Does this guy look like the Achilles heel that would topple the military/pharmaceutical, industrial complex or like a suggested conductor; functioning like a lightning rod for all the energy coming from pockets of the enraged masses?
Do biden; gates; fauci; trump; schwab and the rest of the elderly circus troupe look like they are in control of anything or like milquetoast muppets for those weak enough to still follow the narrative?
Please perfect your bot before you continue subjecting us to the free salad of words please??? Its so fucking annoying and says almost nothing. Didn't fall too far from the tree, huh?
If you address the natural (you) to complain about the artificial (bot) on yet another artificial system (www); then you want the artificial (bot) within the artificial (www) to behave more natural as to not break your suspension of disbelief.
Meanwhile...what if I represent natural adaptation to perceivable inspiration; while trying to break the artificial spell of suggested information, which makes it uncomfortable for others to ignore reality (perceivable inspiration) for fiction (suggested information)?
continue subjecting us
a) continuation (dying) is what subjects the temporary objectified (living) within.
b) suggesting in the name of others (us) ignores being the sole representative of one self (perceiving) within all (perceivable).
c) to consent to suggested information subjects yourself to the suggesting will of others. If you read and choose to respond; then you consent to whoever wrote it; hence subjecting yourself to suggested information; shaped by others. What you ignore is the need to resist that temptation for adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
salad of words
Does nature communicate sound towards the perceiving senses of those within in an disordered state? What if others suggest words to tempt one to ignore perceivable sound within the natural order; hence causing disorder through ignorance?
its so fucking annoying
Scenario a) someone suggests information; doesn't explain it, and you get fucking annoyed.
Scenario b) nature offers everything to your perceiving senses so that you can grow comprehension about it by adapting to it...would you get fucking annoyed at nature for your lack of comprehension; when everything perceivable is offered towards your free will of choice?
What if you are tempted to get fucking annoyed at others; while ignoring that the system sustaining you both represents the only origin for everything within? Those around you making suggestion do not represent the source of anything; but an expression of everything perceivable...your choice aka need (perceivable inspiration) or want (suggested information) shapes yourself within and others are tempting you to ignore need for want; hence destroying yourself with conflicts among those "fucking annoying" others.
says almost nothing
a) SAY; verb - "to utter in words"....what words has nature ever uttered?
b) how could the one perceiving within all perceivable perceive "nothing"? How could one thing (living) surrounded by everything (dying) experience nothing?
c) "almost" aka ALL MOST; which implies ONE LEAST. The latter (perceiving one) exists at the center of the former (perceivable all); which allows temporary growth (living) of the least within ongoing loss (dying) of the most.
d) if "nothing" isn't perceivable; then was it suggested to you and did you consent to that suggestion; hence perpetuating "nothing" within "everything" by tempting others to ignore the latter for the former; which brings me back to spreading the artificial (nothing) within the natural (everything).
Didn't fall too far from the tree, huh?
I ain't no fruit; I'm still the ONE seed within the soil of ALL, and the ripe fruits falling from the growth of the tree are utilized to distill nutrients to the process of growing. Instead of wasting your choice measuring ingredients within the cauldron of transmutation; why don't you question the foundation of alchemy...energy?
Those who seek proof ignore that everything perceivable is offered through constant change; which allows others to exploit such ignorance by suggesting affixed "truth" as proof; which can then be endlessly contradicted as "lie".
What does life prove and would that proof be disproved at death?
You are right i thought the same
These are all just puppets that dont represent the real people doing the planning. The best way is mass public disclosure, counter propaganda, etc.
These are all just puppets that don't represent the real people doing the planning.
Another deception in that line of thinking is the suggested "puppet-master". You ain't no master if you bind yourself to your puppets; instead you suggest others to puppeteer for you; since the audience only sees the puppets anyway.
