Win / Conspiracies
Conspiracies
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
Conspiracies Conspiracy Theories & Facts
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

63
"shut it down, remove the general" – On live TV in France, a famous, retired French General points out the anti-national position of news media owned by a common "community" - Jewish newscaster to whom he is speaking takes offense... (media.conspiracies.win)
posted 4 years ago by clemaneuverers 4 years ago by clemaneuverers +65 / -2
29 comments download share
29 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

Often the identification of error is an error as I believe...

ER'ROR, noun [Latin error from erro, to wander.] Could it be that your belief is causing the perceived error to mean wrong; false? Meanwhile wander represents movement of flow; while implying adaptation from form.

Let's put it into the parasite words...

"Oh well, I'm the type of guy who will never settle down" - (flow)

"Where pretty girls are well, you know that I'm around" - (knowledge aka comprehension)

"I kiss 'em and I love 'em 'cause to me they're all the same" - (ALL the same aka potentiality; which implies that each ONE is different within aka potential)

"I hug 'em and I squeeze 'em they don't even know my name" - (lack of comprehension based on names; brands; idols) also hug'em (momentum within motion aka form within flow) and squeeze'em (velocity causing resistance).

a case where wandering would specifically be an error as it often is

That's you acknowledging the temptation of rootlessness (small-town boy, big-city lights allegory); but still ignoring what causes the need for roots...flow roots form. You're wandering within the constant flow of information; which simultaneously represents nonstop temptation to want the form within. The parasites suggest differences to uproot us; they suggest how "boring" where we are is; and how "extincting" some place else could be. That's the pedophile and candy routine aka exploitation of temptation.

The type of error in a given circumstance likely evolved to come to simply mean any error.

Balance represents different consequences aka different inspiration; both towards self sustenance (need) and towards ignorance (want). Balance sets up ongoing choices; while using consequences as inspiration for the next choice. Proclaiming true or false (error) upon consequence represents ignoring adaptation to inspiration and it also represents its own choice made upon ignorance.

Don't justify consequences; let the consequences be the judge of action aka let flow inspire you on how to act upon form. "Today, you have the opportunity to make tomorrow better than yesterday" ~timebomb. Instead of days tho; apply this to moments; to each choice.

Humans have processes that are approximate

APPROX'IMATE, adjective [Latin ad and proximus, next.] aka temporary forms choice within ongoing flow...a balance act. Narrowing it down requires more comprehension (potential) of the perceived (potentiality); but flow defines it to always be adaptation to balance.

They are designed to get things right more than guessing at random but that is not the same as always being right.

That design represents the collective survival instinct that defines the value of life over death aka forms resistance requires a collective impulse to withstand the velocity of ongoing flow temporarily. Random (without direction) represents forms choice of ignorance towards flow. It's like saying "I'm gonna die, so I don't know what to do with my life"... as if death as the outcome doesn't imply the need for self sustenance of life until then?

always being right

Right vs wrong (reason) aside...how come that you (temporary life) believe in always [all and way]; while ignoring the flow it implies? What could be the "reason" for that...did I mention that "aside" represents on a straight direction?

English - a rhetorical minefield.

When you draw meaning from the dictionary then you are making a mistake.

Yep; it's about showing the contradiction in consented to meaning and how easy it is to change by suggestion.

You should ask me what I mean. I'm the authority on that.

The differences between a restricted and an less restricted mind stand out immediately. Those who ignore act in the name of others; they perpetuate the beliefs they consented to and aim to gain consent from others; while an open mind may lack comprehension; but always speaks from his own potential.

Meaning (aim) is predefined through flow. It is your potential and mine balancing each other that causes resonance, and that balance requires each of us to adapt to inspiration; not to the information we read (aka what each of us transmutes out of it). Those who suggest beliefs to you are the ones questioning your authority (free will).

Only I can know that

The potential you represent is not yours; it's processed potentiality by flow/form for the sustenance of ALL information (energy). You also comprehend that death means you cannot hold onto it; yet you try to claim it among others; who represent the inspiration for you to further increase your potential. Use it; don't claim it; cause you cannot hold it.

Not the dictionary. That is not me.

ALL potentiality; different ONE potentials. You are alone aka ALL in ONE. The differences you perceive are inspiration for the sustenance of ONEself. You can utilize the potential of any dictionary without ever reading what's in it; by questioning for example why definitions are accumulated; who would share it; and why the access to it is restricted; when the source of what is being defined is free for all?

You wandered away from me. In an amusing twist it also happened to be an accidental convergence.

Away and convergence (towards)...a contradiction in ignorance of balance. AC'CIDENT, noun [Latin accidens, falling, from ad and cado, to fall.] - "a coming or falling; an event that takes place without one's foresight or expectation" aka the ever changing circumstances of form within flow; defined by the consequences of action made by individual free will within a collective momentum.

You must however at some point reduce the number of options down to those that you can choose.

ONE has two choices within ALL...need or want. All the restrictions stem from want over need, and to rebalance them requires need over want. The problem? Want represents ignorance towards change.

You must sometimes be able to choose to err

The choice is upon balance in-between coexisting opposites; not upon right vs wrong of outcomes.

there is no such thing as a true safe option

Inception set life towards death. Safe (free from hurt) represents the inversion of survival (struggle for balance). Sustaining life within loss hurts a lot; and that's what's needed to keep struggling for balance.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

REST, noun [Latin resto] - "cessation of motion"

Form cannot sustain without flow. Anyway; relax and no stress about replying.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 1 ▼
– free-will-of-choice 1 point 4 years ago +1 / -0

That's you transmuting (relocation of form within flow) within the momentum of motion; as form within flow. You're mimicking flow; while perceiving not moving as stillness.

STILL, verb transitive (G., to put, set, place) - "to stop, as motion or agitation". Notice how "put, set and place" implies motion; while "to stop motion" contradicts it?

In short...we're operating as temporary form within the confines defined by ongoing flow. Only if one is set into motion, can one choose to ignore (stop comprehending) motion. When you're still...does your heart stop; do you stop breathing; does your blood stops flowing? Nope; still form adapting to flow. You can lay body/mind to rest; but the self (blood) stays in adherence to flow.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?

GIFs

Conspiracies Wiki & Links

Conspiracies Book List

External Digital Book Libraries

Mod Logs

Honor Roll

Conspiracies.win: This is a forum for free thinking and for discussing issues which have captured your imagination. Please respect other views and opinions, and keep an open mind. Our goal is to create a fairer and more transparent world for a better future.

Community Rules: <click this link for a detailed explanation of the rules

Rule 1: Be respectful. Attack the argument, not the person.

Rule 2: Don't abuse the report function.

Rule 3: No excessive, unnecessary and/or bullying "meta" posts.

To prevent SPAM, posts from accounts younger than 4 days old, and/or with <50 points, wont appear in the feed until approved by a mod.

Disclaimer: Submissions/comments of exceptionally low quality, trolling, stalking, spam, and those submissions/comments determined to be intentionally misleading, calls to violence and/or abuse of other users here, may all be removed at moderator's discretion.

Moderators

  • Doggos
  • axolotl_peyotl
  • trinadin
  • PutinLovesCats
  • clemaneuverers
  • C
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2025.03.01 - lf7fw (status)

Copyright © 2024.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy