a) the few conspire to suggest "heliocentrism" towards the consenting many.
b) HELIO (sun) CENTER (middle) represents allegory for being the one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) aka the choice at the center of balance aka the light bearer; born into the choice of enlightenment (comprehension) or darkness (ignorance).
c) instead of growing awareness of others conspiring through suggestion; one is being tempted to oppose the suggested (heliocentric) with another suggestion (flat-earth).
d) nature doesn't suggest labels like heliocentric or flat; it inspires the perceiving senses of the living to adapt to being moved from inception towards death. How to adapt? By resisting (living) temptation (dying), hence adapting to perceivable (need) while resisting suggested (want).
e) try "suggested planet; perceivable plane" and focus on the choice made in-between. As for the missing "T"...T minus 3,2,1...add it back to NASA and you get SATAN.
flat earth isn't a suggestion, its an observation.
OBSERVE, verb transitive (Latin observo; ob and servo, to keep or hold). Those who perceive cannot keep or hold onto perceivable. It's the suggested label "flat earth" which tempts one to consent to want to hold onto it mentally (within memory) as a "truth".
From another perspective...if the partial perceives a "plane" within the whole (perceivable); one still can't perceive the whole as the partial. One cannot perceive the whole flat earth; nor the whole heliocentric earth...both tempt one to ignore being the restricted perspective (perceiving within perceivable) for an out of range suggestion by others.
It's irrelevant for the few if the many reason about wanting vs not wanting heliocentric; flat; cube; inner; greater; energetic and so on...only the consent by the choice of the many towards the suggestions by the choice of the few matters for controlling them.
Why do i, the few, explain to the many, that the earth is flat? i cannot seem to stop.
a) because you represent the temporary (living) within the ongoing (dying), hence no stopping for you.
b) if you ignore adapting to perceivable origin (resisting the process of dying while growing life); then you're tempted to consent to the suggestions by those within, hence trying to grow them.
How many years of "we need to stop world hunger" before the many realize that they're starving themselves to death?
c) instead of viewing the many as lacking something suggested; ask yourself if they're willingly ignore everything perceivable? Will implies choice, and your suggesting choice tempts them to consent by choice; hence ignoring to utilize choice in response to perceivable balance.
If others consent to your suggestion of "flat earth"; they shirk response-ability (choice) onto your suggesting choice. At that moment; whatever you suggested becomes irrelevant for their ignorance of perceivable. Furthermore; you are then tempted by the power to wield the suggested, hence being able to define; redefine and contradict it for everyone who consented to you.
its like an inner motivation to awaken the masses, but i suspect, its not for my own good, and perhaps the demise of us all
a) your growth expands onto others; growing others tempts you to ignore growing yourself. The fruits of your labors tempt you to ignore the needed labor for the wanted fruit.
b) being awaken represents resisting darkness (the sleep of ignorance) which grows enlightenment (comprehension) within perceivable light.
c) suggested MO'TIVE, adjective - "causing motion" tempts one to ignore being moved by the perceivable; hence being RE (response to) MOVED (being moved) aka living within the process of dying.
MOTIVE (causing motion) -ATION (through action) implies one being the reaction enacted upon.
Instead of viewing others as motivation; be aware of them tempting EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] - "any agitation of mind".
the reasons for the deception are unknown
Reasoning about suggested implies ignorance of perceivable (the known).
unintended consequences
a) suggested INTEND', verb - "set forward in mind" ignores being the resistance (living) within what sets forwards (process of dying). The few suggest progressivism to tempt the many to set their minds forwards towards suggested outcomes, while ignoring that memory represents the ram needed to handle incoming inspiration from perceivable origin.
b) living represents the consequence of the enacting process of dying. The few tempt the many to ignore enacting (perceivable) for suggested consequences of reactions.
Meanwhile; the few utilize implication (if/then) upon perceivable origin; while the many are tempted to reason (want vs not want) about suggested; while applying implication upon it; which tempts them to further propagate suggestions.
a) when one grows; others are tempted to feel outgrown.
b) perceivable sound exist before suggested words. I comprehend this and try to dismantle everything associated with the suggested word; which while diminishing the potency of ignorance among others; also makes me look "out of the norm". So be it.
