Often the identification of error is an error as I believe...

ER'ROR, noun [Latin error from erro, to wander.] Could it be that your belief is causing the perceived error to mean wrong; false? Meanwhile wander represents movement of flow; while implying adaptation from form.

Let's put it into the parasite words...

"Oh well, I'm the type of guy who will never settle down" - (flow)

"Where pretty girls are well, you know that I'm around" - (knowledge aka comprehension)

"I kiss 'em and I love 'em 'cause to me they're all the same" - (ALL the same aka potentiality; which implies that each ONE is different within aka potential)

"I hug 'em and I squeeze 'em they don't even know my name" - (lack of comprehension based on names; brands; idols) also hug'em (momentum within motion aka form within flow) and squeeze'em (velocity causing resistance).

a case where wandering would specifically be an error as it often is

That's you acknowledging the temptation of rootlessness (small-town boy, big-city lights allegory); but still ignoring what causes the need for roots...flow roots form. You're wandering within the constant flow of information; which simultaneously represents nonstop temptation to want the form within. The parasites suggest differences to uproot us; they suggest how "boring" where we are is; and how "extincting" some place else could be. That's the pedophile and candy routine aka exploitation of temptation.

The type of error in a given circumstance likely evolved to come to simply mean any error.

Balance represents different consequences aka different inspiration; both towards self sustenance (need) and towards ignorance (want). Balance sets up ongoing choices; while using consequences as inspiration for the next choice. Proclaiming true or false (error) upon consequence represents ignoring adaptation to inspiration and it also represents its own choice made upon ignorance.

Don't justify consequences; let the consequences be the judge of action aka let flow inspire you on how to act upon form. "Today, you have the opportunity to make tomorrow better than yesterday" ~timebomb. Instead of days tho; apply this to moments; to each choice.

Humans have processes that are approximate

APPROX'IMATE, adjective [Latin ad and proximus, next.] aka temporary forms choice within ongoing flow...a balance act. Narrowing it down requires more comprehension (potential) of the perceived (potentiality); but flow defines it to always be adaptation to balance.

They are designed to get things right more than guessing at random but that is not the same as always being right.

That design represents the collective survival instinct that defines the value of life over death aka forms resistance requires a collective impulse to withstand the velocity of ongoing flow temporarily. Random (without direction) represents forms choice of ignorance towards flow. It's like saying "I'm gonna die, so I don't know what to do with my life"... as if death as the outcome doesn't imply the need for self sustenance of life until then?

always being right

Right vs wrong (reason) aside...how come that you (temporary life) believe in always [all and way]; while ignoring the flow it implies? What could be the "reason" for that...did I mention that "aside" represents on a straight direction?

English - a rhetorical minefield.

When you draw meaning from the dictionary then you are making a mistake.

Yep; it's about showing the contradiction in consented to meaning and how easy it is to change by suggestion.

You should ask me what I mean. I'm the authority on that.

The differences between a restricted and an less restricted mind stand out immediately. Those who ignore act in the name of others; they perpetuate the beliefs they consented to and aim to gain consent from others; while an open mind may lack comprehension; but always speaks from his own potential.

Meaning (aim) is predefined through flow. It is your potential and mine balancing each other that causes resonance, and that balance requires each of us to adapt to inspiration; not to the information we read (aka what each of us transmutes out of it). Those who suggest beliefs to you are the ones questioning your authority (free will).

Only I can know that

The potential you represent is not yours; it's processed potentiality by flow/form for the sustenance of ALL information (energy). You also comprehend that death means you cannot hold onto it; yet you try to claim it among others; who represent the inspiration for you to further increase your potential. Use it; don't claim it; cause you cannot hold it.

Not the dictionary. That is not me.

ALL potentiality; different ONE potentials. You are alone aka ALL in ONE. The differences you perceive are inspiration for the sustenance of ONEself. You can utilize the potential of any dictionary without ever reading what's in it; by questioning for example why definitions are accumulated; who would share it; and why the access to it is restricted; when the source of what is being defined is free for all?

You wandered away from me. In an amusing twist it also happened to be an accidental convergence.

Away and convergence (towards)...a contradiction in ignorance of balance. AC'CIDENT, noun [Latin accidens, falling, from ad and cado, to fall.] - "a coming or falling; an event that takes place without one's foresight or expectation" aka the ever changing circumstances of form within flow; defined by the consequences of action made by individual free will within a collective momentum.

You must however at some point reduce the number of options down to those that you can choose.

ONE has two choices within ALL...need or want. All the restrictions stem from want over need, and to rebalance them requires need over want. The problem? Want represents ignorance towards change.

