If you think a straight man can be coerced or convinced to like other men, it's because you're secretly super duper gay. It's that simple.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
I was teaching a class at my local homeschool group. I was going over nutrition and health. Several kids said they don’t like vegetables. Me being an adult and knowing deep down they would like vegetables if they only tried it, I pressed the issue. I would say things like, “do you like pizza?” And the whole class responded with, “YES!” “Do you like potato chips?” “YES!” “Do you like pop corn?” “YES!” “See? ALL those things are made with vegetables. You ALL love vegetables whether you know it or not.” Then I was able to get the kid admit they love vegetables and got them to try some.
Kids are highly malleable. You just need to get the thought in their head and they will run with it.
My kids once told me :
You always said to eat our veggies to be tall like uncle. Uncle doesn't eat veggies!
Best laugh in a long time! Not only were they right, it worked when they were ankle bitters too young to notice.
All they have to do is get you curious enough to try it. Then, once they've got warts and hivvies around your anus, you'll feel too gross to rejoin the straight dating world.
It's the oldest "once you go ______ you don't go back" trick in the book.
If you truly believe this, it's because you're afraid of your own latent homosexuality.
I'm sorry to be the one to break it to you, but you're gay.
Yeah, you've got it figured out for sure...
Hopefully you figure it out too. I'm sorry.
I do not accept the charges
it was bob, he had a baby
OP is a groomer.
Call out this bullshit.
They try to get you all confused in what is right and wrong. Then they go for the kids.
Never give an inch.
Aka me eating onions like apples fresh from the garden; while others reason about sodomy...
That is a throwback euphemism from when most of the world was dangerous for gay people. Historically this decreased when religion decreased.
A suggested -ism doesn't throw one back; it tricks one to ignore that which is for memories of that which was; memories that can be shaped by suggested -isms into whatever those suggesting want it to be.
EU (well) PHEMEL (speaking) ignores that -ISM represents want over need aka suggested words over perceived sound. The parasitic few who make the suggestions aren't making the words more favorable to use; they're diminishing the expression of the consenting many.
a) PEOPLE, noun [Latin populus.] - "the body of persons" ignores PERSON (per sonos aka by sound) aka being individual choice of resonance (need) and dissonance (want) within collectively perceived sound.
b) "gay" represents an individual expression (perceived); not a collective one (suggested). Sodomy represents the choice of want (lust tempting towards death) over need (propagation for the sustenance of life), and "gay" represents the suggested rhetorical umbrella to allow the justification of self destruction, by making it about "attraction"; yet before one can be attracted to others; one has to sustain self (need over want).
a) group identity for individual self destructive behavior is what constantly tempts each one within the group to not just continue the self destruction; but to feel secure while expressing it outwards.
b) less restricted expression of sodomy (defilement of procreation) corrupts everything in its vicinity...both dominance through force and ignorance of resistance by submission to force are used as tools to rule the many; the two male income household is what is being weaponized against the female to get the mother out of the family unit; which in return endangers the child; the entire sodomy lifestyle is prey oriented instead of for the perpetuation of self; it emasculates males and corrupts growth of masculinity within youth; it's still being used for institutionalized blackmail as to ferment organized crime from the top down and so on.
In short...what destroys the so called "gay" is suggested "pride" in behaving self destructive.
a) his-story represents the suggested narrative; which deceives those consenting to it to ignore being the center of the perceived narration.
b) Religion (Latin religio) - "to bind anew" represents the industrialization of choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law; as the inversion of perceived balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law. So your use of euphem-ISM represents you being bound anew to the suggested (information) by others; while ignoring perceived (inspiration). Consent to suggestion represents religion; while everything else under the umbrella of religion represents the sales-pitch to tempt consent and to keep it directed at want (suggestion) over need (perception).
c) form (life) within flow (inception towards death) represents being temporary growth (increase) within ongoing loss (decrease). Both his-story and religion are suggested to the many to tempt them to ignore resisting loss; hence corrupting growth.
The origin of sodomy (lust) represents the choice of want (suggested) over need (perceived). And flow represents the origin of TEMPT (temporary tempted) by ATION (action) for the reacting form.
The keyword in this sentence is, " Man".
People are born without sexual preferences, it's through environment and experience that they gain instincts.
It would be a fair assumption to conclude all humans are Bisexual. Upon developing preference, it is not the case at all.
