Trump was never supposed to win in 2016. The pushed him on the rubes in the GOP with a shit ton of free media in 2016 because they were sure he was unelectable. Ted Cruz was rightfully pissed. It was to crown a glorious Hillary win, she having stolen a rigged nomination from Sanders.
They believed their own polls, and didn't ramp up the cheating machine. They stopped in the middle of the night in 2016 looking for votes, but there were no boxes of pre-made mail in ballots to run through the scanners.
The establishment is made up of different teams, some of them created to be controlled opposition. Different players on different teams are caught up in the game. The establishment lost any control it had when players on fake teams took their roles and teams seriously. Trump is part of one establishment, and a rebel to other parts. The fedsurrection was orchestrated, not by Trump, though.
And what if Trump led a 100-man march with the intent to justify DC shifting into high alert so that when a real revolutionary force arrives, they've already got the defensive manpower earmarked.
Similar to the gun lobby torturing mentally unstable boys to cause shootings with the intent to justify Police shifting to Red Flags, so that when a real revolutionary force arrives, they've already got the weapons confiscated.
Trump's life in politics was birthed with Obama, remember the birth certificate thing? He's a democrat plant, sandwiched between the P and VP of the administration that anointed him. The lady doth protest too much.
The only people saying he's not Establishment are known liars who painstakingly destroyed their own credibility before making the accusation.
You've hit on the primary shill detection mechanism, which applies to this subject and many others.
You see proponents of both narratives everywhere, but you never see proponents of one of the narratives using it to argue against proponents of the other. This tells us that both are false narratives, and their proponents are shills. Oh, or dumbasses that bought into one or the other shill narrative.
If the shills start arguing with each other to simulate an organic discourse, cognitive warfare costs would skyrocket, and they won't be able to keep their own narratives straight. They will never bother. Plus, they know the rest of us would have too much fun watching.
Trump was never supposed to win in 2016. The pushed him on the rubes in the GOP with a shit ton of free media in 2016 because they were sure he was unelectable. Ted Cruz was rightfully pissed. It was to crown a glorious Hillary win, she having stolen a rigged nomination from Sanders.
They believed their own polls, and didn't ramp up the cheating machine. They stopped in the middle of the night in 2016 looking for votes, but there were no boxes of pre-made mail in ballots to run through the scanners.
They got leverage on trump towards the end.
Whatever blackmail they had wasn’t enough to completely control his presidency.
Who hasn't searched for horse porn? Stand amongst you!
The establishment is made up of different teams, some of them created to be controlled opposition. Different players on different teams are caught up in the game. The establishment lost any control it had when players on fake teams took their roles and teams seriously. Trump is part of one establishment, and a rebel to other parts. The fedsurrection was orchestrated, not by Trump, though.
And what if Trump led a 100-man march with the intent to justify DC shifting into high alert so that when a real revolutionary force arrives, they've already got the defensive manpower earmarked.
Similar to the gun lobby torturing mentally unstable boys to cause shootings with the intent to justify Police shifting to Red Flags, so that when a real revolutionary force arrives, they've already got the weapons confiscated.
Trump's life in politics was birthed with Obama, remember the birth certificate thing? He's a democrat plant, sandwiched between the P and VP of the administration that anointed him. The lady doth protest too much.
The only people saying he's not Establishment are known liars who painstakingly destroyed their own credibility before making the accusation.
You've hit on the primary shill detection mechanism, which applies to this subject and many others.
You see proponents of both narratives everywhere, but you never see proponents of one of the narratives using it to argue against proponents of the other. This tells us that both are false narratives, and their proponents are shills. Oh, or dumbasses that bought into one or the other shill narrative.
If the shills start arguing with each other to simulate an organic discourse, cognitive warfare costs would skyrocket, and they won't be able to keep their own narratives straight. They will never bother. Plus, they know the rest of us would have too much fun watching.