Why do i, the few, explain to the many, that the earth is flat? i cannot seem to stop.
a) because you represent the temporary (living) within the ongoing (dying), hence no stopping for you.
b) if you ignore adapting to perceivable origin (resisting the process of dying while growing life); then you're tempted to consent to the suggestions by those within, hence trying to grow them.
How many years of "we need to stop world hunger" before the many realize that they're starving themselves to death?
c) instead of viewing the many as lacking something suggested; ask yourself if they're willingly ignore everything perceivable? Will implies choice, and your suggesting choice tempts them to consent by choice; hence ignoring to utilize choice in response to perceivable balance.
If others consent to your suggestion of "flat earth"; they shirk response-ability (choice) onto your suggesting choice. At that moment; whatever you suggested becomes irrelevant for their ignorance of perceivable. Furthermore; you are then tempted by the power to wield the suggested, hence being able to define; redefine and contradict it for everyone who consented to you.
its like an inner motivation to awaken the masses, but i suspect, its not for my own good, and perhaps the demise of us all
a) your growth expands onto others; growing others tempts you to ignore growing yourself. The fruits of your labors tempt you to ignore the needed labor for the wanted fruit.
b) being awaken represents resisting darkness (the sleep of ignorance) which grows enlightenment (comprehension) within perceivable light.
c) suggested MO'TIVE, adjective - "causing motion" tempts one to ignore being moved by the perceivable; hence being RE (response to) MOVED (being moved) aka living within the process of dying.
MOTIVE (causing motion) -ATION (through action) implies one being the reaction enacted upon.
Instead of viewing others as motivation; be aware of them tempting EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] - "any agitation of mind".
the reasons for the deception are unknown
Reasoning about suggested implies ignorance of perceivable (the known).
unintended consequences
a) suggested INTEND', verb - "set forward in mind" ignores being the resistance (living) within what sets forwards (process of dying). The few suggest progressivism to tempt the many to set their minds forwards towards suggested outcomes, while ignoring that memory represents the ram needed to handle incoming inspiration from perceivable origin.
b) living represents the consequence of the enacting process of dying. The few tempt the many to ignore enacting (perceivable) for suggested consequences of reactions.
Meanwhile; the few utilize implication (if/then) upon perceivable origin; while the many are tempted to reason (want vs not want) about suggested; while applying implication upon it; which tempts them to further propagate suggestions.
a) when one grows; others are tempted to feel outgrown.
b) perceivable sound exist before suggested words. I comprehend this and try to dismantle everything associated with the suggested word; which while diminishing the potency of ignorance among others; also makes me look "out of the norm". So be it.
Smooth talking ignorance doesn't work; impression (perceivable inspiration) and frequency (repetition of choice) does.
c) notice that agreement vs disagreement about who's suggesting information, ignores that whatever is being suggested was shaped out of perceivable inspiration. Ask him if he can utilize what I wrote instead of judging it or me for it?
One can never run out of perceivable inspiration; but it requires choice of adaptation to utilize it. Consenting to any suggested information tempts one to ignore this. Whatever I write about this world...the world was perceivable before I could write about it, so I can't ever be the source; just an expressing ingredient within.
a) clues imply a RID'DLE, verb - "to separate"; hence those separated (perceiving) within the riddle (perceivable) represent the clues.
b) the few suggest the many to seek solutions to problems; which represents the inversion of being a problem (living) within the solution (process of dying).
c) the process of dying represents ongoing temptation for those living within. Simultaneously, being alive implies being partial within whole; which allows the partial to perceive all the other parts of the whole as moving differences aka perceivable inspiration.
This puts choice at the center of balance aka need (perceivable inspiration) or want (suggested information as temptation).
The clues within the flow of inspiration can be clueless (lack of comprehension); when choosing to ignore the riddle (perceivable) for some spandex wearing faggot pretending to be the Riddler...
you are clearly out of the norm, neit normaal. and its fantastic, its challenging, frustrating at times when i dont get it, but exciting when i do.
When you get...was it me or did you chose to struggle for inspiration within the temptation to ignore? It's always about what one shapes out of it; not how others are suggesting it.
