If you think a straight man can be coerced or convinced to like other men, it's because you're secretly super duper gay. It's that simple.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Not a flaw. You're saying we don't have sexual preference, because we are born Asexual. Wrong try again. We have developing reproduction. It perhaps advances differently. 90 year old crustacean, chopping off your garden plant. Perhaps we are innocent until we develop. But we developed how?
Suggesting we are Asexual is wrong. We simply cannot reproduce if we are, despite having hormones and reproductive organs developing into sexual instincts, and choices. Therefore as a species we are as stated.
Believe it or not, Humans have pheromones. How attracted we are to them is subjective.
I said your premise of being born bisexual was wrong because we are born asexual until prepuberty. I also brought up the pheromones as part of the nature vs nurture.
I didn't say being born, repeat it. I said a fair assumption would be to conclude all humans are bisexual. But it isn't the case at all, after developing preference.
I have argued as a species humans are bisexual. Comparing with mammals.
Although I hinted that children are without experience developing instinct as a result of experience and environment.
Sure okay let's try a Lord of the Flies scenario. Let's lock a bunch of males, and females separately into prison, or boarding school, a convent, or monastery, an island, at various ages and what occurs?
Prepuberty is nonsense, sexual behaviour can occur far younger.
Pheromones are again prevalent in all species. Humans being attracted by them is subjective. Hormones play a much larger role. So do our other senses.
Yes I have refuted as a species we are Asexual. We develop preferences. We aren't garden plants.
Nature vs Nuture. Solved.
Or please try to argue the rogue genes. How you grew an ingrown tentacle birthing an octopus? Or perhaps you simply developed a preference because your hormones flared. Where any choice simply adapted to their environment, and experiences?
You said
You did very clearly say being born. And you're backtracking nonsense. You did not refute humans as a species being asexual, AND I never said that.
You saying this is the end of our discussion :
My replies were:
Sexual behavior younger than puberty is inappropriate, and called molestation.
People are born without sexual preferences. But as a species what are humans? They're not Asexual. You're dumb to have suggested it. Why did you try to correct it. Because read your bullshit. I read clearly. You read like an asshole taking a shit. I know what I said. But I sure as hell cannot understand your bullshit. Because you're literally insane.
If you put two naked children together what happens? Children developing instinct. Let's suggest those children had been exposed to their parents, accidentally. Or even TV, or the internet. Or older children, prior to puberty. Would it be a fair assumption that they could explore without understanding, or perhaps even in some other kind of sense of sex. No they're not Asexual. You dumb asshole.
Nature vs Nuture. Solved. This is hypothetical. But you have made an incorrect assumption.
Your stupid down vote is pathetic.