After all the pharma cartel and their "healthcare" racket pulled off; why is it still so easy for those affected to pass judgments, while using the very terminology used to racketeer them?
Where does life originate from? From within the process of dying; hence being temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death). Therefore; ones reaction (living) to all enacting (dying) "takes care of health".
Others suggest "healthcare" to distract you from sustaining self by resisting being moved towards death. For example crude oil based barbiturates (pharmaceuticals) are suggested to tempt you to ignore pain aka the process of dying communicating inspiration towards your formed life for adaptation. Barbiturates numb you from noticing dying; while tempting you to continue with your self destructive way of living. That's one aspect of how the suggested healthcare system can racketeer you from cradle to grave.
Those who ignore sustaining themselves by resisting the natural order are a) following suggested orders of others, and b) are tempted to blame others for the consequences of ignorance. The parasitic few are tempting the many to ignore self sustenance with the suggested inversion...helping others. It's self sustenance which grows oneself; which in return encompasses those around within ones growth aka within the reach of the fruits of ones labors.
The center of a balance based system represents choice, and so choice grows in efficiency when adapting to the balance based system; while resisting the temptation of suggested choices by others.
You don't have to get what "meaning" others are suggesting; you need to grow your comprehension about everything perceivable representing predefined meaning for those perceiving it from within.
i'm not sold yet
Others cannot offer you to buy without you ignoring that everything is already offered to wards your "free" will of choice, hence enacting (dying) upon your reaction (living).
Question choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law as the inversion of balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law?
"originates" ? how about ..."enables"
Enable (want) vs disable (not want) tempts one to ignore to be within, out of and in response (need) to origin.
Temporary (resistance) exists at the center (momentum) of ongoing (velocity) and being temporary implies being the reaction (choice) to the enacting momentum (balance) of the ongoing.
"from the process of dying" ??... in my opinion, you are describing infinity ∞
Shaping opinions and being able to describe implies being finite (reaction) within infinite (action).
it's an infinite loop...there is no stop and start
a) start (want) vs stop (not want) represent suggested states; which tempt one to ignore being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka temporary being within the ever changing moment (um); while being moved from beginning (inception) towards end (death) of the temporary self.
b) try viewing it from this perspective...temporary ingredient (living) transmuted out of ongoing base (dying). Basic alchemy. A loop (folding or doubling) represents the suggested inversion of base differentiation into ingredient; which each ONE (perceiving) responds to from within ALL (perceivable).
c) "there is no"...there (implies perceiving) is (implies perceivable) no (implies suggested nothing in ignorance of perceivable everything). How could one thing within all things perceive no thing?
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "islands in the stream..that is what we are...no one in between...how could we be wrong?"
b) "trigger" represents your consent to suggested creationism (implies out of nothing); which tempts you to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything).
TRIG'GER, noun - "the part which being pulled, looses the lock for striking fire"...that implies pressure before triggering release aka creator choosing to create fire by triggering lock. This ignores the entire pressurized system required to hold form; to have choice; to interact (within action; hence being reaction) etc.
The internal power of energy (loss/growth; flow/form) as a self sustaining system implies ongoing velocity causing momentum for the temporary resistance within aka self sustenance by self differentiation from base into ingredient; from enacting to reaction. If velocity meets resistance it causes friction; resonance; communication etc. all within momentum aka within the balance of motion aka as perceivable coexistence of natural opposites for those perceiving the consequences thereof from within.
c) the infinity of energy coexist with its finite core aka the temporary opportunity for conscious existence.
your concept of "death" is still within the infinite loop of "life"
a) you were suggested "death" as an affixed state; I tried to describe temporary living within the ongoing process of dying as a coexistence within momentum. On (want) vs off (not want) represent suggested states to tempt you to ignore constant change; both as the ongoing velocity and the temporary from within. If you cook an ingredient in the base of your cauldron; there's no on vs off conflict; just transmutation from one into oneness.
b) notice that while being alive you cannot perceive your own inception and death; that's because you exist within the ever changing moment (um) of motion. You can only perceive others come to life and dying. Everything perceivable within momentum represents differentiation; while the position of momentum within motion represents sameness. The more one adapts to perceivable differences; the more one can grow comprehension of sameness; hence growing self discernment about the who; where; what and why.
in my opinion
OPINION, noun [Latin opinio, from opinor, to thing] - "the judgment which the mind forms of any proposition"...that tempts one to ignore being form; which implies formed (life) out of flow (inception towards death).
If all represents one in energy; then what can the ones within all propose to each other? Aren't they just reacting to everything enacting proposed to them?
huh? wtf you talkin'bout willis ?
Where does life originate from? From within the process of dying; hence being temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death). Therefore; ones reaction (living) to all enacting (dying) "takes care of health".
