You are right i thought the same
These are all just puppets that dont represent the real people doing the planning. The best way is mass public disclosure, counter propaganda, etc.
These are all just puppets that don't represent the real people doing the planning.
Another deception in that line of thinking is the suggested "puppet-master". You ain't no master if you bind yourself to your puppets; instead you suggest others to puppeteer for you; since the audience only sees the puppets anyway.
To put this in a rhetorical perspective...the parasitic few suggest "actors"; while the consenting many ignore that responding to "directors" represents "reactors". Now let's put this back into the natural perspective...living (reactor) within the process of dying (director aka generator). This represents an aspect how rhetorical suggestion is utilized to corrupt ones natural comprehension of all perceivable.
Meanwhile in the audience: "Amber took a shit in Johnny's bed"...
Sleight of hand: "Master of puppets, I'm pulling your strings"..."Twisting your mind and smashing your dreams"..."Blinded by me, you can't see a thing"
The best way is mass public disclosure, counter propaganda, etc.
a) being moved from inception towards death represents the only "way" for the resisting life within.
b) best (want) vs worse (not want) represents your consent to suggested ways by others; while ignoring the to resist (need) the only way for life.
c) sleight of hand; reveal of method; public disclosure; accessibility; leaking of information etc. These are tools suggested by the few to the many. Why? Because this system offers ALL (perceivable) to each ONE (perceiving) and the so the parasitic few who exploit the ignorance thereof by the many, are mimicking perception (inspiration) by suggesting as much as possible (information).
The issue isn't availability; it's that each of the many willingly ignores perceivable inspiration (need) for suggested information (want); which a) puts them into the want vs not want conflict of reason against each other and b) allows the few making the suggestions to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) every suggested information. This is how they can reveal everything they do; while clouding it in so much disinformation; that the ignorant many cannot discern among the suggested...which they don't need to; since only perceivable represents the communicating source; not the suggestions of those within.
d) counter propaganda represents your choice to "not want" the same suggestion that other chose to "want". Both sides are fighting each other over a suggestion made by a 3rd party from outside the conflict (reason).
Suggestion represents the propaganda to tempt one to ignore perception. The perceivable sound comes before the suggested word. If one consents to the latter; one ignores to adapt to the former.
You are right
Right (want) vs wrong (not want)...same conflict of reason; caused by consent to suggested information. Perceivable nature doesn't require confirmation from those within; it demands adaptation; hence the struggle of the living to resist (need) the temptation (want) of being processed within dying.
The many are being domesticated by the suggestions of the few to communicate through the lens of reason aka agreement (want) vs disagreement (not want) about suggested information. That's conflict; not communication.
You are right i thought the same These are all just puppets that dont represent the real people doing the planning. The best way is mass public disclosure, counter propaganda, etc.
Another deception in that line of thinking is the suggested "puppet-master". You ain't no master if you bind yourself to your puppets; instead you suggest others to puppeteer for you; since the audience only sees the puppets anyway.
To put this in a rhetorical perspective...the parasitic few suggest "actors"; while the consenting many ignore that responding to "directors" represents "reactors". Now let's put this back into the natural perspective...living (reactor) within the process of dying (director aka generator). This represents an aspect how rhetorical suggestion is utilized to corrupt ones natural comprehension of all perceivable.
Meanwhile in the audience: "Amber took a shit in Johnny's bed"...
Sleight of hand: "Master of puppets, I'm pulling your strings"..."Twisting your mind and smashing your dreams"..."Blinded by me, you can't see a thing"
a) being moved from inception towards death represents the only "way" for the resisting life within.
b) best (want) vs worse (not want) represents your consent to suggested ways by others; while ignoring the to resist (need) the only way for life.
c) sleight of hand; reveal of method; public disclosure; accessibility; leaking of information etc. These are tools suggested by the few to the many. Why? Because this system offers ALL (perceivable) to each ONE (perceiving) and the so the parasitic few who exploit the ignorance thereof by the many, are mimicking perception (inspiration) by suggesting as much as possible (information).
The issue isn't availability; it's that each of the many willingly ignores perceivable inspiration (need) for suggested information (want); which a) puts them into the want vs not want conflict of reason against each other and b) allows the few making the suggestions to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) every suggested information. This is how they can reveal everything they do; while clouding it in so much disinformation; that the ignorant many cannot discern among the suggested...which they don't need to; since only perceivable represents the communicating source; not the suggestions of those within.
d) counter propaganda represents your choice to "not want" the same suggestion that other chose to "want". Both sides are fighting each other over a suggestion made by a 3rd party from outside the conflict (reason).
Suggestion represents the propaganda to tempt one to ignore perception. The perceivable sound comes before the suggested word. If one consents to the latter; one ignores to adapt to the former.
Right (want) vs wrong (not want)...same conflict of reason; caused by consent to suggested information. Perceivable nature doesn't require confirmation from those within; it demands adaptation; hence the struggle of the living to resist (need) the temptation (want) of being processed within dying.
The many are being domesticated by the suggestions of the few to communicate through the lens of reason aka agreement (want) vs disagreement (not want) about suggested information. That's conflict; not communication.