Smooth talking ignorance doesn't work; impression (perceivable inspiration) and frequency (repetition of choice) does.
c) notice that agreement vs disagreement about who's suggesting information, ignores that whatever is being suggested was shaped out of perceivable inspiration. Ask him if he can utilize what I wrote instead of judging it or me for it?
One can never run out of perceivable inspiration; but it requires choice of adaptation to utilize it. Consenting to any suggested information tempts one to ignore this. Whatever I write about this world...the world was perceivable before I could write about it, so I can't ever be the source; just an expressing ingredient within.
c) any suggestion represents the temptation for one to ignore perceivable
d) consenting to anything suggested deceives oneself into ignoring perceivable.
e) DECEPT (misleading) -ATION (through action) implies the reaction (living) being tempted by the enacting (process of dying) to ignore resisting.
f) the few aren't the deceivers; but the suggester of temptations. The only deceiver represents the one consenting to the suggested temptation.
Going from the heliocentric bullshit to proclaiming flat earth from the rooftops doesn't change the dynamic being exploited here, it just keeps the cattle within the pen of reasoning over suggested.
The perceivable doesn't need to be defined (it represents predefined inspiration); the perceiving need to grow their comprehension; while resisting what others are suggesting.
The suggestion "this world is..." tempts one to ignore that it was perceivable before one could make a suggestion about it.
a) CRAZY, adjective - "broken". The partial (perceiving) within the whole (perceivable) implies a broken state, hence the opportunity for oneself to grow; to stabilize; to fix temporarily.
b) "I am nothing" implies one being defined by the suggested "nothing" from others.
c) "I am" tempts one to ignore that one was; before being able to suggest to others that "I am..."
Sleight of hand: "I am whatever you say I am; cause if I wasn't; then why would I say I am?"
d) if others think you're crazy; then you're crazy to them and they will behave as if you were crazy. It's the suggested label "crazy" which allows the suggesting 3rd party to tempt conflicts among those who consent to it by either wanting or not wanting the label "crazy".
i only proclaim from this site. not the rooftops
The world wide web reaches more than any rooftop...
you would get ostracized
The few suggest ostracism to tempt them many to fear banishment; which tempts them to ignore that the perceiving mind is already bound to the natural order of the perceivable.
The center of everything cannot be exiled; yet it can be tempted to ignore expression; by consenting to be repressed through the suggestion of others.
the more i try to help, the more they close off into their programming
Your suggested help contradicts them already consenting to other suggestions. They are bound by choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law to the will of others; and you're breaching that contract. They lack comprehension about that contract; yet view any suggested contradiction as a conflict.
Underneath that; they willingly ignore perceivable for suggested; and your suggested contradiction challenges their ignorance; their will; their shirking of response-ability (choice).
its amazing how stubborn people are
If one exists as perceiving choice within perceivable balance, then one also has the choice to ignore (want) all perceivable (need). Even breathing is being ignored; hence allowing the few to suggest spiritual warfare (put a mask over your mouth and nose) after also suggesting the sleight of hand (I can't breathe...leads to death).
do you get paid for replies?
Nah; that would contradict free-will-of-choice. Would be nice tho; then again...growing evaluation by growing comprehension represents more than enough compensation.
Good question! If you have any others, and are interested in some alternative perspectives on them - please join us on flatearthresearch to explore and exchange them!
The density gradient in our air tends to cause light to curve convexly towards the ground. That bending becomes less and less extreme as you increase altitude, because the density decreases as you rise. In addition to this, ultimately that density is responsible for a “fog”/“haze” that prevents you from seeing anything further. Because the density of the air you are looking at is lesser from higher altitudes, the distance to that “fog”/“haze” point (where you can’t see further, because light from distant objects can’t reach you anymore) is also greater. These are the 2 main reasons.
for the record, I have heard, reviewed and weighed all the "evidence" (and how can we not - it's practically shoved-down our throats):
"... but the bible says"
"...but nathan says"
"...but zoom lenses!"
"....but horizons!"
"....but water finds a level!"
"....but light doesn't bend!!"
"....but there is no proof!!!"