Others suggest "healthcare" to distract you from sustaining self by resisting being moved towards death. For example crude oil based barbiturates (pharmaceuticals) are suggested to tempt you to ignore pain aka the process of dying communicating inspiration towards your formed life for adaptation. Barbiturates numb you from noticing dying; while tempting you to continue with your self destructive way of living. That's one aspect of how the suggested healthcare system can racketeer you from cradle to grave.
Those who ignore sustaining themselves by resisting the natural order are a) following suggested orders of others, and b) are tempted to blame others for the consequences of ignorance. The parasitic few are tempting the many to ignore self sustenance with the suggested inversion...helping others. It's self sustenance which grows oneself; which in return encompasses those around within ones growth aka within the reach of the fruits of ones labors.
The center of a balance based system represents choice, and so choice grows in efficiency when adapting to the balance based system; while resisting the temptation of suggested choices by others.
hmm... i get what you mean - i think.
however.
i'm not sold yet.
"
originates" ? how about ..."enables"."from the process of dying" ??
... in my opinion, you are describing infinity ∞
it's an infinite loop. ∞
there is no stop and start. ∞
what triggered the infinite loop? ∞
because your concept of "death" is still within the infinite loop of "life". ∞
in my opinion.
good thoughts. cheers.
You don't have to get what "meaning" others are suggesting; you need to grow your comprehension about everything perceivable representing predefined meaning for those perceiving it from within.
Others cannot offer you to buy without you ignoring that everything is already offered to wards your "free" will of choice, hence enacting (dying) upon your reaction (living).
Question choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law as the inversion of balance (perceivable) to choice (perceiving) natural law?
Enable (want) vs disable (not want) tempts one to ignore to be within, out of and in response (need) to origin.
Temporary (resistance) exists at the center (momentum) of ongoing (velocity) and being temporary implies being the reaction (choice) to the enacting momentum (balance) of the ongoing.
Shaping opinions and being able to describe implies being finite (reaction) within infinite (action).
a) start (want) vs stop (not want) represent suggested states; which tempt one to ignore being form (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka temporary being within the ever changing moment (um); while being moved from beginning (inception) towards end (death) of the temporary self.
b) try viewing it from this perspective...temporary ingredient (living) transmuted out of ongoing base (dying). Basic alchemy. A loop (folding or doubling) represents the suggested inversion of base differentiation into ingredient; which each ONE (perceiving) responds to from within ALL (perceivable).
c) "there is no"...there (implies perceiving) is (implies perceivable) no (implies suggested nothing in ignorance of perceivable everything). How could one thing within all things perceive no thing?
a) loop aside...infinite (action) and finite (reaction) aka perceivable/perceiving aka flow/form aka potentiality/potential aka ongoing/temporary aka velocity/resistance aka loss/growth aka male/female aka electric/magnetic aka balance/choice aka ALL/ONE represents EN'ERGY, noun [Greek; work.] - "internal or inherent power"
Sleight of hand: "all for one and one for all" or "there can be only one" or "islands in the stream..that is what we are...no one in between...how could we be wrong?"
b) "trigger" represents your consent to suggested creationism (implies out of nothing); which tempts you to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of everything).
TRIG'GER, noun - "the part which being pulled, looses the lock for striking fire"...that implies pressure before triggering release aka creator choosing to create fire by triggering lock. This ignores the entire pressurized system required to hold form; to have choice; to interact (within action; hence being reaction) etc.
The internal power of energy (loss/growth; flow/form) as a self sustaining system implies ongoing velocity causing momentum for the temporary resistance within aka self sustenance by self differentiation from base into ingredient; from enacting to reaction. If velocity meets resistance it causes friction; resonance; communication etc. all within momentum aka within the balance of motion aka as perceivable coexistence of natural opposites for those perceiving the consequences thereof from within.
c) the infinity of energy coexist with its finite core aka the temporary opportunity for conscious existence.
a) you were suggested "death" as an affixed state; I tried to describe temporary living within the ongoing process of dying as a coexistence within momentum. On (want) vs off (not want) represent suggested states to tempt you to ignore constant change; both as the ongoing velocity and the temporary from within. If you cook an ingredient in the base of your cauldron; there's no on vs off conflict; just transmutation from one into oneness.
b) notice that while being alive you cannot perceive your own inception and death; that's because you exist within the ever changing moment (um) of motion. You can only perceive others come to life and dying. Everything perceivable within momentum represents differentiation; while the position of momentum within motion represents sameness. The more one adapts to perceivable differences; the more one can grow comprehension of sameness; hence growing self discernment about the who; where; what and why.
OPINION, noun [Latin opinio, from opinor, to thing] - "the judgment which the mind forms of any proposition"...that tempts one to ignore being form; which implies formed (life) out of flow (inception towards death).
If all represents one in energy; then what can the ones within all propose to each other? Aren't they just reacting to everything enacting proposed to them?
Thank you for the inspiration.
lol ok... good for you... because the rest of your statement is just nonsense to me.
yes i can - speak for yourself.
peace out
Bot
suck a dick