Restricting comprehension by cornering choice through reduction of inspiration. That's why they unify all under the chain of command; the mainstream; the part-line; while balancing it by offering controlled outbursts of individualism aka their "revolutionary spirit". In short..they all follow orders; while being allowed to playact rebelling against order.
On a larger scale...protests are used to buffer the revolutionary spirit among subjugated people; by allowing controlled rebellion against authority. They also use sports to buffer the rooted (nationalism) response to uprooting (globalism; internationalism). Sports represents kosher nationalism; where only the flag is national; while the players under it are interchangeable goons of internationalism.
Humans are sometimes so good at reasoning they can do so for its own sake and they can also sometimes reason anything. That is, to give a reason for anything.
Another deception...the corruption of reason into intention. Flow defines direction for form so we don't need to focus on an intended outcome; but need to adhere to the demand for adaption to motion aka balance.
We mix up intention and reason; because we don't perceive reason as conflict; but only our beliefs as true; while those who oppose it are just wrong non-believer. This way we form intent based on belief; while calling it reason, and the parasites are also happily propagating "the cunning of reason" and such catchy slogans to make sure that the civilized man of faith is a reasonable one.
That is, to give a reason for anything.
As a believer reason represents (fictitious) unity against non-believer aka a status symbol. Also; the domesticated subject that is restricted in action (by the laws of men), is being indoctrinated to "solve" conflicts through reasoning; while ignoring that reason represents conflict between truth and false.
they use to say that sex and race doesn't exist.
Sex as distinction between male and female is based on natural law "opposites must coexist; because they're defined by each other within motion", and sex as the rhetoric for intercourse represents the suggested inversion of the balance between opposites. Intercourse is defined as the choice between procreation (need) and lust (want) and the sex rhetoric is used to promote pure lust (sexual liberation); while making the choice about how to deal with the consequences of lust aka birth control or abortion?
Furthermore; the term homosexuality adds sodomy (defilement of procreation) under the same umbrella with procreation (procreating life) and lust (temptation luring towards death) aka a deliberate contradiction for those with eyes to see.
The whole race issue RACE, noun [Latin radix and radius; rod, ray, radiate, etc.] is about stiffing potential (comprehension) by corrupting perceived differences (needed for inspiration) through miscegenation; as well as corrupting the blood and the soil. The former representing our roots as form within flow; the latter our placement within momentum by motion.
Velocity of motion meeting resistance of momentum causes friction; vibration; resonance; form etc. which implies that flow sets form into a resonance based position aka order vibrating chaos into a temporary balance. We should each have a distinct habitat that resonates with us; yet who knows how often the parasites have shuffled the board, and until we get ignorance sorted out I so far lack comprehension how we individually find that resonance.
Two things to soften the race issue a) ask if racism means the hatred of others races; then what's the term for loving ones own race? Racism is a one way rhetoric that only allows accusation; but no defense against miscegenation, and b) use kin and make it about sensing ones own kin doesn't requiring labels. What matters is that nature segregates differences and that we need to adhere to that.
then you can argue nothing exists
Creationism represents the obfuscated belief in nothingness; because it implies that we can create out of nothing. Both deities as the one creator of all and "new" feed into the out of nothing belief.
Before action comes information; hence ALL (energy) being required for the ONEs within to act upon information offered to then create (transmute) out of.
If high grade reason doesn't work then use low grade reason.
That would be the Pinocchio/Tower of Babel allegory...setting lies (fiction; ignorance) into flow a) leads to more lies and b) will be destroyed by the natural order of flow. Religions wouldn't work without ritualistic repetition of suggestion. The consciousness would shake the self inflicted restriction of beliefs off; if those beliefs aren't getting reconfirmed over and over again.
It's really the action that truly tells you about the person.
The consequences of actions is how flow uses form to communicate inspiration; which is what we need to adapt to. Not how each of us defines the who; what; where and why to each other.
However when reason is justification and in having justification your are given licence to do what would be wrong otherwise then if you remove that reason that made it wrong it just becomes wrong and they become guilty so now they must maintain that reason at all costs.
The choices we have...resistance/struggle (need) or ignorance/temptation (want) represent the natural opposites of "self sustenance". Energy causes motion (loss of potentiality); motion causes energy (recharge of potentiality through unification of potential within the momentum of motion). Our wants are processed for loss; our needs are processed for recharge.
