There's nothing quite so satisfying to a pathological manipulator than to get their victim to beg for the opportunity to harm themselves. (abortion of healthy children being one of the most successful forms of this twisted game)
For me, I think it goes back a little further to the Kennedy Assassination. That was when the obvious gaslighting began for the US and the CIA really took over the country.
The realization through study of how effective you can “educate” people through TV/media. It started long ago and I see how far gone my boomer parents are due to their unquestioning reliance on these mediums. Any conversation with them seems like it were lifted from CNN
Yeah, through the process of learning the truth about the scamdemic and subsequently learning about Q, I've come to realize that everything is a fucking lie.
I thought the moon landing was fake, but now I just don't think we can leave because we'll hit the firmament. It explains a lot.
They went. Apollo tapes which are now 'lost' kinda summed up why it had all the secrets and sets around it: if the aliens went ballistic, they would not let it get shown live.
Some of our history IS some BS astronauts on a stage set: yes.
We went to the moon, saw aliens, but nobody freaked out: yes.
Aliens: woop de doo. The only reason we dont have disclosure is because the elites (mj12) still use it to their advantage. The entire NWO stems from mj12. It allowed them to weaponize the National apparatus against the citizen. Now its worldwide.
Why do you need reflectors on the Moon to bounce lasers off from there? They claim Moon rock is so reflective that it bounces Sun light from the surface of the moon and have it light up the ground on Earth during nighttime.
If you think we can accurately hit a tiny reflective surface on the moon with a laser but cant see the landing site with a telescope you must be a shill because no one is that retarded. How can they aim it if they cant even see what they are aiming. Shills get dumber every day.
False premise. They know generally where the mirrors were placed (there is no lunar GPS per se) but then with the lasers as tight beams that can be directed and aimed at the mirrors.
And, yes, you can see the moon landing sites with the appropriate equipment.
Lunar orbiters are powerful enough to see the junk left behind, as well as the tracks of the rovers.
You can also see the spots where they landed, but not the junk they left behind with earth based telescopes, but only by comparing the spots on the moon from where they said the landed, before and after. Because the moon has no wind, and doesn't get struck much by debris, you can see the new "spots" on the surface.
The moon is very far away, it would take a very ,very powerful telescope to see something the size of car, like the rover.
Your car windshield also reflects sunlight but you get better reflection off a mirror. It’s about precision and having the right tool for the job, and not using something that works kinda okay for it.
Bounce it off, sure. Are you going to get the return back at the angle you need for proper measurements without a known flat angle to bounce back against? Doubtful. The moon is kinda big, if you haven’t looked at it. Hitting the mirror precisely is hard enough, adding in hitting the exact same patch of rock time and time again adds needless complexity.
Other sources included earlier proposals to use the Moon as a radio wave reflector, which date back to 1928. The first proof of this concept was the Project Diana program of the U.S. Army Signal Corps in 1946, which detected radar waves bounced off the Moon.
Four years ago (1962), a ruby laser considerably smaller than those now available shot a series of pulses at the moon, 240,000 miles away. The beams illuminated a spot less than two miles in diameter and were reflected back to earth with enough strength to be measured by ultrasensitive electronic equipment.
Awesome. So they can do a thing, which proves their concept but doesn’t have any immediate use. They add a mirror to the laser bouncing to make the results more focused and useful. How is this a bad thing?
Just because they can bounce a signal off it and see it again doesn’t mean it’s giving them useful data. We had fuel injection technology in World War Two, it wasn’t made widespread into every car until there was a need and a profit for doing so.
The moon holds little value as far as profit goes. The cost of making a permanent base there and cycling out personnel to avoid permanent muscle atrophy is huge and for what? Some rocks and maybe some helium3? That require more money to bring back safely. It would be different if there was some kind of super uranium that would enable fission reactors cheaply, or for a staging base for sending material to Mars, but given the history of every colony ever rebelling and fighting for independence, anyone who looks at mars being both a colony and friendly for long needs to look at history a lot closer.
A moon base beyond military use doesn’t justify the cost to most beancounters, nor does repeated trips there and back.
Moon rock reflecting light, like virtually every other matter, doesn't mean they act like a mirror works like a mirror. Otherwise, we would use rocks when combing our hair in the morning. Plus, they know exactly where the mirrors are.
Lasers lose focus with distance. You can use a laser at a short distance with a lower power laser, making your cat chase it, as it reflects off the floor. Trying to reflect laser light off the moon would require a very powerful laser, or something more reflective to hit it with, like a mirror, because the moon is very far away.