You must sometimes be able to choose to err

The choice is upon balance in-between coexisting opposites; not upon right vs wrong of outcomes.

there is no such thing as a true safe option

Inception set life towards death. Safe (free from hurt) represents the inversion of survival (struggle for balance). Sustaining life within loss hurts a lot; and that's what's needed to keep struggling for balance.

lobotomised

Restricting comprehension by cornering choice through reduction of inspiration. That's why they unify all under the chain of command; the mainstream; the part-line; while balancing it by offering controlled outbursts of individualism aka their "revolutionary spirit". In short..they all follow orders; while being allowed to playact rebelling against order.

On a larger scale...protests are used to buffer the revolutionary spirit among subjugated people; by allowing controlled rebellion against authority. They also use sports to buffer the rooted (nationalism) response to uprooting (globalism; internationalism). Sports represents kosher nationalism; where only the flag is national; while the players under it are interchangeable goons of internationalism.

Humans are sometimes so good at reasoning they can do so for its own sake and they can also sometimes reason anything. That is, to give a reason for anything.

Another deception...the corruption of reason into intention. Flow defines direction for form so we don't need to focus on an intended outcome; but need to adhere to the demand for adaption to motion aka balance.

We mix up intention and reason; because we don't perceive reason as conflict; but only our beliefs as true; while those who oppose it are just wrong non-believer. This way we form intent based on belief; while calling it reason, and the parasites are also happily propagating "the cunning of reason" and such catchy slogans to make sure that the civilized man of faith is a reasonable one.

That is, to give a reason for anything.

As a believer reason represents (fictitious) unity against non-believer aka a status symbol. Also; the domesticated subject that is restricted in action (by the laws of men), is being indoctrinated to "solve" conflicts through reasoning; while ignoring that reason represents conflict between truth and false.

they use to say that sex and race doesn't exist.

Sex as distinction between male and female is based on natural law "opposites must coexist; because they're defined by each other within motion", and sex as the rhetoric for intercourse represents the suggested inversion of the balance between opposites. Intercourse is defined as the choice between procreation (need) and lust (want) and the sex rhetoric is used to promote pure lust (sexual liberation); while making the choice about how to deal with the consequences of lust aka birth control or abortion?

Furthermore; the term homosexuality adds sodomy (defilement of procreation) under the same umbrella with procreation (procreating life) and lust (temptation luring towards death) aka a deliberate contradiction for those with eyes to see.

The whole race issue RACE, noun [Latin radix and radius; rod, ray, radiate, etc.] is about stiffing potential (comprehension) by corrupting perceived differences (needed for inspiration) through miscegenation; as well as corrupting the blood and the soil. The former representing our roots as form within flow; the latter our placement within momentum by motion.

Velocity of motion meeting resistance of momentum causes friction; vibration; resonance; form etc. which implies that flow sets form into a resonance based position aka order vibrating chaos into a temporary balance. We should each have a distinct habitat that resonates with us; yet who knows how often the parasites have shuffled the board, and until we get ignorance sorted out I so far lack comprehension how we individually find that resonance.

Two things to soften the race issue a) ask if racism means the hatred of others races; then what's the term for loving ones own race? Racism is a one way rhetoric that only allows accusation; but no defense against miscegenation, and b) use kin and make it about sensing ones own kin doesn't requiring labels. What matters is that nature segregates differences and that we need to adhere to that.

then you can argue nothing exists

Creationism represents the obfuscated belief in nothingness; because it implies that we can create out of nothing. Both deities as the one creator of all and "new" feed into the out of nothing belief.

Before action comes information; hence ALL (energy) being required for the ONEs within to act upon information offered to then create (transmute) out of.

If high grade reason doesn't work then use low grade reason.

That would be the Pinocchio/Tower of Babel allegory...setting lies (fiction; ignorance) into flow a) leads to more lies and b) will be destroyed by the natural order of flow. Religions wouldn't work without ritualistic repetition of suggestion. The consciousness would shake the self inflicted restriction of beliefs off; if those beliefs aren't getting reconfirmed over and over again.

It's really the action that truly tells you about the person.

The consequences of actions is how flow uses form to communicate inspiration; which is what we need to adapt to. Not how each of us defines the who; what; where and why to each other.

However when reason is justification and in having justification your are given licence to do what would be wrong otherwise then if you remove that reason that made it wrong it just becomes wrong and they become guilty so now they must maintain that reason at all costs.