Ask yourself If I could've wrote it in any other way to make you get it sooner; or if "getting it" was your free will of choice?
a) because you represent the temporary (living) within the ongoing (dying), hence no stopping for you.
b) if you ignore adapting to perceivable origin (resisting the process of dying while growing life); then you're tempted to consent to the suggestions by those within, hence trying to grow them.
How many years of "we need to stop world hunger" before the many realize that they're starving themselves to death?
c) instead of viewing the many as lacking something suggested; ask yourself if they're willingly ignore everything perceivable? Will implies choice, and your suggesting choice tempts them to consent by choice; hence ignoring to utilize choice in response to perceivable balance.
If others consent to your suggestion of "flat earth"; they shirk response-ability (choice) onto your suggesting choice. At that moment; whatever you suggested becomes irrelevant for their ignorance of perceivable. Furthermore; you are then tempted by the power to wield the suggested, hence being able to define; redefine and contradict it for everyone who consented to you.
a) your growth expands onto others; growing others tempts you to ignore growing yourself. The fruits of your labors tempt you to ignore the needed labor for the wanted fruit.
b) being awaken represents resisting darkness (the sleep of ignorance) which grows enlightenment (comprehension) within perceivable light.
c) suggested MO'TIVE, adjective - "causing motion" tempts one to ignore being moved by the perceivable; hence being RE (response to) MOVED (being moved) aka living within the process of dying.
MOTIVE (causing motion) -ATION (through action) implies one being the reaction enacted upon.
Instead of viewing others as motivation; be aware of them tempting EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] - "any agitation of mind".
Reasoning about suggested implies ignorance of perceivable (the known).
a) suggested INTEND', verb - "set forward in mind" ignores being the resistance (living) within what sets forwards (process of dying). The few suggest progressivism to tempt the many to set their minds forwards towards suggested outcomes, while ignoring that memory represents the ram needed to handle incoming inspiration from perceivable origin.
b) living represents the consequence of the enacting process of dying. The few tempt the many to ignore enacting (perceivable) for suggested consequences of reactions.
Meanwhile; the few utilize implication (if/then) upon perceivable origin; while the many are tempted to reason (want vs not want) about suggested; while applying implication upon it; which tempts them to further propagate suggestions.
Thanks for the inspiration.
a) when one grows; others are tempted to feel outgrown.
b) perceivable sound exist before suggested words. I comprehend this and try to dismantle everything associated with the suggested word; which while diminishing the potency of ignorance among others; also makes me look "out of the norm". So be it.
Smooth talking ignorance doesn't work; impression (perceivable inspiration) and frequency (repetition of choice) does.
c) notice that agreement vs disagreement about who's suggesting information, ignores that whatever is being suggested was shaped out of perceivable inspiration. Ask him if he can utilize what I wrote instead of judging it or me for it?
One can never run out of perceivable inspiration; but it requires choice of adaptation to utilize it. Consenting to any suggested information tempts one to ignore this. Whatever I write about this world...the world was perceivable before I could write about it, so I can't ever be the source; just an expressing ingredient within.
d) BOT; ROBOT; noun (Latin roboro; robur) - "strength".
a) clues imply a RID'DLE, verb - "to separate"; hence those separated (perceiving) within the riddle (perceivable) represent the clues.
b) the few suggest the many to seek solutions to problems; which represents the inversion of being a problem (living) within the solution (process of dying).
c) the process of dying represents ongoing temptation for those living within. Simultaneously, being alive implies being partial within whole; which allows the partial to perceive all the other parts of the whole as moving differences aka perceivable inspiration.
This puts choice at the center of balance aka need (perceivable inspiration) or want (suggested information as temptation).
The clues within the flow of inspiration can be clueless (lack of comprehension); when choosing to ignore the riddle (perceivable) for some spandex wearing faggot pretending to be the Riddler...
When you get...was it me or did you chose to struggle for inspiration within the temptation to ignore? It's always about what one shapes out of it; not how others are suggesting it.
Ask yourself If I could've wrote it in any other way to make you get it sooner; or if "getting it" was your free will of choice?