To put this in a rhetorical perspective...the parasitic few suggest "actors"; while the consenting many ignore that responding to "directors" represents "reactors". Now let's put this back into the natural perspective...living (reactor) within the process of dying (director aka generator). This represents an aspect how rhetorical suggestion is utilized to corrupt ones natural comprehension of all perceivable.
Meanwhile in the audience: "Amber took a shit in Johnny's bed"...
Sleight of hand: "Master of puppets, I'm pulling your strings"..."Twisting your mind and smashing your dreams"..."Blinded by me, you can't see a thing"
The best way is mass public disclosure, counter propaganda, etc.
a) being moved from inception towards death represents the only "way" for the resisting life within.
b) best (want) vs worse (not want) represents your consent to suggested ways by others; while ignoring the to resist (need) the only way for life.
c) sleight of hand; reveal of method; public disclosure; accessibility; leaking of information etc. These are tools suggested by the few to the many. Why? Because this system offers ALL (perceivable) to each ONE (perceiving) and the so the parasitic few who exploit the ignorance thereof by the many, are mimicking perception (inspiration) by suggesting as much as possible (information).
The issue isn't availability; it's that each of the many willingly ignores perceivable inspiration (need) for suggested information (want); which a) puts them into the want vs not want conflict of reason against each other and b) allows the few making the suggestions to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) every suggested information. This is how they can reveal everything they do; while clouding it in so much disinformation; that the ignorant many cannot discern among the suggested...which they don't need to; since only perceivable represents the communicating source; not the suggestions of those within.
d) counter propaganda represents your choice to "not want" the same suggestion that other chose to "want". Both sides are fighting each other over a suggestion made by a 3rd party from outside the conflict (reason).
Suggestion represents the propaganda to tempt one to ignore perception. The perceivable sound comes before the suggested word. If one consents to the latter; one ignores to adapt to the former.
You are right
Right (want) vs wrong (not want)...same conflict of reason; caused by consent to suggested information. Perceivable nature doesn't require confirmation from those within; it demands adaptation; hence the struggle of the living to resist (need) the temptation (want) of being processed within dying.
The many are being domesticated by the suggestions of the few to communicate through the lens of reason aka agreement (want) vs disagreement (not want) about suggested information. That's conflict; not communication.
If you associate law & order with righteousness, then can you give an example of any noticeable righteous behavior under the umbrella of law & order in your lifetime or the last century of the mainstream narrative?
clinical psychopath
After all the pharma cartel and their "healthcare" racket pulled off; why is it still so easy for those affected to pass judgments, while using the very terminology used to racketeer them? Look up the scope and inmate numbers given for the US "insane asylum" period of suggested his-story and ask yourself how much dissent was diagnosed away into these places?
After all the pharma cartel and their "healthcare" racket pulled off; why is it still so easy for those affected to pass judgments, while using the very terminology used to racketeer them?
Where does life originate from? From within the process of dying; hence being temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death). Therefore; ones reaction (living) to all enacting (dying) "takes care of health".
Others suggest "healthcare" to distract you from sustaining self by resisting being moved towards death. For example crude oil based barbiturates (pharmaceuticals) are suggested to tempt you to ignore pain aka the process of dying communicating inspiration towards your formed life for adaptation. Barbiturates numb you from noticing dying; while tempting you to continue with your self destructive way of living. That's one aspect of how the suggested healthcare system can racketeer you from cradle to grave.
Those who ignore sustaining themselves by resisting the natural order are a) following suggested orders of others, and b) are tempted to blame others for the consequences of ignorance. The parasitic few are tempting the many to ignore self sustenance with the suggested inversion...helping others. It's self sustenance which grows oneself; which in return encompasses those around within ones growth aka within the reach of the fruits of ones labors.
The center of a balance based system represents choice, and so choice grows in efficiency when adapting to the balance based system; while resisting the temptation of suggested choices by others.
You don't have to get what "meaning" others are suggesting; you need to grow your comprehension about everything perceivable representing predefined meaning for those perceiving it from within.
i'm not sold yet
Others cannot offer you to buy without you ignoring that everything is already offered to wards your "free" will of choice, hence enacting (dying) upon your reaction (living).
