) causing vibration and heat.
Reaction implies within enacting; hence partial living (fission) within the whole process of dying (fusion). Each one represents fission (perceiving) reacting to fusion (perceivable).
The parasitic few suggest dualism (two states; on or off) to tempt the many to ignore perceivable coexistence (if/then implication)...if fusion; then fission and vice versa.
All represents one in energy; hence being one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) aka partial transmuted out of whole; ingredient out of base; form out of flow; choice out of balance; potential out of potentiality; magnetic out of electric; female out of male; living out of the process of dying; resistance out of velocity; growth out of loss and so on.
Question the perceivable origin of ION (to go; to move; to proceed); then put yourself into it as the perceiving center; hence going from inception towards death; being moved by; being processed. Finally utilize implication (if/then) upon it...if going from inception towards death; then being alive, if being moved by; then being reaction within enacting; if being processed; then existing as resistance within velocity etc.
Notice also that the entire infrastructure of suggested nuclear energy is based upon a core (a center structure) aka the inner partial of the outer whole. If you consent to believe in power hidden inside a core; while surrounded by an outer shell; then how could you ever grow your comprehension of being the inner core (choice) within the outer shell (balance) aka the partial (perceiving) temporary wielding the power of the ongoing whole (perceivable) aka the choice to express everything balance (momentum of motion) impresses?
"brilliant"... whatever
-state will control any assets like this. So yeah, they'll destroy the crypto market if they wanted to.. And btc watchout!
But with etheriums shift today to no stake of work, its just going to be controlled by them anyways..
Barring real climate change.
STOP SIMPING.
Who can count (compute) amounts (quantum)? The perceiving ONE.
Where can one count amounts? Within the ONEness of all perceivable.
What if others suggest "one" to count amounts, as to tempt "one" to ignore perceivable oneness? NUMBER (designation of a unit) implies UNIT (Latin unus; one).
What if temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) can only exist as choice at the center of balance (momentum)? What if living within the process of dying implies in (inception) and out (death) of origin?
What if others suggest extinction (focusing on end) to distract one from being at the center; hence imbalancing one with suggested distractions? How easy is it to tempt choice to ignore its origin aka the center of balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs evil; rich vs poor; basketball vs football; Russia vs Ukraine; us vs them; black vs white; left vs right; 2 dollars vs $1,99 ?
Anyway...does being require self discernment within perceivable or consent to what others suggest one to be? Is it really "to be or not to be" or could it be "being within; out of and in response to origin"?
Does one have response-ability (choice) to discern the who; where; what and why of ones existence and should one respond to others for suggested answers?