The sun, being very very bright, is capable of putting out light that reflects off rocks.
I am saying that if you believe in the moon landing, you believing in the moon reflectors also make total sense. Instead of watching those Space wars movies, try going outside, and look at just how bright the moon is.
Yea, I was out last night with my dog, almost full moon. Pretty bright.
Again, if you think moon rocks are as reflective as mirrors, and thus equally as useful for laser measuring, why don't you brush your hair while looking at a slab of granite?
Almost everything reflects light to make it visible, that's now light works.
Also world war 1, 2 and JFK. the elites already know that the public will accept anything. Soviet Union is/was another bullshit part of the NWO. The elites faked the cold war
I have a take on this that nobody seems to like, and it is this:
The Apollo program was real, and real rockets went up, circled the earth, and returned. May or may not have been automated. People went to the moon (and other places) in other craft, craft that would have had over 20 years of development at the time of 1969. They did not fly there in tin cans.
I love how the moon landing hoax crowd completely ignores the secret space program. Why is that?
And before then you have the Khmer Rouge of 1975 paving the way for it as well.
This is a psychological experiment to prove that people will accept their very oblivion entirely unopposed.
There's nothing quite so satisfying to a pathological manipulator than to get their victim to beg for the opportunity to harm themselves. (abortion of healthy children being one of the most successful forms of this twisted game)
You may be right. But it's not an experiment, this is no test. We only disagree on the end game I suppose.
It will chang with the cyborg cannibalism
For me, I think it goes back a little further to the Kennedy Assassination. That was when the obvious gaslighting began for the US and the CIA really took over the country.
The realization through study of how effective you can “educate” people through TV/media. It started long ago and I see how far gone my boomer parents are due to their unquestioning reliance on these mediums. Any conversation with them seems like it were lifted from CNN
Yeah, through the process of learning the truth about the scamdemic and subsequently learning about Q, I've come to realize that everything is a fucking lie.
I thought the moon landing was fake, but now I just don't think we can leave because we'll hit the firmament. It explains a lot.
Totally agree on Wagging the Moondoggie. If you don’t walk away knowing the moon landing was completely fake, you’re cucked.
They went. Apollo tapes which are now 'lost' kinda summed up why it had all the secrets and sets around it: if the aliens went ballistic, they would not let it get shown live.
Some of our history IS some BS astronauts on a stage set: yes. We went to the moon, saw aliens, but nobody freaked out: yes.
Aliens: woop de doo. The only reason we dont have disclosure is because the elites (mj12) still use it to their advantage. The entire NWO stems from mj12. It allowed them to weaponize the National apparatus against the citizen. Now its worldwide.
The only reason I think we may have possibly actually went there is the head and the glass wall.it made no sense to actually go there though.
Why do you need reflectors on the Moon to bounce lasers off from there? They claim Moon rock is so reflective that it bounces Sun light from the surface of the moon and have it light up the ground on Earth during nighttime.
Lasers allow for precise measurements.
If you think we can accurately hit a tiny reflective surface on the moon with a laser but cant see the landing site with a telescope you must be a shill because no one is that retarded. How can they aim it if they cant even see what they are aiming. Shills get dumber every day.
False premise. They know generally where the mirrors were placed (there is no lunar GPS per se) but then with the lasers as tight beams that can be directed and aimed at the mirrors.
And, yes, you can see the moon landing sites with the appropriate equipment.
Lunar orbiters are powerful enough to see the junk left behind, as well as the tracks of the rovers.
You can also see the spots where they landed, but not the junk they left behind with earth based telescopes, but only by comparing the spots on the moon from where they said the landed, before and after. Because the moon has no wind, and doesn't get struck much by debris, you can see the new "spots" on the surface.
The moon is very far away, it would take a very ,very powerful telescope to see something the size of car, like the rover.
You faggots make absurd claims and never provide proof you claim exists.
And a happy New Year too shitbag!
Merry Christmas!
Thanks for the laugh shill. Just aim a laser at a moving object you can't see lol
Merry Christmas!
I always get a good laugh out of so called experts too.
Moon rock already acts as a mirror for sunlight, or so are we told.
Your car windshield also reflects sunlight but you get better reflection off a mirror. It’s about precision and having the right tool for the job, and not using something that works kinda okay for it.
So you agree that we can bounce a laser off the surface of the Moon, even without a reflector placed there?
