a) the few conspire to suggest "heliocentrism" towards the consenting many.
b) HELIO (sun) CENTER (middle) represents allegory for being the one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) aka the choice at the center of balance aka the light bearer; born into the choice of enlightenment (comprehension) or darkness (ignorance).
c) instead of growing awareness of others conspiring through suggestion; one is being tempted to oppose the suggested (heliocentric) with another suggestion (flat-earth).
d) nature doesn't suggest labels like heliocentric or flat; it inspires the perceiving senses of the living to adapt to being moved from inception towards death. How to adapt? By resisting (living) temptation (dying), hence adapting to perceivable (need) while resisting suggested (want).
e) try "suggested planet; perceivable plane" and focus on the choice made in-between. As for the missing "T"...T minus 3,2,1...add it back to NASA and you get SATAN.
flat earth isn't a suggestion, its an observation.
OBSERVE, verb transitive (Latin observo; ob and servo, to keep or hold). Those who perceive cannot keep or hold onto perceivable. It's the suggested label "flat earth" which tempts one to consent to want to hold onto it mentally (within memory) as a "truth".
From another perspective...if the partial perceives a "plane" within the whole (perceivable); one still can't perceive the whole as the partial. One cannot perceive the whole flat earth; nor the whole heliocentric earth...both tempt one to ignore being the restricted perspective (perceiving within perceivable) for an out of range suggestion by others.
It's irrelevant for the few if the many reason about wanting vs not wanting heliocentric; flat; cube; inner; greater; energetic and so on...only the consent by the choice of the many towards the suggestions by the choice of the few matters for controlling them.
Why do i, the few, explain to the many, that the earth is flat? i cannot seem to stop.
a) because you represent the temporary (living) within the ongoing (dying), hence no stopping for you.
b) if you ignore adapting to perceivable origin (resisting the process of dying while growing life); then you're tempted to consent to the suggestions by those within, hence trying to grow them.
How many years of "we need to stop world hunger" before the many realize that they're starving themselves to death?
c) instead of viewing the many as lacking something suggested; ask yourself if they're willingly ignore everything perceivable? Will implies choice, and your suggesting choice tempts them to consent by choice; hence ignoring to utilize choice in response to perceivable balance.
If others consent to your suggestion of "flat earth"; they shirk response-ability (choice) onto your suggesting choice. At that moment; whatever you suggested becomes irrelevant for their ignorance of perceivable. Furthermore; you are then tempted by the power to wield the suggested, hence being able to define; redefine and contradict it for everyone who consented to you.
its like an inner motivation to awaken the masses, but i suspect, its not for my own good, and perhaps the demise of us all
a) your growth expands onto others; growing others tempts you to ignore growing yourself. The fruits of your labors tempt you to ignore the needed labor for the wanted fruit.
b) being awaken represents resisting darkness (the sleep of ignorance) which grows enlightenment (comprehension) within perceivable light.
c) suggested MO'TIVE, adjective - "causing motion" tempts one to ignore being moved by the perceivable; hence being RE (response to) MOVED (being moved) aka living within the process of dying.
MOTIVE (causing motion) -ATION (through action) implies one being the reaction enacted upon.
Instead of viewing others as motivation; be aware of them tempting EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] - "any agitation of mind".
the reasons for the deception are unknown
Reasoning about suggested implies ignorance of perceivable (the known).
unintended consequences
a) suggested INTEND', verb - "set forward in mind" ignores being the resistance (living) within what sets forwards (process of dying). The few suggest progressivism to tempt the many to set their minds forwards towards suggested outcomes, while ignoring that memory represents the ram needed to handle incoming inspiration from perceivable origin.
b) living represents the consequence of the enacting process of dying. The few tempt the many to ignore enacting (perceivable) for suggested consequences of reactions.
Meanwhile; the few utilize implication (if/then) upon perceivable origin; while the many are tempted to reason (want vs not want) about suggested; while applying implication upon it; which tempts them to further propagate suggestions.
c) any suggestion represents the temptation for one to ignore perceivable
d) consenting to anything suggested deceives oneself into ignoring perceivable.
e) DECEPT (misleading) -ATION (through action) implies the reaction (living) being tempted by the enacting (process of dying) to ignore resisting.
f) the few aren't the deceivers; but the suggester of temptations. The only deceiver represents the one consenting to the suggested temptation.
Going from the heliocentric bullshit to proclaiming flat earth from the rooftops doesn't change the dynamic being exploited here, it just keeps the cattle within the pen of reasoning over suggested.