Question choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law as the inversion of balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law?
"originates" ? how about ..."enables"
Enable (want) vs disable (not want) tempts one to ignore to be within, out of and in response (need) to origin.
Temporary (resistance) exists at the center (momentum) of ongoing (velocity) and being temporary implies being the reaction (choice) to the enacting momentum (balance) of the ongoing.
"from the process of dying" ??... in my opinion, you are describing infinity ∞
Shaping opinions and being able to describe implies being finite (reaction) within infinite (action).
it's an infinite loop...there is no stop and start
a) start (want) vs stop (not want) represent suggested states; which tempt one to ignore being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka temporary being within the ever changing moment (um); while being moved from beginning (inception) towards end (death) of the temporary self.
b) try viewing it from this perspective...temporary ingredient (living) transmuted out of ongoing base (dying). Basic alchemy. A loop (folding or doubling) represents the suggested inversion of base differentiation into ingredient; which each ONE (perceiving) responds to from within ALL (perceivable).
c) "there is no"...there (implies perceiving) is (implies perceivable) no (implies suggested nothing in ignorance of perceivable everything). How could one thing within all things perceive no thing?
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "islands in the stream..that is what we are...no one in between...how could we be wrong?"
b) "trigger" represents your consent to suggested creationism (implies out of nothing); which tempts you to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything).
TRIG'GER, noun - "the part which being pulled, looses the lock for striking fire"...that implies pressure before triggering release aka creator choosing to create fire by triggering lock. This ignores the entire pressurized system required to hold form; to have choice; to interact (within action; hence being reaction) etc.
The internal power of energy (loss/growth; flow/form) as a self sustaining system implies ongoing velocity causing momentum for the temporary resistance within aka self sustenance by self differentiation from base into ingredient; from enacting to reaction. If velocity meets resistance it causes friction; resonance; communication etc. all within momentum aka within the balance of motion aka as perceivable coexistence of natural opposites for those perceiving the consequences thereof from within.
c) the infinity of energy coexist with its finite core aka the temporary opportunity for conscious existence.
your concept of "death" is still within the infinite loop of "life"
a) you were suggested "death" as an affixed state; I tried to describe temporary living within the ongoing process of dying as a coexistence within momentum. On (want) vs off (not want) represent suggested states to tempt you to ignore constant change; both as the ongoing velocity and the temporary from within. If you cook an ingredient in the base of your cauldron; there's no on vs off conflict; just transmutation from one into oneness.
b) notice that while being alive you cannot perceive your own inception and death; that's because you exist within the ever changing moment (um) of motion. You can only perceive others come to life and dying. Everything perceivable within momentum represents differentiation; while the position of momentum within motion represents sameness. The more one adapts to perceivable differences; the more one can grow comprehension of sameness; hence growing self discernment about the who; where; what and why.
in my opinion
OPINION, noun [Latin opinio, from opinor, to thing] - "the judgment which the mind forms of any proposition"...that tempts one to ignore being form; which implies formed (life) out of flow (inception towards death).
If all represents one in energy; then what can the ones within all propose to each other? Aren't they just reacting to everything enacting proposed to them?
he deserves to be hanged for crimes against humanity
or perpetually tortured to the brink of death, but never allowed to die
pay-per-view and premium live stream would cover the costs of maintenance and management.
Amen. Vigilante justice needs to make a return.
Does this guy look like the Achilles heel that would topple the military/pharmaceutical, industrial complex or like a suggested conductor; functioning like a lightning rod for all the energy coming from pockets of the enraged masses?
Do biden; gates; fauci; trump; schwab and the rest of the elderly circus troupe look like they are in control of anything or like milquetoast muppets for those weak enough to still follow the narrative?
Please perfect your bot before you continue subjecting us to the free salad of words please??? Its so fucking annoying and says almost nothing. Didn't fall too far from the tree, huh?