There's no right vs wrong within energy; want/need represent a balance based on form being the response to flow. Ignorance (want) is not wrong; It's inspiration needed for resistance (need). Balance wouldn't work without the consequences of imbalance.
Once someone is hooked that's often it. Maintaining the reason is followed with more action, more guilt and more cause to maintain the reason to the point of it becoming existential.
Hooked refers to the pull of flow upon form aka the temptation to not resist and to go with the flow, and since ignorance represents the choice of want (temptation); to ignore flow represents to corrupt comprehension of being within flow.
"Rebel without a Cause" is the allegory for what you're describing aka the self destruction through lack of comprehension by choice of ignorance.
There are real secrets though I understand that you're referring to things that present as secret knowledge but are not. Another human exposed to the same information can figure out the same.
The suggested inversion of secrecy is that it's about withhold information. SE'CRET, adjective. [Latin secretus; secerno; seg) - "to separate, to cut off". It is flow that represents the flow of information; which separates ALL potentiality (flow) into individual ONE potential (form) within its momentum.
Potential isn't withheld information; it's limited growth potential within unlimited source potentiality. Our ignorance of that causes us to "want" information from others; which they offer as suggestions and to which we consent by believing them.
What we ignore is the need to adapt to the flow of information; that uses moving form (moving potential) as inspiration to our senses; so that we can transmute (by choice of action) perceived inspiration into comprehended information within ONEself; to grow ONEs own potential within ALL potentiality; out of ALL potentiality.
Each ONE of us is "exposed" to ALL information; but it's in form of perceived inspiration; which each ONE of us needs to change (transmute) into comprehended information by ourselves. We cannot exchange information among each otehr without tempt us to ignore adaptation to inspiration. This is how motion maintains the balance of momentum. We cannot accumulate information without corrupting ourselves until flow retakes form. The allegory for this is the "Library of Alexandria".
The technology we are using right now to accumulate information was already set into motion to be destroyed and the allegory for this is the "Butlerian Jihad" aka men vs machine; which will once again destroy all the information we accumulated. The parasites comprehend all of this and setting it all up for their own (temporary) benefit by suggesting us both transhumanism to get us hooked on technology, and stories like Terminator as the sleight of hand for the consequences of falling for the temptation of technology of convenience.
And no; we will not fight cyborgs with laser weapons; which the parasites will eventually clumsily try to stage, but once again destroy what we build by ourselves under false pretenses; acting in ignorance and on the suggestions of others...unless enough of us choose otherwise.
Look at wars...the parasite try to frame it as a good vs evil conflict; while utilizing any -ism that sticks to motivate participation in self destruction; which is what it always is, just odds of ignorance steered into each other through suggestions. Afterwards the few racketeer the revisionism of his-story for a couple of generations; while farming the many during the regrowth phase, and while setting up the next sacrifice event. It's akin to cattle farming.
People often don't appreciate this and indeed can build an unproductive dependence on someone else...
The deception in that is subtle...the need to build or the want of what is being built? This is what allows others to set up dependency aka do what I say and you get what you want (just kidding; only as much as is needed to maintain dependency).
The value for ALL is set by flow; form needs the ability to evaluate (appreciate) to be able to balance choice of actions for adaptation. Only if we want what we build; can others exploit our affixed belief in the value of it. If we just keep building; we would get what we want along side it and then some; but it has to be about the need to build for balance; not for the wanted outcome.
Often you cannot fully put another in your footsteps across time...
Take a step away from suggested his-story and ask yourself why your story isn't written down and taught to the world? Does his-story evaluate death over life? What are the implication for ignoring that which is (life) for that which was (death)?
Once that clicked in your comprehension; tackle suggested time and do the same with past; present and future. Why do the few insist upon suggesting that which was and that which could be to the many? How much stress does contemplating the loss of the past, and the hope/fear towards the future cause at the present, and how is it the present when we defined it by past and future?
What does time measure? Flow. What does that which was or will be ignore for form within flow? Adaptation to the change that is.