Humans cannot reproduce from the same sex. They were born how. But in an environment of choice, instincts are created. Experience causing differing choices.
People aren't born gay, they're born without experience. Hormones often drive sex.
Stupid topic. Ridiculous comparison. But okay choice. It doesn't quite cause instinct, or preference. Somebody could force you to eat onions, and unless you died from it, you might sooner be eating them. What actually caused your distaste of onions. I am sure you eat them anyway. They're in everything you haven't read the label.
If by listening to bullshit science of otherwise assumptions. They're trying to convince us of rogue genes. Where in random occurrence, neutral organs are created. I severely doubt this, because it is science simply trying to develop them, and increasingly today. But it's for you to decide your choice. You weren't born with it. Born without experience. You develop it, causing your preferences.
I would correct bisexual to asexual. Because your premise is a nature vs nurture idea, and that is reinforced with woke sex ed.
Keep kids innocent, but safe. Teach biological sex ed, or traditional actions, and you get what you see in nature. Teach woke sex Ed, and you've nurtured QUILTBAG for the pedos that call themselves MAPS.
No my debate is solid. The nature is that you have reproductive organs and hormones. It leads to sex by nature from reproducing, adapting, and surviving. The choice by nature is therefore bisexual. It is with every mammal, and many other species. But specifically our species. Sex is a product of environment and experience, leading to instinct or preference.
Science would argue unbalanced rogue genes. But this isn't factual when regardless of hormone levels your biology will always be bisexual, choosing how you have sex and any preferences towards it.
Or please try to argue otherwise. Asexual is contrary to our species reproduction. But sex becomes a preference.
Nature has pheromones that attract the opposite sex.
Nuture is a separate debate. But preference developed how. Environment and experience, developing.
All species have pheromones. Including our own. Although we tend to rely mostly on a combination of all our senses, and we are also driven by our hormones.
I am not debating my preferences, it again is hetero. I don't care about how you developed your choices, or what they are. I am debating this topic, and rationalising why as a species there are increasing preferences?
My comment was intended as constructive criticism for you theories flaws.
The answer to your question is nurture. You may elaborate that to woke sex ed.
Not a flaw. You're saying we don't have sexual preference, because we are born Asexual. Wrong try again. We have developing reproduction. It perhaps advances differently. 90 year old crustacean, chopping off your garden plant. Perhaps we are innocent until we develop. But we developed how?
Suggesting we are Asexual is wrong. We simply cannot reproduce if we are, despite having hormones and reproductive organs developing into sexual instincts, and choices. Therefore as a species we are as stated.
Believe it or not, Humans have pheromones. How attracted we are to them is subjective.
I said your premise of being born bisexual was wrong because we are born asexual until prepuberty. I also brought up the pheromones as part of the nature vs nurture.
i fixed that for you bot lmao
No Bisexual. I have no idea what Asexual is? I think it means, not having sex, or can reproduce by themself. Humans cannot survive as a species without sex, they cannot reproduce. So they're Bisexual, like every other mammal.
What caused their preference is the only question, experience and environment.
I am not debating my heterosexual preference. Simply the topic.
you spent more time reacting emotionally than you could have educating your self-declared ignorance lmao i am glad because this was much more entertaining lmao asexual it is lmao
WTF. I am educated. You have produced an absurd argument.
Humans are born how. No they're not Asexual. Because they cannot reproduce.
Sex is involved, causing their preference. Because sex is involved, it causes them to be Bisexual. They have equipment to reproduce. Being born without experience, it sooner develops into preferences or choice.
Idiot.
Like every other mammal they're born Bisexual. No experience causing their hormones to react and seek sex. Of course you get 90 year old virgins too. But they're not Asexual.
I am sure somewhere your education has faltered. It was trying to include rogue genes, it is selling. You have a dick or a cunt. Those hormones produce testorone or oestrogen, despite of any other accident, environment, diet, hazard, and unbalance.
when bots get mad lmao tell whomever programmed you that they are retarded lmao i know this because i read some but not all of that comment lmao
Then you're dumb, far too dumb to have a conversation with.
You have proved beyond all reasonable doubt that you have had no idea what you're talking about. So why are you attempting a debate. It's because you're dumb. Cannot read. Responds in giggles.
See how that works. Go be Asexual all by yourself, and try birthing. You'll faster turn into a cannibal. Chop chop snip snip. There it's the embodiment of another plant, or crustacean. Asexual.
holy shit lmao