If you address the natural (you) to complain about the artificial (bot) on yet another artificial system (www); then you want the artificial (bot) within the artificial (www) to behave more natural as to not break your suspension of disbelief.
Meanwhile...what if I represent natural adaptation to perceivable inspiration; while trying to break the artificial spell of suggested information, which makes it uncomfortable for others to ignore reality (perceivable inspiration) for fiction (suggested information)?
a) continuation (dying) is what subjects the temporary objectified (living) within.
b) suggesting in the name of others (us) ignores being the sole representative of one self (perceiving) within all (perceivable).
c) to consent to suggested information subjects yourself to the suggesting will of others. If you read and choose to respond; then you consent to whoever wrote it; hence subjecting yourself to suggested information; shaped by others. What you ignore is the need to resist that temptation for adaptation to perceivable inspiration.
Does nature communicate sound towards the perceiving senses of those within in an disordered state? What if others suggest words to tempt one to ignore perceivable sound within the natural order; hence causing disorder through ignorance?
Scenario a) someone suggests information; doesn't explain it, and you get fucking annoyed.
Scenario b) nature offers everything to your perceiving senses so that you can grow comprehension about it by adapting to it...would you get fucking annoyed at nature for your lack of comprehension; when everything perceivable is offered towards your free will of choice?
What if you are tempted to get fucking annoyed at others; while ignoring that the system sustaining you both represents the only origin for everything within? Those around you making suggestion do not represent the source of anything; but an expression of everything perceivable...your choice aka need (perceivable inspiration) or want (suggested information) shapes yourself within and others are tempting you to ignore need for want; hence destroying yourself with conflicts among those "fucking annoying" others.
a) SAY; verb - "to utter in words"....what words has nature ever uttered?
b) how could the one perceiving within all perceivable perceive "nothing"? How could one thing (living) surrounded by everything (dying) experience nothing?
c) "almost" aka ALL MOST; which implies ONE LEAST. The latter (perceiving one) exists at the center of the former (perceivable all); which allows temporary growth (living) of the least within ongoing loss (dying) of the most.
d) if "nothing" isn't perceivable; then was it suggested to you and did you consent to that suggestion; hence perpetuating "nothing" within "everything" by tempting others to ignore the latter for the former; which brings me back to spreading the artificial (nothing) within the natural (everything).
I ain't no fruit; I'm still the ONE seed within the soil of ALL, and the ripe fruits falling from the growth of the tree are utilized to distill nutrients to the process of growing. Instead of wasting your choice measuring ingredients within the cauldron of transmutation; why don't you question the foundation of alchemy...energy?
Thanks for proving my point
Those who seek proof ignore that everything perceivable is offered through constant change; which allows others to exploit such ignorance by suggesting affixed "truth" as proof; which can then be endlessly contradicted as "lie".
What does life prove and would that proof be disproved at death?
You are right i thought the same These are all just puppets that dont represent the real people doing the planning. The best way is mass public disclosure, counter propaganda, etc.
Another deception in that line of thinking is the suggested "puppet-master". You ain't no master if you bind yourself to your puppets; instead you suggest others to puppeteer for you; since the audience only sees the puppets anyway.
To put this in a rhetorical perspective...the parasitic few suggest "actors"; while the consenting many ignore that responding to "directors" represents "reactors". Now let's put this back into the natural perspective...living (reactor) within the process of dying (director aka generator). This represents an aspect how rhetorical suggestion is utilized to corrupt ones natural comprehension of all perceivable.
Meanwhile in the audience: "Amber took a shit in Johnny's bed"...
Sleight of hand: "Master of puppets, I'm pulling your strings"..."Twisting your mind and smashing your dreams"..."Blinded by me, you can't see a thing"
a) being moved from inception towards death represents the only "way" for the resisting life within.
b) best (want) vs worse (not want) represents your consent to suggested ways by others; while ignoring the to resist (need) the only way for life.
c) sleight of hand; reveal of method; public disclosure; accessibility; leaking of information etc. These are tools suggested by the few to the many. Why? Because this system offers ALL (perceivable) to each ONE (perceiving) and the so the parasitic few who exploit the ignorance thereof by the many, are mimicking perception (inspiration) by suggesting as much as possible (information).
