Who can count (compute) amounts (quantum)? The perceiving ONE.
Where can one count amounts? Within the ONEness of all perceivable.
What if others suggest "one" to count amounts, as to tempt "one" to ignore perceivable oneness? NUMBER (designation of a unit) implies UNIT (Latin unus; one).
extinction-level
EXTINCT (being at the end) + LEVEL (being at the center of balance).
What if temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) can only exist as choice at the center of balance (momentum)? What if living within the process of dying implies in (inception) and out (death) of origin?
What if others suggest extinction (focusing on end) to distract one from being at the center; hence imbalancing one with suggested distractions? How easy is it to tempt choice to ignore its origin aka the center of balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs evil; rich vs poor; basketball vs football; Russia vs Ukraine; us vs them; black vs white; left vs right; 2 dollars vs $1,99 ?
Anyway...does being require self discernment within perceivable or consent to what others suggest one to be? Is it really "to be or not to be" or could it be "being within; out of and in response to origin"?
Does one have response-ability (choice) to discern the who; where; what and why of ones existence and should one respond to others for suggested answers?
Who can count (compute) amounts (quantum)? The perceiving ONE.
Where can one count amounts? Within the ONEness of all perceivable.
What if others suggest "one" to count amounts, as to tempt "one" to ignore perceivable oneness? NUMBER (designation of a unit) implies UNIT (Latin unus; one).
What if temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) can only exist as choice at the center of balance (momentum)? What if living within the process of dying implies in (inception) and out (death) of origin?
What if others suggest extinction (focusing on end) to distract one from being at the center; hence imbalancing one with suggested distractions? How easy is it to tempt choice to ignore its origin aka the center of balance (need/want) for suggested imbalance (want vs not want; true vs false; good vs evil; rich vs poor; basketball vs football; Russia vs Ukraine; us vs them; black vs white; left vs right; 2 dollars vs $1,99 ?
Anyway...does being require self discernment within perceivable or consent to what others suggest one to be? Is it really "to be or not to be" or could it be "being within; out of and in response to origin"?
Does one have response-ability (choice) to discern the who; where; what and why of ones existence and should one respond to others for suggested answers?