The choices we have...resistance/struggle (need) or ignorance/temptation (want) represent the natural opposites of "self sustenance". Energy causes motion (loss of potentiality); motion causes energy (recharge of potentiality through unification of potential within the momentum of motion). Our wants are processed for loss; our needs are processed for recharge.

There's no right vs wrong within energy; want/need represent a balance based on form being the response to flow. Ignorance (want) is not wrong; It's inspiration needed for resistance (need). Balance wouldn't work without the consequences of imbalance.

Once someone is hooked that's often it. Maintaining the reason is followed with more action, more guilt and more cause to maintain the reason to the point of it becoming existential.

Hooked refers to the pull of flow upon form aka the temptation to not resist and to go with the flow, and since ignorance represents the choice of want (temptation); to ignore flow represents to corrupt comprehension of being within flow.

"Rebel without a Cause" is the allegory for what you're describing aka the self destruction through lack of comprehension by choice of ignorance.

There are real secrets though I understand that you're referring to things that present as secret knowledge but are not. Another human exposed to the same information can figure out the same.

The suggested inversion of secrecy is that it's about withhold information. SE'CRET, adjective. [Latin secretus; secerno; seg) - "to separate, to cut off". It is flow that represents the flow of information; which separates ALL potentiality (flow) into individual ONE potential (form) within its momentum.

Potential isn't withheld information; it's limited growth potential within unlimited source potentiality. Our ignorance of that causes us to "want" information from others; which they offer as suggestions and to which we consent by believing them.

What we ignore is the need to adapt to the flow of information; that uses moving form (moving potential) as inspiration to our senses; so that we can transmute (by choice of action) perceived inspiration into comprehended information within ONEself; to grow ONEs own potential within ALL potentiality; out of ALL potentiality.

Each ONE of us is "exposed" to ALL information; but it's in form of perceived inspiration; which each ONE of us needs to change (transmute) into comprehended information by ourselves. We cannot exchange information among each otehr without tempt us to ignore adaptation to inspiration. This is how motion maintains the balance of momentum. We cannot accumulate information without corrupting ourselves until flow retakes form. The allegory for this is the "Library of Alexandria".

The technology we are using right now to accumulate information was already set into motion to be destroyed and the allegory for this is the "Butlerian Jihad" aka men vs machine; which will once again destroy all the information we accumulated. The parasites comprehend all of this and setting it all up for their own (temporary) benefit by suggesting us both transhumanism to get us hooked on technology, and stories like Terminator as the sleight of hand for the consequences of falling for the temptation of technology of convenience.

And no; we will not fight cyborgs with laser weapons; which the parasites will eventually clumsily try to stage, but once again destroy what we build by ourselves under false pretenses; acting in ignorance and on the suggestions of others...unless enough of us choose otherwise.

Look at wars...the parasite try to frame it as a good vs evil conflict; while utilizing any -ism that sticks to motivate participation in self destruction; which is what it always is, just odds of ignorance steered into each other through suggestions. Afterwards the few racketeer the revisionism of his-story for a couple of generations; while farming the many during the regrowth phase, and while setting up the next sacrifice event. It's akin to cattle farming.

People often don't appreciate this and indeed can build an unproductive dependence on someone else...

The deception in that is subtle...the need to build or the want of what is being built? This is what allows others to set up dependency aka do what I say and you get what you want (just kidding; only as much as is needed to maintain dependency).

The value for ALL is set by flow; form needs the ability to evaluate (appreciate) to be able to balance choice of actions for adaptation. Only if we want what we build; can others exploit our affixed belief in the value of it. If we just keep building; we would get what we want along side it and then some; but it has to be about the need to build for balance; not for the wanted outcome.

Often you cannot fully put another in your footsteps across time...

Take a step away from suggested his-story and ask yourself why your story isn't written down and taught to the world? Does his-story evaluate death over life? What are the implication for ignoring that which is (life) for that which was (death)?

Once that clicked in your comprehension; tackle suggested time and do the same with past; present and future. Why do the few insist upon suggesting that which was and that which could be to the many? How much stress does contemplating the loss of the past, and the hope/fear towards the future cause at the present, and how is it the present when we defined it by past and future?

What does time measure? Flow. What does that which was or will be ignore for form within flow? Adaptation to the change that is.

How about this? ACROSS' [a and cross.] - "from side to side, opposed to along" A deliberate contradiction of flow (beginning towards end) and it uses the symbology for death. This is how the parasites use a sleight of hand while mocking us for our ignorance. The most recent example is "I can't breathe" leads to death; followed by "put a mask over your nose and mouth".

mistake

MISTA'KE, verb transitive - "to take wrong; to conceive or understand erroneously; to misunderstand or misapprehend"...to...take...wrong implies to take right; but taking aka claiming (also proclaiming) is what causes right vs wrong (conflict of reason). Form cannot own form within flow; it can only ignore being form defined through flow.