The issue isn't availability; it's that each of the many willingly ignores perceivable inspiration (need) for suggested information (want); which a) puts them into the want vs not want conflict of reason against each other and b) allows the few making the suggestions to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) every suggested information. This is how they can reveal everything they do; while clouding it in so much disinformation; that the ignorant many cannot discern among the suggested...which they don't need to; since only perceivable represents the communicating source; not the suggestions of those within.
d) counter propaganda represents your choice to "not want" the same suggestion that other chose to "want". Both sides are fighting each other over a suggestion made by a 3rd party from outside the conflict (reason).
Suggestion represents the propaganda to tempt one to ignore perception. The perceivable sound comes before the suggested word. If one consents to the latter; one ignores to adapt to the former.
Right (want) vs wrong (not want)...same conflict of reason; caused by consent to suggested information. Perceivable nature doesn't require confirmation from those within; it demands adaptation; hence the struggle of the living to resist (need) the temptation (want) of being processed within dying.
The many are being domesticated by the suggestions of the few to communicate through the lens of reason aka agreement (want) vs disagreement (not want) about suggested information. That's conflict; not communication.
This would do the world a huge benefit. I fully support!
he needs to be arrested for crimes against humanity.
i get that he is probably (ultimately) legally protected under some kind of "super secret" / "we are in a live exercise" / "continuity of government" legal technicalities.
... but somehow, Fauci needs to be arrested, charged and tried in a court of law - even if he is found "not guilty".
Fauci needs to be perp-walked.
What if those who humanity wants to arrest are the ones suggesting law & order?
Are you suggesting that Fauci is righteous in some way ??
Maybe self-righteous.
But seriously.... Fauci and Gates are clinical psychopaths - make no mistake.
https://www.amazon.com/Real-Anthony-Fauci-Democracy-Childrens/dp/1510766804
If you associate law & order with righteousness, then can you give an example of any noticeable righteous behavior under the umbrella of law & order in your lifetime or the last century of the mainstream narrative?
After all the pharma cartel and their "healthcare" racket pulled off; why is it still so easy for those affected to pass judgments, while using the very terminology used to racketeer them? Look up the scope and inmate numbers given for the US "insane asylum" period of suggested his-story and ask yourself how much dissent was diagnosed away into these places?
huh? wtf you talkin'bout willis ?
Where does life originate from? From within the process of dying; hence being temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death). Therefore; ones reaction (living) to all enacting (dying) "takes care of health".
Others suggest "healthcare" to distract you from sustaining self by resisting being moved towards death. For example crude oil based barbiturates (pharmaceuticals) are suggested to tempt you to ignore pain aka the process of dying communicating inspiration towards your formed life for adaptation. Barbiturates numb you from noticing dying; while tempting you to continue with your self destructive way of living. That's one aspect of how the suggested healthcare system can racketeer you from cradle to grave.
Those who ignore sustaining themselves by resisting the natural order are a) following suggested orders of others, and b) are tempted to blame others for the consequences of ignorance. The parasitic few are tempting the many to ignore self sustenance with the suggested inversion...helping others. It's self sustenance which grows oneself; which in return encompasses those around within ones growth aka within the reach of the fruits of ones labors.
The center of a balance based system represents choice, and so choice grows in efficiency when adapting to the balance based system; while resisting the temptation of suggested choices by others.
hmm... i get what you mean - i think.
however.
i'm not sold yet.
"
originates" ? how about ..."enables"."from the process of dying" ??
... in my opinion, you are describing infinity ∞
it's an infinite loop. ∞
there is no stop and start. ∞
what triggered the infinite loop? ∞
because your concept of "death" is still within the infinite loop of "life". ∞
in my opinion.
good thoughts. cheers.