"....but that's not what we see!!!" #reeeeee
BOTTOM LINE: it's a CIA (and/or Mossad)-run #psyop to corrupt and confuse western society. and you are either an agent, or you belong to a deep-state-driven "woke science" cult. go play somewhere else.
a) the few conspire to suggest "heliocentrism" towards the consenting many.
b) HELIO (sun) CENTER (middle) represents allegory for being the one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) aka the choice at the center of balance aka the light bearer; born into the choice of enlightenment (comprehension) or darkness (ignorance).
c) instead of growing awareness of others conspiring through suggestion; one is being tempted to oppose the suggested (heliocentric) with another suggestion (flat-earth).
d) nature doesn't suggest labels like heliocentric or flat; it inspires the perceiving senses of the living to adapt to being moved from inception towards death. How to adapt? By resisting (living) temptation (dying), hence adapting to perceivable (need) while resisting suggested (want).
e) try "suggested planet; perceivable plane" and focus on the choice made in-between. As for the missing "T"...T minus 3,2,1...add it back to NASA and you get SATAN.
From another perspective...if the partial perceives a "plane" within the whole (perceivable); one still can't perceive the whole as the partial. One cannot perceive the whole flat earth; nor the whole heliocentric earth...both tempt one to ignore being the restricted perspective (perceiving within perceivable) for an out of range suggestion by others.
It's irrelevant for the few if the many reason about wanting vs not wanting heliocentric; flat; cube; inner; greater; energetic and so on...only the consent by the choice of the many towards the suggestions by the choice of the few matters for controlling them.
a) because you represent the temporary (living) within the ongoing (dying), hence no stopping for you.
b) if you ignore adapting to perceivable origin (resisting the process of dying while growing life); then you're tempted to consent to the suggestions by those within, hence trying to grow them.
How many years of "we need to stop world hunger" before the many realize that they're starving themselves to death?
c) instead of viewing the many as lacking something suggested; ask yourself if they're willingly ignore everything perceivable? Will implies choice, and your suggesting choice tempts them to consent by choice; hence ignoring to utilize choice in response to perceivable balance.
If others consent to your suggestion of "flat earth"; they shirk response-ability (choice) onto your suggesting choice. At that moment; whatever you suggested becomes irrelevant for their ignorance of perceivable. Furthermore; you are then tempted by the power to wield the suggested, hence being able to define; redefine and contradict it for everyone who consented to you.
a) your growth expands onto others; growing others tempts you to ignore growing yourself. The fruits of your labors tempt you to ignore the needed labor for the wanted fruit.
b) being awaken represents resisting darkness (the sleep of ignorance) which grows enlightenment (comprehension) within perceivable light.
c) suggested MO'TIVE, adjective - "causing motion" tempts one to ignore being moved by the perceivable; hence being RE (response to) MOVED (being moved) aka living within the process of dying.
MOTIVE (causing motion) -ATION (through action) implies one being the reaction enacted upon.
Instead of viewing others as motivation; be aware of them tempting EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] - "any agitation of mind".
Reasoning about suggested implies ignorance of perceivable (the known).
a) suggested INTEND', verb - "set forward in mind" ignores being the resistance (living) within what sets forwards (process of dying). The few suggest progressivism to tempt the many to set their minds forwards towards suggested outcomes, while ignoring that memory represents the ram needed to handle incoming inspiration from perceivable origin.
b) living represents the consequence of the enacting process of dying. The few tempt the many to ignore enacting (perceivable) for suggested consequences of reactions.
Meanwhile; the few utilize implication (if/then) upon perceivable origin; while the many are tempted to reason (want vs not want) about suggested; while applying implication upon it; which tempts them to further propagate suggestions.
Thanks for the inspiration.
a) when one grows; others are tempted to feel outgrown.
b) perceivable sound exist before suggested words. I comprehend this and try to dismantle everything associated with the suggested word; which while diminishing the potency of ignorance among others; also makes me look "out of the norm". So be it.
Smooth talking ignorance doesn't work; impression (perceivable inspiration) and frequency (repetition of choice) does.
c) notice that agreement vs disagreement about who's suggesting information, ignores that whatever is being suggested was shaped out of perceivable inspiration. Ask him if he can utilize what I wrote instead of judging it or me for it?
One can never run out of perceivable inspiration; but it requires choice of adaptation to utilize it. Consenting to any suggested information tempts one to ignore this. Whatever I write about this world...the world was perceivable before I could write about it, so I can't ever be the source; just an expressing ingredient within.
d) BOT; ROBOT; noun (Latin roboro; robur) - "strength".
a) to know implies to perceive
b) all -isms represent suggestions
c) any suggestion represents the temptation for one to ignore perceivable
d) consenting to anything suggested deceives oneself into ignoring perceivable.
e) DECEPT (misleading) -ATION (through action) implies the reaction (living) being tempted by the enacting (process of dying) to ignore resisting.
f) the few aren't the deceivers; but the suggester of temptations. The only deceiver represents the one consenting to the suggested temptation.