Claiming represents the temptation (want); using represents the resistance (need).

adhering to the social order is often driven by a sense of self preservation

Social is the suggested inversion here aka ONEs self preservation under another ONE; instead of ONE in adherence to ALL (not to all other ONEs but as form to flow). The trick being played is suggesting to us to "follow" the social order to create order out of chaos, when in reality flow represents the natural order moving form from beginning towards end; which causes the need for form to adhere to it by resisting (aka struggle for survival; balance; adaptation; choice of action).

The response of form to flow is resistance, which does not represent a conflict with flow; but a struggle within form for self sustenance within flow. Flow represents both growth and loss for form; depending on choice of action (need/want).

The parasites utilized suggestion to set us up to want outcome; to follow orders; to seek convenience; to individually sit on our thumbs while celebrating collective achievements like culture; history; science; politics, while working towards peace, prosperity and progress etc. That's all the 'Pied Piper of Hamelin' blowing his suggestive pipe; while we follow lockstep towards self destruction.

Even altruism in humans can be self serving

How is it ONEs altru-ISM; when ONE consents by free will of choice to an -ism suggested by the free will of another ONE? The parasites call this humanitarianism; and they use idols (Bono; Geldof etc.) to racketeer the believers of it; while the non-believers are racketeered within world wide poverty by the usury cartel.

In the middle operates ignorance...the believers ignore whatever happens to themselves as long as they can feel better than those poor starving kids promoted to them, and the poor ignore the usury cartel maintaining poverty as long as they can hate those who never donate enough for them to get out of it. Guilt bred on one side; "gibs me dats" envy on the other. All by means of suggestion.

However, what you often really see is that set quota for selflessness is being harvested by socially predatory people who want you for yourself.

There's no selflessness...it's self sustenance (need for form within flow) or ignorance thereof (want aka temptation of flow upon form). ONE does not exist to sustain other ONEs...our children represent the shared sustenance of ONEself (within the blood). Not you for them; but you, your wife and them for the collective ONEself within ALL; that which can be sustained within flow...the blood; passed on from form to form.

The more you sustain the seed and the soil you plant it into; the more growth it will emit outwards; while attracting others. That's how unity works; not fixing the symptoms within others; while ignoring the cause within self...ignorance over self sustenance aka want over need. See, you want to help others; but you need to help yourself; which would allow the consequence of your actions to become exponentially more beneficial for those around you.

ONE spreads outwards; using the power out of ALL aka growth of magnetic resistance through adherence to electric velocity.

Those who you want to help are being set up by those who want you to help others; while ignoring yourself, as to exploit all together.

They'll suck up everything you have to give and then what? Then they'll take more and you'll start to realize if you keep giving yourself away you'll be left with nothing.

Correct, except the end...the time it takes for you to realize the self harm represents your ignorance being farmed through suggestion. The accompanied trauma of losing everything you had (money; status, power; security etc.) is all part of the suggestion racket...money only has value because we ignore free will for evaluation; status is not defined among others, but as ONEself within ALL; flow holds ALL potentiality; form represents the growth potential within (that's the real power), and as form within flow you're not free from danger (secure); but have the free will within the dominance of deadly danger.

Form cannot own anything within flow; ONE can only use ALL; not own any other ONE within ALL. They exploit our want for ownership to get us attached to form; while flushing us down the drain of flow.

their logic is often broken implication

LOG'IC, noun [Latin id; Gr. from reason, to speak.]. Of course; because reason contradicts implication. Reason is based on affixed assumptions (true vs false); implication is in adherence to flow (if/then). Implication is used for adaptation; reason for the ignorance thereof; while arguing about who believes what.

They get all approaches wrong.

That's because reason is based on consent to suggested belief; which represents the choice of ignorance, and so when they act upon beliefs; the consequences thereof will be based on ignorance. The parasites comprehend that if the many consent to believe/not believe true/false suggestions; then their actions are impotent; self destructive; no concern to the many.

A crude tool rarely gets the job done properly.

That refers to the self restriction of comprehension aka their potential. Ignorance diminishes that, and they don't comprehend what they're doing; because they believe something else.

The problem with their use of implication is that it's vague. You can imply all kinds of things. By definition, like assumption, implication is not something that is perfectly accurate.