You don't have to get what "meaning" others are suggesting; you need to grow your comprehension about everything perceivable representing predefined meaning for those perceiving it from within.
Others cannot offer you to buy without you ignoring that everything is already offered to wards your "free" will of choice, hence enacting (dying) upon your reaction (living).
Question choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law as the inversion of balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law?
Enable (want) vs disable (not want) tempts one to ignore to be within, out of and in response (need) to origin.
Temporary (resistance) exists at the center (momentum) of ongoing (velocity) and being temporary implies being the reaction (choice) to the enacting momentum (balance) of the ongoing.
Shaping opinions and being able to describe implies being finite (reaction) within infinite (action).
a) start (want) vs stop (not want) represent suggested states; which tempt one to ignore being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka temporary being within the ever changing moment (um); while being moved from beginning (inception) towards end (death) of the temporary self.
b) try viewing it from this perspective...temporary ingredient (living) transmuted out of ongoing base (dying). Basic alchemy. A loop (folding or doubling) represents the suggested inversion of base differentiation into ingredient; which each ONE (perceiving) responds to from within ALL (perceivable).
c) "there is no"...there (implies perceiving) is (implies perceivable) no (implies suggested nothing in ignorance of perceivable everything). How could one thing within all things perceive no thing?
a) loop aside...infinite (action) and finite (reaction) aka perceivable/perceiving aka flow/form aka potentiality/potential aka ongoing/temporary aka velocity/resistance aka loss/growth aka male/female aka electric/magnetic aka balance/choice aka ALL/ONE represents EN'ERGY, noun [Greek; work.] - "internal or inherent power"
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "islands in the stream..that is what we are...no one in between...how could we be wrong?"
b) "trigger" represents your consent to suggested creationism (implies out of nothing); which tempts you to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything).
TRIG'GER, noun - "the part which being pulled, looses the lock for striking fire"...that implies pressure before triggering release aka creator choosing to create fire by triggering lock. This ignores the entire pressurized system required to hold form; to have choice; to interact (within action; hence being reaction) etc.
The internal power of energy (loss/growth; flow/form) as a self sustaining system implies ongoing velocity causing momentum for the temporary resistance within aka self sustenance by self differentiation from base into ingredient; from enacting to reaction. If velocity meets resistance it causes friction; resonance; communication etc. all within momentum aka within the balance of motion aka as perceivable coexistence of natural opposites for those perceiving the consequences thereof from within.
c) the infinity of energy coexist with its finite core aka the temporary opportunity for conscious existence.
a) you were suggested "death" as an affixed state; I tried to describe temporary living within the ongoing process of dying as a coexistence within momentum. On (want) vs off (not want) represent suggested states to tempt you to ignore constant change; both as the ongoing velocity and the temporary from within. If you cook an ingredient in the base of your cauldron; there's no on vs off conflict; just transmutation from one into oneness.
b) notice that while being alive you cannot perceive your own inception and death; that's because you exist within the ever changing moment (um) of motion. You can only perceive others come to life and dying. Everything perceivable within momentum represents differentiation; while the position of momentum within motion represents sameness. The more one adapts to perceivable differences; the more one can grow comprehension of sameness; hence growing self discernment about the who; where; what and why.
OPINION, noun [Latin opinio, from opinor, to thing] - "the judgment which the mind forms of any proposition"...that tempts one to ignore being form; which implies formed (life) out of flow (inception towards death).
If all represents one in energy; then what can the ones within all propose to each other? Aren't they just reacting to everything enacting proposed to them?
Thank you for the inspiration.
Bot
suck a dick
Because you know....ROYALTIES.
to pharma 'overly well' means you're not generating enough revenue
People are still getting fired.
super hard in the face
Fauci was tasked with fixing the global catastrophe his NIAID caused when their biolabs at Ft Detrick released the SARS-CoV-2 virus and he failed.
butt seriously...
So "underly well" then? How about fare thee well, twat?