Going from the heliocentric bullshit to proclaiming flat earth from the rooftops doesn't change the dynamic being exploited here, it just keeps the cattle within the pen of reasoning over suggested.
The perceivable doesn't need to be defined (it represents predefined inspiration); the perceiving need to grow their comprehension; while resisting what others are suggesting.
The suggestion "this world is..." tempts one to ignore that it was perceivable before one could make a suggestion about it.
a) CRAZY, adjective - "broken". The partial (perceiving) within the whole (perceivable) implies a broken state, hence the opportunity for oneself to grow; to stabilize; to fix temporarily.
b) "I am nothing" implies one being defined by the suggested "nothing" from others.
c) "I am" tempts one to ignore that one was; before being able to suggest to others that "I am..."
Sleight of hand: "I am whatever you say I am; cause if I wasn't; then why would I say I am?"
d) if others think you're crazy; then you're crazy to them and they will behave as if you were crazy. It's the suggested label "crazy" which allows the suggesting 3rd party to tempt conflicts among those who consent to it by either wanting or not wanting the label "crazy".
The world wide web reaches more than any rooftop...
The few suggest ostracism to tempt them many to fear banishment; which tempts them to ignore that the perceiving mind is already bound to the natural order of the perceivable.
The center of everything cannot be exiled; yet it can be tempted to ignore expression; by consenting to be repressed through the suggestion of others.
Your suggested help contradicts them already consenting to other suggestions. They are bound by choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law to the will of others; and you're breaching that contract. They lack comprehension about that contract; yet view any suggested contradiction as a conflict.
Underneath that; they willingly ignore perceivable for suggested; and your suggested contradiction challenges their ignorance; their will; their shirking of response-ability (choice).
If one exists as perceiving choice within perceivable balance, then one also has the choice to ignore (want) all perceivable (need). Even breathing is being ignored; hence allowing the few to suggest spiritual warfare (put a mask over your mouth and nose) after also suggesting the sleight of hand (I can't breathe...leads to death).
Nah; that would contradict free-will-of-choice. Would be nice tho; then again...growing evaluation by growing comprehension represents more than enough compensation.
https://files.catbox.moe/e3invd.webm
This is great lmao thank you.
Why is the ship's lookout posted on the top of the mainmast? Why does he see land before the guys on deck?
perspective
Ships Disappear Beyond Earth's Curvature? (4 mins) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BrfFn-nZ3ns
Good question! If you have any others, and are interested in some alternative perspectives on them - please join us on flatearthresearch to explore and exchange them!
The density gradient in our air tends to cause light to curve convexly towards the ground. That bending becomes less and less extreme as you increase altitude, because the density decreases as you rise. In addition to this, ultimately that density is responsible for a “fog”/“haze” that prevents you from seeing anything further. Because the density of the air you are looking at is lesser from higher altitudes, the distance to that “fog”/“haze” point (where you can’t see further, because light from distant objects can’t reach you anymore) is also greater. These are the 2 main reasons.
2 questions (1 serious and 1 joke)
In my view, there is no conspiracy. People are just wrong, like always.
fuck off
/downvoted - psyop
suck a dick
fuck you too cunt.
for the record, I have heard, reviewed and weighed all the "evidence" (and how can we not - it's practically shoved-down our throats):
"... but the bible says"
"...but nathan says"
"...but zoom lenses!"
"....but horizons!"
"....but water finds a level!"
"....but light doesn't bend!!"
"....but there is no proof!!!"
"....but that's not what we see!!!" #reeeeee
BOTTOM LINE: it's a CIA (and/or Mossad)-run #psyop to corrupt and confuse western society. and you are either an agent, or you belong to a deep-state-driven "woke science" cult. go play somewhere else.
...real pile of bullshit
okay, hector
Fucking retarded nutter.
Yeah, you both are.
Also, both the same person.
Jew.
Pvki alts talking to themselves.
Fake argument.
Fake accounts.
Real dumb person behind it all. Total fucking moron.