They imply within reason; which is easy to spot; because it's outcome oriented. They proclaim to believe/not believe something and then use implication on that; which isn't in adherence to flow whatsoever.

As for accuracy...the balance of choice between need and want doesn't require accuracy; it demands quick adaptation; and a consciousness trained on implication will return the highest potential of odds to make the simple choice between need and want And what is the balance between need and want? The responsibility over "enough" aka when is the need fulfilled; before it becomes the temptation of a want?

That sounds easy; but as the name implies...it's tempting to ignore need for want and we cannot escape falling for this over and over again; hence the demanded adaptation to sustain form within flow. Sounds daunting? We die at the end, so it isn't about achievements; but about responsibility in exchange for infinite possibilities for a finite moment(um) within motion.

To simply exhaust any amount of intelligence.

INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand). What corrupts comprehension is adapting to suggested information; which is what believers and non-believers are reasoning about; instead of choosing to adapt to whatever inspires ONEself for the sustenance of ONEself.

Communication is not about debating conflicts; it's about resonance to ALL. Both ONEs find balance with each other when resonating to ALL. Predator and prey are not in conflict with each other; they share a habitat despite different eating habits. They are natural opposites and their individual self sustenance balances each other out...until mankind brings ignorance around. Then it's dissonance all over the place.

Asking questions and a question tree is often far more effective. Then they have to traverse the implications tree for you.

Yep, what you will notice is that their beliefs will prevent answering questions; the more your use of implication contradicts their beliefs. This is when they start to fish for any flaws to shut the messenger down; which in return will teach you just how rhetorically distorted our languages are; because they will constantly point out different meanings of words.

This is what inspired me to a) use the oldest dictionary available to show the contradictions in meaning; b) use Latin to show how English was robbed of natural connotations and c) put it into my comprehension of natural law; while boiling the languages down to the simplest terms...I'm slowly cornering ignorance by taking all the suggested corruptions away; but alas now I'm called a bot; merely capable of human interaction; emotionless etc. So much fun...

It's very hard to fully comprehend another reality from words alone. From the beginning you can only truly comprehend the reality that you are in.

ALL reality is equally offered to our perception; each ONEs comprehension within is diverse. It is the suggested beliefs that restrict us to build comprehension; to increase potential. Each word proclaimed about perceived form within flow; corrupts our comprehension of flow moving form.

If we comprehend flow; we can use words like any other tool for self sustenance; but the majority of us doesn't even comprehend that using free will to consent to the free will of others; represents the ignorance of free will for self. Suggestions are temptations that need to be resisted; while free will represents a responsibility over ONEs choice to ALL.

There are people who I am sure over rely on verbal reasoning which is limited.

That's because reason represents conflict, and society suggests their domesticated subjects to avoid any physical conflicts. And to balance that they promote physical violence to those with the lowest impulse control; by letting them get away with it; while reprimanding those who use violence as a tool for self sustenance. And that doesn't have to be carefully balanced and enforced either, just a bunch of examples propagated through the media as suggestion works just as fine to groom behavioral traits.

Adding to this...lowering education; language skills; attention span and so on also feeds into this mess.

I don't believe that's the only cause but having a false reality and then rejecting that which is inconsistent as false is a common component of confirmation bias.

The consciousness is a tool of adaptation for self sustenance of from within flow. If we set beliefs as the foundation to restrict comprehension of what we perceive; then the consciousness adapts in accordance to those self restrictions. It still tries to protect form from harm; but it's designed for outside harm; not for self inflicted harm through misuse.

Reality doesn't offer fiction; ignorance of reality (flow) causes us to uphold temporary fiction (form). Motion is out of our physical reach; we are within its momentum; where we can reconfigure/transmute temporary form; based on our potential (comprehension). We are deceived to ignore what allows us to do that (flow).

I almost never get an answer to the implication that nature doesn't offer false information. It's hilarious how they can't answer without contradicting their beliefs. Questions like this are a quick way to undermine the conflict of reason; before they start telling you what they believe is true or false. Takes the wind right out of it.

Ego is often all people have until reality imprints itself more and more. Many people will try to imprint themselves.

How does one contemplate mentally without words defining what to contemplate? To focus inwards ignores adaptation to the change outwards. Adaptation to perceived (outwards) inspiration is what grows our comprehension inwards. The ego represents a corruption of communication; solely based on us consenting to suggested words and we perpetuate this to our children.

During martial arts we train reflexes by throwing tennis balls at each other whenever one gets "in the zone" during training. When you're loosing yourself mentally; and a ball comes at you physically; it's all instinctive reaction. Without the ego distraction; instincts would react so much more efficiently.