Oliver Stone ponders about a nuclear false flag in Ukraine
(de.catbox.moe)
Comments (24)
sorted by:
"Neoconservative anarchists" lol. Other than this absurd statement, I agree with most of this.
There is nothing absurd about calling them what they are. They have no respect for a rules based world order except when they can bend the rules in their favor.
daily reminder trump put neocons in his cabinet
I have come to despise daily reminders.
they're for your own good sorry
low yield it won't be low yield when they do it, it will be high yield enough to trigger warnings all over the northern hemisphere to blame the covid cancers on
Source:
https://www.facebook.com/TheOliverStone/posts/549497186533668
How many atomic bombs has Russia or The USSR detonated on foreign soil?
Japan isn't the only country to have a USA nuke go off in it's borders. England and France have also detonated atomic bombs on foreign soil.
nukes are fake and gay, japan was a firebombing
https://files.catbox.moe/u3xhd1.pdf
If nukes are fake, the soviets would have known they didnt need a nuclear bunker complex deep below Azovstal to protect its 40,000 steel workers from a nuclear strike. So why did they build one? In addition to that fact, the earthquake caused by the ammonium nutrate explosion at Beruit last year caused a magnitude 3 earthquake. The explosion of that amount of ammonium nitrate is known to be equal to 1 thousand tons of TNT (1kt).
So when nuclear tests cause magnitude 6 earthquakes we know those explosions were 1000 times more powerful than the ammonium nitrate at Beruit so they had to be in the megaton range.
because the elites have infinite money and rape kids down there. The reason they told you they built it is not the real reason they built it.
Thats cool ive never felt a nuke explosion just like I've never seen the earth curvature.
Just like you've never seen kids being raped in the nuclear bunker complex deep below Azovstal.
I agree with Stone's thesis, but would speculate on a different implementation. The key phrase is "no matter how preposterous". That is, we are far beyond any examination of evidence by the target audience. Emotion created by narrative is the sole measure.
The military situation is hopeless, on which I need not elaborate, and far past the time when a "Hail Mary" false flag would be enough to turn the tide. That should should not be interpreted as evidence that they won't, but rather that they can't. I think "They" have no access to a tactical nuke and delivery platform.
But they don't need to go to all that trouble, do they? I would place my money on a scenario like this: a fairly large conventional explosive placed well-within Ukrainian-controlled territory (Lviv?) in a gathering place of foreign mercenaries, near hospital facilities and a civilian concentration if possible. Malcolm Nance can then describe to us all the excruciating symptoms of radiation poisoning he's suffering.
Or they'll just distract everyone with say, overturning Roe V. Wade..
In fairness, Roe has killed more innocent life than all the bombs ever detonated on Earth, combined.
Yeah and perhaps even more plausible atm is biological. Plays into the lockdown strategy and we know there's plenty of biolabs over there so plausible vector and blame infrastructure. They just voted to give authorization for use of force if chemical, biological, or nuclear occurs.
anti jewish?
sounds good
(*man/color/*berg/field/feld/bell/smith/miller/cohen/stone) every 'kin time!
No, Oliver Stone fell out with Putin after the 2016 election because he believe(s/d) in the Russiagate hoax. He made a really good documentary about Putin but at the part where the 2016 election took place he starts treating Putin with fury and accusations