If you think a straight man can be coerced or convinced to like other men, it's because you're secretly super duper gay. It's that simple.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Nature has pheromones that attract the opposite sex.
Nuture is a separate debate. But preference developed how. Environment and experience, developing.
All species have pheromones. Including our own. Although we tend to rely mostly on a combination of all our senses, and we are also driven by our hormones.
I am not debating my preferences, it again is hetero. I don't care about how you developed your choices, or what they are. I am debating this topic, and rationalising why as a species there are increasing preferences?
My comment was intended as constructive criticism for you theories flaws.
The answer to your question is nurture. You may elaborate that to woke sex ed.
Not a flaw. You're saying we don't have sexual preference, because we are born Asexual. Wrong try again. We have developing reproduction. It perhaps advances differently. 90 year old crustacean, chopping off your garden plant. Perhaps we are innocent until we develop. But we developed how?
Suggesting we are Asexual is wrong. We simply cannot reproduce if we are, despite having hormones and reproductive organs developing into sexual instincts, and choices. Therefore as a species we are as stated.
Believe it or not, Humans have pheromones. How attracted we are to them is subjective.
I said your premise of being born bisexual was wrong because we are born asexual until prepuberty. I also brought up the pheromones as part of the nature vs nurture.