How about this? ACROSS' [a and cross.] - "from side to side, opposed to along" A deliberate contradiction of flow (beginning towards end) and it uses the symbology for death. This is how the parasites use a sleight of hand while mocking us for our ignorance. The most recent example is "I can't breathe" leads to death; followed by "put a mask over your nose and mouth".
mistake
MISTA'KE, verb transitive - "to take wrong; to conceive or understand erroneously; to misunderstand or misapprehend"...to...take...wrong implies to take right; but taking aka claiming (also proclaiming) is what causes right vs wrong (conflict of reason). Form cannot own form within flow; it can only ignore being form defined through flow.
Claiming represents the temptation (want); using represents the resistance (need).
Restricting comprehension by cornering choice through reduction of inspiration. That's why they unify all under the chain of command; the mainstream; the part-line; while balancing it by offering controlled outbursts of individualism aka their "revolutionary spirit". In short..they all follow orders; while being allowed to playact rebelling against order.
On a larger scale...protests are used to buffer the revolutionary spirit among subjugated people; by allowing controlled rebellion against authority. They also use sports to buffer the rooted (nationalism) response to uprooting (globalism; internationalism). Sports represents kosher nationalism; where only the flag is national; while the players under it are interchangeable goons of internationalism.
Another deception...the corruption of reason into intention. Flow defines direction for form so we don't need to focus on an intended outcome; but need to adhere to the demand for adaption to motion aka balance.
We mix up intention and reason; because we don't perceive reason as conflict; but only our beliefs as true; while those who oppose it are just wrong non-believer. This way we form intent based on belief; while calling it reason, and the parasites are also happily propagating "the cunning of reason" and such catchy slogans to make sure that the civilized man of faith is a reasonable one.
As a believer reason represents (fictitious) unity against non-believer aka a status symbol. Also; the domesticated subject that is restricted in action (by the laws of men), is being indoctrinated to "solve" conflicts through reasoning; while ignoring that reason represents conflict between truth and false.
Sex as distinction between male and female is based on natural law "opposites must coexist; because they're defined by each other within motion", and sex as the rhetoric for intercourse represents the suggested inversion of the balance between opposites. Intercourse is defined as the choice between procreation (need) and lust (want) and the sex rhetoric is used to promote pure lust (sexual liberation); while making the choice about how to deal with the consequences of lust aka birth control or abortion?
Furthermore; the term homosexuality adds sodomy (defilement of procreation) under the same umbrella with procreation (procreating life) and lust (temptation luring towards death) aka a deliberate contradiction for those with eyes to see.
The whole race issue RACE, noun [Latin radix and radius; rod, ray, radiate, etc.] is about stiffing potential (comprehension) by corrupting perceived differences (needed for inspiration) through miscegenation; as well as corrupting the blood and the soil. The former representing our roots as form within flow; the latter our placement within momentum by motion.
Velocity of motion meeting resistance of momentum causes friction; vibration; resonance; form etc. which implies that flow sets form into a resonance based position aka order vibrating chaos into a temporary balance. We should each have a distinct habitat that resonates with us; yet who knows how often the parasites have shuffled the board, and until we get ignorance sorted out I so far lack comprehension how we individually find that resonance.
Two things to soften the race issue a) ask if racism means the hatred of others races; then what's the term for loving ones own race? Racism is a one way rhetoric that only allows accusation; but no defense against miscegenation, and b) use kin and make it about sensing ones own kin doesn't requiring labels. What matters is that nature segregates differences and that we need to adhere to that.
Creationism represents the obfuscated belief in nothingness; because it implies that we can create out of nothing. Both deities as the one creator of all and "new" feed into the out of nothing belief.
Before action comes information; hence ALL (energy) being required for the ONEs within to act upon information offered to then create (transmute) out of.
That would be the Pinocchio/Tower of Babel allegory...setting lies (fiction; ignorance) into flow a) leads to more lies and b) will be destroyed by the natural order of flow. Religions wouldn't work without ritualistic repetition of suggestion. The consciousness would shake the self inflicted restriction of beliefs off; if those beliefs aren't getting reconfirmed over and over again.
The consequences of actions is how flow uses form to communicate inspiration; which is what we need to adapt to. Not how each of us defines the who; what; where and why to each other.
The choices we have...resistance/struggle (need) or ignorance/temptation (want) represent the natural opposites of "self sustenance". Energy causes motion (loss of potentiality); motion causes energy (recharge of potentiality through unification of potential within the momentum of motion). Our wants are processed for loss; our needs are processed for recharge.