Bounce it off, sure. Are you going to get the return back at the angle you need for proper measurements without a known flat angle to bounce back against? Doubtful. The moon is kinda big, if you haven’t looked at it. Hitting the mirror precisely is hard enough, adding in hitting the exact same patch of rock time and time again adds needless complexity.
Even so, they claim to have done it.
Other sources included earlier proposals to use the Moon as a radio wave reflector, which date back to 1928. The first proof of this concept was the Project Diana program of the U.S. Army Signal Corps in 1946, which detected radar waves bounced off the Moon.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communication_Moon_Relay
Four years ago (1962), a ruby laser considerably smaller than those now available shot a series of pulses at the moon, 240,000 miles away. The beams illuminated a spot less than two miles in diameter and were reflected back to earth with enough strength to be measured by ultrasensitive electronic equipment.
https://www.checktheevidence.com/wordpress/2019/01/03/national-geographic-magazine-december-1966-the-lasers-bright-magic/
1962, that is before the alleged Moon landing.
We shot v1 missiles at it too
Awesome. So they can do a thing, which proves their concept but doesn’t have any immediate use. They add a mirror to the laser bouncing to make the results more focused and useful. How is this a bad thing? Just because they can bounce a signal off it and see it again doesn’t mean it’s giving them useful data. We had fuel injection technology in World War Two, it wasn’t made widespread into every car until there was a need and a profit for doing so. The moon holds little value as far as profit goes. The cost of making a permanent base there and cycling out personnel to avoid permanent muscle atrophy is huge and for what? Some rocks and maybe some helium3? That require more money to bring back safely. It would be different if there was some kind of super uranium that would enable fission reactors cheaply, or for a staging base for sending material to Mars, but given the history of every colony ever rebelling and fighting for independence, anyone who looks at mars being both a colony and friendly for long needs to look at history a lot closer. A moon base beyond military use doesn’t justify the cost to most beancounters, nor does repeated trips there and back.
Moon rock reflecting light, like virtually every other matter, doesn't mean they act like a mirror works like a mirror. Otherwise, we would use rocks when combing our hair in the morning. Plus, they know exactly where the mirrors are.
Lasers lose focus with distance. You can use a laser at a short distance with a lower power laser, making your cat chase it, as it reflects off the floor. Trying to reflect laser light off the moon would require a very powerful laser, or something more reflective to hit it with, like a mirror, because the moon is very far away.
The sun, being very very bright, is capable of putting out light that reflects off rocks.
They know exactly where those mirror are, but placing a man on the Moon they can not?
Your sentence reads like Yoda wrote it. What exactly are you saying?
I am saying that if you believe in the moon landing, you believing in the moon reflectors also make total sense. Instead of watching those Space wars movies, try going outside, and look at just how bright the moon is.
Yea, I was out last night with my dog, almost full moon. Pretty bright.
Again, if you think moon rocks are as reflective as mirrors, and thus equally as useful for laser measuring, why don't you brush your hair while looking at a slab of granite?
Almost everything reflects light to make it visible, that's now light works.
Also world war 1, 2 and JFK. the elites already know that the public will accept anything. Soviet Union is/was another bullshit part of the NWO. The elites faked the cold war
I agree 100%.
I have a take on this that nobody seems to like, and it is this:
The Apollo program was real, and real rockets went up, circled the earth, and returned. May or may not have been automated. People went to the moon (and other places) in other craft, craft that would have had over 20 years of development at the time of 1969. They did not fly there in tin cans.
I love how the moon landing hoax crowd completely ignores the secret space program. Why is that?
Preach, brother!
IMO we went, but the events were heavily "curated", much of what was released to the public was faked.
You know what I think is silly, conspiracy theorist who have purity tests.
"You have to believe that XYZ is a conspiracy or else-wise, you can't be on my side about ABC conspiracy."
That, mon ami, is garbage.
Ah, the classic "do the work" response.
Thanks.
Imagine having standards and not being retarded in current year. Fuck off shill
Ah, the classic "I don't want to argue with someone that disagrees with me so they must be a shill tactic." I read that it's a winner with the chicks.
You know what's retarded? Your purity tests.
Enjoy your clot shot
Merry Christmas!
I'm a pureblood, and fuck off
lmao sure faggot. keep consooming soyence
And a happy New Year too shitbag!
You got me all wrong buddy. Have a Merry Christmas.
You're retarded. Go back to reddit with your space shit and cape shit.