The perceivable doesn't need to be defined (it represents predefined inspiration); the perceiving need to grow their comprehension; while resisting what others are suggesting.
The suggestion "this world is..." tempts one to ignore that it was perceivable before one could make a suggestion about it.
a) the few conspire to suggest "heliocentrism" towards the consenting many.
b) HELIO (sun) CENTER (middle) represents allegory for being the one (perceiving) within oneness (perceivable) aka the choice at the center of balance aka the light bearer; born into the choice of enlightenment (comprehension) or darkness (ignorance).
c) instead of growing awareness of others conspiring through suggestion; one is being tempted to oppose the suggested (heliocentric) with another suggestion (flat-earth).
d) nature doesn't suggest labels like heliocentric or flat; it inspires the perceiving senses of the living to adapt to being moved from inception towards death. How to adapt? By resisting (living) temptation (dying), hence adapting to perceivable (need) while resisting suggested (want).
e) try "suggested planet; perceivable plane" and focus on the choice made in-between. As for the missing "T"...T minus 3,2,1...add it back to NASA and you get SATAN.
From another perspective...if the partial perceives a "plane" within the whole (perceivable); one still can't perceive the whole as the partial. One cannot perceive the whole flat earth; nor the whole heliocentric earth...both tempt one to ignore being the restricted perspective (perceiving within perceivable) for an out of range suggestion by others.
It's irrelevant for the few if the many reason about wanting vs not wanting heliocentric; flat; cube; inner; greater; energetic and so on...only the consent by the choice of the many towards the suggestions by the choice of the few matters for controlling them.
a) because you represent the temporary (living) within the ongoing (dying), hence no stopping for you.
b) if you ignore adapting to perceivable origin (resisting the process of dying while growing life); then you're tempted to consent to the suggestions by those within, hence trying to grow them.
How many years of "we need to stop world hunger" before the many realize that they're starving themselves to death?
c) instead of viewing the many as lacking something suggested; ask yourself if they're willingly ignore everything perceivable? Will implies choice, and your suggesting choice tempts them to consent by choice; hence ignoring to utilize choice in response to perceivable balance.
If others consent to your suggestion of "flat earth"; they shirk response-ability (choice) onto your suggesting choice. At that moment; whatever you suggested becomes irrelevant for their ignorance of perceivable. Furthermore; you are then tempted by the power to wield the suggested, hence being able to define; redefine and contradict it for everyone who consented to you.
a) your growth expands onto others; growing others tempts you to ignore growing yourself. The fruits of your labors tempt you to ignore the needed labor for the wanted fruit.
b) being awaken represents resisting darkness (the sleep of ignorance) which grows enlightenment (comprehension) within perceivable light.
c) suggested MO'TIVE, adjective - "causing motion" tempts one to ignore being moved by the perceivable; hence being RE (response to) MOVED (being moved) aka living within the process of dying.
MOTIVE (causing motion) -ATION (through action) implies one being the reaction enacted upon.
Instead of viewing others as motivation; be aware of them tempting EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] - "any agitation of mind".
Reasoning about suggested implies ignorance of perceivable (the known).
a) suggested INTEND', verb - "set forward in mind" ignores being the resistance (living) within what sets forwards (process of dying). The few suggest progressivism to tempt the many to set their minds forwards towards suggested outcomes, while ignoring that memory represents the ram needed to handle incoming inspiration from perceivable origin.
b) living represents the consequence of the enacting process of dying. The few tempt the many to ignore enacting (perceivable) for suggested consequences of reactions.
Meanwhile; the few utilize implication (if/then) upon perceivable origin; while the many are tempted to reason (want vs not want) about suggested; while applying implication upon it; which tempts them to further propagate suggestions.
a) to know implies to perceive
b) all -isms represent suggestions
c) any suggestion represents the temptation for one to ignore perceivable
d) consenting to anything suggested deceives oneself into ignoring perceivable.
e) DECEPT (misleading) -ATION (through action) implies the reaction (living) being tempted by the enacting (process of dying) to ignore resisting.
f) the few aren't the deceivers; but the suggester of temptations. The only deceiver represents the one consenting to the suggested temptation.
Going from the heliocentric bullshit to proclaiming flat earth from the rooftops doesn't change the dynamic being exploited here, it just keeps the cattle within the pen of reasoning over suggested.
The perceivable doesn't need to be defined (it represents predefined inspiration); the perceiving need to grow their comprehension; while resisting what others are suggesting.
The suggestion "this world is..." tempts one to ignore that it was perceivable before one could make a suggestion about it.