There's no right vs wrong within energy; want/need represent a balance based on form being the response to flow. Ignorance (want) is not wrong; It's inspiration needed for resistance (need). Balance wouldn't work without the consequences of imbalance.
Hooked refers to the pull of flow upon form aka the temptation to not resist and to go with the flow, and since ignorance represents the choice of want (temptation); to ignore flow represents to corrupt comprehension of being within flow.
"Rebel without a Cause" is the allegory for what you're describing aka the self destruction through lack of comprehension by choice of ignorance.
The suggested inversion of secrecy is that it's about withhold information. SE'CRET, adjective. [Latin secretus; secerno; seg) - "to separate, to cut off". It is flow that represents the flow of information; which separates ALL potentiality (flow) into individual ONE potential (form) within its momentum.
Potential isn't withheld information; it's limited growth potential within unlimited source potentiality. Our ignorance of that causes us to "want" information from others; which they offer as suggestions and to which we consent by believing them.
What we ignore is the need to adapt to the flow of information; that uses moving form (moving potential) as inspiration to our senses; so that we can transmute (by choice of action) perceived inspiration into comprehended information within ONEself; to grow ONEs own potential within ALL potentiality; out of ALL potentiality.
Each ONE of us is "exposed" to ALL information; but it's in form of perceived inspiration; which each ONE of us needs to change (transmute) into comprehended information by ourselves. We cannot exchange information among each otehr without tempt us to ignore adaptation to inspiration. This is how motion maintains the balance of momentum. We cannot accumulate information without corrupting ourselves until flow retakes form. The allegory for this is the "Library of Alexandria".
The technology we are using right now to accumulate information was already set into motion to be destroyed and the allegory for this is the "Butlerian Jihad" aka men vs machine; which will once again destroy all the information we accumulated. The parasites comprehend all of this and setting it all up for their own (temporary) benefit by suggesting us both transhumanism to get us hooked on technology, and stories like Terminator as the sleight of hand for the consequences of falling for the temptation of technology of convenience.
And no; we will not fight cyborgs with laser weapons; which the parasites will eventually clumsily try to stage, but once again destroy what we build by ourselves under false pretenses; acting in ignorance and on the suggestions of others...unless enough of us choose otherwise.
Look at wars...the parasite try to frame it as a good vs evil conflict; while utilizing any -ism that sticks to motivate participation in self destruction; which is what it always is, just odds of ignorance steered into each other through suggestions. Afterwards the few racketeer the revisionism of his-story for a couple of generations; while farming the many during the regrowth phase, and while setting up the next sacrifice event. It's akin to cattle farming.
The deception in that is subtle...the need to build or the want of what is being built? This is what allows others to set up dependency aka do what I say and you get what you want (just kidding; only as much as is needed to maintain dependency).
The value for ALL is set by flow; form needs the ability to evaluate (appreciate) to be able to balance choice of actions for adaptation. Only if we want what we build; can others exploit our affixed belief in the value of it. If we just keep building; we would get what we want along side it and then some; but it has to be about the need to build for balance; not for the wanted outcome.
Take a step away from suggested his-story and ask yourself why your story isn't written down and taught to the world? Does his-story evaluate death over life? What are the implication for ignoring that which is (life) for that which was (death)?
Once that clicked in your comprehension; tackle suggested time and do the same with past; present and future. Why do the few insist upon suggesting that which was and that which could be to the many? How much stress does contemplating the loss of the past, and the hope/fear towards the future cause at the present, and how is it the present when we defined it by past and future?
What does time measure? Flow. What does that which was or will be ignore for form within flow? Adaptation to the change that is.
How about this? ACROSS' [a and cross.] - "from side to side, opposed to along" A deliberate contradiction of flow (beginning towards end) and it uses the symbology for death. This is how the parasites use a sleight of hand while mocking us for our ignorance. The most recent example is "I can't breathe" leads to death; followed by "put a mask over your nose and mouth".
MISTA'KE, verb transitive - "to take wrong; to conceive or understand erroneously; to misunderstand or misapprehend"...to...take...wrong implies to take right; but taking aka claiming (also proclaiming) is what causes right vs wrong (conflict of reason). Form cannot own form within flow; it can only ignore being form defined through flow.
Claiming represents the temptation (want); using represents the resistance (need).